TheTrucker.com

Is the freight recession finally over? The experts aren’t sure, but there’s a light at the end of the tunnel

The title of the press release said it all: “For-hire rate recession is over.” That’s good news for carriers who have been struggling to hold on until freight rates improve. The Nov. 22 press release from ACT Research included comments from ACT’s vice President and senior analyst, Tim Denoyer. “Currently, with a significant capacity contraction by for-hire fleets and private fleet insourcing slowing, capacity has finally rebalanced enough for rates to start moving higher,” he noted. Unfortunately, not everyone agrees that the freight market is currently entering a new phase. “My belief is that we are in what I’d term “freight cycle limbo” in that the down cycle that started in Q3 2022 has indeed bottomed out, but we aren’t yet in a true upcycle,” said Jason Miller, professor of supply chain management at the Michigan State University Eli Broad College of Business. “That upcycle will wait till late Q1 or early Q2 2025 to materialize.” So, who’s right? According to DAT Freight and Analytics’ Trendlines, dry van spot rates rose by a nickel per mile to a national average of $2.02 in October. Flatbed rates also rose, but at $2.41 per mile they still haven’t reached the August rate level. Refrigerated rates also rose in October to $2.39 per mile on the average — but that’s still a penny beneath the August average. Perhaps the most telling DAT statistic is the load-to-truck ratio for each category. After all, more loads per truck means more competition for trucks, pushing rates upward. In October, there were 4.13 loads posted on the DAT load board for every truck posted. In October 2023 that number was 3.01, so the numbers show a 37% increase in loads. In the refrigerated segment, 5.85 loads were posted for each truck, a 30% increase from October 2023. For flatbed, 14.31 loads were posted for each truck posted, an increase of nearly 63% over October a year ago. When average spot rates are compared, however, there hasn’t been much progress. Van spot rates increased just 0.5% year over year, refrigerated rates actually declined by 2.1%, and flatbed rates climbed 3.2% over October 2023. The price of diesel fuel also plays a role in freight rates. Fuel is cheaper today than it was a year ago, so excluding fuel costs, the rates look better. “With DAT spot rates net fuel tracking 7% higher than a year ago in Q4, contract rates are rising modestly but consistently across DAT data, Cass data, and fleets’ financial reports for the first time in three years,” said ACT’s Denoyer. “The market is very close to balance, and in 2025 the combination of normalizing equipment supply and a pre-tariff safety stock build are poised to drive higher for-hire freight demand and rates.” The Cass Freight Index for Shipments wasn’t as positive, showing a 1.9% decline from September and a tiny 0.1% decline from October 2023. The Cass Index for expenditures was also down, dropping 1.5% from September and 1.7% from last October. But keep in mind that the Cass report isn’t exclusive to trucking — it also includes data from rail, air, barge, ship and pipeline modes of freight transportation. A telling number comes from a chart included in the Cass report, which shows reported fleet sizes for 13 of the largest publicly traded carriers. For the first quarter of 2023, those fleets reported a total of 117,103 tractors. In the third quarter of 2024, that number had dropped to 107,191. That’s nearly 10,000 trucks removed from the freight hauling market, and the figure doesn’t count smaller carriers that have either downsized or closed up shop entirely. Other factors in play Looking at the broader picture of U.S. production, Miller’s view is less optimistic. He referenced two Reserve Economic Data (FRED) charts in his opinion. One showed the seasonally adjusted industrial production of fabricated metal products. “The past few months have seen sharp declines in production,” he wrote in a LinkedIn post. “Drawdowns in fabricated metal production in 2015 and the especially steep drop in 2019 corresponded to freight recessions.” Miller notes that production has been trending down since mid-2022. A second chart shows that wood product production is still beneath 2017 levels. “You will note how production started falling in Q4 2018, which was the same time the FOMC had started raising interest rates,” he wrote. Those two areas of production are vital to the manufacturer of automobiles, appliances and machinery as well as products for home building, which are subdued by the current higher interest rates Miller wrote, “As November and especially December exhibit seasonal tightening, we won’t truly know if the freight recession is over until mid-January (and that assumes no extreme weather events like in January 2018 or January 2024).” Better days expected ahead Still, as Miller considers the manufacturing side and Denoyer looks toward the capacity side, it seems evident that the market is approaching an upturn, if it isn’t in one already. Denoyer thinks the reduction of capacity in trucking may be enough to overcome any slowed production, at least temporarily. “After a long downturn in freight rates, the difference between the 5.9% contraction in capacity and the 2.8% drop in shipments may help explain why TL (truckload) rates have started to rise, if only by a little,” he said. “The big private fleet expansion of the past two years will likely still leave anyone looking for a boom disappointed, but the for-hire rate recession is finally over.” Back at DAT, Ken Adamo, chief of analytics, says the numbers are looking positive. “October continued the pattern of year-over-year gains in spot truckload rates and volumes, while contract rates approached parity compared to October 2023,” Adamo said. “Five months into it, the contours of this freight cycle look conventional, like the 2013-2017 cycle, when monthly spot van rates averaged +5% year over year.” Whether the end to the freight recession is a few months away or has already started, light is finally visible at the end of the tunnel. Better days are ahead for the trucking industry.

New truck sales remained solid in October with vocational tractors leading the way

As expected, October was another strong sales month for new Class 8 trucks in the U.S. Manufacturers reported sales of 20,859 trucks, according to data received from Wards Intelligence. While that number reflects a 4.4% drop from September 2024 sales — and 2.6% lower than October 2023 — it was still strong, given the overcapacity situation in the freight market. Pre-buying in advance of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2027 mandates for tougher fuel mileage and emissions standards is the most likely reason for the month’s strong sales. With those 2027 mandates, the added technology, along with the increased warranties required, is expected to drive up the cost of a new Class 8 truck by $30,000 or more. In the past, the truck buying market has reacted to such mandates by purchasing extra equipment before the changes go into effect in order to mitigate the cost increases and maintenance issues sometimes caused by the new technology. Vocational truck sales on the rise During this cycle, buyers of vocational trucks seem to be jumping aboard the pre-buy bandwagon. Most vocational trucks (those fitted with dump, concrete, trash or other bodies rather than a fifth wheel for pulling trailers) tend to remain in fleets longer than their over-the-road (OTR) counterparts. Newer equipment is a larger selling point to OTR drivers who remain in their trucks during non-working hours. “Vocational truck orders totaled 9,500 units (North American market) and, after last month’s surge, suggest the potential for vocational market queueing ahead of EPA’27 and GHG-3,” said Kenny Vieth, president and senior analyst at ACT Research. And there’s another incentive for vocational buyers to buy new equipment now — government money. “Vocational truck buyers not only have a willingness to get a head start on refreshing their fleet but a clear ability as the $2 trillion in stimulus continues to be deployed,” Vieth said, referring to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, signed into law in November 2021, the CHIPS and Science Act (August, 2022) and the Inflation Reduction Act (August, 2022). All together, these three bills make more than $2 trillion available for construction and other projects. October’s orders for new trucks will fill build slots well into 2025 — and could help alleviate the overcapacity problem that has held freight rates down. How and why? As build slots are taken by vocational trucks, fewer slots are available for OTR equipment, reducing the number of new trucks added to the nation’s fleet. Fewer trucks means shippers must compete for trailers to haul their product, which generally results in rate increases. On the used Class 8 truck market, ACT reported that sales in October were 29% higher than in September and 28% higher than in October 2023. The price of the average used truck sold increased by 2%, while the average age and the odometer mileage both declined. The median price of used trucks was 12% lower than October 2023, certainly due to the increased inventory available. On the new truck market, an increase in orders for vocational trucks is likely a big reason for the surge in sales at Daimler-owned Western Star. In November 2023, the company announced its intention to expand production of its lineup. OEMs report in Western Star reported record sales of 8,334 in 2023, a total they surpassed in October 2024 with sales of 1,117 to bring their total to 9,215 with two months left in the year. For the year to date, the company is 37.3% ahead of last year’s sales pace in a market that as a whole declined 11.4%. Of course, Western Star has a much smaller footprint than sibling company, Freightliner, which reported sales of 7,863 in October, down 2.4% from September sales but an increase of 18.2% over October 2023. Western Star’s 4.6% of the new Class 8 market pales in comparison to Freightliner’s dominant 36.4%, but its share has grown 1.6% from last year’s pace — while Freightliner’s has shrunk. The two PACCAR companies, Kenworth and Peterbilt, have stayed ahead of the market trend. Kenworth reported sales of 3,013 in October, down 5.1% from a month earlier and down 18.2% from October 2023. Peterbilt’s 3,119 sold was 1% better than September but still down 13.6% from October 2023. Still, for the year to date, Kenworth sales are 5% lower than last year and Peterbilt’s numbers are down 3.6%, the lowest declines among all manufacturers. Both have picked up market share this year, Kenworth grabbing 1.0% more to hold 15.4% and Peterbilt taking 1.3% to total 15.9%. International, which ditched the “Navistar” moniker to return to its roots, has seen the biggest loss in market share for 2024, losing 3.4%. October sales of 2,533 were down 6.4% from September and 10.6% from October 2024. The company that in 2009 topped Freightliner for the largest share of the U.S. Class 8 market today holds only 10.8% of it. For the year to date, International sales lag 32.8% behind last year’s sales, the largest decline of all major manufacturers. Volvo reported sales of 1,840 Class 8 trucks in October, down 26.8% from September sales and down 16.8% from October of 2023. For the year to date, Volvo holds 10.2% of the new truck market, actually gaining 0.3% over last year’s pace despite a 9.1% decline in sales. Tiny Hino has been making inroads into the market with its XL8 day cab offering, reporting sales of 11 units in October after selling 19 in September. For the year to date, the company is up to 155 units, good for one tenth of a percent of the market. Hino is much more well known in the Class 4-6 markets and is primarily used in local and regional operations. Truck sales impact freight rates At this point, truckers are continuing to keep an eye on freight rates, hoping that a turn upward will arrive sooner rather than later. While the performance of the U.S. economy will have a bearing on the amount of available freight, the number of trucks in the national fleet will go a long way toward determining whether rates rise or remain depressed going into the new year.

The cold hard truth about hauling reefers: Is it right for you?

Choosing which segment of trucking to work in is often a matter of personal preference. Pulling refrigerated trailers can be a rewarding experience and it can be profitable, but it comes with its own requirements for special handling. Refrigerated trucking offers the opportunity to haul a variety of temperature-controlled products, from frozen items to fresh produce and even to items that must be protected against freezing in winter temperatures. Additionally, when temperature-controlled freight is scarce, the refrigeration unit can be turned off and the trailer used like any dry van trailer. Running a refrigerated trailer, however, means more responsibility for the driver, who has to ensure that the temperature is set and the internal temperature of the trailer, including the freight, is within the limits set by the customer. If the product temperature is off, even by a few degrees, the receiver may reject the load or file a claim for damage. It is important to understand the customer’s demands before loading the product. Shippers often place devices in the load that record the temperature periodically, so fluctuations in degrees can be cause for load rejection even if the temperature seems correct at the destination. Keeping the temperature as constant as possible is the goal, but the trailer and other factors can make it difficult. Products such as ice cream, for example, may need to be kept at a temperature lower than zero to make sure the product doesn’t soften in transit. On a hot day, with the sun beating down on the trailer, the refrigeration unit may labor to keep the temperature down. Fresh produce, on the other hand, has unique properties. It can’t be allowed to freeze or damage will occur. If it gets too warm, however, it can continue to ripen, producing methane gas that causes other produce to ripen. At warmer temperatures, bacteria can begin the process of rotting the product. The temperature at which the product is loaded can cause problems, too. The refrigeration unit on the trailer is good at maintaining the temperature as the product is received, but not always good for changing the product temperature. For example, 40,000 pounds of vegetables loaded right at the field where they were harvested will be at the outdoor temperature of that location. Insisting that they be at 34 degrees when delivered may be more than the system is capable of. Good communication with the carrier or broker who assigned the load is important to make sure everyone is in agreement. The Bill of Lading (BOL) is the document that records the customer requirements for temperature. It’s important to make sure the customer who is paying for the freight, if different from the shipper, is making the same demands as the shipper. If the load you accepted specifies one temperature while the paperwork specifies another, that’s an issue to resolve prior to loading. The BOL is also where you note any discrepancies you find. If, for example, produce looks wilted or beyond freshness, note it on the BOL. If the temperature of the product isn’t accurate when you receive it, note that as well. Anything that doesn’t look right should be discussed with whomever assigned the load. Receivers generally want products with a long shelf life, so products that are approaching their “use by” date or produce that doesn’t appear fresh could turn into a freight claim at the other end. Again, the time to call is before loading if possible and always before leaving the shipper. Refrigerated trailers are often pre-loaded and ready to hook up to upon the driver’s arrival. It’s important to note on the BOL if this occurs, especially if the doors are closed and sealed. One problem is weight distribution. Since the refrigeration unit on the front of the trailer adds weight, loading heavy products in the front of the trailer can cause the tractor-trailer to be overweight on the drive axles. Improper loading can also result in freight shifting in the trailer, changing weight distribution and possibly damage. Most refrigerated units have a lighted panel that can be observed in the driver’s side mirror, and some even connect to communication units in the cab. Regardless of the interface type, the driver is responsible for checking the temperature periodically to make sure it stays withing the parameters specified. One choice the driver may have is whether to run the unit continuously or in a start/stop mode. Some shippers will specify continuous run because of the product, or you may have an option. Products that are frozen are usually handled on continuous, but produce and other medium temperature products may allow start/stop operation, which saves fuel. The unit starting and stopping can also make it difficult to sleep. Some customers will require pre-cooling of the trailer, which is mostly defeated as soon as the doors are opened. Running the unit with the doors open isn’t a good idea, because the chute along the ceiling of the trailer directs the airflow right out the open doors while warmer air move in to take its place. Most refrigeration units have a “defrost” function. On humid days, condensation can form on the evaporator and freeze, preventing air flow. The defrost function clears this without impacting the temperature of the load. Although battery electric refrigeration units are being introduced, they have not yet occupied a significant share of the market. Your unit will run on diesel fuel, but the diesel used to run it is taxed differently because it isn’t for highway (driving) use. When fueling the tank on the trailer, be sure to specify “off highway” or “reefer” fuel so you’ll get the correct price. Depending on the customer, refrigerated drivers can experience long waiting times and are sometimes tasked with handling some of the freight in their loads. Most drivers quickly learn which receivers to avoid. Refrigerated trucking isn’t for every driver, but can provide an enjoyable career for those drivers who like the extra responsibilities that come with it.

Does new Lytx product further erode driver independence?

No over–the–road driver that has struggled to find a parking space when it’s time to rest needs to be informed that a parking shortage exists. In fact, an American Transportation Research Institute report ranked parking as the number two issue in the trucking industry. So when an email arrived stating that Lytx, a provider of in–cab video services, had announced a solution to “help commercial truck drivers nationwide find safer parking spots wherever they are,” interest at The Trucker was high. Unfortunately, those words turned out to be misleading. The truth is that Lytx has developed a product that will inform a client–carrier when a driver parks in an area deemed “unsafe,” such as the shoulder of a highway or an exit or entrance ramp. The notification can include video of the area. The carrier representative, whether fleet manager, safety professional or someone else, would then contact the driver to discuss parking options. The Lytx product offers no “help” to find parking and does not alert the driver that a chosen parking space may be unsafe. There is no question that most carriers have “sitting duck” policies that prohibit parking in areas that may be exposed to a motorist hitting a commercial vehicle. Additionally, “nuclear verdicts,” those court decisions that award huge payouts to plaintiffs for accidents with trucks, are a concern for every carrier struggling with ever–increasing insurance rates. According to Tamara Prewitt, Lytx vice–president of product marketing, the company’s Parked–Highway/Ramp solution will help carriers avoid some of those situations. “The Lytx technology can identify when a vehicle is stopped on the side of the road on highways and ramps in what may be considered an unsafe manner using GPS data and by conducting geospatial analysis,” she responded to an emailed question. “Additional parameters used to determine if a vehicle is parked unsafely include the amount of time a vehicle is stopped and known legal parking locations near highways.” The Parked–Highway/Ramp feature isn’t new. It was introduced in 2022 and has been provided to subscribers to the Lytx Driver Safety Program and the Lytx Risk Detection Service. The feature is automatically enabled. “Clients can disable the feature, but there is no additional fee for this feature, and it has been widely adopted,” Prewitt explained. “Since it was released in 2022, millions of Parked–Highway/Ramp alerts and events have been generated, helping to keep drivers and highways safer.” Since the Parked–Highway/Ramp feature alerts a carrier when a vehicle has been parked in unsafe area for more than ten minutes, it provides an additional benefit when those situations are caused by a vehicle breakdown. Drivers have expressed privacy concerns since in–cab video systems were introduced, and a feature that tells the boss when the vehicle is parked outside of a truck stop or rest area space will not be welcomed by everyone. Prewitt addressed those concerns.  “If drivers have concerns about privacy, fleets can activate the video privacy mode setting for Parked–Highway/Ramp. This gives clients visibility outside the vehicle while addressing driver privacy concerns. When privacy mode is enabled, the in–cab view is blacked out.” One issue with this is that the carrier has an option to black out the driver-facing camera while the driver does not. Drivers may not be aware of carrier policies or when someone might be viewing video of the driver. Another issue is the timing of notifications from carrier to driver. A driver who has parked and begun a rest break may be woken up by a phone call or satellite message from the carrier. Moving the truck to another location may require an Hours of Service (HOS) violation if the driver is out of driving hours, and would require restarting the rest break period once parked in a more suitable location. And if the driver chose the parking spot after exhausting other options, getting back behind the wheel to explore those options again doesn’t seem productive, or safe. In-cab video systems are, of course, designed to improve safety for both drivers and for other motorists. They provide a method for carriers to identify and correct unsafe behaviors, hopefully before they result in accident or injury. According to Prewitt, “Lytx technology is validated and backed by the largest and fastest-growing driving database of its kind, which is currently growing by approximately 350,000 new driving events each day, further training and improving its algorithms.” The system is far more than cameras recording video. “We apply sensor fusion, machine vision, artificial intelligence, and scientific behavior change models to help our clients improve safety and increase operational efficiency so they can thrive in today’s ultra-competitive environment,” explained Prewitt. “Lytx uses the best technologies available to identify high risk behaviors that matter accurately, quickly, and comprehensively.” Those technologies are also used to identify behaviors that aren’t high risk so that false alerts can be minimized. Drivers have benefitted from counselling and training, and many have improved their driving performance and become safer drivers today due to information provided by Lytx systems. Features like Parked-Highway/Ramp certainly have a part in correcting unsafe behaviors, but if the alerts result in other unsafe behaviors like driving while fatigued, the benefits might be questionable. In the meantime, the days of the independent truck driver hitting the road with the only carrier contact achieved in a daily phone call are long gone. Those who chose the open road to be free of the watchful eye of the boss have discovered that, thanks to technology, that watchful eye now accompanies them on every trip.

Back in the Game: Modern ICEs will play vital role in the future of zero emissions

While much of North America is focused on electric vehicles (EVs) in the push toward zero emissions, another player is back on the field and rapidly gaining ground: the internal combustion engine (ICE). The freight industry is grappling with the adoption of electric heavy-duty trucks for numerous reasons. Their limited range makes them suitable for use only where charging is accessible, typically at carrier terminals or vendor sites. Irregular route carriers have difficulty finding a use for vehicles that must return to the terminal each night. Power grid issues are problematic for carriers trying to install charging infrastructure for their fleets. Finding qualified technicians to keep the trucks working — and drivers to drive them — are added issues. Luckily, advances in technology and alternative fuels are bringing ICEs back into the game. In September, the Engine Technology Forum gathered experts from half a dozen related industries to discuss taking the ICE to the next level. They shared an encouraging message: ICE technology can deliver the lower emissions benefits of EVs more quickly, at less expense and with fewer changes to the national infrastructure. At a minimum, the new ICEs offer a viable bridge to a zero-emissions future. According to Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the Engine Technology Forum, reaching the goal of zero emissions in trucking requires a combination of solutions — not just a rapid-fire switch to EVs. “Internal combustion engines, those powered by gasoline, diesel, natural gas and propane, really are key to our current economy, and we see them also as a key part of our energy future,” he said. One method of reducing emissions that is already available is the use of biomass-based diesel fuel, according to Steve Howell, founding partner of M4 Consulting and Chair of the ASTM Biodiesel Task Force. Renewable diesel and Biodiesel are both products that Howell refers to as “liquid solar energy.” “The major driving force now is carbon,” Howell said. “When you look at biomass-based diesel, it takes CO2 from the air to grow oil or fat. When we burn that oil or fat, there’s a net life cycle reduction of carbon in the atmosphere about 70%.” In other words, burning petroleum-based diesel adds carbon to the air, but the process of growing the soybeans or other crops used in biomass-based fuels actually removes CO2, helping to balance the scale. The end result is a 70% reduction in total carbon emissions. The remaining 30% comprises mostly the diesel fuel burned to grow, harvest and transport the crops needed to produce the biofuel. If the crops were grown and transported using only biomass-based diesel, that 30% could be reduced to zero, Howell noted. Soybeans, corn, canola and animal fats can be used to manufacture biomass diesel fuel, but Howell focused on the additional benefit of using soybeans. Because the beans are 80% protein and 20% oil, the protein meal left after the oil is extracted could decrease the price of the product by $20 to $40 per ton. Last year, about 4.5 billion gallons of biomass-based diesel were produced, about 10% of the distillate demand in the U.S. (70% in California). The industry plans to increase production to over 6 billion gallons by 2030 and 15 billion gallons by 2050. Time, however, is of the essence. According to Howell, atmospheric CO2 builds each year. For each five year of delay, CO2 reductions will need to increase by a factor of 13 times. New engine and aftertreatment technologies are already reducing tailpipe emissions of NOx and particulate matter to near-zero levels. Replacing the current mixture of biomass-based and petroleum-based fuels with 100% biomass-based fuels will soon be viable options for low-carbon combustion. Fuel additives also play a part in emissions reductions, according to Mary Dery, PhD, who is the performance additives technical director at Innospec. Noting that fuel filter plugging, fouled injectors and saturated diesel particulate filters all contribute to increased emissions, Dery highlights the benefits of adding detergents to diesel fuel. Cleaner injectors, she says, provide better fuel economy and reduced DEF consumption, while cleaner particulate filters mean more time between fewer regens and less fuel use. Propane, while not a new fuel option, has typically been used in its gaseous form. Srinu Gunturu, chief engineer at Stanadyne, is excited about advances in the use of liquid propane as vehicle fuel. By developing high-pressure liquid fuel systems and specialized direct injectors, Gunturu sees liquid propane as a bridge to achieving zero carbon. “We believe that liquid propane is going to be a great alternative, and we see that direct injection is going to result in a huge efficiency improvement and also improved emissions,” he explained. The fuel has lower greenhouse gas emission levels than either gasoline or diesel and close-to-zero particulate matter emissions. “We see that liquid propane and direct injection emissions results are promising compared to diesel and gasoline, Gunturu said. “We believe that this technology will improve the efficiency of the engine significantly in the current market.” There’s no question that the goal of zero-emissions vehicles is desirable for all forms of transportation. The question, then, is this: Are EVs the best answer right now? While battery power represents the cleanest option for tailpipe emissions, battery-electric vehicles won’t be truly “zero emissions” until the electricity used to charge them is also free of emissions — and that day is a long way off. On top of that, mining and transporting the rare substances needed to construct batteries for them also requires carbon emissions. In reality, unless someone figures out how to safely install and operate a small nuclear powerplant under the hood, solving vehicle emissions will take a combination of different technologies. Back in the early days of the automobile age, the internal combustion engine turned out to be the power choice over steam, electric and other technologies. For many applications, it still is.

Carriers must protect themselves against ever-increasing jury awards

The trucking industry was shocked recently when a jury awarded nearly a half-billion dollars to the plaintiffs in a case involving a 2019 crash. Two people died when their Volkswagen crashed into the rear of a 2004 Wabash dry van trailer. The ruling cited the rear impact guard as defective — despite the fact that it met all legal safety requirements at the time the equipment was manufactured. In addition to $12 million in compensatory damages, the jury awarded $450 million in punitive damages. Stunningly, what most would deem as crucial evidence — that the driver’s blood alcohol content was over the legal limit and that neither the driver nor the passenger of the Volkswagen were wearing seat belts — was withheld from the jury. The plaintiffs’ attorneys were allowed to withhold this information because the suit was not against the motor carrier and truck driver; it was a product liability case against Wabash. The company and driver were not a part of the litigation at all. Rising insurance costs Earlier this year, the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) released an update to its “Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking,” which noted a 12.5% increase in trucking insurance premiums in 2023. Some reasons cited for the increases were rising equipment costs, litigation and inflation. According to the report, some carriers reported further premium increases during the first quarter of 2024. Protecting the company from both nuclear verdicts and rising insurance premiums is an issue for every carrier. “It is clear that excessive jury verdicts have been permanently stamped on the litigation landscape,” said Jay Starrett, head of accident litigation for Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C. “Not only are excessive verdicts occurring routinely, but the number of jurisdictions reporting excessive verdicts continues to grow.” Starrett spoke of judicial “hellholes” — jurisdictions where plaintiff’s attorneys are more likely to find sympathetic judges and juries. “Unfortunately, reports of verdicts in the tens of millions of dollars are now routine, even in jurisdiction formerly considered conservative,” he said. “While the transportation defense bar is constantly developing new trial methods to counter excess verdicts, the reality is that we are fighting an uphill battle.” Lewie Pugh, executive vice-president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, says he’s noticed a troubling pattern in litigation against motor carriers and equipment manufacturers. “They’ll try to prove a pattern of unsafeness whether it’s factual or not. We need tort reform,” Pugh said. “People need to be made whole (after an accident) but some of these awards go far beyond.” Fighting for tort reform The most obvious — as well as possibly the most difficult — solution is to limit the amount of compensation that can be awarded to plaintiffs, as well as to reduce the number of lawsuits filed. “The most effective way to combat excessive verdicts — perhaps the only way — is through tort reform,” Starrett said. Getting tort reform passed has turned out to be a large problem, however. “Since every state establishes its own tort laws, tort reform must be accomplished on a state-by-state basis,” Starrett explained. “In today’s political climate, obtaining relief at the legislative level requires significant resources.” The trucking industry ends up picking up the tab for most tort reform efforts … but carriers end up paying for both sides of the argument. “The irony is not lost that the plaintiffs’ bar’s funding opposing tort reform is being paid for by transportation companies through multi-million dollar contingent fees they pocket from excessive verdicts,” Starrett said. Just days after the Wabash verdict, an Alabama jury issued a $160 million award against Daimler Truck North America. The driver of a Western Star truck, manufactured by the company, was rendered a quadriplegic after a rollover crash. Nearly half of the award — $75 million — was punitive. The jury heard that Daimler had offered a different seat as an option in Freightliner and Western Star trucks which may have prevented the catastrophic injury to the driver. Since the company knew the seat was available but did not make it standard equipment, the jury ruled them responsible for the driver’s injuries. “I’m blown away by some of the arguments that were not allowed in the Wabash case, from what I read,” explained Gary Johnson, head of safety and compliance strategy at Motive. “I mean, there are huge aspects that weren’t even allowed into the evidence.” With the exception of small victories in a few states, real tort reform isn’t on the horizon. Carrier must be able to demonstrate their safety values beyond collision statistics. Bring technology into the battle Johnson is a firm believer in the use of driver technology to protect against unreasonable jury awards. For example, he says, dash cameras featuring artificial intelligence (AI) are a technology that works to record what actually happened during a crash event. “In court, it’s pretty hard to argue when you have evidence right there,” he said. Unfortunately, many fleets are not utilizing the available tech. A 2023 “State of Safety” report published by Motive surveyed 1,100 trucking and logistics companies and found that 40% of respondents said their fleets were underinvested in driver safety technology. At the very least, integrating dash camera video recorders into a fleet can help in litigation. In addition, driver-facing cameras can help refute claims that a driver was distracted or fatigued at the time of an incident. In addition, many camera systems can be set to alert the driver when certain potentially unsafe behaviors are recorded, helping reinforce safe driving behavior. Evidence that training has occurred, or hasn’t been needed, can be presented to strengthen a court case. Pugh believes it’s a good idea for drivers to protect themselves using various means of documentation. “To protect yourself, it’s a good thing,” he said. “Document, document, document everything.” The argument used against Daimler — that a safer product was available but not used — can be used for any safety system. Advanced Driver Assist Systems (ADAS) such as adaptive cruise control and collision mitigation are available, as are in-cab video systems. Carriers that decide not to use these safety features could possibly be judged as liable for any accidents or injuries they could have prevented. Costs passed along to consumers The cost of excessive financial awards in litigation is costly not only to the parties involved, but also to the general public. “The industry is being devastated by nuclear verdicts, and society as a whole ultimately absorbs these verdicts through higher prices on goods,” Starrett said. Real jobs are being lost and insurance rates are skyrocketing, if a carrier can even find an insurer,” he continued. In addition, Johnson notes, exorbitant judgements against transportation companies are driving the size of the average award upward. “FMCSA says the average the average cost of a general fatality is $1.7 million, but when you add the commercial motor vehicle equation into that, it’s $3.6 million,” Johnson explained. “It tells you right there that the industry is a target. Now you throw in these nuclear verdicts, and that’s just going to increase that average award.”

Tim Chelette of Big G Express finds joy in mentoring other drivers

You can often tell a great athlete by the number of awards and accolades they’ve earned during their careers. The same can be said of professional truck drivers — in particular, Tim Chelette of Big G Express. Chelette is one of five drivers honored as a 2024 Professional Driver of the Year by the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA). The drivers were presented with their awards during the closing banquet of TCA’s 2024 annual convention, held in March at the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center in Nashville. The winners each received a prize of $20,000 along with a standing ovation from banquet attendees. Chelette has been driving for a total of 22 years, and he’s been with Big G Express for the past 18. During his years behind the wheel, he’s earned awards from Big G Express, as well as the Tennessee Trucking Association, Pilot Flying J Travel Centers and DMC Insurance. He was also a Captain of the American Trucking Association’s America’s Road Team in 2019-2020. Chelette’s career in the trucking industry did not begin behind the wheel, he told Truckload Authority. “I used to work in a distribution center, over the inventory department and unloading department, and drivers kept telling me how much they really love driving,” he said. “I never thought that I would ever become a trucker,” he said, adding that he loves his job as a driver. “I tell people all the time that when I get tired of being ‘on vacation,’ I’ll quit my job.” After making the decision to try his hand at driving, Chelette enrolled in a CDL school in Lebanon, Tennessee. He says he was surprised at how much professional drivers need to know. “I never had so much stuff crammed into my mind in that many days,” he said. “It was unbelievable!” At some point in the training, embarking on a trucking career became a reality for him. “It was a great experience, from the minute I walked up to that truck in the school,” he said. “I’m thinking, “My goodness, you see these things on the highway!’” While he had seen countless rigs traveling on the road, he’d never stopped to think about everything involved in transporting freight across the country, he said, adding that he believes the general public is mostly uneducated about trucks and the trucking industry. “That’s the beauty of getting to be being part of trucking associations — we get to educate the American people about following distance, stopping distance, how to pass a semi-truck,” he said. “They just don’t know about it.” Chelette has covered nearly 2 million miles in his driving career and has managed to see every state except Hawaii, either from behind the wheel of his truck or while vacationing. “I just came back from Alaska, so now I got 49 states,” he said. He appreciates the accolades he gets from trucking awards, but his passion goes beyond winning awards. “People see the passion and the love that I have for trucking. I really love it,” he said. “I love mentoring other drivers.” Chelette says he used to have as much fun on two wheels as he does driving an 18-wheeler. “I’ve ridden motorcycles all my life,” he said, but says those days have ended. “I just gave up motorcycles, and I’m getting back to my roots again.” In addition to riding for fun, he parlayed his love for motorcycles into fundraising, leading motorcycle events to raise money for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis. “I did it for six years, and the last year I did it, I had 187 motorcycles. It was growing about 50 motorcycles every year. It was getting to the point where we would have had to split it into two rides” he said. “Since the goal was that 100% of the money raised would go to St. Jude’s, we didn’t want to take anything out of that.” Larger rides would have meant more administrative costs, more sponsors and more time away from work, so Chelette decided to move on, pursuing other interests. “I grew up doing a lot of hunting and fishing. I wanted to get back into fishing again, so I’ve been doing that a lot,” he said. “I have a two-car garage on my house, but I built me a nice two car garage in my backyard — and I just bought me a brand-new boat that goes in that garage.” Chelette has also embarked on another endeavor, one that he’s eager to share with world: He’s lost 130 pounds simply by changing his eating habits. He’s healthier and happier at his lower weight. Over the years, he’s been interviewed numerous times for stories about the various awards he has won, but his message remains constant. “When I get behind the wheel, I feel like it’s my job not just to make sure I get home safely to my family; it’s my job to make sure you get home to your family,” he said. Driving safety — and helping mentor others to do the same — just might be more important to Chelette than any of the awards and accolades he’s earned. Tim Chelette has no plans to stop helping others get home safely.

Strong new truck sales delay capacity adjustment in the freight market

U.S. sales of new Class 8 trucks were stronger than expected in September when 21,813 trucks were reported sold by manufacturers, according to Wards Intelligence. Strong truck sales would seem to be bad news for a freight market that’s plagued by overcapacity, keeping rates low. There is, however, good news in the numbers. Large numbers of the new trucks being sold are going to vocational purposes. “The clean energy transition and AI are driving utility infrastructure investment, while government programs such as CHIPS and BIL have boosted public infrastructure and reshoring projects,” said Kenny Vieth, president and senior analyst at ACT Research. The CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 (CHIPS) provides $50 billion for research, development and manufacture of silicone chips used in electronics and other applications. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), passed in November 2021, provides $1.2 trillion for infrastructure projects. Those projects require trucks — and lots of them. Grants for projects under these bills are just getting started and will continue for years. Companies involved in these construction projects are stocking up on equipment such as day-cab tractors to pull dump trailers and Class 8 trucks fitted with dump, concrete or other bodies. OTR freight segment still awash with available tractors The number of sleeper-equipped Class 8 tractors going to the freight hauling segment of trucking is declining, but at an excruciating low pace. “The U.S. and Canadian tractor markets remain awash in capacity, allowing rates to rise only incrementally over the past year,” Vieth said. “The result has been for-hire carrier profitability at the lowest levels since the global financial crisis (2007-2008).” Vieth describes current levels as “the current worst-in-15-years depression in carrier financial conditions.” September is typically a big month for new truck orders as the next year’s models are announced in August. FTR reports that preliminary North American Class 8 orders in September reached 30,000. That figure is way up from August but represents a decline of 4% from September of 2023. The figure was revised to 3,3000 units as more data came in. Dan Moyer, FTR’s senior analyst/commercial vehicles, also points to the vocational market as a driver of the orders. “The vocational market considerably outperformed the conventional sector, driving most of the month-over-month improvement,” Moyer said. Carriers are still buying, but they’re not expanding their fleets. “Despite stagnant freight markets, fleets continue to invest in new equipment, albeit at replacement demand levels in 2024 to date,” he said. On the used Class 8 market, ACT Research reported a robust month, with dealers reporting an 11% increase over August and a 13% increase over September 2023 numbers. The average used truck was 11% cheaper than it was a year ago and about the same age with 4% more miles on it. ACT’s Steve Tam, vice president and senior analyst says lower interest rates may have sparked some of the increase as well as confidence in freight rates. Carriers ordered trailers in September, too, but not at the levels at which they ordered tractors. FTR reported sales of 11,532 orders for new trailers, down 63% from September 2023. It was the worst September for trailer orders since 2016, the report said. “This divergence suggests that some fleets are prioritizing spending on new power units over trailers, possibly due to reduced profitability or shifting trade cycles,” Moyer said. OEM sales for September 2024 Freightliner led the way in U.S. new Class 8 truck sales in September, reporting movement of 8,137 units for a 6.3% increase over August sales. Compared with September 2023, sales increased 3.4%. For the year to date, Freightliner’s 64,286 trucks sold is 16.0% behind last year’s pace but good for 36.2% of the new Class 8 market in the U.S. Daimler sibling Western Star topped sales of 1,000 for the second consecutive month, reporting 1,006 sold. Although the company’s 8,098 trucks sold represents just 4.6% of the U.S. Class 8 market year to date, the number represents a 40.4% increase over last year’s first nine months — the only percentage increase for any of the major truck manufacturers. International is going in the other direction for the year to date, with 18,835 Class 8 trucks sold compared with 28,973 at the same point of 2023 — a decline of 35%. U.S. sales of 2,705 in September represented an increase of 3.6% over August but lagged behind September 2023 sales by 15.5%. The company has seen its market share drop from 14.3% a year ago to its current 10.6%. Peterbilt reported 3,088 Class 8 trucks sold in September, just 27 fewer than in August (0.9%) and down 10.6% from September 2023 sales. For the year to date, Peterbilt ‘s 28,366 is 2.3% behind sales at the same point as last year, but as a share of the total Class 8 market has risen by 1.6% and currently sits at 16.0% for the year. Kenworth’s 3,176 sold in September was 1.8% higher than its August sales and 5.9% higher than a year ago September. Year to date, the company has sold 27,491 Class 8 trucks, 15.5% of the total market for 2024 and 3.3% ahead of last year’s pace. Volvo reported U.S. sales of 2,514 Class 8 trucks, up 44.9% from August’s sales numbers. For the year, 18,331 Class 8 Volvos have been sold, down 8.2% from last year at the same point. According to reports, 10.3% of the new Class 8 trucks sold this year have been Volvos, down 0.5% from the 2023 pace. Mack took the largest sales drop in September with sales of 1,168 compared with 1,391 in August for a decline of 16.0%. Compared with September 2023 sales declined by 28.0%. For the year so far, Mack’s 11,898 sold represents an 11.9% decline from its 2023 pace for the first nine months. Its share of the Class 8 market remains the same as last year’s at 6.7%. How truck sales finish out the final quarter of 2024 will help determine how 2025 will begin for carriers. For freight rates to increase, more trucks must come out of the market — but that process may be delayed further if new truck sales remain strong.

Analysts say trucking conditions will begin to improve — but slowly

For several months, there have been hints that the freight market is beginning to turn. Unfortunately, spot freight rates have been bouncing along the bottom for so long that smaller carriers — and some larger ones, too — weren’t able to hold on. Those that remain should see market improvement, but analysts say it may be excruciatingly slow. The Cass Freight Index showed a 1.7% decrease in shipments for September, following a 1.0% August increase. September shipments were down 5.2% from the same month of 2023. The Cass Freight Index for Expenditures, however, rose 2.4% in September from August levels. Shippers paid more for freight transportation, even though diesel fuel costs declined during the month. The Cass Inferred Freight Rates, calculated from the total expenditures and shipments, showed a 4.2% month-over-month increase. While the rates are averaged from multiple modes of transportation and not taken from actual published rates, the trend is encouraging. The Cass report, written by Tim Denoyer of ACT Research, points out that private fleets have helped prolong the down cycle in freight rates. Companies that were severely impacted by record high freight rates during the pandemic increased the size of their own fleets, putting less of their product on the spot market while taking loads that would have been hauled by for-hire carriers. Denoyer mentions another event that could impact freight rates: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s mandated automatic downgrade of CDLs when a driver is in a “prohibited” status takes effect Nov. 18, 2024. Under the “Clearinghouse-II” rule, states are required to downgrade CDLs to non-CDL status when drivers fail a drug or alcohol screen, refuse to test or are otherwise disqualified. As of Nov. 18, all licensing agencies are required to be connected to the Clearinghouse database. As a result, states that were not previously connected could find drivers who are currently in a prohibited status but still driving. There’s no way to estimate how many drivers might lose their CDL privileges as a result, but the number could be significant enough to push freight rates upward — at least temporarily. DAT Freight & Analytics, which operates the largest U.S. load board, began its October report by saying that September freight volumes and rates “signaled that the usual cyclical demand for truckload capacity is on the upswing.” DAT reports that its Truckload Volume Index (TVI) declined for dry van, refrigerated and flatbed segments in September — but the declines were seasonal. They happen every September. The good news is that all three equipment types saw increases over September 2023. Van volumes increased by 6% and refrigerated by 12%, while flatbed volumes rose a more modest 2%. “September showed we’re firmly into a new freight cycle after nearly 22 months of rather extreme expansion and 27 months of contraction,” said Ken Adamo, DAT’s chief of analytics. “We expect seasonality to provide some tailwinds over the next few months, and hopefully modest improvements in rates coupled with retail freight volumes and stable fuel prices can get the motor carrier base on more solid footing.” The American Trucking Associations’ (ATA) Truck Tonnage Index fell 2.1% in September. Like the DAT information, the results were due more to the season than trends. “Freight has been very choppy this year, but despite the latest drop, tonnage is up 1.8% since hitting a low in January,” explained Bob Costello, ATA’s chief economist. “No doubt, the climb up has been slow and difficult as manufacturing activity remains flat, but the trend is up, not down.” Low freight rates are only one of the problems facing carriers. Inflation has hit everyone hard, and small trucking businesses are no exception. The cost of trucks, parts, repairs and just about everything else has risen in the past few years. The exception is diesel fuel, which has declined in price. While the rate of inflation has slowed, the cost increases brought about by higher inflation remain. Without a recession to “reset” the economy, prices won’t be going down; they just won’t be going up as fast as they were. Financial services provider Deloitte, in its economic forecast for the third quarter of 2024, said that “robust consumer spending, high business investment and lower interest rates” have created optimism about the U.S. economy. The firm predicts that federal adjustments to interest rates will succeed in keeping inflation around 2.2% toward the end of the year. For 2025, an inflation rate of 1.5% is forecast. The Fed’s Open Market committee meets again in early November and is expected to reduce interest rates another .25%. Deloitte predicts total cuts for 2024 of 1%, with another 1% through 2025. The economic wild card for trucking could be the cost of diesel fuel. Military conflicts are ongoing in both the Middle East and in Ukraine — and both are regions that produce petroleum. Should either conflict escalate, crude oil prices could rise quickly. Another potential issue could come as a result of the presidential election in the U.S. Both major candidates — former President Donald Trump and current Vice President Kamala Harris — have discussed the possibility of imposing or increasing tariffs on foreign goods. When tariffs are involved, imports and exports are impacted. The result can be changes in the amount of available freight, pushing rates up or down. The short-lived labor stoppage at U.S. East Coast ports has been settled, for now. The International Longshoremen’s Association and the U.S. Maritime Alliance agreed to a tentative deal, extending their current contract to January 15, less than a week prior to the inauguration of the next U.S. president. Expected freight shortages throughout this year’s holiday season have been averted. The agreement calls for a 61.5% pay increase for workers with other issues to be ironed out in negotiations by the January 15 deadline. Perhaps the largest issue to resolve is that of automation. The U.S. lags behind other countries in the degree of automation used. The 85,000-member union seeks to preserve jobs, while port operators look to increase efficiency and reduce costs. The months ahead should see trucking conditions improve, but slowly.

Practical innovation: Shell Starship 3.0 shows how to get the most from available technology

The development of technology simply for the sake of using technology is not practical, nor is it useful. That’s a lesson exemplified by the 48-cylinder, 4,200 CC Kawasaki Whitelock Tinker Toy, one of more than 1,000 motorcycles on display at the Barber Vintage Motorsports Museum in Leeds, Alabama. Although the bike holds the record for “functional vehicle with the greatest number of cylinders,” its fuel efficiency (or lack thereof) and required maintenance render it into nothing more than a novelty. Enter the Shell Starship program. At the other end of the practicality spectrum are technological developments that have the potential to bring greater efficiency to an entire industry. On Oct. 8, 2024, the Shell Starship 3.0 was put through its paces at Alabama’s Barber Motorsports Park Proving Ground, with all of the latest practical technology available for Class 8 trucks on display. Members of trucking media from across North America were treated to a presentation about the technology used in the creation and operation of the vehicle, along with the opportunity to inspect and photograph the latest iteration of the truck. Some attendees received rides around the proving grounds track — while those with CDLs, including this writer, were encouraged to drive a lap or two. Of course, I took the opportunity to take the Starship for a spin. The Shell Starship program began in 2018 with the goal of setting new benchmarks for energy efficiency for the commercial vehicle industry. Combining the latest in aerodynamic design with lightweight and efficient drive train components, low rolling resistance tires and the most advanced Shell lubricants, each Starship iteration has set new standards for fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. The Starship 3.0 deviates from the industry standard of diesel fuel, with a goal of meeting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) upcoming emissions standards and, at the same time, to improve fuel mileage and reduce costs. The Starship is powered by a Cummins X15N natural gas engine and can use renewable natural gas where available. The engine is lubricated with Shell Rotella NG Plus SAE 5W-30 FA-4 synthetic oil, which the developers say is capable of handling the higher heat load produced by natural gas engines. Shell Spirax S6 GME 40 lubricant, specially formulated for high-torque transmissions, protects the auto-shift unit. The truck and trailer are equipped with some familiar technology — with a few adaptations. The tractor body is constructed of carbon fiber for strength and weight reduction. Tractor side fairings covered the drive wheels. Cab extender fairings, both side and top, are designed to deploy at 50 mph, closing the tractor – trailer gap. Trailer side skirts extended to within an inch of the road surface and completely covered the trailer tires. A “boat tail” device at the rear of the trailer extended all the way down. Because less air can move underneath the tractor and trailer, heat extractors are molded into the body of the cab behind the steer tires to prevent buildup of engine heat. A 5,000-watt solar panel array, mounted on the roof of the trailer, provides charging for batteries without taxing the truck’s generator or increasing fuel consumption. During on-road testing in the fall of 2023 while operating at nearly 80,000 pounds, the Starship 3.0 achieved more than 2.5 times the freight-ton per gallon efficiency of the U.S. average for Class 8 diesel trucks. Additionally, because natural gas requires less emissions aftertreatment, the unit scored more than three times the freight-ton efficiency for carbon dioxide emissions of its diesel equivalent. A second Starship 3.0, a hybrid diesel-electric, is being tested in China. So, what’s it like to pilot the Starship? Driving the Starship 3.0 was a unique experience in some ways — but rather ordinary in others. Entering the cab using the electric powered fold-down stairway was reminiscent of similar stairs on smaller business jets. Raising the stairs closes the door, which blends nearly seamlessly into the passenger side of the cab. Familiarizing myself with the cab involved checking out the display panels that replace traditional west-coast mirrors. Mounted near the windshield pillars, these displays provided a superior view of the area alongside the truck with less head movement required to check them. An additional “blind spot” camera and display clearly shows anything that’s near the right side of the tractor. An electronic control mounted near the left mirror display controls adjustment of the camera view for each separate camera. In addition, there’s a “night view” available that uses infra-red technology to provide a clear view alongside the truck even when visibility is compromised. The gauges are incorporated into a driver interface to the right of the steering wheel. Although the displays are digital, they look very similar to traditional gauges with “needles” that moved accordingly. Operating the auto-shift transmission is as simple as rotating a switch located on a stem on the steering column, about where automobile shifters have been located for decades. The action was much like turning on windshield wipers in an automobile. The traditional yellow and red parking brake/protection valve buttons operate as normal. Once I was acclimated, we were on our way. The Starship’s acceleration is smooth and powerful, with the transmission smoothly shifting as the truck’s speed increases. The natural gas powerplant provides power similar to that of a diesel engine, but perhaps a little higher RPM is needed to provide torque at startup. Controlling the Starship feels much like any other truck with smooth, responsive steering and solid controlled braking. In some ways, driving the truck is a whole new experience. The most noticeable driving difference I noticed was visual: The aerodynamic shape of the windshield and the side-to-side dimensions of the tractor make the cab seem cavernous. Without lines painted on the proving ground test track, it took a little extra effort to determine lane positioning. The difference, however, doesn’t seem to be anything a driver wouldn’t become accustomed to within a few miles of driving. While the Starship 3.0 is definitely different in looks, as well as in some functions, the overall driving experience doesn’t feel that different from any modern Class 8 vehicle, at least to me. The engine even sounds like a diesel! The familiar odor of diesel exhaust was missing while I walked around the idling truck, replaced by a less-noticeable aroma. At a time when it’s difficult to predict how the truck of the future will be powered, the team behind the Shell Starship 3.0 is demonstrating what can be achieved with currently available technology. As the world pursues zero-emissions vehicles, every extra mile and every reduction in emissions brings the trucking industry closer to zero — in a good way.

Lessons learned: Use Roadcheck results to make sure equipment, drivers are roadworthy and safe

In September, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) released the results of its 2024 Roadcheck inspection blitz. As a refresher, the event was conducted over a three-day period May 14-15. In jurisdictions throughout North America, 48,761 inspections were performed, with 23% of the vehicles inspected being placed out of service (OOS) for safety violations. Additionally, 4.8% of drivers were OOS. CVSA describes the Roadcheck event as an “inspection, enforcement and data-gathering initiative” — but it can be so much more. The Roadcheck can also be an educational experience for carriers and — especially for owner-operators — who pay attention to the results. Knowing what the top violations were during the blitz helps truck owners focus their maintenance efforts on issues that are most likely to arise. For example, the No. 1 violation for the 2024 Roadcheck was Defective Service Brakes, which totaled 25% of all vehicle OOS violations. “Other Brake Violations” was No. 3 on the list at 18.3%. Together, 5,873 violations were found totaling 43.3% of all vehicle violations found. Why were so many violations discovered? Obviously, there’s an issue with drivers and truck owners when it comes to making sure their trucks’ braking systems are working properly. It’s astounding that, given months of advance notice of the dates, plus information about the focus of the Roadcheck event, so many drivers were found driving around in equipment that couldn’t pass inspection. Granted, drivers who know how to check slack adjusters for adjustment have become a rare breed. Even rarer are drivers who actually do it. But with ample notice of the inspection event, thousands of trucks still failed, many for items that could have been found on a half-decent pre-trip inspection. Brake drums that are contaminated by a leaking wheel seal, for example, aren’t hard to find. The No. 2 OOS violation in this year’s event was an item that’s much easier to inspect: Tires were responsible for more than a fifth of all violations at 20.8%. While drivers might be excused for not knowing about an out-of-adjustment slack adjuster, tires are pretty simple to access during a pre-trip inspection. The same is true of lights, which were responsible for 1,406 OOS violations and 12% of the total. How ‘random’ are these random inspections? It would be incorrect and unfair to assume that the 23% of vehicles placed OOS for one or more violations is representative of all trucks on the road. That’s because the inspections aren’t totally random. While some jurisdictions might choose randomly, others might focus on appearance, choosing trucks that appear older or poorly maintained. Still others might target trucks from a specific industry such as logging or trash hauling. Some choose trucks to inspect based on CSA data, selecting equipment from specific carriers. Some jurisdictions don’t participate at all, while others may inspect a larger or smaller number of trucks. The newest trucks with the greatest chance of passing without violations may be the ones least often inspected. On the other side of that coin, however, are the drivers and carriers that avoid inspection by shutting down or by avoiding scales or likely inspection areas. With months of notice, it isn’t difficult to avoid inspection delays by simply not running during the dates of the event. Enough trucks are shut down during inspection days to have an impact on spot freight rates, which rise due to the decrease in trucking capacity. What about driver violations? Many of the inspections included checking drivers’ credentials, hours of service (HOS) and records in the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse. Incredibly, given the advance warning the industry is provided about the inspection, 63 drivers who had been barred from driving due to failed drug and/or alcohol tests in the Clearinghouse record were still found — and removed from — behind the wheel during the Roadcheck event. One hundred and four more drivers were issued OOS violations for possession of drugs or alcohol. Nearly 700 drivers (688, to be exact) were cited for not having a CDL in their possession, and 138 for driving on a suspended license. Another 304 were cited for not having a medical card. The largest number of violations, however, were for HOS violations. During this year’s Roadcheck, 870 OOS violations were found, comprising 32.1% of all driver OOS violations. An additional 297 drivers, or 10.9%, were placed OOS due to falsified record of duty status. As usual, there were a group of drivers cited for not wearing their seat belts; 535 citations were issued. There were undoubtedly more drivers who quickly put their belts on as they approached the inspection area, cleverly avoiding a citation. The FMCSA estimates that about 14% of drivers do not wear their safety belts, about double the percentage of personal vehicle drivers. The agency has announced its intention of conducting an online survey to better understand driver perceptions about safety belts. In the past, drivers have expressed fear of entrapment in case of an accident as a reason for not belting in, while others simply find seat belts uncomfortable. Efforts to educate drivers on the probabilities of being entrapped versus the increased odds of surviving a crash have met with some success, but old attitudes sometimes prevail. What can motor carriers and drivers learn from Roadchecks? The CVSA Roadcheck event is well publicized and the results are widely shared. While getting unsafe equipment and drivers off of the road is certainly a goal, carriers and truck owners would be wise to pay attention to the results. While it’s true that equipment defects can appear at any time, it’s doubtful the nearly 21% of OOS violations for tires all “suddenly happened” in the half-hour just before the inspection, or that all of the non-working lights went out just a mile before the weigh station where inspections were conducted. The sad reality is that too many drivers failed to perform a thorough pre-trip inspection on the day they were inspected. Others knew they were driving illegally, like the drivers with failed drug screens in the Clearinghouse, while still others didn’t check to make sure important credentials, like CDL and medical card, were in their possession before leaving home. There are lessons to be learned by those who don’t want to be among the statistics in the next inspection event. Inspect your truck. Make sure you have your driving documents with you. Leave the alcohol at home. Take the time needed to follow simple steps to help ensure you and your truck get a passing grade at the next roadside inspection.

FMCSA’s certification label requirements on rear impact guards: Safety or silliness?

Professional drivers have been known, on occasion, to question some of the regulations put in place by federal agencies and their effectiveness in making our nation’s highways safer for everyone. Once in a while, however, a rule makes the news that causes a national pandemic of head-scratching. It’s even more perplexing when the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has an opportunity to make a correction … and passes. The saga to which I’m referring involves multiple government agencies, notably the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) it issues, and the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA), an independent association that includes government agencies, law enforcement, carriers, manufacturers, safety groups and more. The regulation in question is FMCSR 393.86, “Rear impact guards and rear end protection.” The regulation deals with a device once called the “ICC bumper” and later, the “DOT bumper” — but it’s officially referred to as the rear impact guard, or RIG. The regulation requires RIGs to be installed on all trailers and semitrailers manufactured after Jan. 26, 1998, and regulates its width (with 4 inches of the trailer sides) and how close to the ground (not more than 22 inches) it must be, along with other measurements. These RIGs can be bolted or welded in place, and they must be “substantially constructed.” FMVSS Standard 223 provides strength and force-resistance requirements. None of the regulations noted in the paragraph above have been contested. The issue around the RIG requirements comes down to a sticker. In subparagraph 6, the regulation states that each RIG must be permanently marked or labeled with the name of the manufacturer of the guard, the year it was manufactured and the letters “DOT.” This labeling is certify that the guard conforms to all the requirements of FMVSS 223. As the CVSA pointed out in a March 12, 2019 petition for rulemaking in which it asked the FMCSA to remove the labeling requirements, there are several issues with the label. During normal use, the label is exposed to the elements, ice-removal chemicals and other damaging conditions. Parts of the RIG often come into contact with bumper pads or other parts of loading docks, which could damage the label. Further, shippers and receivers often employ devices that grip or restrain the RIG, preventing drivers from moving the trailer while loading and unloading are occurring. Damage to certification labels is a common occurrence. The CVSA petition also notes that these labels can’t be replaced if they’re damaged or removed. Trailer manufacturers or the suppliers who constructed the RIG will not issue a new certification for a device that has been in use, possibly for years. Then there’s the justification for a “certification” that the device meets regulations. Is there a similar requirement for other parts of the vehicle (for example, a sticker on the front bumper “certifying” it was properly made)? Are certification stickers required on critical safety parts like brake drums, or fifth wheels and kingpins? Are manufacturers required to “certify” that windshields are strong enough or tires are able to handle the rigors of the road? In a September 4, 2024, letter, the FMCSA denied the CVSA petition. One argument cited for the denial was that, if the RIG was damaged beyond repair and replaced, the new RIG would come with a shiny new certification sticker, so the regulation was satisfied. Not mentioned were the far more likely scenarios in which the “damage” included scratches, scrapes and cosmetic damage such as rust or paint blisters that did not result in replacement of the entire RIG but obliterated the information printed on the sticker. The FMCSA also cited an NHTSA denial of the petition based on the premise that the labels enable crash investigators to determine if a RIG was compliant with the regulations and whether it contained any defects. Such reasoning assumes, of course, that every RIG with a label is automatically compliant and those with no label are not. Finally, the FMCSA made the statement that “damaged or worn labels during regular operation of the vehicle on the original equipment would compromise the overall safety to the motoring public but would not represent a compliance issue with the requirements of FMVSS No. 223.” Wait. Let’s make sure we have this straight. A damaged or worn sticker compromises “the overall safety to the motoring public” — but it isn’t a “compliance issue?” If it’s not a “compliance” issue, does that mean violations will not be recorded if the sticker is missing? That no citations or warnings will be given to drivers or vehicle owners? The FMCSA closed with this statement: “As such, the permanence and placement of the label are left to the discretion of the manufacturer of the rear impact guard.” The permanence? Does this mean that it doesn’t even need to be a quality sticker that doesn’t fall off as the trailer leaves the sales lot? After all, it’s up to the manufacturer, as is the placement. If the sticker is on the part of the RIG that faces the front of the vehicle, requiring the inspector to crawl under a trailer to see it, that’s fine. In summary, the FMCSA is requiring a label to certify that one particular vehicle part meets regulations even though they don’t require similar labels on other parts; if the sticker is missing or damaged it there’s no replacement available but that’s not an issue because nobody gets a ticket for it anyway. Those whose living is governed by federal regulation, however, can rest assured that important matters like this one are handled speedily by our safety agencies. The CVSA petition for removal of the requirement for the certification label only took five and a half years to resolve. One wonders if the ruling was expedited because of the danger to “the overall safety of the motoring public.”

Owner-ops can have their say in the FMCSA Truck Leasing Task Force

One of the easiest highways to truck ownership is to enter a lease-purchase agreement with a carrier. Unfortunately, this can also be a path to failure. Some lease operators have complained of predatory practices by carriers, including overpricing of trucks, unfair maintenance and other fees, and deliberate reduction in available loads to encourage default. A task force to study the “terms, conditions and equitability of common truck leasing arrangements” was mandated by a provision in the $1.2 billion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), signed into law in November 2021 by President Joe Biden. The bill is best known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Members of the task force, which includes motor carriers, unions, consumer protection groups, attorneys, educators and owner-operators, were named on May 1, 2023. The task force is to report its findings to the U.S. Secretaries of Transportation and Labor, including recommendations for best practices for informing drivers before they sign agreements, assisting those who are having issues with current agreements, and helping drivers who are currently in predatory agreements. Additionally, the committee is to recommend changes to current laws. Why even bother with a lease-purchase agreement if it could be predatory? When operated properly, lease purchase agreements at their best provide a benefit for both the carriers and the drivers who participate: Carriers find an outlet for used equipment that is often more profitable than simply trading it in — plus, they have an incentive to retain drivers who might have otherwise gone elsewhere for a chance to own their own trucks. Drivers are often offered easier financial arrangements with a low (if any) down payment and less stringent credit requirements. It’s a rent-to-own arrangement that many drivers have used to start their own independent trucking businesses. There are also third-party companies that work with carriers to provide trucks for lease-purchase agreements. These arrangements allow carriers to provide a greater variety of equipment and help lessen the administrative burden from the carrier, who sometimes agrees to collect lease payments and other fees from drivers on behalf of the leasing company. One key benefit of the lease-purchase arrangement is the relative ease of terminating the agreement if things don’t work out. Carriers may offer a “walk-away” lease, where a driver who determines that truck ownership isn’t for them simply turns the truck in and goes back to work as an employee. The carrier is then free to lease the truck to someone else or to dispose of it in some other manner. So, what’s the catch if I can just walk away? Terminating the lease-purchase agreement isn’t always equitable to both partners. If, for example, the driver leasing the truck hasn’t kept up with regular maintenance or the truck has been damaged in an accident, the carrier could be stuck with repairs the cost of which could exceed the value of the truck. In addition, bills for fuel, towing or fines from citations can sometimes come in long after the truck has been surrendered by the erstwhile driver. The driver, on the other hand, may find themselves obligated to have the truck repaired at carrier locations at an expense set by the carrier, and may even be restricted in choices for insurance coverage, registration and even fueling. Some drivers have complained their carrier knew about likely mechanical issues before leasing the equipment and then required the drivers to foot the bill. Because lease payments and other expenses are typically deducted from the driver’s settlements, the amount the driver actually receives can be less than expected — and this may cause hardship at home. Some drivers make the problem worse by not running enough miles to cover the expenses with enough left over for a paycheck. However, other drivers have claimed that carriers cut their miles in an intentional attempt to get them to fail so the carrier could reclaim the truck and lease it to someone else. While a walk-away lease may appear beneficial to a driver who wants out, equity can be an issue. When the driver buys a truck outright and then has difficulty meeting the payments, he or she still owns any equity that has accumulated. It might be possible to sell the truck, pay off the lending institution and have some cash left over. In a lease-purchase agreement, the truck goes back to the carrier, which owns any residual value. The driver may even still owe for any delinquent lease payments. Because many lease-purchase deals include the expectation that the driver will continue working for the leasing carrier until the truck is paid for, the driver is dependent on the carrier for the income needed to make the lease payments. If the carrier loses customers or sees a decline in the amount of business it handles, the driver’s compensation can decline, too. Accusations are sometimes made that the carrier reduced the driver’s income, but such claims are difficult to prove. You can make your voice heard on Capitol Hill. The Truck Leasing Task Force was created to study the different nuances of lease-purchase agreements. Drivers are invited to participate and to submit comments or other documentation. A meeting held on July 18, 2024, for example, lists letters from both the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) and the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), as well as comments from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and from a carrier that is 100% owner-operator. Everyone is encouraged to participate in upcoming meetings, which are conducted virtually via ZOOM. However, you must register for the meeting at least a week in advance — and if you want to submit written materials for consideration, you must also do so a week in advance of each meeting. The next meetings will be held on Wednesday, Oct. 30, and Thursday, November 20, from 10 a.m.-4 p.m. You must register in advance for the meeting at fmcsa.dot.gov/tltf. A copy of the agenda for each meeting will be available at the same website a week before each meeting. Copies of the meeting minutes are posted on the website after each meeting concludes. A public oral comment period for drivers and lessees of CMVs will be included in each meeting, but due to time constraints, comments will be limited to two minutes. Any written comments, however, will be included in the permanent record. Interested parties can read the announcement of the October and November meetings and register to attend at fmcsa.dot.gov/tltf.

New to the road? Here’s what you need to know when packing for a run

Ask 50 truck drivers what you should plan to bring along when you make your first solo trip and you’ll likely get 50 different answers, including a few that start, “Well, it depends.” That’s a good place to start. Depending on the truck you’re driving — whether it’s assigned by the carrier you work for or one you bought to launch your business — you’ll need to know how much storage space is available. In addition to a place to stow your clothing and personal items, you’ll need to know if there’s cold storage for food and drinks. Some trucks are equipped with small refrigerators and electric inverters that supply 120-volt electricity for any appliances you’ll use. In others, you’ll need to supply a cooler, either one that you fill with bags of ice or an electric one that plugs in. Once you know how much space you have, it’s time to start packing. What will you wear? You’ll need enough clothing to last the duration of your trip — or at least until you have time and a place to wash them. Most truck stops have laundry facilities, but they aren’t always available when needed and they can be expensive to use on a regular basis. Some clothing might be worn multiple days, like a pair of jeans (as long as you don’t get overly dirty or sweaty). Fresh undergarments and a clean shirt can help you feel cleaner even when you can’t shower. You’ll need sturdy footwear, too. Whether you choose boots or shoes, they should provide plenty of support when you’re climbing in and out of the truck or walking around on questionable surfaces. It’s a good idea to bring a jacket along, even in summer. In certain parts of the country, especially at high elevations, it can get chilly any time of year. It’s always better to have a jacket and not need it than the other way around. Just for good measure, add a hat and some gloves, too. What will you eat? When it comes to meals on the road, one of the fastest ways to quickly go broke (and ruin your health) is to eat every meal at restaurants and truck stops. Plus, you’ll eventually find yourself in a situation where a restaurant isn’t available at the time you need it. If you have a refrigerator, pack some lunch meat, cheese, condiments, fruit/veggies — whatever you like. You can make a few days’ worth of sandwiches for the cost of a single truck stop meal. Be sure to pack some non-perishable food, too. Cans of soup, stew, chili or whatever you like; tuna is great for protein. Packaged protein bars or crackers and peanut butter come in handy when there’s no time to prepare something. You don’t have to stick to cold sandwiches, either. There are several ways to cook in your truck. You can find 12-volt appliances to heat soups, make coffee and even pop popcorn, but the most popular appliance is a small microwave oven. Consider the capacity of the inverter in your truck (you may need to provide your own the one you provide), and make sure it’ll handle the voltage requirements of your microwave. Paper plates and bowls make cleanup a snap. Don’t forget the bottled water. Even in cold weather, dehydration can be a problem. Air conditioning removes moisture from the air and, while doing so, removes it from your body, too. Carry your favorite non-alcoholic beverages (the more water, the better). Where will you sleep? Bunk mattresses come in all sizes, and bedding can be expensive. Plain flat sheets fit most bunks but tucking them in constantly can be inconvenient. Measure your mattress carefully, and don’t be afraid to get creative. You can make a “pillowcase” that fits some mattresses by folding a king-size flat sheet in half and sewing the long side and one short side. It’ll stay tucked and the mattress can be flipped to the unused side. You’ll also need blankets or a comforter. A large sleeping bag can do double duty and keep you from coming in contact with the mattress. A favorite pillow will help you sleep better. What else will you need? Unless you’ll be home every day, you’ll need toiletries. Buy a duplicate of each product you use at home, such as shaving cream, soap, shampoo, deodorant and toothpaste. Baby wipes are great when you don’t have access to soap and water! Household medications like pain killers or antacids are good to add. Most truck stops have a 24-hour C-store available — but beware. The “C” stands for “convenience,” not “cheap.” Buy your toiletries, your food and beverages and any other items when you’re at home, or you can stop at a regular grocery or box store. Use the C-store when other choices aren’t available. If you take any prescribed medication, make sure you bring enough for your expected time out, and then some more. It’s best to keep it in the original prescribed bottles to avoid any suspicion of illegal possession. How will you pay for things? Think about how you intend to pay for things while you travel. Many drivers use cash, taking advances from their fuel cards as needed. This practice can deplete the next paycheck in a hurry. Using debit cards to pay for purchases is an option but drawing cash from an ATM often results in charges both from the truck stop and your bank. Credit cards carry interest fees and often result in surcharges when used. However you pay, it’s a good idea to stash some cash somewhere in your truck so that if you lose your wallet or purse, you’ll have something to fall back on. Some drivers carry blank checks to pay for any repairs without incurring credit card fees. Anything else? Electronic devices are a part of daily life, and you’ll need your cellphone. You may also need a laptop or tablet, both for record-keeping and for communication. Before you leave home, download any apps you might need on the road. If you’ll need your own GPS, bring that, too. Mapping software on phones often doesn’t provide trucking information. Make sure you have any login information and passwords you’ll need to log into any accounts you’ll need to access while on the road. Your carrier may provide you with a copy of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) and an Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG). Store these where you can get at them, if needed. If you haul hazardous materials, keep the ERG with the load paperwork. Being on the road has its own difficulties, but you can be as safe and comfortable as possible with a little planning and careful packing. Safe travels!

Class 8 truck sales stronger than expected in August as inventories pile up

U.S. sales of new Class 8 trucks remained stronger than expected in August, according to data received from Wards Intelligence. Manufacturers reported sales of 20,674 trucks, topping the 20,000 mark for the second time this year. That number was down 3.4% from July sales of 21,398, however — and trailed August 2023 sales by 11.4%. Despite the declines, however, truck sales have exceeded expectations for the second half of 2024. On the North American market, 26,500 Class 8 trucks were sold, 8.9% fewer than August 2023 numbers, as reported by ACT Research. “The decline from July’s unseasonably high sales indicates the industry is on the path to normalization,” Kenny Vieth, president and senior analyst at ACT, said in a Sept. 12 release. One issue that’s impacting production is inventory. Manufacturers are still building, even as production outpaces ordering. The result is that dealer lots are filling with unsold units. Body manufacturers — like dump, concrete or trash unit builders — have unsold inventory piling up. Additionally, August is traditionally a transition month when builders switch their order books over to the next model year. “With August order and build volumes pushing backlogs to their annual nadir (and multi-year lows), ‘order season’ has not been so important since the fall of 2016,” Vieth said. “Excessive inventories cloud both the front and back ends of the demand arc. “A year ago, the total Class 8 inventory was 61,800 units,” he continued. “At the end of July 2024, the Class 8 inventory was a record 88,800 units — an increase of 27,000 units year over year. We are sitting in the lull before a hoped-for sustained surge as ‘order season’ gets underway.” FTR Intel data reported 13,400 orders for August, about 16% fewer than in August 2023. Still, FTR reported a total of 271,000 orders for Class 8 trucks in the past 12 months. “OEMs this month faced a somewhat mixed market, though overall conditions were stable,” said Dan Moyer, senior analyst-commercial vehicles for FTR. “The conventional market outperformed the vocational sector, driving most of the m/m improvement. Despite stagnant freight markets, fleets continue to invest in new equipment, albeit at a slower pace.” Moyer also addressed inventory. “Pressure on OEMs to reduce production rates is mounting,” he said. Excess capacity in the freight market has delayed rate increases for well over a year now. The extra trucks are coming out of the market slowly, but lower prices for used equipment are enticing some drivers to buy trucks and get back into the hauling business. Pre-buying to beat the EPA’s 2027 model-year regulations expected to increase. One factor that should show increasing impact is pre-buying to mitigate the impact of 2027 model-year efficiency and emissions standards from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Concerned about expected cost increases — up to $30,000 per truck — and wary of the dependability of the new technology, buyers are expected to buy more 2025 and 2026 models. For fleets that replace hundreds of trucks each year, the savings incurred by buying early can be tremendous. The downside, of course, is that an economic downturn could result in new trucks parked and waiting for freight, as it did in the 2008-2009 recession. Trailer orders have plummeted. According to Jennifer McNealy, director of commercial vehicle market research and publications for ACT Research, trailer orders have seen a 27% contraction over last year. “It is important to remember that for orders, we remain in the weakest months of the annual cycle,” she said. “While we do see fleets starting to make more money later this year — thereby increasing their ability to purchase equipment — that improvement is off a very low base as carrier profits in the first half of 2024 were at levels not seen since 2010.” Reports from individual OEMs were mixed. As for the individual manufacturers, Western Star saw the largest increase in month-over-month sales by percentage. Sales of 1,031 were 16.5% better than July sales of 885 — and the first time the company has reported sales of over 1,000 in a month. Compared with August 2023, sales are up a healthy 42.8%, and the company has grown from 2.8% of the U.S. Class 8 market to its current 4.6%. Western Star’s much bigger sibling, Daimler-owned Freightliner, reported 7,654 units sold in August, up 1.2% from July but down 6.2% from August 2023. The company is responsible for 36.1% of the Class 8 trucks sold in the U.S. in 2024. Navistar — which recently rebranded as International — saw increased sales of 2,612 units in August, 14.1% better than July sales. Compared to August 2023, however, sales were down 27.2%. For the year to date, Navistar sales have declined by 37.4%, the largest decline of any of the OEMs. Kenworth sales of 3,119 represented a decline of 10.6% from July and a 15.5% drop from August 2023 sales. For the year to date, Kenworth lags 4.4% behind 2023 sales — not bad when the industry average decline is 13.6%. Peterbilt’s numbers are similar, with 3,115 units reported sold in August, down 11.9% from July and down 9.9% from August 2023. Year to date, Peterbilt’s U.S. sales are down just 1.2% from last year’s pace, well ahead of the industry average. Volvo sales of 1,735 in August were down 18.9% from July and 18.5% from August 2023. Sales at Volvo are about 10% behind last year’s pace for the first eight months of the year. Mack Trucks reported sales of 1,391 in August, down 6% from July and down 13% from August 2023. Year to date, the company has reported sales that are 9.6% behind last year’s pace. The industry is waiting to see the future of internal combustion engines. In news related to future sales, a Sept. 19 online presentation hosted by the Engine Technology Forum claimed the transition to electric vehicles is not the fait accompli that many think it is. Advances in internal combustion engine (ICE) technology and developments in alternative fuels could allow the transportation industry to achieve more efficiency and fewer emissions faster than transitioning to electric motors. Hydrogen can be burned in ICEs, some with minimal modifications. Renewable biofuels produce fewer emissions when burned, and advances in engine technology can reduce those even further. Soybeans, in particular, were touted for their ability to produce 30 pounds of protein and 22 pounds of carbohydrates for each gallon of biodiesel, helping to increase the world’s food supply. It’s possible the ICE will be around for many years, and the muted purr of an electric engine may be a characteristic of trucks far into the future.

More freight should mean higher rates — so why isn’t it happening?

DAT’s Truckload Volume Index (TVI) for August rose month over month for the dry van, refrigerated and flatbed segments tracked. DAT reported an increase of 2.8% from July for dry van, 4.3% for refrigerated and 0.3% for flatbed. Also in August, however, national average spot freight rates fell for all three segments, with dry van falling by a nickel a mile, refrigerated by four cents and flatbed by seven cents. The news wasn’t all bad, though. DAT’s TVI showed a 6.3% improvement over August 2023, and the refrigerated TVI was up 17.6%. “Linehaul rates were year-over-year positive for the first time since March 2022, a trend that should continue into the fall shipping season,” said Ken Adamo, chief of analytics at DAT. “However, year-over-year comparisons are little consolation for truckers looking for better pricing now.” Increasing Costs Because of inflation, truckers are already contending with higher prices for everything they purchase — with the exception of fuel — but fuel is often covered by a surcharge and isn’t included in the DAT rate calculations. The recent half-percent rate cut by the Federal Reserve isn’t likely to show up on credit card interest for months, if at all, and existing truck loans with fixed interest rates won’t be impacted anyway. A 2024 update on the Operational Costs of Trucking, published in June by the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), reported that trucking costs, minus fuel, rose by 6.6% in 2023 compared to 2022 costs. Insurance premiums and truck and trailer payments are growing at the fastest rates: From 2022 to 2023, insurance costs rose 12.5%, while truck and trailer payments rose 8.8%. It’s important to note that those increases added to even higher increases the year before. In 2022, for example, truck and trailer payments rose 18.6% and then rose another 8.8% in 2023. Respondents to another ATRI survey reported that those costs continued to rise in the early months of 2024. ATRI reported that driver wages rose by 7.6% in the same period, but truck owners are finding it difficult to increase their take-home cash after paying the increased business costs. Those that are leased to carriers may be seeing a higher per-mile compensation. The Seasonal Factor A part of the rate problem in August is seasonal. Harvests of vegetables and early fruits have mostly been completed and shipped, leaving refrigerated trucks to compete for dry van loads. Grain harvests are beginning, but these products are mostly handled by hopper-bottom or dump equipment. In short, August is typically a slow shipping month, which translates to lower shipping rates. The Cass Freight Index for Shipments reported a 1.0% increase in shipments, but a decrease from last August of 1.9% following a 1.1% decline in July. “These were the smallest declines in 18 months as goods demand continues to grow slowly — and slowing capacity additions reduce the pressure on for-hire shipments,” wrote Tim Denoyer, vice president and senior analyst for ACT Research, who administers the Cass report. The Cass report is compiled using billing data from its clients and includes data from trucking, rail, ship, air and pipeline transportation segments, with about 75% coming from trucking. The data skews towards contract freight rates rather than the spot market. Politics Play a Role There’s no denying that this year’s presidential election, along with numerous other races at both the federal and state levels, have created uncertainty in the trucking industry. “We generally strive to base our outlook on industry economics, rather than politics … but no strategy worth its salt can avoid election implications right now,” Denoyer wrote. Those implications, according to Denoyer, include elevated near-term uncertainty and slowing industrial activity as normal short-term features of presidential elections. “Almost regardless of the outcome, some combination of near-term softness and post-election relief recovery in freight demand is thus likely,” he said. Available Freight The American Trucking Associations (ATA) weighed in with its Truck Tonnage Index, which showed an increase of 1.8% in available freight in August. The ATA index is comprised of survey data received from its membership and leans heavily to contract freight. “August tonnage levels rose to the highest level since February 2023,” said Bob Costello, chief economist for ATA. “Not only does the latest robust gain show freight levels are coming off the bottom, but so does the sequential pattern over the last eight months,” he said. “Starting earlier this year, every time tonnage falls, it is higher than the previous low. For me, this month-to-month pattern is more important than looking at the year-over-year percent changes since we are at an inflection point in the freight market.” Possible Port Strike The Motive Monthly Report for September showed a 7.7% increase during August in truck visits to warehouses of the top 50 U.S. retailers. The report noted an increase in inventory-to sales ratios, indicating that retailers are increasing their stocks ahead of the holiday season. There’s another reason, however. A labor agreement between the International Longshoremen Association (ILA) and port owners is due to expire, and a deadline of Oct. 1 has been set to reach a new agreement. The ILA handles 43% of all U.S. imports, moving through ports on the East Coast and the Gulf of Mexico. A strike could impact consumer goods, causing shortages and price increases. Shipping costs, already on the rise, will be pushed further upward, both by shortages caused by a strike and by higher labor costs once agreement is reached. With the election so close, President Biden isn’t likely to become involved in the negotiations unless conditions become severe. A strong holiday retail season would be a badly needed boon to the trucking industry, but potential strikes at Eastern ports could remove a lot of freight from the market. In the meantime, both presidential candidates have discussed import tariffs that could dampen trade. Per Diem Boost In other news, per diem rates are increasing from $69 to $80 per day, effective Oct. 1. This 16% increase in per diem amounts to another $21 per day on the road to deduct from the income tax bill. This is especially important for owner-operators who pay self-employment tax, as it can increase tax deductions as much as $3,000 to $4,000 per year. That’s not much difference to struggling trucking businesses … but every little bit helps. In the meantime, truckers are still waiting for conditions to get better.

Video systems and telematics have changed the job of truck driving forever

Professional truck drivers have long been known for their independence. In decades past, the practice was to just give a driver the keys, a truck and a dispatch and turn them loose with instructions to call if there was a problem. Most of the time, the job got done. For the most part, those days are over. In-cab video systems, combined with vehicle telematics and the availability of more data than ever before, have virtually made the “cowboy of the highway” image of trucking obsolete. Today, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is helping guide that process. Perhaps the beginning of the end was when pagers became widely available in the ’80s and ’90s. At any time, dispatchers or other carrier personnel could send a page to a driver; the receipt of that page meant, “stop and call in.” As technology improved, the message delivered by pagers included a phone number, making it possible for more people (anyone with the pager’s number) to contact the driver. Clever users made up numeric codes to convey messages or indicate the priority of the page. Some might say the real demise of trucker independence came with the introduction of satellite tracking and messaging. Dispatchers could pinpoint a driver’s location within a few feet and could send and receive messages nearly at will. These devices communicated other data, too. Carriers not only knew where drivers were, but how fast they were going, how many times they hit the brakes hard, when they idled their trucks and more — all recorded by the truck’s electronic systems and sent directly to dispatch. Of course, cellphones took everything further. Drivers could be contacted almost any time by carrier representatives — and by the folks back at home, too. As cellphones morphed into smartphones — basically handheld computers that “also made phone calls” — apps like FaceTime used video to create the next best thing to actually being there. This actually helped many drivers feel more connected to their family, friends and loved ones (in addition to dispatch). It was only a matter of time until advances in technology led to dash cameras. Like the evolution from cellphones to smartphones, dash cams have evolved into something more. These cameras don’t just take pictures or record video; the devices can also “decide” what video is worth sharing and who should see it. Many of these systems include multiple lenses that record the view to the sides of the vehicle and even inside the cab. Many drivers rebelled, at least at first. After all, no independently minded truck driver wanted the dispatcher or safety staff to be able to look in at will! It didn’t take long, however, for drivers to become more comfortable with the systems. Perhaps the largest benefit of dash cams, many drivers discovered, was exoneration in the event of a collision. Finally, the carrier’s safety department could actually SEE what happened instead of depending on the driver’s story and the police report. In addition, dash cam vendors and motor carriers made convincing arguments that videos showing a driver’s actions would be used for training purposes, providing an opportunity for drivers to improve their skills and safety records. Still, concerns persisted about drivers’ privacy. After all, a camera facing the cab and driver could also record the driver in the sleeper. Drivers could be videoed in stages of undress or while scratching a rather personal spot on their bodies. They might be harassed if a video showed them yawning or not checking a mirror often enough. Those with excellent driving records without crashes or tickets were offended that the carrier wanted more proof of their reliability. Some drivers quit. Most simply adapted. Some carriers compromised by only using data from forward-facing cameras, but many of them, about 25% or so, went with 360-degree systems. AI has improved the process (or made it more invasive, depending on your point of view). Today’s camera systems are designed to record video continuously while the vehicle is in motion; however, all of that video isn’t saved. Obviously, a carrier representative isn’t going to sit and watch hours and hours of video for each driver every day, especially when the driving might occur outside office hours. Video system vendors responded by using vehicle telematics to determine which segments of video to save. If an accelerometer built into the camera detects a sudden slowdown, such as a collision for example, video of the event is saved for review. Telematics send data about hard stops or swerving, which is matched with video for a closer look. Today, AI can read road signs in the video and detect less obvious dangers, including driver behavior. Use of a cellphone while behind the wheel triggers video recording. Some systems combine biometrics and are able to detect driver fatigue based on nodding, yawning or other input. Speed limit data can now be obtained through GPS or routing systems, but AI can detect construction zones or areas where speed limits are reduced. This enables carriers to coach drivers on speeding even when limits are much lower than a company’s maximum speed. Vendors of video systems don’t publicize everything their cameras detect, but AI is used to monitor “unsafe driving behavior” or actions. Not wearing your seat belt? It’ll be on video. Reading a text? Got it. Driving with a drink in one hand and a burger in the other? You’re dining with the safety director. Spending too much time watching the accident across the median, and not enough watching the road? Yep — so is the team back home. These systems now allow service providers and carriers to create a “driver report card.” The newest systems come with a driver interface that alerts the driver, giving them a chance to correct their actions. Views from different cameras are used, so that a lane departure or following too closely will result in a visual and audio warning. These alerts help the driver understand what’s being monitored and recorded so that the behavior can be corrected right away instead of waiting for a discussion with safety. The trucking industry has tried to put together a driver “report card” for many years, with varying degrees of success. Now that more behaviors are observable than ever before, video system vendors are offering their own versions of scoring systems that carriers can use to evaluate drivers — and that drivers can use to evaluate themselves. There’s no stopping progress, as they say. Hopefully, drivers losing part of their independence on the job is balanced by improved safety and efficiency.

What’s in your PSP report? What you don’t know could hurt your chances of employment

For many years, the Federal Motor Carrier Safey Administration (FMCSA) required carriers to perform background checks on all drivers that were hired or leased on with the company. That requirement listed a few specifics about what was to be checked — but few details were provided about who must be contacted, what questions the would-be employer must ask, and what happened if the contact couldn’t (or wouldn’t) provide information. Some carriers had thick personnel files for each driver, while others had very little information available. Because communication between individual states and between states and the FMCSA was haphazard, the process of requesting background information was often also. For example, an accident report in one state might never make it back to the state that issued the driver’s CDL; therefore, the incident wouldn’t show up on the driver’s motor vehicle record (MVR). The FMCSA’s Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) was created to streamline that process and provide a centralized source for carriers to find records of any accidents or incidents in which a driver had been involved, as well as inspection records. What’s in your PSP? The PSP has accomplished its intended purpose in making more information available — but it’s still far from a perfect system. Many drivers still don’t know what their PSP record shows, and the carriers who receive the information may look at it in entirely different ways. The PSP report shows any FMCSA “reportable” crashes in which you have been involved while driving a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) during the past five years. Reportable crashes are those in which there is a fatality, an injury that requires transport for medical care (ambulance), or in which one or both vehicles can’t be driven and must be towed. The PSP also shows the results of any driver or vehicle inspections you have had in the past three years. Any citations you receive as a result of either an accident or an inspection can be included in your PSP report. What the PSP report does NOT show are accidents that happen in your personal vehicle or tickets you receive outside of your CMV. However, a ticket you receive in your work truck could end up on both your PSP report and your state’s (MVR) … or not. Some jurisdictions don’t report to the PSP at all, while a local officer who performed a brief vehicle inspection might. That’s why it’s important for every driver to know what their PSP report contains. Further, if you receive a citation and you later are found not guilty in court or the charge is dismissed, you may need to file a request for a review of your record so it can be corrected. How do carriers use the PSP? As the name implies, the PSP is used by carriers as a part of the screening process for drivers they want to hire. The FMCSA does not assign a score of any kind to the PSP. Although the information can be identical to data in the carrier’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA)v record, the two programs are not the same. One big issue with the PSP report is that carriers interpret the information it contains differently. Some use their own scoring process, assigning “points” to each crash or violation and using a total score when making their hiring decisions. Other carriers may look for particular violations, such as excessive speeding, failure to use seat belts and so on. In addition, since use of the PSP is voluntary, some carriers don’t use it at all. Some carriers look for patterns of behavior in a driver’s PSP. If, for example, if you have multiple violations for failure to secure cargo, a carrier may believe you haven’t learned from those violations and will also fail to secure their cargo. Many vehicle violations could be interpreted as being caused by a driver not inspecting equipment — or possibly that you worked for a carrier that provided older, poorly maintained equipment. How do I know if my PSP record is good? Since the PSP contains information that can keep you from getting a job you want, it’s important that you know what’s in it. Start by going to psp.fmcsa.dot.gov/psp/home and sign up. You can review what’s in your PSP for free. You can also sign up for a free notification service to receive an email whenever there’s a change to your record so you can make sure it’s accurate. Knowing what’s on your PSP allows you to be sure the employment application you fill out matches your actual record. If a crash was relatively minor, remembering dates, locations and details might be difficult … but if you leave it off your application and it turns up on your PSP report, it could be considered a falsification. What if I find a mistake on my record? If you find something on your PSP record that isn’t true, or if something has changed — for example, you’ve been acquitted of a violation for which you received a violation — you can request a review at dataqs.fmcsa.dot.gov. If you submit a request, along with the paperwork showing the acquittal, the violation will be removed from your record. If you are convicted of a lesser charge, your record will reflect that too; however, you may have to request a review and provide documentation. Some charges are dealt with by adjudication, such as a court supervision agreement that removes a violation from your record if you attend classes or don’t get another ticket during a specified time period. If you’ve met the requirements, the original violation can be removed from your PSP also, if you request a review and submit the paperwork. Violations issued to drivers who are part of a team sometimes end up on the PSP record of both drivers. Filing a request for review can start the process of getting your record corrected, but you may need to send copies of your record of duty status or other documentation. Even if you aren’t successful getting information removed from your PSP record, knowing what’s on it can help you prepare to answer any questions asked by a prospective employer. If you have a reasonable explanation about a reported violation, the carrier may be more comfortable making a decision to hire you than if you didn’t know it was on your record.

Knowing your cost per mile can make or break a small trucking business

It’s not difficult to tell which small trucking business owners don’t have a handle on the economics of their business. They tend to explain things in generalities. For example, “It used to cost about $700 to fill up my truck, but now it’s $1,000.” They’ll talk about how many dollars they usually take home in a week, or how they used to get paid a certain amount to go to Albuquerque, but now it’s less. “About” is a word they use frequently. On the other hand, owners who truly manage their business understand that generalized data and statistics are meaningless. These business owners track their expenses by the mile, and they can tell you — to the penny —their actual cost of operations. Some total those expenses every month or maybe every quarter, adjusting their business plan as they go. Some calculate costs for each trip, but small sample sizes aren’t usually as meaningful. In short: The most successful trucking company owners are intimately familiar with their cost per mile. Most begin with tracking revenue. In most operations, rates for some loads are disappointing, while others might be a little more profitable. Knowing your revenue per mile helps you make better decisions. If you’ve been averaging a certain amount per mile and you’re offered a load that comes in lower, you can consider specific factors, such as how this load positions you to pick up the next load or how the timing fits with your need for home time. Track your fuel costs. Smart business managers know what their fuel cost is for every mile. They track miles driven and gallons of fuel purchased, and they incorporate fuel surcharge payments received. They have a gross cost per mile for fuel as well as a net cost after applying the fuel surcharge. They track expenditures for DEF, too. Fuel cost is likely to be the biggest expense an owner operator has, but there are other important items, too. Factor in costs of repairs, as well as the cost of downtime. Many truck owners have experienced the shock of a large repair bill — but at the end of the year, they can’t determine the actual impact that expense had on their business’s bottom line. But it takes time to be able to estimate repair costs for the coming year. If you know your maintenance costs were 12.5 cents per mile last year, you can multiply that by the number of miles you intend to drive to calculate approximately what you’ll spend in the coming year. If you know that you’ll have a major expense, like an engine overhaul, in the coming year, you can adjust your estimate to accommodate the cost. There is another cost of maintenance, too, that of lost business. If you know what your typical revenue is per day, you can calculate how much revenue you’ll lose each day your truck is in the shop for repairs. It’s usually better if you can schedule repairs during time you were planning to be off anyway … but things don’t always work out that way. It’s important to remember that trips to the maintenance facility involve TWO checks; the one you write for the repairs and the one you don’t get for hauling freight while the truck was in the shop. Tires are a maintenance item, but some owners calculate the cost separately. This is helpful when you need a true picture of what you’re spending on tires, recaps and repairs. Fixed costs can add up. Some fixed costs, like truck payments and insurance premiums, can look better or worse depending on the miles you drive. You may not be able to make your truck payment smaller — but you can reduce the cost per mile by simply driving more miles. Insurance payments, registration and tags, parking spot rent and other expenditures all fit in this category. Due to post-COVID inflation, interest rates have risen considerably. More of each month’s truck payment is devoted to interest payment than in the past. If you’re planning to purchase new equipment, the down payment required may be higher than it was in the past. But there’s another area where credit cost can eat up a budget: Revolving credit. Most credit cards have an adjustable rate of interest. The rate fluctuates depending on several factors, including the interest rate charged by the Federal Reserve to lenders. The average interest rate for credit cards is now in excess of 20%. On Sept. 18, the Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate by a half-point, an unusually high drop. Unfortunately for those with existing debt, it won’t impact your interest rate very much, if at all. If you MUST use credit cards for business expenses (and many of you do), pay off the balances as quickly as possible. Know the terms from your credit card company, such as the period when balances are carried to the next month and interest is charged. You could get charged with a month’s interest even though you paid the balance long before the month ended. If you have several credit cards, consider implementing the “avalanche” method of debt reduction. By paying as much as you can to the card with the highest interest rate and making minimum payments on other cards, you’ll eliminate the largest interest expense sooner. Then you can work on the others. As you are calculating cost per mile for different items, it might be helpful to track interest expense separately. That helps you identify where you may need a consolidation loan or other action to reduce costs. Day-to-day expenses also eat into your profits. Don’t forget to track expenses for meals, lodging, tolls, broker fees and even miscellaneous items like shampoo, water bottles, etc. When it comes to daily expenses, the old adage that the first step to managing something is measuring it definitely applies. Ask for help if you need it. There are companies and organizations that offer assistance in tracking your expenses. Some offer forms or programs to assist you in keeping track. For example, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA)v has a fill-in form that will do the calculations for you if you answer some questions. DAT and Truckstop, two websites known for load boards, offer a wealth of tools and advice — and a lot of it’s free. A quick internet search will turns up several sites that offer downloadable spreadsheets. If you’re managing your business properly, your take-home pay isn’t simply what’s left over after expenses. (You should know what your own pay costs per mile, too!)

CVSA works to keep drivers and vehicles rolling safely

Many drivers dread entering weigh stations — but not because of the scales. (Hopefully, they’ve already weighed their trucks and made the necessary adjustments so they know they’re running legal.) It’s that lighted arrow pointing to the inspection area, or the words “pull it around back” emanating from a speaker that can generate fear, or at least impatience, in every driver. No driver ever says, “Yes! An inspection!” Keep in mind, though, that these inspections are critical to keeping the trucking industry rolling safely down the road. Inspection data shows the justification for continued inspections. During the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s (CVSA) 2023 Roadcheck inspection blitz, 59,429 vehicles were inspected. Nineteen percent of those vehicles — that’s nearly one in five — were found to have out-of-service (OOS) defects. Another 5.5% of the drivers inspected were found to have OOS violations. It’s important to note that the CVSA’s 72-hour Roadcheck inspection is always announced well in advance, focus areas are publicized, and information about what to check and how to pass an inspection is distributed. The 2023 Roadcheck was not a surprise — yet almost one in five trucks failed. Who’s in charge? Most drivers don’t know who performs these inspections and who sets the rules. While just about any law enforcement officer can check a driver’s paperwork or issue a citation for equipment defects, the CVSA sets the inspection standard. What is CVSA? In a nutshell, it’s a nonprofit organization that includes local, state, provincial, territorial and federal commercial motor vehicle (CMV) safety officials and industry representatives. The mission of the group is to prevent CMV crashes, injuries and fatalities by providing guidance and education for the trucking industry and enforcement agencies. This partnership between government and industry helps make sure the same standards are used across North America to determine the safety of CMVs. When CVSA-qualified inspectors check an item, they’re following CVSA guidelines for determining what a defect is and whether it should put the driver or vehicle OOS. The organization determines what gets inspected, how it’s inspected, what constitutes a violation and when the vehicle or driver should be placed out of service. During CVSA’s fiscal year 2023 (Oct. 1, 2022-Sept. 30, 2023), the group says nearly 4 million inspections were conducted in North America, with more than 1.3 million decals indicating “no critical defects found” were issued. More than 16,000 copies were sold of CVSA’s North American Standard Out-Of-Service Criteria books in printed and electronic form. Training is accomplished through in-person events, meetings and conferences and webinars. Inspectors are certified for different levels of inspection. Wait. There are inspection levels? CVSA conducts eight levels of inspection. Which inspection is performed can depend on available inspectors, the cargo and other considerations. Level I is the classic “everything” inspection. Driver documents such as CDL, medical card and Skill Performance Certificate are checked, along with the record of duty status, vehicle inspection reports and seat belt use. A complete vehicle inspection is included. (Note: A Level I inspection includes the items from Level III and Level V inspections.) Level II is a walk-around inspection of the vehicle, checking systems that can be observed without crawling underneath, as well as all of the driver documents. Level III inspections deal with the driver’s credentials. When the driver is instructed to bring paperwork into the weigh station office, it’s often for a Level III inspection. Vehicle documents, such as registration and authority, can be checked. With electronic logs (ELDs), inspectors may go to the vehicle or may request faxed or electronic copies of the driver’s record-of-duty status. Level IV inspections are conducted for special purposes, such as a government study of a particular item or document. Level V inspections are thorough checks of the vehicle. The driver does not need to be present. These can be conducted where the truck is parked or abandoned. Level VI inspections involve radioactive materials classified as waste or route-controlled quantities. Most drivers will never experience this level of inspection. Level VII are jurisdictional in nature, usually specified by a government agency. For example, a county might mandate that all school buses in the county must be checked for broken windshields. A full inspection may not be necessary, and CVSA certified instructors are not required. Level VIII inspections are electronic and could be conducted without the driver being aware. Records such as the driver’s CDL and medical card, registration, duty status and more can be wirelessly checked without stopping the vehicle. If the vehicle portion of a Level I or Level V inspection is passed with no critical violations, a CVSA decal may be placed on the vehicle. The decal must be placed by a certified instructor and is valid for three months. A vehicle bearing the CVSA decal generally won’t be inspected again until the decal expires … but there are no guarantees. If an inspector notices something that should be checked, if the vehicle breaks down or if the jurisdiction is checking trucks that meet specific criteria, an inspection can be conducted regardless of whether the vehicle has a sticker. Is the CVSA out to “get” drivers? While being chosen for an inspection can be inconvenient and anxiety inducing, it’s important to remember that the CVSA is there to look out for the interests of everyone, including you. While it’s true that lives have been saved by removing unsafe trucks from the road, there’s another way to look at it: Inspections often catch problems before they escalate to critical or OOS status, providing the truck owner with the opportunity to make repairs before an expensive breakdown (or a crash) can occur. Inspections also help educate drivers on what to look for in pre-trip inspections and alert them to what they might be missing. That makes everyone safer and, from a business perspective, helps truck owners keep maintenance costs down. In short, the CVSA serves as a partnership that brings together motor carriers, vehicle manufacturers, law enforcement — and, of course, drivers.