TheTrucker.com

Can the COVID-19 crisis serve as a ‘vaccination’ against nuclear verdicts in trucking?

The COVID-19 crisis isn’t the type of tunnel a nation enters with expectations of an ever-brightening light ahead. After all, an enemy with the ability to kill millions and destroy the global economy isn’t something a nation can look beyond. But in terms of the trucking industry and its executives, drivers and support personnel, history may view the current crisis as a turning point. 2020 could go down as the year truck drivers attained a status similar to what first responders received after 9/11 — heroes, or at least doers of heroic deeds. The shift in public opinion has been a long time coming. Not since the 1970s, when public opinion of truckers was based more on myth than reality, have truck drivers been as popular as they are today. Crisis situations tend to pull the veil from decades of misconceptions and negative publicity. Public-opinion surveys as recent as last October deemed tractor-trailers and their drivers as menaces of highways. But as the COVID-19 crisis spread, anecdotal evidence sprung up signaling a change of opinion. The vital role the trucking industry plays in the nation’s economy shone brightly, and Americans have recognized it. Billboards offering thanks to truckers have popped up along interstates and highways, and testaments of drivers being personally thanked by strangers are numerous. Small businesses are even making special efforts to ensure drivers have what they need to keep them safe as they make the deliveries that will help save the economy. An early April White House ceremony sang the praises of truck drivers. President Trump stated that “America’s truck drivers are the foot soldiers carrying us to victory,” a reference to the many drivers working seven days a week to complete deliveries of essential freight. Ultimately, if the trucking industry is truly to be thanked for its efforts, the evidence may first be seen in the legal system, where juries have increasingly returned “nuclear” verdicts against the industry. Americans aren’t known for their sympathies for insurance companies. After all, dealing with an insurance company can bring 10 times the aggravation of being involved in a car accident. When the insurer does meet its obligations, it frequently sends its “thank you” in the form of a skyrocketing premium or outright cancellation of a policy. Insurance companies are not blameless in the high costs of driving a vehicle, and they share the blame for the crippling premiums truck drivers and carriers pay to fulfill their “heroic” roles. Still, insurance companies increase premiums to remain viable, cover costs and turn a profit. Maintaining the benefits insurers once provided for their customers became more difficult when personal-injury lawyers factored into the equation. Their ability to convince juries to return “nuclear” verdicts against the trucking industry played no small role in building the negative public opinion of the trucking industry in recent decades. The hundreds of personal-injury lawyer billboards lining the roadways of any large American city are hard to miss. For every billboard thanking truck drivers, a hundred continue to encourage motorists to speed to the nearest law firm if they have even a minor run-in with a tractor-trailer. The personal-injury attorneys specializing in incidents involving trucks on the highways are masters at twisting information and statistics to convince motorists and juries that trucks are the bane of highway traffic. Take for instance the statistics involving rear-end collisions. When a rear-end collision happens, fault is seldom placed on the leading vehicle or its driver. After all, it’s a matter of following distance. If the proper distance is maintained, the trailing vehicle’s driver will be able to stop before hitting the lead vehicle. The basic safety measure is as sure as the law of gravity, and every state has traffic laws against “following too close.” A personal-injury attorney is skilled at convincing a jury that a traffic law that’s almost as sure as the law of gravity does not apply in the case of a rear-end collision involving injury or death. The attorney’s arguments deem basic traffic laws insignificant; in fact, any actions of the lead vehicle’s driver are immaterial. And the arguments can result in the type of nuclear verdicts that juries are returning with increasing frequency. The tactics an attorney uses to reverse fault in the case of a rear-end collision are simple. One law firm, known to motorists for its countless billboards vilifying tractor-trailers, openly explains the approach on its website. Fault in such an accident, according to what is posted on the firm’s site as of April 17, 2020, does not rest with either driver; instead, the vehicle itself is at fault. For instance, if the tractor-trailer was equipped with “truck under ride guards” (TUG), shields intended to prevent vehicles from becoming trapped beneath a trailer, the number of accidents involving injuries or fatalities would plummet. Currently, the website claims that federal safety standards require TUGs on trucks weighing over 10,000 pounds. But it also states that the FMCSA is considering strengthening requirements to include TUGs on the front, rear and sides of all trucks. In other words, the attorney’s argument is that the law does not necessarily require TUGs in all situations, but it should. That’s enough for juries to return large judgments in favor of the plaintiffs. While insurance companies are busy defending lawsuits against freight carriers, the seemingly improved public image of truck drivers on jury verdicts remains to be seen. In July 2019, Rep. Matt Cartwright (D-Penn.) introduced a bill that would increase the minimum liability insurance a trucking company must carry from $750,000 to $4.5 million, an increase of 500%. If passed, the bill would force many small carriers to cease operations under the weight of increasing insurance premiums. To date, Rep. Cartwright’s bill has not gained traction, possibly in part to Rep. Cartwright history as an attorney with a reputation for suing freight carriers. His family still operates a law firm, so in debate, the question of conflict of interest would weigh heavily on the bill’s chances of advancing. For many, Rep. Cartwright’s bill will be viewed as a means of providing “reptile” attorneys access to the riches held in every tractor-trailer on the road — rolling ATM machines, if you will. Then again, the public already has negative perceptions of personal-injury lawyers, yet jurors still return nuclear verdicts rewarding their efforts. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao said at the White House event honoring truck drivers, “Truckers are playing a heroic role in helping America cope during this crisis and will play a critical role in economic recovery.” It is too soon to determine the impact of the public’s sudden and dramatic positive view of truck drivers in the past several weeks. But with government officials and business owners lauding them as heroes, will juries continue to view the industry a rolling ATM machine? For the time being, those monitoring the tractor-trailer versus personal-injury-attorney battle may find counting billboards to be the most accurate barometer. [Photo Credit: AP Photo: Matt York]

Ted Daffan: Musical pioneer satisfies society’s simple needs with simple song

Louisiana-born Ted Daffan (1912-1996) had already made his mark as a singer/songwriter in southeast Texas when he pulled into a roadside diner one evening in 1938. Little did he know the diner would inspire a new song — a short, simple tune that would make Daffan a pioneer of a new category of American music. Historians agree that when Ted Daffan went home and penned the lyrics to “Truck Driver’s Blues,” he gave birth to “truck-driving music,” a genre that lives on 82 years later. The irony of the background to “Truck Driver’s Blues” is that Daffan’s simple observations and simple lyrics satisfied the needs of a society in the grips of the Great Depression, a society for which simplicity was a luxury. In the process, the song also made Ted Daffan quite wealthy for a musician of the time. After graduating from Lufkin (Texas) High School in 1930, Daffan taught himself to play the Hawaiian guitar, the metallic sound of Hawaiian music catching his ear. By 1933, he played well enough to land a spot with The Blue Islanders, a band with a regular radio show on Houston’s KTRH. When The Blue Islanders folded, he played with other bands such as The Blue Playboys and The Bar-X Cowboys, signaling a movement toward western swing. Daffan held an interest in electronics, particularly how they could be used to improve instrumental music. During the 1930s, he experimented with amplified guitars and operated a shop in Houston specializing in electrical instruments. By the end of the decade, Daffan and his amplified steel guitar blazed a new trail in western swing, a style of music previously known for its use of twin fiddles. The steel guitar put the “twang” in western swing — and eventually in mainstream country music. Today the instrument is regarded as one of most difficult to master. But Daffan was ahead of his time. Daffan considered himself a songwriter first and a performer second. “Truck Driver’s Blues,” the song for which he is arguably best remembered, took shape two years before he began a serious recording career. Daffan turned to fiddle-playing bandleader Cliff Bruner with his song, hoping Bruner and his Texas Wanderers could make it suitable for airplay. Likewise, Bruner had a contract with Decca Records, the label that gave Bing Crosby his break in the music business. History proves Daffan made a wise choice. The story of “Truck Driver’s Blues” is almost too perfect to be anything but a legend, but it is a story music historians repeat as factual. Daffan’s stop at the unknown roadside café, perhaps a precursor to the truck stops of later years, gave him the chance to observe several truck drivers. As Daffan waited for his meal he watched, as one after another, the drivers parked their rigs andentered the diner. Before sitting down, every driver stopped at the jukebox, put in a couple of nickels and hung around to hear a favorite tune. Realizing that Depression-era truck drivers willingly spent five or 10 hard-earned cents on something as simple as a song gave Daffan an idea. What would truck drivers pay if one of those songs in the jukebox focused on the drivers themselves? As the story goes, Daffan saw dollar signs — or at least a lot of nickels — all destined for his pockets. A few hours later he penned what would become the first truck-driving song. When the Texas Wanderers recorded “Truck Driver’s Blues” in early 1939, it was an instant success. In the early days of country music, a major hit sold about 5,000 copies. Released on the Decca Records label, “Truck Driver’s Blues” was not only the top-selling record of 1939, but it also sold a staggering 100,000 copies. Ted Daffan had indeed struck a chord with a new audience, and in the eight decades since, many songwriters and performers have made their marks on music following Daffan’s lead. “The blues” had been around a lot longer than Ted Daffan. In the first few decades of the 20th century, the blues, a music genre thought to have originated in Africa, became mainstream. The Great Depression was a period when most Americans had a case of the blues, and the songs of the 1930s are nothing less than a musical history of the years of poverty. Whether the blues performers sung of breadlines, tax collectors, the Dust Bowl, prohibition, Wall Street, milk cows or perhaps the most collective, “The All In and Down and Out Blues,” the songs struck the collective nerve of society. Daffan recognized the same look of “the blues” in the faces of truck drivers. More than 80 years after The Texas Wanderers recorded “Truck Driver’s Blues,” the lyrics are just as applicable as they were in 1939. Drivers of the 21st century may travel America on controlled-access highways designed for speed rather than the winding two-lane roads following pig trails of days gone by, but the worries of yesteryear remain alive in the trucking industry. Like many blues-related songs, “Truck Driver’s Blues” begins with a familiar line of misery, “Feelin’ tired and weary.” Beyond those opening words, however, Daffan sums up the life of a truck driver in just three short phrases: “Keep them wheels a-rolling, I ain’t got no time to lose. There’s a honky-tonk gal a waitin’ and I’ve got troubles to drown. Never did have nothin’, I got nothing much to lose — just a low-down feelin’, truck driver’s blues.” Those sentiments, the same truck drivers have today, are what “Truck Driver’s Blues” put to music — no time to lose, troubles to drown and nothing left to lose (other than the blues). “Truck Driver’s Blues” is a simple song written in simple times. And as Daffan discovered after an evening in a roadside café, satisfying Americans’ simple desires through simplicity itself can be lucrative — and groundbreaking. Until next time, when you’re feeling tired and weary, stay safe and pull off the highway. Staying safe can keep the blues at bay.

At the Truck Stop: Retired U.S. Air Force firefighter serves multiple roles as a Schneider Ride of Pride driver

David Buck has spent a career pulling double duty, and it has served him well. In fact, when Schneider chose Buck from its pool of military veteran employees as a driver in its Ride of Pride program, his proven ability to handle multiple tasks likely made him an obvious selection. For a man who has served his country and its veterans in both military and civilian roles, driving the Ride of Pride truck, “The American,” is double duty Buck considers a privilege. Personal values and collective success Before entering high school in Springfield, Illinois, Buck’s parents placed him on the road to success by helping him focus on values. While his grandfather, father and uncle had previously served in the military, carrying on a family tradition wasn’t what called Buck to enlist. “I didn’t feel pressure to join,” said Buck. “I truly felt a passion and calling to serve my country.” For Buck, the calling lasted much longer than his original four-year commitment; in fact, even after retirement from a 20-year Air Force career, he still feels the calling and passion to serve. Buck knows distractions can cause him to exit his highway to success, but he keeps his eyes on the road and lets his values guide the way. The Air Force taught Buck that honor and sacrifice walk hand in hand He learned that increased responsibility comes with the duty of accountability. And he realized how honor, sacrifice, responsibility and duty work together to benefit the Air Force, fellow airmen and the collective culture of America. Overall, learning the importance of standing for something larger than himself fueled Buck’s journey. Double duty in the 21st century David Buck’s military specialty was firefighting. He could have geared up, responded to the occasional Air Force fire and fulfilled his most important duty. But firefighting is more than just extinguishing blazes. Buck trained constantly to learn the protocols for attacking various fire situations. He passed his knowledge on to airmen in other specialties, introducing them to the fire risks inherent in their normal course of duties and how to prevent or handle them if an emergency occurs. As an airman, Buck served both stateside and overseas, including a deployment to Saudi Arabia in support of the War on Terror. When he retired from the military he didn’t leave his passion behind. In fact, the direction he chose did not take him far from his military roots. Buck went to work for Camp Butler National Cemetery in Springfield, Illinois, a cemetery where 20,000 veterans dating back to the Civil War are buried. He began as a landscaper and later worked as master gardener for the Veteran’s Administration. Although Buck held a civilian job, he continued to serve his country by honoring veterans and their families. Buck soon decided his career needed a more radical shift. He didn’t realize it wasn’t as radical as he first believed. Changing roles and new challenges “I got my CDL and started driving,” said Buck. Buck chose a truck-driving career out of love for traveling and driving. The “career” part was a bonus, he said. Schneider, a Wisconsin-based carrier founded in 1935 and today employs more than 20,000 people, both trained and hired Buck. In 2018, Schneider honored Buck’s military service when handing him the keys to “The American,” a Freightliner decorated as a rolling tribute to veterans. Suddenly Buck was back to serving double duty — representing Schneider’s company values and, once again, honoring U.S. veterans. “I was an ambassador for Schneider all over the country,” he said. “I drove the truck in veterans’ parades and to driving schools, job fairs and military events.” He is especially proud of driving in the honor convoy for the Wreaths Across America (WAA) program. The national nonprofit works with volunteers, including truck drivers and carriers, to deliver wreaths to display on gravesites at veterans’ cemeteries across the country. “It’s the longest veterans’ parade in the country,” he said. The WAA convoy traveled from Columbia Falls, Maine, to Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia, hauling wreaths to be placed in the most hallowed cemetery in America. “We received police escorts every mile of the 740-mile trip,” Buck said. Along with other members of the convoy, Buck delivered wreaths honoring 400,000 U.S. veterans buried in the cemetery. “There are 18 veteran-related memorials and monuments depicted in the artwork on ‘The American,’” said Buck. “I’ve driven the truck to 12 so far.” Slowing down and coming home Buck still drives “The American,” but he’s no longer a full-time Schneider ambassador; instead, he drives a dedicated route. “A month or so back I took on a dedicated route pulling Walmart reefers,” he said. “After a few years of being away from home, I like the free time a dedicated route offers.” But Buck still makes the rounds to events and appearances with his truck. “I see a lot of jaw-dropping when people walk up to the truck,” said Buck. “Lots ask if they can take pictures.” That’s exactly what Schneider and Daimler Trucks hoped for when beginning the Ride of Pride program. Buck said he hopes to drive two or three more years before moving into a training or safety role. “Safety was my job for 20 years,” he said. “I’d like to put those skills to work.” When Buck no longer drives “The American,” he’ll pass the keys to another driver selected from Schneider’s pool of drivers with military service. Hopefully his successor will feel the same sense of privilege Buck felt as a Schneider Ride of Pride ambassador. Come to think of it, maybe David Buck hasn’t made a career performing double duty after all. As far as Buck is concerned, his career is not about multitasking; it represents but one example of the collective role we all play as U.S. citizens — being Americans.

For a classic country trucking song of the modern era, look no further than ‘King George’

My previous columns, I believe, have made the point that my preferences in country music rest in the “classic” era — or almost anything recorded prior to about 1993. Still, one artist transcends time: George Strait.  From the first time I spun “Strait Country” on my turntable as a 15-year-old in 1981, I was hooked on the music of the artist who would one day be known as “King George” to millions. As much as I hated to fall in step with the crowd, it would have been impossible to part ways with George Strait and his 60 No. 1 singles. After all, I considered myself a George Strait “original.” I didn’t jump on the bandwagon midway through a career that saw him rack up more chart-topping songs than Elvis, the Beatles, and Strait’s closest competitor, Conway Twitty.  Strait covered a lot of territory before recording a pure truck-driving song, but it finally came on his 2008 CD, “Troubadour.” Solo performers and groups normally only release three or four songs as singles out of the 10 or 12 recorded on a CD. Over the years, Strait has recorded dozens of “would be” chart-toppers that never received radio airplay. “Brothers of the Highway” is just one, and in the opinion of a few truck drivers who have emailed me about the song, it might be his best.  The beauty of “Brothers of the Highway” is not so much in the way Strait presents the song; rather it is the way co-writers — including the late Kim Williams, Nichole Witt and Doug Johnson — composed the lyrics. The trio of writers skillfully connected the golden age of truck-driving songs — often considered a sort of musical mythology — with the reality of the important role truck drivers play in keeping the nation’s economy moving. In fact, in choosing Strait to record the song, the writers made a masterful selection. While remaining true to his musical roots, Strait has a proven record of successfully crossing boundaries throughout his career, one now entering its fifth decade.   “Brothers of the Highway” offers listeners a choice when categorizing it in a country-music sub-genre. In two minutes and 43 seconds, Strait sings a love song, a road song, a truck-driving song and a ballad — one of pirates and heroes.  The title, “Brothers of the Highway,” prepares the listener for what lies ahead. It begins as a love song, as Strait sings of a driver once again saying good-bye to his wife who, like other wives Strait describes in countless songs of rodeo and life as a musician, knows she can’t hold him back from his calling to the highway.  Next, as the driver pulls onto the road, Strait gives a nod to the 1960s and ’70s, when truck-driving songs built up drivers as modern-day cowboys. When Burt Reynolds solidified the image of a truck driver as a cowboy, outlaw and hero in the movie “Smokey and the Bandit,” he successfully tied generations of truck drivers together in a brotherhood reminiscent of pirates in early America. For all their flaws, pirates have carried a historical flair, leaving a taste of adventure in the mouths of the many children and adults who dream of the days when, as leaders of the brotherhood, captains like Johnny Depp guided ships.  Strait wastes no time connecting the beloved outlaws of days gone by to modern-day truckers through metaphors comparing those brotherhoods of buccaneers and the ships they sailed to the modern brotherhood of drivers and their terrestrial “ships” that carry cargo to all corners of the country. Both pirates and truck drivers head for the sunset, the trucks sailing on the freedom of the open road. Still, just as the listener’s mind drifts to childhood dreams of playing pirates with a fallen tree or even a cardboard box as a ship, Strait abruptly returns to reality. After all, unlike pirates who didn’t follow itineraries, truck drivers don’t have the same freedom. The highways and roads don’t allow for the same type of travel as the open seas.   In listing destinations and routes truckers might drive coast to coast (“Carolina west to Denver, Baton Rouge east to Pittsburg, Portland south to San Diego — sail on, sail on”), Strait does offer the illusion of free, open roads, albeit with a sense of urgency pirates seldom felt. After all, “truck-stop coffee, goes running through his veins” keeps the driver moving toward a destination a pirate only reached in a drunken state with an empty barrel of rum by his side.  Finally, Strait concludes with a line proving, if the listener has yet to catch on, that “Brothers of the Highway” is a different type of trucking song. Rather than contributing to the outlaw image of truckers — dodging scales, tearing up “swindle sheets” or taking “little white pills” to keep their eyes open wide — “Brothers of the Highway” is a tribute to truck drivers and the miles they travel in service to America.   In the 12 years since George Strait recorded “Brothers of the Highway,” the song has been covered by the bluegrass group Dailey & Vincent and more recently by a real-life truck driver, Tony Justice, joined by former driver-turned-musician Aaron Tippen. When the song wraps up with the line, “God bless you, brothers of the highway, children of the wind,” the meaning of the tune is clear. With it, Strait added a truck-driving song to his discography and, as he so often does with all topics of which he sings, he offered truck drivers the praises of a king.  

Trucker’s invention could be answer to many icing situations leading to jackknifed rigs

CHICAGO — “Jackknifing” is a trucking-related term most nontruckers understand. Many have passed the scene of an accident involving a jackknifed trailer during their travels. Unfortunately, jackknifing is a relatively common cause of accidents involving tractor-trailers, and drivers must remain alert and at the ready to handle a potential jackknifing situation. Keeping their rigs upright and on the road, and avoiding collisions with other vehicles, is something drivers may be able to read about, but it takes experience at the wheel to truly understand. Today, thanks to a former OTR driver, a proactive method helping to prevent jackknifing situations is now on the market. Bob Allen, a driver with 38 years of experience who now works for the City of Chicago, spent years thinking about a method to prevent brake lines from freezing. In 2013 he invented a prototype, and his invention, “The Brake Releaser,” manufactured by Milton Industries, hit the market late last year. “There’s a lot of reasons a tractor-trailer can jackknife,” Allen told The Trucker. “Most often, the brake shoes aren’t adjusted properly. But a trailer with frozen brakes is also common.” The Brake Releaser is designed to prevent frozen brake situations. Allen’s story began about 30 years ago. As a 28-year-old with seven years of driving experience already under his belt, Allen experienced a near-miss in a winter storm north of Indianapolis. “The weather conditions were a virtual whiteout,” Allen said. “Through the snow, I saw what I thought was another rig jackknifing alongside my truck.” Allen acted quickly, accelerating to move out of the other rig’s unpredictable path. After driving clear of the perceived threat, he realized the “other rig” was not another rig at all — instead, it was his own trailer on the verge of passing his tractor. Allen had narrowly escaped jackknifing his own rig and slamming into an Indiana State Trooper’s vehicle. Allen pulled his rig over. Using a time-proven but time-consuming method drivers still use today, he warmed his frozen trailer-brake system with a torch, using a hammer to release the brakes. Considering the weather conditions, working on the side of the road and getting the brakes to release was not only difficult but also dangerous. That experience in the bitter cold of a Midwest winter provided the inspiration Bob Allen needed. Knowing that frozen brakes were what caused his trailer to jackknife, Allen thought hard about ways to keep brake fluid and components from freezing or thickening in cold weather. He recognized moisture as a braking system’s worst enemy, especially in freezing conditions. Hammers, torches and possibly de-icing fluid were useful after a driver recognized an icing situation, but safety called for something to prevent brakes from freezing in the first place. Allen sought a proactive solution. “It really didn’t take a lot of time to figure it out,” he said. “I had the idea in my mind quite a few years, but I never had the money to pursue it.” In 2013, Allen created a prototype device that allowed a driver to inject a de-icing solution into a trailer’s brake system, either upon realizing moisture is in the system or in preparation for the truck to operate in extremely cold conditions. It took several years, but after several drivers proved the worth of Allen’s prototype, he happened to meet someone who was interested in manufacturing and marketing the device. “It was a true case of being in the right place at the right time,” Allen said. “I’d met the former CEO of Milton Industries through a friend, and he encouraged the new CEO to look at my device,” Allen said. “He was very interested. My prototype was even the same color as the Milton Industries logo.” In short order, Milton Industries and Allen signed a long-term licensing agreement. The company has secured patents on the device in the U.S. and Canada and has applied for a patent in Europe. Milton placed the device on the market last November, just in time for winter. “The Brake Releaser,” the name Milton Industries gave the device, is a small reservoir attached to the trailer emergency gladhand line and the tractor service hose. Holding about 8 ounces of de-icing fluid, the driver can easily access the reservoir, fill it, and after replacing the cap, turn a valve to let the fluid enter the brake system. A “chirping” noise will indicate the fluid is flowing. Before The Brake Releaser, if a driver wanted to pretreat a trailer’s brake line with fluid, it meant pouring de-icer into the narrow inlet of the emergency line and then holding the line as high as possible. Gravity would — hopefully — pull the fluid into the brake system. Often, more of the flammable fluid poured onto the driver and the ground than into the brake line. “The Brake Releaser is not something a driver should use after realizing the brakes have nearly frozen,” Allen said. “If I know the temperature is going to be at or below freezing where I’m driving, I’ll pretreat in the morning and be set for 24 hours.” The device is not designed to be permanently installed; in fact, a safety mechanism prevents the truck from moving with The Brake Releaser attached. The device is a safe and proactive way to help drivers prevent freezing before it happens. Servicing a tractor-trailer braking system before driving takes only a couple of minutes. According to Milton Industries’ website, The Brake Releaser is designed as a backup to the truck cab’s heater. When the heater malfunctions, or when temperatures are so low the heater is ineffective, a driver can use The Brake Releaser as an alternative to the “torch and hammer” method. The Brake Releaser can handle air-line pressures up to 300 psi and prevent freezing of brake components in temperatures as low as -40 degrees Fahrenheit. At a retail price of $349, Milton Industries states The Brake Releaser will easily pay for itself in a single winter, citing the costs of calling a technician, paying travel costs, and time and labor expenses to thaw a frozen brake component. The product inventor echoes Milton Industries’ marketing efforts. “The product is geared more for independent drivers,” Allen said. “If a driver breaks down, it could be a three- or four-hour wait to get a service call, plus the cost of service.” Allen is attempting to convince the State of Illinois to mandate that the device be required for all trucks compatible with The Brake Releaser. Likewise, Milton Industries is in the process of becoming an approved vendor with the U.S. military. In the first few months, Allen said, sales have gone well. As for the future, Allen said he has a few other inventions in mind to improve the truck-driving experience. But for now, he is concentrating on helping Milton Industries turn The Brake Releaser into a widely used and profitable product. When that happens, Allen has ideas for his portion of the profits. “I want to build churches,” he said. “The reality of it is that this is God’s work anyway. I’ve been thinking of it all this time, and no one else has come up with the idea, so He gave it to me for a reason. I think building some churches and helping people is a good thing to do.”

With U.S.-Canada borders closed to non-essential travel, attention turns to nation’s southern border

As of March 16, the U.S. had provided little information about restricting travel at its southern border with Mexico. Most discussions regarding the Mexico border related to illegal immigration and Border Patrol directives to agents that they should return any Mexican residents caught crossing the border to their country immediately rather than follow normal agency procedures. In fact, discussions of border restrictions were more active in Mexico than the U.S., as the Mexican government sought to protect its citizens from an expansive COVID-19 outbreak. This morning, March 18, the U.S. reported confirmed cases of COVID-19 had reached 7,678 nationwide, with 117 deaths attributed to the virus to date. Mexico, on the other hand, has reported 93 confirmed cases and zero deaths. Mexican officials did, however, indicate that the country’s confirmed cases rose over 13% from the previous day. But with the U.S. ranking No. 8 in reported cases worldwide, Mexico remains far down the list, and officials want to keep it that way. Mexican government officials are concerned about Americans entering Mexico. “If it were technically necessary to consider mechanisms of restriction or stronger surveillance, we would have to take into account not that Mexico would bring the virus to the United States, rather that the United States could bring it here,” Deputy Health Minister Hugo Lopez-Gatell said. Mexican agents have been photographed wearing masks and other protective gear at border stations. Economists fear any restrictions related to trade would be catastrophic for businesses operating on both sides of the border. Interfering with commerce would also impact Canada as the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, like its predecessor, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) ensures the flow of freight between all three North American countries. While Mexico’s officials consider options and ramifications of closing its border with the U.S., in the past 24 hours, U.S. officials have ramped up discussions related to the border. Such restrictions could follow similar measures mutually agreed upon by the U.S. and Canada this morning that restrict all non-essential travel between the countries. “Non-essential travel” does not including movement of freight including that hauled by trucks. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Trump Administration is considering a plan to close the border to asylum seekers and others without permission to enter the country. Ports of entry would remain open to U.S. citizens and others with permission to cross into the U.S. from Mexico. President Trump has indicated that he does not want to close the border with Mexico, and if the decision is made to do so, freight movement will not be affected. Authority to make border decisions in cases of pandemics and similar threats rests with the U.S. Surgeon General who by U.S. code has the power “to prohibit, in whole or in part, the introduction of persons and property from such countries or places as he shall designate in order to avert such danger, and for such period of time as he may deem necessary for such purpose.” Of course, it is unlikely the Surgeon General would act without the agreement of President Trump. This obscure portion of the U.S. code allowing for such restrictions has never been used. As with Canada and today’s announcement closing the U.S.-Canada border to non-essential crossings, the situation along the U.S.-Mexico border is rapidly development. Truck drivers expecting to cross into Mexico or the United States should remain apprised of the latest news.

Keep the U.S. out? Not yet, says Canada

UPDATED: March 18, 12:10 pm CT President Trump announced in a tweet this morning, “We will be, by mutual consent, temporarily closing our Northern Border with Canada to non-essential traffic. Trade will not be affected. Details to follow!” Prime Minister Trudeau stated, “I just spoke to President Trump again this morning and we have agreed that both Canada and the United States will temporarily restrict all non-essential travel across the Canada-U.S. border. Our governments recognize that it is critical we preserve supply chains between both countries.” Trucking will not be affected by this new development Last Friday, the Canadian parliament ratified the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), a replacement for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that has guided trade between the two countries for 26 years. The new agreement is seen as an improvement on NAFTA, filling loopholes and revising the original provisions considered problematic in the time since NAFTA went into effect in 1994. With the Agreement ratified, a 90-day period to guide implementation of USMCA is now underway. But an unwelcome pandemic happened on the way to the planning table. As of this morning, cases of COVID-19 in the U.S. top 5,000,. By comparison, Canada (482) has yet to become a “hot spot” for the virus. Officials hope to keep it that way. Canada is, however, keeping a close eye on the spread of the virus in the U.S. Officials have implemented minimal preventive measures at border crossings, but the precautions are far less restrictive than those placed on most international travel. With the USMCA now ratified and expected to boost the economic advantages over the offered by NAFTA, ironically, COVID-19 may send the economies of the U.S. and Canada, as well as Mexico, into tailspins. The Canadian government, however, recognizes the importance of its relationship with the U.S. on its national security and economy. Foreign? Not Americans, especially truck drivers! In terms of freight, officials say any restrictions will not impact trade or commerce. Both Canadian and U.S. carriers hauling freight will be allowed to cross into Canada, although drivers may experience brief delays as border officers take extra time to question them. “Travel restrictions announced today will not apply to commerce,” said Prime Minister Trudeau, who is under self-quarantine with his family after his wife tested positive for COVID-19 following a trip to Great Britain. “At this point, we are closing our borders to all non-Canadians or non-permanent residents of Canada. We are recognizing for the moment that measure does not apply to U.S. citizens.” The major concern for Canada is that northbound drivers may have visited areas like Seattle, a “hot spot” for potential exposure to COVID-19. On a global scale, Canada’s border restrictions are extensive. Airlines bound for Canada are required to ban passengers displaying COVID-19 symptoms from boarding planes at their points of origin. All international travelers are being routed through just four Canadian airports, although the country has designated 18 as “international” and dozens more as “airports of entry.” Canadians are discouraged from traveling outside the country and may face quarantine requirements upon return. But Prime Minister Trudeau is encouraging Canadians currently overseas to return to the country. “If you’re abroad, it’s time for you to come home,” Trudeau said. “If you’ve just arrived, you must self-isolate for 14 days.” Trudeau also encouraged all Canadians to stay home to prevent exposure to COVID-19. Still, he has not yet suggested that the U.S. poses a significant risk to Canada, despite the disparity in the number of cases reported between the two countries. “We recognize that the level of integration of our two economies and the coordination that we’ve had over the past while, puts the U.S. in a separate category from the rest of the world,” he said. “But we will continue to coordinate with the U.S., and we will continue to examine next steps and measures that must be taken.” Canada-bound truckers need to know… Both U.S. and Canadian officials have notified the Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA) that truck drivers should expect at least some delays at border crossings. Drivers will be subjected to more questions than usual, and they will be observed for COVID-19 symptoms. CTA announced Canadian border officials will “attempt to prioritize the efficient movement of truck drivers and goods as much as possible moving forward.” Canadian truckers returning to Canada from the U.S. will also be observed for symptoms and could be denied entry if they have hauled to high-risk areas such as Seattle during the previous 14 days. “The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is committed to limiting the spread of COVID-19 in Canada. Health and safety remains our top priority,” CBSA’s John Ossowki was quoted as saying in a released statement.  Ossowki said his agency’s response to the pandemic is “measured, proportional and responsive” and based on the best available scientific evidence and World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. As part of its border security efforts, CBSA has posted additional officers at Canada-U.S. border crossings. The officers will “use their training to approach any traveler displaying signs of illness for further questioning.” Officers are conducting public health screenings and outreach while observing those seeking passage into Canada. Likewise, information on COVID-19 is being distributed at all Canadian ports of entry. Some Canadian officials are dissatisfied with the measures the federal government has taken to protect against a more expansive outbreak of COVID-19. Ontario Premier Doug Ford is one official calling for stronger measures. “We need the federal government to tighten up the border,” he said. “I’d be OK to closing the border to visitors,” he said. Ford does not take issue with the national government’s stance on trade and commerce. “We have to keep the supply chain moving,” he said. To date, CTA spokesmen have emphasized it has received no reports of truck drivers displaying symptoms of COVID-19 at the U.S. border. The organization did express concern about placing 14-day quarantine on Canadian drivers returning to the country.  Restricting providers of essential services —including truck drivers —would not be a good policy. Within Canada, carriers are stepping up to the plate in a time of crisis. One carrier delivered 40 loads to a grocery retailer last weekend, over four times the customer’s normal order. Some private carriers contracting with companies shipping non-essential goods are seeing lulls in business, but those delivering cleaning and medical supplies report activity far exceeding capacity. While truck drivers bound for Canada are not expected to encounter any issues at this time, the COVID-19 pandemic is a rapidly evolving crisis. As it continues, drivers and carriers should check daily for potential new Canadian border restrictions.

The coronavirus: A trucker’s guide to germs and illness — Part 5

  DOWN AND DIRTY: KILLING THE CORONAVIRUS AND OTHER GERMS To date, scientists haven’t come up with a guaranteed method of killing the coronavirus. As mentioned in the previous articles of this series, the best available advice is hand-washing and using hand sanitizer. But how should you do all you can to sanitize your truck? The answer is multipronged, as you need to eliminate bacteria, viruses, mold and allergens, all of which infest your truck, inside and out. Mold and allergens are among the most common but difficult germs to eradicate. If you are allergic to something in your cab, chances are you already know it. But there are plenty of undetected allergens and spores growing under your seat or in your sleeper. Mold and allergens can often be found on dashboards. Disinfecting wipes are offer a quick and simple ways to combat germs on the dashboard and other hard surfaces. Your cab’s air filters are important in fighting these types of germs, so make sure you replace and/or clean them at recommended intervals. If the infestation is especially bad, you may need to consider cleaning your cab’s air circulation system. Auto Loan Solutions has posted a handy fact sheet at www.autoloansolutions.ca/blog/4-tips-to-kill-germs-in-your-car that addresses the many places germs can be found in vehicles, from the steering wheel to knobs and controllers, upholstery, the ventilation system and even car keys. All of these apply to trucks as well, only trucks have larger surfaces. Likewise, with special systems and equipment, most trucks have disinfecting needs beyond those listed for automobiles. For starters though, consider the following next time you decide if it’s time for a thorough inside and outside detailing job for your truck. To begin, consider where germs tend to hide. The Auto Loan Solutions fact sheet reiterates that germs are found almost anywhere. Life is never germ-free. Where germs ‘hide’ in broad daylight The keys to your truck’s ignition host many germs. They spend a lot of time in spots that harbor high concentrations of germs — your hands and your pockets. Think about what you carry in your pockets. If you stick your keys inside, they become covered with all the germs of every item carried, and a standard washing of pants or jackets will not necessarily kill germs imbedded in the fabric. If another driver uses your truck, consider the unknown places they have been and the items in their pockets. When you retrieve the keys to your truck, you also retrieve the attached germs. Wash and sanitize those keys frequently. Airborne germs are another major concern. These germs aren’t nearly as easy to battle. Cleansing the air is not an easy chore. You can see grease on your door handle, but airborne dirt is more difficult to recognize. Some tips for keeping cabin air clean are to let your windows down on occasion and adjust your vents to allow outside air to enter your cabin. Recirculating contaminated air only causes more germs to grow. Again, if you cab has an air filter attached to the air conditioning or heating system, replace it at recommended intervals. When it comes to carpet, seats and upholstery, you probably realize when you drop food crumbs on the floorboard or on or under your seat. But by the time you get to a location where it’s safe and convenient to clean them up, you’ve likely forgotten. Over time, these crumbs get ground as finely as flour and become nearly invisible. Like any organic matter, food encourages growth of mold, bacteria and other germs. Once germs get kicked around the cab and some become airborne, the they can literally infest you truck. On another front, if you have children and carry them in a car seat in your personal vehicle when off work, take note. Studies show that children’s car seats, like fuel-pump handles, carry double the number of germs normally found on a toilet seat. Another area that germs find accommodating — and that you cannot avoid touching as a driver — is your truck’s “operation center.” The door handles, buttons and controls in your truck hold more germs than any other part of vehicle, at least in terms of parts you regularly touch. Germs love to be in control, so what better surface to infest than a steering wheel? A study reported steering wheels host up to 700 species of bacteria, depending on the type of material and any covering. Recommendations include driving with gloves or keeping hand sanitizer handy, especially if you share driving duties with someone else. Likewise, anywhere passengers tend to touch (door handles, radio controls, etc.) should be sanitized frequently. Cleaning Methods There are literally thousands of cleaning solutions and cleaning machines on the market. Before using any of them, make sure they are appropriate for the surfaces in your truck. Also, make sure you aren’t using something that is merely giving your germs a bath. You don’t want clean germs; you want them to die. First, brush and vacuum your cab top to bottom. A monthly vacuuming is recommended, but in the face of the coronavirus, the more frequent the better. Next, you need to reach the tiny particles such as pollen, dust and other that escape the vacuum. Shampoo your upholstery on occasion. A good shampoo can wipe out a lot of germs. Disinfecting you cab may be the most important step in cleaning. Germs that are difficult to eradicate may not stand a chance against a good disinfectant. Wipes and disinfectants designed specifically for use in trucks are available. Keep in mind, the performance of your truck isn’t just based on gross weight and horsepower. Its operation also depends on your abilities as a driver. If you have a cold, the flu or any other illness, you aren’t going to operate at top speed or efficiency. Keeping your truck clean is something you can do to remain comfortable and in control. Beyond hygienic care No matter how often or how long drivers wash their hands, and even if they employ a company such as EZFill to fuel their trucks, nothing offers 100% certainty when it comes to germs, especially those like the coronavirus, for which a scientifically based disinfectant has yet to be confirmed. While the coronavirus is a hot topic worldwide and a growing concern in the U.S. since early this year, analysts are just now recognizing its impacts on cargo and freight movement. Airlines, cruise ships and even Amtrak have canceled or reduced flights, cruises and travel along specific routes. The impact of the virus in transportation is becoming very visible. The ports of Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Seattle and other cities that are normally filled with ships at dock, others waiting to dock, and longshoremen offloading intermodal containers and freight are virtually silent. Some companies have circulated photos showing a few trucks waiting cargo to arrive from China, Japan, South Korea, and other Asian countries, and that cargo may never arrive. On the East Coast, the ports of Savannah and Miami, which only recently experienced dramatic increases in freight due to the widening of the Panama Canal, are seeing activity dwindle. For now, measuring the actual impact of the canal-widening project will have to wait until the coronavirus is no longer infecting the data. Whether rigs are hauling intermodal containers or are loaded with goods for distribution centers, port activity plays an enormous role in the health of the trucking industry. What happens on the docks of port cities directly impacts the demand for trucks and drivers throughout the country. Demand levels and orders not yet arriving at U.S. ports are slowly appearing in statistical reports. A lot of information has been published about the effects of the coronavirus on imports, but most relates to statistics and economic impact data, information someone lacking analytic skills related to the trucking industry is likely to overlook. But when one drills through the data and allows the impact on truck drivers to be recognized, anxiety builds. The human impact of the coronavirus related to jobs and how decreased imports affect industry and business from coast to coast have received widespread attention only over the last few days. But signs of those impacts are everywhere. Events no one ever dreamed could be canceled will wait another year to resume. A city like Seattle will likely go through an extended period before residents are confident and comfortable visiting stores and meeting new people. Online giants such as Facebook and Amazon have sent employees home if their duties can be completed from remote locations, and many analysts suggest that once executives recognize the benefits, the employees may be told to continue working remotely. As a truck driver, “working from home” most often means driving your truck. The impact of the coronavirus on the trucking industry may be as important a challenge facing governmental officials as any other. But if you’ll do your small part to protect yourself and your truck from accumulating germs, collectively the nation’s trucking industry can greatly help officials strike a balance between protecting public health and preserving the nation’s economic stability.

Canadian singer little known to Americans stomped across Canada with trucking song

I’m not much into what Nashville passes off as country music these days, but let’s assume for a moment that these artists are worthy of “country” status: Shania Twain, Anne Murray (she’s approved), K.D. Lang, Terri Clark, Paul Brandt and Emerson Drive. What do these half-dozen performers have in common? If you said they are all Canadian, you’re right. Then again, if you answered that if he was still alive, Charles Thomas Connors — better known as “Stompin’ Tom Connors,” would have loathed all of them, you’d also be dead-on. Canadians love country music, and their country has offered its share of home-grown talent. But Nashville is where careers are built, and Canadians seeking high billing in country music usually relocate to the city in search of stardom in the U.S. and Canada. Stompin’ Tom Connors, one of Canada’s most successful country musicians, never relocated. He never became a star in the U.S. His music, even “Bud the Spud,” a trucking song of the “golden age,” received no airplay in the U.S. But one fact always remained true — Tom Connors didn’t care. Connors was born in 1936, in Saint John, New Brunswick. His teenage mother was poor, a fact Connors described when saying they lived in the “poorest, most run-down part of Saint John.” Connors later said he didn’t realize how poor he was until he saw his mother steal food for the first time. Young Tom must have led an eventful life. When Connors discussed his autobiography, he said that he tried to remember every moment of his life. Mentioning 130 pages of single-spaced narrative, Connors said, “That covers everything through age four.” While Connors was still young, his mother was sentenced to a low-security prison; stealing food to avoid starvation was likely the worst of her crimes. With nowhere else for Connors to go, she brought him along. In short order, authorities stepped in, and a family living in Skinner’s Pond, Prince Edward Island (PEI) adopted him. The province would provide inspiration for Connors’ first hit single, but he traveled a long road before recording music. Connors hitchhiked out of PEI at age 15, spending 13 years working odd jobs and writing songs. He finally settled in Ontario, accepting a one-year contract to entertain at a hotel. He soon launched his recording career. Connors never sought the nickname “Stompin’ Tom.” Instead, the owners of the low-class, loud and rowdy venues he played gave it to him, and it stuck. Connors couldn’t just tap his toe to keep time with the music; he wanted to hear his foot. He stomped the stage with his boot heel so hard that venue owners complained he cracked the stage. Connors began bringing plywood to shows, stomping on it until it was broken. He’d then complain about low-quality lumber and call for another piece. When asked why he stomped so hard, Connors answered, “It’s just a stage I’m going through.” Connors is credited with writing more than 300 songs and releasing four dozen albums. His sales topped 4 million records — virtually all in Canada. In fact, Stompin’ Tom didn’t allow his music to be released in the U.S. He was a proud Canadian who sang about Canadian topics. He admitted he had no love lost for Canadians who left home to achieve stardom in Nashville — “turncoats,” he called them. Aside from his song “The Good Ole Hockey Game,” played today at many National Hockey League arenas, his music is virtually unknown to Americans. While enjoying his greatest success from 1970-1972, when he had three No. 1 and two No. 2 songs on Canada’s country charts, the title song from his 1969 album, “Bud the Spud,” may be his most lasting. In “Bud the Spud,” Connors sings of a PEI truck driver hauling potatoes across Canada. Connors’ reputation could have caused fellow countrymen to believe he meant the song as an insult to Americans. Many recognize Idaho potatoes as the gold standard, but the Canadian maritime provinces are also well-known for producing them by the tens of millions. In fact, Canadians will claim Idaho’s crop can’t compare to its “budados,” almost as if Canada grows a different commodity. Of course, it’s the same root vegetable with the same spelling, but at least on PEI, it’s pronounced “bu-da-do” (with “u” as in “us,” “da” as in “day,” and “do” as in “dough). “Bud the Spud” struggled for radio play, but live audiences loved it. Eventually, DJs in Nova Scotia started playing the song based on listener demand. When Connors returned to PEI after a 14-year hiatus, audiences couldn’t get enough of “Bud.” Connors sang his song six times before closing in front of a rowdy church hall that would’ve stayed all night had he kept playing it. The story behind “Bud the Spud” isn’t much of a story at all. “It was written kind of quickly,” Connors said. “I wanted to write a song about PEI, and a friend wanted me to write him a trucking song.” The two songs gelled into one. The friend, Bud Roberts, didn’t care for the song and didn’t record it. For Connors, it was a blessing. The opening lyrics — “It’s Bud the Spud from the bright red mud” — referencing PEI soil, and the following lines describe the large “budados” it grows. With a truckload of the crop, Bud regularly ferries from PEI to New Brunswick before heading to Montreal and Ontario. “Bud” isn’t popular among Canada’s traffic officers — “Now the Ontario Provincial Police don’t think mucha Bud. … the cops been looking for the son of a gun that’s been rippin’ the tar off the 401” — referring to a 500-mile highway crossing Ontario. The remainder of the song praises “Bud the Spud” for his thirst of delivering PEI potatoes across Canada. Connors closes by commenting that Bud hauls “the best doggone potatoes that’s ever been growed — and they’re from Prince Edward Island.” “Bud the Spud,” if nothing else, had staying power. In 1994 the song became a children’s book featuring the travels of Bud and a dog companion, and in 2013 Parliament sang it before a hearing. Again, Stompin’ Tom couldn’t have cared less. In the 1970s Connors earned a half-dozen Juno awards, Canada’s top recognition for artists. Soon after, he decided the Junos didn’t represent Canada when they rewarded the “turncoats” who’d gone to Nashville. He even started a brief but unintentional racial controversy when he complained that country-music icon Charley Pride, one of few African-American country artists, was presented a Juno award. Eventually, Connors returned his Junos along with a letter stating, “As far as I am concerned, you can give them to the border jumpers who didn’t receive an award this year, and maybe you can have them presented by Charley Pride.” He also vowed to never accept another Juno nomination or award. Connors never buried his hatchet, later declining induction into the Canadian Country Music Hall of Fame. But he couldn’t avoid all recognition. A 2004 television show, “The Greatest Canadian,” ranked Stompin’ Tom as the 13th-greatest person born in the country. The top performing artist on the list, he beat out Canadian icons Bobby Orr, Gordie Howe, and even Dr. James Naismith, the man who invented basketball. Naismith’s presence on the list likely angered Stompin’ Tom, as he invented the game in Massachusetts the same year he left Ontario to live the remainder of his life in the U.S. Over the course of four decades until Connors’ death of kidney failure in 2013, he stomped his way across Canada. In the process, he recorded what is likely the most popular Canadian truck-driving song. And whether Connors would have liked it or not, “Bud the Spud” did become known outside Canada thanks to YouTube, where one of several videos has been visited more than a half-million times. Until next time, keep with the rhythm of the highway, and key up an Anne Murray tune for the heck of it. You’ll probably hear Tom Connors stompin’ a hole in his grave in the background.

The coronavirus: A truck driver’s guide to germs and illness — Part 4

  HYGIENE: BEYOND HAND-WASHING As a truck driver, you may do everything within your ability to protect yourself from germs. Most likely you follow the time-proven recommendations to avoid illnesses of many types — hand-washing, using sanitizer, avoiding people showing symptoms of illness, and when possible, staying home from work are typical steps of your daily routine. But you need to protect more than your body from risks. Keeping your home and your workplace as germ-free as possible is just as important. When driving a truck, these two locations often overlap. For days, weeks or months at a time, your truck may also be your “home.” If you want to do everything you can to lower your risk of contracting any disease-causing germs, whether the coronavirus, the flu, or the common cold, you cannot ignore your truck. Trucks, like anything else, carry enormous populations of germs. You can think of your truck as a “melting pot.” where many varieties of germs try to live together; and some battle for supremacy. Always remember: Germs live for one reason — to reproduce with the goal of covering every habitable surface on the planet. For drivers who traveled along Interstate 40 in western Tennessee 20 or 30 years ago, think of the Virginia Creeper vines, which were planted on the roadsides for highway beautification, as giant-sized germs. In short order, the invasive plant covered every rock and tree it could reach. The result was an enormous number of dead trees — and an equally enormous amount of money spent to eradicate something that had intentionally been planted. Germs spread the same way, but much faster. No matter how hard you try, the typical steps you take to clean and disinfect your truck will not eliminate every disease-causing germ from either the interior or exterior. Even if you fumigate your truck, by the time you drive out of the parking area, tens of millions of germs will have already attached themselves to exterior surfaces. They won’t waste time joining you in your truck’s cab. People deal with germs every day, both viral and bacterial; there is no way to completely avoid them. Even if you self-isolate, you can be guaranteed you’ll be surrounded by hundreds of millions of germs. It’s simply a matter of life. Germs outnumber the population of Earth by a factor too large to calculate. Accepting that some germs are advantageous won’t reduce your anxiety, especially when you are met at every turn with information about a new illness such as the coronavirus. However, since the coronavirus protection measures for now, identical to those followed to protect against common illnesses, let’s look at your truck and germs from, say, the 12-foot level. A Hygienic Truck Keeping a truck clean and completely germ-free is an impossible task. Don’t waste your time trying. But that’s not to say you can’t do a better job and expend a little more effort than usual when germs such as the coronavirus are at the forefront of everyone’s minds. Take a few minutes to consider what about your truck and your daily routine makes it a paradise for tremendous germ populations. In a recent press release, EZFill, a South Florida company that provides mobile fuel delivery, shared some surprising research findings. Based on a Kimberly-Clark study endorsed by an independent research firm, the filthiest, germ-laden item a truck driver contacts on a regular basis is a fuel pump. In fact, the study showed that a fuel-pump handle is covered with 11,000 times as many germs as a public toilet seat. And as far as the touch-buttons on a fuel pump are concerned, the numbers are even more harrowing. When touching a button to select a fuel type or quality or entering information using a fuel pump keypad, a driver is exposed to 15,000 times as many germs found on a public toilet seat. In either event, that’s a lot of germs to worry about. But you don’t necessarily need to worry. You can reduce your exposure the germs while fueling your truck by taking the simple step of wearing medical gloves. You can purchase them in any pharmacy, and a single box will last months. If gloves aren’t available, finish fueling and head directly to a hand-sanitizing station or use sanitizer stored in your truck. Of course, no matter how cautious you are when fueling, you’ll likely still carry some of the germs into your truck, and they’ll likely set up shop on your steering wheel — the part of your truck where more than 70 million germs daily organize and create their battle plans. In addition to fuel pumps and your steering wheel, consider other equipment you frequently touch with your hands or other parts of your body. Take your CB radio as an example. Not only do you pick up the mic with your hand and press a button that likely opens a housing, allowing germs to pour inside by the millions, but you also speak and breathe directly into your mic. In some cases, the mic may even touch your mouth. If there is anything worse than touching a germ-infested surface, it is inhaling while holding that mic within millimeters of your mouth. You may think you are only inhaling your own germs, but germs are different than barnacles attaching to a ship’s hull. Germs like to travel, both OTR and in the cab of your truck. Moving from your dash to your CB unit and up the cord to your microphone is something germs do for enjoyment, not as exercise. As noted earlier, even a run-of-the-mill germ lives for the sole purpose of reproducing so its population will someday cover every square inch of habitable surface on the face of the earth. The larger the population, the more powerful germs become. The overall lesson is that germs travel by land, air and sea. Even the water you use to clean your truck is home to untold numbers of germs. Check cleaning instructions for various surfaces and use the strongest allowable solutions. If it won’t damage your equipment, a water-bleach mixture is usually an effective and inexpensive choice. Considering the inherent risks of touching or inhaling the germs that live on various surfaces in your truck, don’t forget the germs that any passengers bring aboard. You never know where your passengers’ hands have been, and you likely don’t want to find out. Instead, take the time to sanitize the passenger seat and any surface, such as the door handle and directional air vents, that passengers might touch while riding with you. Some carriers have recently told drivers, including owner-operators, that they can use company charge cards to purchase disinfectants, sanitizers and associated supplies. In any event, most of the items needed to maintain a healthy cab aren’t going to break the bank. Some steps, in fact, cost nothing. The typical cold or flu virus usually runs its course in a week or 10 days, and while the conditions are seldom chronic, they do create discomfort, if not misery. Likewise, a severe case of the flu can easily knock a driver off the road for the duration of its cycle, creating financial concerns and stress to go along with the illness. Germs love stress. It weakens immune systems and increases the length of time germs can make you ill. If you have a particularly robust population of germs, you can suffer through recurring bouts of the same illness as the various viruses or bacteria cycle through their life spans at 500 RPM. If you are an OTR driver, your truck is at least your temporary home. You carry enough germs inside without the need for help. Conduct business outside your truck, and avoid passengers who are coughing or sneezing. They may bring a whole new set of germs aboard. To read Part 5, the final installment in this series, “Down and dirty: Killing the coronavirus and other germs,” click here.      

The coronavirus: A truck driver’s guide to germs and illness — Part 3

  INFORMATION: AN OVERWEIGHT LOAD DESTINED FOR ANXIETY As alluded to in Part 1 of this series, when it comes to the coronavirus, truck drivers are probably suffering from information overload as much as — if not more than — any American. It’s the lead story of every newscast on television or radio. And you can’t be involved in social media without seeing hundreds of posts about the virus. News outlets seem to have accepted Walter Cronkite’s role during the Vietnam War: Each night Cronkite read the number of U.S. casualties the military reported on the CBS Evening News broadcast. In what is building into a war against the coronavirus, newscasters are now providing, not just nightly, but constant real-time updates tallying confirmed cases of the virus, “presumptive positives” and state-by-state breakdowns. Unfortunately, the numbers of late have been increasing by the hour. As a truck driver, assuming you haven’t trained your ears to filter out the coronavirus news — something no one can afford to do at this point — you have read or heard countless proclamations, such as NASCAR’s statement about the status of upcoming races expected to draw hundreds of thousands of fans to pack grandstands across the South: “The health and safety of our fans, competitors, employees and everyone associated with IMSA, ARCA and NASCAR remain our top priority. We are in regular communication with relevant authorities and will continue to monitor the situation closely.” The NASCAR statement could be a template for the response of many organizations at risk of losing large amounts of money to the spread of the coronavirus, or just the anxiety associated with the situation. Some organizations or events expecting to draw large crowds are adding a tagline that states, “We are increasing the number of hand-sanitizing stations throughout the facility and encourage all visitors to follow hygiene protocols.” Despite statements such as the one issued by NASCAR, the past few days have seen a change in the measures event-organizers are taking. Last week, the South by Southwest festival (SXSW) in Austin, Texas, was canceled. The annual event was expected to draw more than 400,000 people from around the world to Austin, where SXSW was set to receive up to $700 million in registration fees alone. The City of Austin didn’t hesitate, favoring cancelation of the event despite the estimated $350 million impact on the area’s economy. The SXSW cancelation seemed to be a tipping point for all large gatherings. At the time of this writing, the NBA has suspended its season, the NCAA announced the cancelation of March Madness, the NHL has put their season on “pause,” and major-league baseball associations are developing plans two weeks ahead of the season’s opening. Universities are ending the semester with online assignments, high schools are closing, and high school basketball state championship tournaments are being canceled. Even Wimbledon, the world’s most notable and traditional professional tennis tournament played in England is under threat of cancelation. While these extreme measures may be necessary, as the list grows longer, people will likely wonder how they will be directly impacted: Will they be sent to work from home or experience layoffs? And they wonder how their world will look in the aftermath of the coronavirus. All of these “wonders” create anxiety, a biological reaction resulting in stress, which ironically makes people even more susceptible to illness. Despite their political differences and the opinions of both Democrats and Republicans that the opposing party is exploiting the coronavirus for political purposes, President Trump and House and Senate leaders will eventually agree on a plan to fight the coronavirus on several fronts. Public health will be top priority, followed closely by protecting workers from financial stress if they are exposed to the virus. From the political and economic perspective, propping up the economy and stock markets during a time of tremendous uncertainty will be important, as will working with other countries to develop coordinated approaches in battling the disease. President Trump has already announced a ban on travelers to the U.S. from Europe, something European leaders did not accept quietly. Such displays suggesting a lack of coordination between countries will only exacerbate the problems associated with the coronavirus. Drastic times and drastic events call for drastic action. People are searching for any information they can find on the coronavirus, particularly as it relates to them, their families and their friends. It’s a heavy load to carry, but we are in this together, and we all have the same destination in mind. To read Part 4 of this series, “Hygiene: Beyond hand washing,” click here.

The coronavirus: A trucker’s guide to germs and illness — Part 2

GERMS 101: AN INTRODUCTION FOR TRUCK DRIVERS Robert Dudley, M.D., a physician in New Britain, Connecticut, told The Trucker, “Protecting yourself and others from the coronavirus is a matter of following the same recommendations to avoid any illness. Wash your hands. Use hand sanitizer. And, in the case of the coronavirus, avoid large crowds. Also, keep up with the latest from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).” You’re probably thinking, that’s all a doctor can say? He doesn’t have access to inside information or recommendations not yet official, but something the CDC might soon release? Unfortunately, the answer is no. Little information exists about specific measures one can take to prevent contracting or spreading the coronavirus. As of this writing, the best health officials have to offer is to follow the same guidelines recommended to avoid catching a cold or seasonal flu virus. But while most people recognize cold and flu viruses as illnesses everyone will occasionally have to fend off, the coronavirus is a new opponent. With the coronavirus lingering and the germs spreading it — in effect, under orders to infect as many living organisms as possible — increasing your deep-cleaning efforts is a wise move. After all, despite the advice we receive either from doctors or the media, as stated on ScienceAlert.com, “the coronavirus isn’t just like the flu.” The coronavirus versus the flu: How they differ According to ScienceAlert, while the coronavirus symptoms include the same aches and pains, sore throat, and fever that accompany the seasonal flu, the illnesses are quite different. First, while the flu is a widespread illness affecting tens of millions of Americans each year, only 0.01% of flu cases result in death. To date, worldwide statistics suggest the coronavirus mortality rate is as high as 3.5%. Some public-health officials suggest this rate is inflated, but they generally agree the coronavirus mortality rate will probably settle at approximately 1.0%. That means the odds of dying after contracting the coronavirus are 1 in 100 — as opposed to 1 in 1,000 with the flu. The age and health of people who test positive for the disease both play huge roles in mortality rates. In China, where the coronavirus pandemic began, a sample of 45,000 confirmed cases of the disease indicated death rates far higher among elderly individuals than the rest of the group studied. Officials reported that 14.8% of people age 80 and older who tested positive for the virus died as a direct result of virus-related conditions. In terms of serious but not necessarily fatal cases, 27% occurred in people over age 65, while 41% of victims were under age 50. Surprisingly few children have tested positive for the disease, and none have died to date, a statistical anomaly being studied in hopes that children have some sort of immunity that will help researchers develop a vaccination against the virus. While the public usually focuses on the death toll associated with any disease or illness, health officials say the danger of the coronavirus is more a matter of health systems becoming overwhelmed by cases requiring hospitalization and ventilators to support breathing. Hospitals in any city have a limited number of beds — and far fewer ventilators at their disposal. When discussing the level of contagiousness of the coronavirus as opposed to the flu, researchers estimate that each person testing positive for the flu interacts with numerous people, 1.3 of which will also contract the flu virus. To date, statistics for the coronavirus indicate that for every positive case, two to three additional people will likely test positive. In other words, the coronavirus is approximately twice as contagious as the flu. Of course, each year many Americans are vaccinated against the flu, but the vaccination is not guaranteed to be effective. Of those vaccinated, a sizable number come down with the flu despite their proactive steps. No vaccination is available to prevent the coronavirus, and depending on who you find credible, researchers suggest no effective vaccine will be available for at least 12 to 18 months. In the meantime, research trials have indicated that antiretroviral drugs may reduce the severity of some cases. Other experimental therapies are being studied, but the sample sizes are too small for researchers to draw conclusions. While some trials have shown promise, delivering antiretroviral drugs to serious cases, as well as some experimental therapies, their sample sizes are too small to roll out to the general population. Even if researchers suddenly announced a vaccine against the coronavirus, conducting widespread vaccinations would be a challenge. One researcher stated that the widely available seasonal flu vaccine is not provided to enough people to ensure what he refers to as “herd immunity.” Although the coronavirus is an entirely different microscopic animal than the flu virus, the two do share some similarities. As Dudley advised, the best way to protect yourself against either virus, at least at this time, is to practice good personal hygiene and limit interaction with other people. Frequent hand-washing, avoidance of shaking hands and making a conscious effort to avoid touching your face with what may be contaminated hands are all steps people can take to reduce their risk of contracting most contagious illnesses, including stomach viruses, more serious respiratory or gastro illnesses, and many others. Check back tomorrow for Part 3 of this series, “Information: an overweight load destined for anxiety,” click here.

The coronavirus: A truck driver’s guide to germs and illness — Part 1

  SELF-QUARANTINE: ADMIRABLE, BUT IMPOSSIBLE FOR TRUCKERS It would be difficult to find many Americans who are not somewhat familiar with the latest world crisis, the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic — and truck drivers don’t live under rocks. Sure, the average driver may not interact with as many people as a shoe salesman, but the idea that truckers perform their duties in isolation is a myth. Drivers don’t sit behind a steering wheel all day, and they can’t avoid interacting with people either professionally or casually. The risks of exposure to or developing the symptoms of COVID-19 are as varied as the ages, health conditions, areas of travel, lifestyles, hobbies and occupations of people across the country. Truck drivers are no exception. In fact, while many people see truck driving as a career of relative isolation, the reality is far from this perception. Without providing a crash course to truck drivers, who already know the people they interact with during just one delivery, nondrivers may be surprised at how much truck drivers to interact face to face with other people. Likewise, nondrivers may be surprised at the unique challenges truck drivers face in protecting themselves from the millions of germs, viruses and bacteria we all live with, including COVID-19. A general overview of a day in the life of Joe, a truck driver Let’s briefly discuss the basic levels of human interaction and object-handling a driver must face on a single delivery route. Joe is a driver with a carrier specializing in intermodal transportation, most often working out of the Port of Long Beach, California. He arrives at his Los Angeles terminal after a weeklong break spent with his family. He first interacts with his fleet manager, who appears to have a cold, to gather paperwork and instructions for a hauling a load of goods, imported from the Far East, to a customer’s distribution center in San Antonio, Texas. Next, he chats with a dispatcher and route planner, who prints maps and directions and hands them to Joe. He doesn’t know if his dispatcher and route planner have been exposed to any disease-causing agents; he has a pretty good idea his fleet manager is ill, but Joe doesn’t know if it’s a cold, the flu or something more serious (or contagious). Joe might also use a telephone, pour a cup of coffee, drink from a water fountain or enter a public restroom. While Joe was off the road for a week, another driver, Sandy, used his truck for some short-haul deliveries. Sandy briefs Joe on the condition of the truck, how it performed and where she drove it. The two then complete any paperwork the carrier requires when a truck is transferred between drivers. With the handover complete, Joe takes the keys and climbs into the cab. Within seconds, any germs Sandy (or any other prior driver) left behind on the seat, keys or steering wheel are transferred onto Joe’s hands or clothing. Before Joe even pulls out of the terminal he has likely been exposed to countless varieties of germs, some disease-causing, and they’ll be riding shotgun with him for the duration of his trip. When Joe arrives at the Port of Long Beach, he works with port authorities, freight managers, longshoremen and other dock workers responsible for offloading intermodal containers and securing them for truck transport. He completes necessary paperwork and returns it to the company representative his carrier serves as a contractor. On the road from Long Beach to San Antonio, Joe makes stops for fuel and meals, showers at a truck stop and makes conversation with the public and truck drivers of various nationalities working for various carriers. Joe might also stop for repairs, where he meets face to face with service technicians. Finally, upon arriving at the San Antonio distribution center, Joe chats with the facility’s employees and again might use the phone, coffee pot, drinking fountain and restroom. Someone at the distribution center checks Joe’s load, and they exchange paperwork. If at any time during the transport of imported goods from Long Beach to San Antonio Joe handles a box or an item in his trailer, he is likely to contact many other germs, some disease-causing and some Joe has never been exposed to before. Joe’s risk of carrying a communicable disease increase dramatically as does his risk of developing symptoms. The disease or illness may be as simple as the common cold or as serious as COVID-19. It’s all microscopic, so Joe has no idea he has been exposed to anything but exhaust from his truck — and maybe some greasy food along his journey. To read Part 2 of this series, “Germs 101: an introduction for truck drivers,” visit https://www.thetrucker.com/trucking-news/the-nation/coronavirus-a-truckers-guide-to-germs-and-illness-part-2.

‘More than a truck’: Electric-transportation advocates eye many community benefits

FONTANA, Calif. — The Los Angeles area, particularly Orange County and communities between the Pacific Coast and Little San Bernardino Mountains, is notorious for poor air quality. The area is often mentioned as having the worst air quality of any location in the United States and sometimes the world. But steps to improve the region’s long-polluted air are moving forward, and public health, the climate, traffic congestion, traveler experiences, and job training and placement are receiving the benefits. On Feb. 11, Volvo Trucks chose Fontana, California, to unveil its efforts to reduce the trucking industry’s contribution to air pollution. The Volvo LIGHTS project was presented to 250 attendees at the main offices of TEC Equipment, one of the largest Volvo dealerships in the country. Auto Club Speedway served as the program’s official introduction. Volvo LIGHTS (LIGHTS being an anacronym for “low impact green truck solutions”) is a demonstration program being conducted in the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) to determine the feasibility of converting gasoline and diesel-powered trucks to battery electric vehicles. While the project may seem to be a truck manufacturer-led effort, the considerations when developing such vehicles go far beyond simply building a truck. For that reason, AQMD, recipient of a $45 million grant to conduct the project, is partnering with Volvo and 14 area organizations including businesses, colleges, public-health advocates, and other stakeholders to turn what many consider a long-coming dream into reality. Working with Dependable Highway Express (DHE), a regional carrier, the partners will determine the many factors to be considered in converting a fleet to battery electric power. The list of considerations is long, and as research moves forward many more will likely be added. In the words of several partners, “We don’t have all the answers yet.” The project is focusing on four aspects of transitioning the trucking industry to alternative energy programs. For the time being, in working with DHE, the focus is on improving the battery-powered range for local and regional vehicles and transporters. At some point in the future, project leaders expect Class 8 trucks for OTR use to be manufactured and tested. The OTR market, however, will not move to production until as much as possible can be learned from the Volvo LIGHTS project. From the standpoint of Volvo and future truck manufacturers using alternative energy sources, focus areas include testing existing vehicle technologies and adjusting based on data collected, increasing the charging infrastructure and providing sales and service support. If any of the three fails to keep up with the others, the entire project will be delayed, as will expanding the use of battery electric vehicles in larger truck classes and geographic areas. When DHE begins utilizing Volvo’s trucks, monitoring and adjusting to data received will be a high-tech process. The information obtained will be analyzed in algorithms related to the charge-distance ratio and the impact of time of day, topography and driver patterns. With those results in hand, researchers will then recommend and implement improvements. Efforts will focus on optimizing energy usage and range; developing web-based tools to improve “uptime” and maximize range; increasing existing battery densities (the amount of power the battery stores) by at least 20%; and testing multiple truck configurations. Without the ability to access charging stations when needed, a battery electric vehicle can be stranded, delaying deliveries and cutting into carrier profits. As part of the Volvo LIGHTS program, partners will work to increase the number of charging stations in the project area. Intended infrastructure development includes public and private electric chargers, including one of the nation’s first publicly accessible fast-charging truck stations. The stations will be networked to vehicle telematics so researchers can isolate data on specific vehicles and compare their operation to others in the program. Increasing the capabilities of charging stations will require on-site solar panels to reduce grid impacts, as well as additional research into methods of storing energy. Since most truck operation will occur in daylight hours when energy is being collected (in solar applications), a significant increase to storage capacity will be a priority. Also, researchers will study the use of second-life batteries and how they may offset operations costs. With all the technology in place and all systems ticking, Volvo LIGHTS and its partners know that it is the human aspect of the project that will lead to its success or failure. Being able to meet consumer needs in a timely and efficient manner will depend on sales and service, both controlled by the human element. Volvo is committed to providing sales and service support for those interested in adding LIGHTS trucks to their fleets, and they will offer leasing options allowing carriers to test performance for unique applications prior to committing to a purchase. Likewise, as the technology is new and continuing to develop, two colleges within the testing area are training students in battery-electric vehicle repair and servicing using reality-based training. While Volvo LIGHTS has just been unveiled, many components are in place and partners are prepared to perform their roles. To date, Volvo has manufactured 23 heavy duty battery electric trucks and 29 pieces of warehouse equipment (i.e., forklifts); 58 public and private chargers are in place; two after-market service centers are operational; and colleges have announced training programs are full through the end of 2020. Two ports (Los Angeles and Long Beach) are providing infrastructure planning. Add in the ability to generate solar energy up to 1.8 million kilowatt hours per day, and the project is off to a running start. The goals of the Volvo LIGHTS project are not only to decrease costs for carriers and increase efficiencies. Improving air quality and the health of at-risk residents of Southern California will be the project’s true measure of success.

It’s no bull. States looking at toll initiatives and why oxen can be blamed.

Toll. Is there another four-letter word that leads to a longer string of four-letter words from the mouths (and keyboards) of those employed in the trucking industry? Google “toll poll” and you will find a lengthy list of links to articles reporting, for the most part, that drivers of all vehicles strongly oppose toll roads. Whether it’s turnpikes, with tolls that support dedicated projects, or the means to drive an otherwise inaccessible route (i.e., a bridge connecting the mainland to an island), the public overwhelmingly wants convenient traffic routes paid for by means other than tolls, even if the overall costs are the same. Toll talk has been all the rage in several states as lawmakers position themselves in preparation for transportation bills, developing creative answers to the problem of the decreasing funds in the National Highway Trust Fund. While tolls aren’t exactly a creative solution, they’re already in place in several states. Some states may consider increasing toll fees, expanding the roadways subject to tolls, or even beginning a toll program from scratch. Pennsylvania has increased its toll fees along the Pennsylvania Turnpike by 35%, and in Connecticut, Gov. Ned Lamont’s ever-changing toll proposal, which finally settled into a trucks-only toll at 12 bridges throughout the state, was set for a legislative vote in early February. Report released just in time for lawmakers’ consideration The American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) released the findings of its most recent study on tolls, an issue the organization placed at the top of its list of research priorities for 2019. Based on 2018 data provided by 21 tolling systems (81.7% of U.S. toll collections), ATRI reported that motorists paid $14.7 billion in tolls throughout the country. The report also included data on how toll revenue is reinvested, how truck-toll revenue compares with road usage, and the expenses involved in operating toll systems. The results of the 2019 study should be considered along with a 2017 ATRI study that concluded tolling to be the least effective method of funding national highways among the six methods studied. Major findings of the 2019 study include: The 21 tolling systems studied represent 80% of the estimated $18 billion of tolls paid in the U.S. Approximately 6,000 miles of the nation’s roadways are tolled, resulting in collections of $3 million per mile; comparatively, 220,000 miles of roadway in the National Highway System receive funding primarily from fuel taxes, equating to collections of $159,091 per mile. Toll revenues have increased more than 72% since 2008, far exceeding the inflation rate (16.9%) over the same period. Except for driver wages, tolls represent the highest cost per mile of any truck-associated expense (45 cents). Tolling far exceeds the cost per mile of fuel taxes (14.6 cents). In trucking, toll-road costs are inflationary; trucks paid $4.2 billion of total toll revenue collected (31%) and $811 million in fuel taxes associated with miles driven on the toll roads sampled. Toll-collection facilities costs consumed 32.4% of tolls revenue; approximately one-half of facilities costs covered actual toll collections. Of the total net toll receipts after deducting expenses ($7.1 billion), 48% was diverted to uses other than operating toll roads and bridges. Truck drivers and carriers paid 28.5% of net receipts. Since 2009, toll revenues have increased 72.5% for systems providing statistics on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). During the same period, VMT increased 2.4%. The result is toll revenue increases exceeding VMT increases by nearly 3,000%. Government agencies, such as those managing mass transit and nontolled roadways, received more than $3 billion (20.5%) of gross revenues. This transfer of funds occurred in nine of the 21 tolling systems sampled. Toll systems received subsidies of more than $1 billion from other agencies, 17.5% of which came from the federal-interest-rate subsidy, Build America Bonds. ATRI determined that 79% of trips made by trucks over toll roads involved “critical interstate commerce” transportation generating more than $3.3 billion in toll revenue. Clearly, state governments make a lot of money from tolling, as do third-party collectors, which states may use to manage tolling systems. Likewise, private companies that manufacture and install tolling-system equipment see temporary profits during the construction and implementation phases of new toll facilities or expansions. Given the statistics, one must ask, “Why do we have tolls, and where did these things come from?” It takes some time and research to get answer, but the bottom line is that we can blame it all on oxen. Toll-Road Origins One reason people are accustomed to paying tolls could stem from short-term neurological changes leading to acceptance of the inevitable. Tolls are nothing new, and they were not invented in Pennsylvania, a fact the state’s highway authority may dispute. Tolls have been traced back 2,700 years when travelers on foot, horse, camel, or via other means paid tolls to cross property, whether a road existed or not. Landowners and others with authority to impose tolls first charged them in Asia and Arabia. Germany may have been the first to impose an “over-the-mountain” toll when the most convenient (or only) routes to cross mountain ranges were gated and travelers were ordered to pay before crossing. Eventually, Great Britain implemented tolling. In fact, England’s imposing travel tolls could have been one reason that angry root peddlers left for the New World to build settlements like Plymouth, Jamestown, and St. Augustine in the early 17th century. No doubt, the Flat Earth Society charged tolls on ship captains for the privilege of sailing over the edge of the planet. And the Pennsylvania Turnpike Authority will likely be pleased to know that it was in their state that private investors established the first significant toll road in the country, charging travelers along the 62-mile route between Philadelphia and Lancaster. For a century, after investors built the early Pennsylvania tollway, like-minded individuals and corporations made tolling a routine aspect of travel. State governments, for the most part, stayed out of the business. They preferred the “road-labor tax,” a revenue-raising method whereby male citizens could either devote a few days of labor a year helping with road upkeep or pay a fee. In New York, for example, males had to work on the roads three days a year or pay a one-dollar fine. As an alternative, they could pay a fee of 62.5 cents per day. The fact that three days at 62.5 cents per day exceeds the fine by 87.5 cents shouldn’t confuse matters. On the other hand, the fact that a state government set the fine and “opt-out” rates may have created enough mistrust that ­even today many Americans oppose all toll charges. Westward, ho! (But please stop at the ticket window on your way out of town) For Americans wishing to travel during the nation’s early years, and especially for those headed into the western wilderness, improved roads were important. After all, the narrow trails Native Americans had followed for centuries couldn’t handle the abuse of ox-drawn wagons. Likewise, the damage these large animals and wagons could impose on a muddy roadway could shut a route down until conditions improved or the owner could make repairs. The idea pro-tolling organizations promote in favor of charging tolls, especially to trucks, based on their belief that larger vehicles do more damage than smaller varieties, could have begun when oxen and other stock animals tore up roads in the 1790s. A wise man once said something to the effect of “The sins of the father are passed on to his sons.” A legislator at his side quickly added, “And the sons shall pay tolls to rectify them.” Regardless of who collected tolls, early roads in the U.S. were not well maintained and were often impassable, although logic suggests a corporate entity needing to keep roads in good condition to remain viable would reinvest in its infrastructure. But it wasn’t these toll roads that invigorated early entrepreneurs to develop more; instead, it was the success of toll-bridge companies a decade earlier. In the late 18th century, states granted charters to 59 bridge-tolling companies. And they were profitable, sometimes offering investors dividends exceeding 10%. Success resulted from good materials, well-planned construction, a limited length of infrastructure to maintain, and travelers with no other alternative. While later travelers avoided tolls by taking alternate (and undoubtedly more primitive) routes, those needing to cross water usually found the savings in avoiding bridges far less than simply paying the toll. The early toll roads in the Northeast took on the name “turnpikes,” a designation still in use more than two centuries later. Between 1800 and 1830, 946 corporations in the northeastern states were incorporated as turnpikes. In nine states, turnpikes totaled 27% of all corporations. Proudly leading the way was Pennsylvania, where 199 of 446 corporations, or 46%, were operating turnpikes. New York bested its neighbor in quantity, registering 339 turnpike corporations. Between 1830 and 1845, another 138 turnpike corporations were established in Pennsylvania, and 110 in New York. The bubble soon burst as steamships and the railroad arrived. Turnpikes began to fall out of vogue. No longer maintained, those still seeing profits in land routes constructed “plank” roads, where travelers and wagons had a relatively smooth ride on top of crudely planed lumber. The plank roads rotted far faster than expected, however, and the 1,000 or so corporations operating them made little money. Profit versus convenience Turning a profit was not the only reason for toll roads. In the era when the roads were privately owned, stakeholders became investors. Farmers who needed a more efficient way to transport their products to market, politicians who promised well-maintained roads in return for votes, and shop owners in communities who relied on products being transported from afar were all in favor of maintained roads, and investors from each of these groups supported them. They realized toll roads were not likely to pay direct dividends on their investments; yet, the indirect benefits fed their families. Eventually, new materials made roadways easier to maintain, and private corporations could no longer charge fees the public considered excessive. For decades to follow, toll roads disappeared from most of America. They always lurked in the shadows, however, and the motorized automobile pumped in a breath of new life. With the 1916 Federal-Aid Road Act, the U.S. Congress included clauses that allowed states to charge tolls on roads not supported by the federal government, but prohibited tolls on roads receiving federal aid. In general, the reason for this prohibition stemmed from the Interstate Commerce Act: Tolls restricted the free flow of interstate commerce. Eleven years later, the Oldfield Act offered states an olive branch, allowing the use of federal funds to build toll bridges, provided operational costs were at the states’ expense. Still, for the typical highway, federal funds could not be utilized if states assessed a toll on users. State-funded toll roads, largely focused in the Northeastern U.S., once again became popular. The feds offer states relief When federal funding in the 1950s went to support construction of the interstate system, fuel and other “user-paid” taxes eliminated the need for toll roads, at least in the government’s opinion. Construction of new tollways essentially ceased. Eventually, under some conditions, interstate routes could be established as tollways; however, the tolls could not be the means for funding construction and were only allowed after completion of the road work. Finally in 2012, more leeway was provided for tolling federally funded roadways, but only for newly constructed interstates or in efforts to expand lanes and decrease congestion. High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes were also approved as tollways. Tollways have changed a lot since the 18th century. Rather than literally passing through a “turnpike” with a toll both to access a road, automated cameras requiring limited personnel are used to collect tolls. While these systems are undoubtedly more efficient than manned toll booths, implementation costs are much higher. South Carolina, for example, rejected efforts to charge tolls on Interstate 95, largely due to the $3.5 billion implementation costs. As years pass, many states will propose to institute or expand tolls on highway, bridges, tunnels, and other travelways, and when a state can be sure the burden will largely fall on out-of-state vehicles, a few initiatives may be approved. But rest easy, truck drivers and carriers, because if public-opinion polls are any indication, you have tens of millions of voters on your side. And the voting public, for the most part, realizes that any cost placed on the transportation of products soon shows up in the price tags staring at them on the shelves of their favorite retailers. Of course, the extra sales tax collected from increased prices could be considered “triple taxation,” could it not? Taking heed The 21st-century trucking industry needs to take note, as the number of voters recognizing the relationship between truck tolls and consumer prices is in a constant state of change. Voters who believe repairing any perceived highway damage caused by trucks may someday outnumber those who place priority on lower prices at the checkout stand. At that point, support for tolls may swing. When voters decide they dislike trucks more than increased price tags, one can expect more “trucks-only” tolling propositions like those already being fought in Rhode Island courts. And we can blame them all on our ancestors’ oxen tearing up muddy toll routes a couple of centuries back.

Red Sovine’s ‘Giddy-Up-Go’ got up and left after Minnie Pearl climbed aboard bandwagon

In early 1966, Red Sovine had his second No. 1 hit on Billboard’s Hot Country Singles chart with “Giddy-Up-Go.” As many songs of the era did, upon reaching No. 1, it stayed a while, maintaining its position for six weeks. The recording, like Sovine’s other trucking songs, was characterized by its recited lyrics and attempt to present truck drivers as sentimental rather than an outlaw group of workers. In later years, for better or worse, Sovine followed the pattern with “Phantom 309” and “Teddy Bear.” The “Giddy-Up-Go” story features a truck-driving father abandoned by a wife who took his young son with her. The driver never found his family. Before the boy’s mother took him away, the youngster called his dad’s truck “Giddy-Up-Go,” words his dad painted on the truck. Many years passed before the father saw the same phrase on another truck along U.S. Highway 66. As one can imagine without even hearing the song, the phrase led to a much-delayed father-son reunion. Since “Jaws” became a national sensation in movie theaters in 1975 and was followed by a sequel in 1978, spin-offs, remakes and covers have become an expectation among fans. These types of films, TV shows and songs don’t require much creativity and can be turned out quickly and the original stars often return to build their success. Of course, the sequel never bests the original and is often added to the list of entertainment’s worst decisions. In the 1960s, sequels and remakes had yet to become popular. Singers and songwriters had a world of uncharted territory they could use to build legacies. But, with “Giddy-Up-Go,” a most unlikely source saw Sovine’s hit song as an early exception to the rule and tried to capitalize on it. Minnie Pearl (born Sarah Colley) is arguably the best-known comedian, male or female, in country music history. She spent over 50 years on the Grand Ole Opry and 22 years as a cast member of the television show credited with introducing country music to a national audience, “Hee-Haw.” A native of Tennessee and graduate of what would become Belmont University, Pearl was trained in theater and dance. During her career, Pearl recorded comedy albums, wrote several books and appeared on television. But she was never a singer. Then again, at least in many of his trucking songs, neither was Sovine. Perhaps the chance to release a “recited” single with chart-making potential motivated Pearl. In what was clearly an attempt to capitalize on the success of “Giddy-Up-Go,” Pearl inexplicably recorded a sequel, “Giddy-Up-Go Answer.” It debuted just weeks after the original fell from the No. 1 spot on country radio. In Pearl’s recording, one briefly hitting No. 1 on the country charts itself, she retells “Giddy-Up-Go” from the perspective of a waitress at the truck stop where Sovine’s father and son reunited. As fate would have it, the waitress was a friend of the wife who abandoned her truck-driving husband. One might expect “Giddy-Up-Go Answer” (what kind of title is that?) to be a statement from a strong-willed wife who left a husband who cared more for spending weeks alone in his truck than taking care of his family. But that is not the case. Instead, Pearl describes a wife who left with her son without a trace or a reason. In Pearl’s version of the story, she does mention that the wife had developed a terminal disease — something she apparently didn’t tell her husband. “So, without leaving a trace, she took her son and left town one night,” was the lyric spoken by Pearl in response to the wife’s knowing she needed to move to a dry climate. The wife and Pearl’s character became good friends, and Pearl recalled chats about the man left behind and the son growing into the image of his father. The wife soon dies, and Pearl continues working as a waitress, waiting for the “Giddy-Up-Go” truck to arrive. As it must, the song ends with Pearl witnessing the father-son reunion. “Giddy-Up-Go Answer” answers little, but it does leave a question for listeners to ponder. “Why?” Why did Pearl record the tune? Why did she think the original story needed an answer? Why did she think Sovine fans sought an answer? Why did she not think Sovine would have revealed an answer if it mattered?  “Answer” is nothing more than a retelling of Sovine’s story from an onlooker’s perspective — an onlooker without any insight or information to add the story. At the end, the listener is left unsatisfied. Sovine’s “Giddy-Up-Go” was completely in the artist’s character and played well to his audience — truck drivers. Pearl, on the other hand, stepped out of her role as a beloved country comedian to record what, for many, was a meaningless single. But the 1960s were different times, and country music had far less variety than future decades would offer. “Giddy-Up-Go Answer” was Pearl’s first and last charting song; in fact, it was the first and last song she recorded, period. Over the span of 54 years, Sovine’s “Giddy-Up-Go” remains a high point of trucking music history. Pearl’s “Answer” is mostly forgotten. And if Pearl ever doubted why her song lacked staying power, she might ask the truck-driving father when he pulls into her truck stop. “Sorry, Minnie,” he’ll say. “Giddy-Up-Go heard your song… and he done got up and went.” Be assured, no fan of trucking music is left asking, “Why?” Until next time, don’t lose sight of that white line, and if you come across a trucking song or any country tune that makes you ask, “Why?” drop me a line. Perhaps I can come up with an answer that makes some sort of sense.

Famed trucking song boosts artist’s career, publicizes lightly traveled road

When it comes to trucking songs of the “golden era” (1963-1977), songwriters were, for the most part, inspired by locations or experiences in the South, Midwest and on the West Coast. Most of the artists recording the songs hail from the same areas, although Canada has offered up a few trucking songs receiving U.S. radio airplay. But even Canada, where U.S. country music has a large following, has likely inspired more songs than its neighbor — Maine. A full-time country radio station of note didn’t even exist in the state until 1967. Even today, the number of nationally recognized country artists native to Maine can be counted on a few fingers. Dick Curless, a trucker turned musician, has yet to be surpassed as the most successful. Dick Curless was born in 1932 in Fort Fairfield, Maine. Today, Fort Fairfield is a hamlet of 120 residents in the secluded northeastern area of the state bordered to the east by New Brunswick, Canada. Before turning 10-years-old, Curless’ family relocated to Massachusetts, where in 1948 he began his music career with a local band. A few years later, he was in Korea driving an Army truck and known to soldiers as “The Paddy Ranger” on Armed Forces Radio. Upon returning to Maine, Curless didn’t immediately resume singing, instead buying a truck to haul timber. He did eventually return to the stage, his stature, baritone voice and eye patch helping him earn the nickname, “The Baron of Country Music.” Dan Fulkerson, a young DJ and aspiring songwriter in early 1960s Bangor, Maine, hitchhiked the roads around the city in hopes of catching a ride northward to Aroostook County. Truckers often gave Fulkerson a lift, and they traveled Route 2A northward from Haynesville, a tiny town equal in size to Dick Curless’ birthplace. Route 2A was long considered one of Maine’s most unforgiving roads (“highway” would be giving it far too much credit), but at the time, it was the only way to Aroostook County from points south. The winding, secluded route could be impassable in the winter months, and it supposedly claimed its share of truckers’ lives. Fulkerson had intended to pitch his song to Johnny Cash but instead chose Curless, preferring a local artist who could identify with Route 2A. His choice turned out to be a good one, as “Tombstone Every Mile” topped out at No. 5 on the Billboard country music charts. The focus of “Tombstone Every Mile” is the road Fulkerson traveled as a tag-along in big rigs, one he described as “a stretch of road up north in Maine that’s never ever, ever seen a smile.” Specifically, Fulkerson’s lyrics described only the portion of the road passing through the Haynesville Woods, just a few miles north of Haynesville. The two-lane road was known for a few harrowing 90 degree turns virtually invisible to a driver not acquainted with the route. Its location experiences average high temperatures below the freezing mark three months of the year, low temperatures below freezing nine months annually, and snowfall an average of seven months. When Fulkerson wrote the lyrics of “Tombstone Every Mile” and referred to the road as a “ribbon of ice,” he was not exaggerating. The most memorable phrase in Curless’s recording is, “if they buried all the truckers lost in them woods, there’d be a tombstone every mile.” Now, pinning down the number of truckers killed along Route 2A is difficult; in fact, the precise length of the stretch of Route 2A Curless sings of isn’t easy to determine. But local folklore supports the claim that the road isn’t exactly the most hospitable route for drivers of any vehicle. Route 2A is frequently noted as “the most haunted place in Aroostook County,” if not in the entire state. Locals and ghost hunters tell of paranormal experiences along the road, but few tales mention trucks. Still, even if “a tombstone every mile” isn’t an accurate statistic, the road has apparently snuffed out more than its share of lives. After riding “Tombstone Every Mile” into the top 5 singles charts, Curless recorded on and off over the years. When he did, he relied on his first song’s success and firmly implanted himself in the country sub-genre of trucking music. Other Curless hits through the mid-1970s included “Tater Raising Man,” “Travelin’ Man” and “Highway Man.” In addition to “The Baron,” Curless left no doubt he was a “man.” As many low to mid-level U.S. country artists do, he gained his greatest popularity overseas and ended his career in Branson, Missouri. He passed away in his beloved home state of Maine in 1995 at the age of just 63. It’s hard to say how much of “Tombstone Every Mile” is fact versus fiction. Even in Haynesville, locals debate the question. One longtime resident told a group of college kids what he thought of the stories. “All I know is that the road is a dangerous one,” he said. When asked if he’d change his mind if he saw a ghost, he answered, “Sure. If [someone] sat down beside me and vanished, I’d believe in ghosts.” Today, Route 2A is even more lonely and secluded than 50 years ago. Interstate 95 now stretches from Maine’s southernmost point to Houlton, about 25 miles northeast of Haynesville. Truckers bypass the dangerous and reportedly haunted Route 2A in favor of faster, safer interstate travel that ends at the Canadian border. Still, the legacy of “Tombstone Every Mile” lives on. Notable accidents have and continue to occur along Route 2A. In fact, just two years after Curless became a mainstay of trucking music with his recording, two young girls were killed on Route 2A. Both girls died on August 22, 1967. And both were hit by tractor-trailers. Until next time, keep the rhythm, and watch out for those blind twists in the road ahead.

‘Road song’ covers a lot of territory – how do truckers stack up?

The line separating “trucker” and “road” songs is thin. Roger Miller’s signature song, “King of the Road,” makes no mention of trucks but is about life on the road. Dave Dudley’s “Six Days on the Road” is written from a truck driver’s perspective. Although both songs include “road” in their titles, Miller’s is about the “hobo” lifestyle while Dudley’s is about a hard-working truck driver excited to get home. One interesting aspect of country music is its ability to connect people from seemingly different worlds. In the instance of Miller and Dudley, when they do meet, the difference between the trucker and road songs blurs. Hank Snow was born in Brooklyn, Nova Scotia in 1914. Separated from his father, authorities deemed his mother unfit to care for him. Instead, he lived with his paternal grandmother, reportedly a despicable human being who made sure Hank grew up in a household filled not with love but physical and verbal abuse. Eventually, Hank reunited with his mother. And when she purchased a guitar and allowed him to play, word spread of his talents. At just 12-years-old, Hank set to sea, not uncommon among youth growing up in Canada’s maritime provinces. A cabin boy on a fishing schooner, the job paid nothing except experience. Four years later, after his schooner barely survived a storm, Hank decided he had all the experience he needed. In the meantime, Hank’s musical talents developed, and he eventually found his way to Nashville. By chance, he got his shot to play the Grand Ole Opry, Nashville’s most coveted welcome gift. His second single, “I’m Movin’ On,” placed him on the road to stardom as it hit the No. 1 slot on country charts and remained there for 21 weeks. In 1962, “I’ve Been Everywhere,” became another of  Hank’s signature songs, a version of Australia songwriter Geoff Mack’s tour of his home country rewritten by Lucky Starr. Hank’s version, with apologies to Johnny Cash’s outstanding cover, is arguably the most recognized among fans of classic country music, with bonus points added to the original singer. “I’ve Been Everywhere” begins with Hank (singing as a hitchhiker) along “the dusty Winnemucca road,” a reference to U.S. Route 50, a cross-country highway passing through north-central Nevada. The chosen road, known as “The Loneliest Road in America,” tells listeners a lot about the hitchhiker and his secluded, slow-paced life. When “a semi with a high and canvas-covered load” stops, the driver asks if the hitchhiker needs a lift to Winnemucca, the passenger climbs aboard. The conversation in the cab turns to the U.S. 50 when the driver asks if his passenger has “seen a road with so much dust and sand.” The response reminds one of the pauses in Beethoven’s “Surprise Symphony,” a halting answer showing little appreciation for the ride the trucker is providing – “Listen, Bud. I’ve traveled every road in this here land.” And with that, “I’ve Been Everywhere” abruptly shifts from a trucker song to a tune about the road. The remainder of “I’ve Been Everywhere” begins with a chorus that will be repeated five times and four stanzas of lyrics listing what Hank means by “everywhere.” But the song is far more than impressive memorization of many obscure locations in the western hemisphere. The style Hank employs is indicative of the “road” experience and how it can change depending on perspective. Hank sings the remaining lyrics at a fast pace, so fast that the names of cities, towns, states, and areas of the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and South America almost blend into a very long multi-syllable-to-the-extreme word. In fact, the slow, lonely introduction having passed, the change in tempo is likely intentional, as Hank contrasts of a life walking the roads with the trucker’s high-speed, deadline-driven lifestyle. Hank references 91 locations he has visited. He could easily list 500 more, and the song would never get old. If we mapped the 91 locations Hank mentions, we’d realize that he has “been everywhere.” The various locations are spread across the country and a few outside the U.S. Hank tells us he has visited eight countries in North America, Central America, and South America. In the U.S., he rattles off 64 cities loosely broken down as: Southwest, 10; Northwest, 10; Midwest, 15; Southeast, 17; and Northeast, 12. He mentions nine states by name, four locations in Canada, and eight south of the U.S.-Mexico border. By the time the song wraps up with a fading chorus, listeners can imagine the truck driver’s exhaustion; in fact, they are exhausted as well, proof that the song filled its intended purpose. Still, firing the tune-up is almost an addiction, if only to see how much of the song listeners can memorize. Somewhere out there in the sea of truck drivers, at least one has visited every location Hank rambles through in “I’ve Been Everywhere.” There are likely more, if we consider just those in the U.S. I challenge you to pull up the lyrics on the internet and check off how many you’ve been to or passed. My count is 32, or 35%, not bad for someone who hasn’t visited the Pacific Coast, the Northwest, or South America. Take a few minutes to count how well you’ve followed Hanks’s trail, and email me with the number of checkmarks you make along with a photo of you and the truck that made it all happen. I’ll run a list of the most widely traveled drivers in a future column. Until next time, keep in rhythm with the road. I just remembered I have an appointment in Ombabika.

Wellness ambassador encourages truck drivers to remain ‘Fit to Pass’

Bob Perry didn’t think he had a choice. Born in northeast Ohio, trucking was in Bob’s blood. Between his father and two brothers, the Perry family has 60 years of driving experience—or 61 if you include Bob’s one year behind the wheel. In 1972, family tradition called for Bob to climb in the cab of his first (and only) truck. He did as was expected. For about a year he drove… and thought… and thought… and drove some more. All that thinking allowed Bob to reach a swift conclusion. “Trucking just wasn’t for me,” he said. And so ended Bob Perry’s career on the highways. But fate had the final word. He might have been finished driving a truck, but he was far from finished with the trucking industry. “I soon became involved in health and wellness,” he said. By 1975, Bob had worked in the healthcare industry and for several years after managed and owned fitness centers. But being so close to the trucking culture, he knew drivers as people, not just anonymous faces he passed on the interstate, and he understood the truckers’ lifestyle. “I realized my experience in the personal health arena could be applied to improving truckers’ lives,” Bob said. “Drivers don’t have opportunities to train, join a fitness center, or even shop at health food stores.” Shifting gears About 20 years ago, Bob combined his knowledge of personal health and trucking to provide information to medical clinics with substantial numbers of truck driving patients. But it was a brief encounter in 2008 that set Bob’s wheels turning. The connection between driver health and the trucking industry’s needs became clear. Bob stood outside a Georgia truck stop chatting with a couple of drivers. The subject turned to lifestyles on the road. The drivers weren’t particularly satisfied with their health status, so Bob provided a few tips they could put to immediate use. They followed Bob’s lead and later told him those tips led to notable health improvements. “A couple of drivers for Covenant Transport out of Chattanooga, Tennessee, caught wind of the advice I offered and asked if I could help them as well,” Bob said. “They convinced Covenant to let me work with a couple of other drivers. Before long I was working with all Covenant drivers. Bob built on his strong start and grew his list of clients. Sherwin-Williams, Greyhound Bus Lines, and Hogan Transportation soon signed on. “The growth really validated what I was doing,” Bob said. His understanding of truck drivers and their families also helped him realize the payoff of his efforts. “Drivers’ families depend on them,” he said. “When parents can’t pass a DOT exam, and the family loses a source of income, it impacts both adults and kids.”  He noted that truck driving is a unique occupation and lifestyle. When a driver can no longer work, adjustment is difficult. “Not just any job is going to provide satisfaction to someone who has been on the road for years,” Bob said. Even without fear of job loss, the lonely life of driving takes its toll in the form of depression and other mental health issues, conditions Bob is incorporating into his programs. In 2009, Bob founded “Rolling Strong,” an initiative encouraging drivers to become health-conscious. Rolling Strong worked with travel centers to install self-administered “StayHealthy” stations where drivers could check weight, BMI, blood pressure, and vision. As the stations became widely available, Rolling Strong developed the first truck driver-focused wellness app for the iPhone. By 2012, Freightliner took note of Bob’s work and asked him to join them in developing the first in-cab gym, “The Fit System.” He soon became in great demand as an advocate for trucker wellness. One thing Bob has learned when presenting health information to a group is to keep the message simple and speak in terms that hit home with his audience. Rather than a narrative about the importance of wellness, for instance, Bob may tell a group to take a “peek under their personal hoods,” suggesting drivers should “check their personal oil and gauges” just like they do those in their trucks. Or, he may compare drivers’ awareness of truck maintenance needs to that of their health. “If a light is out on a truck,” Bob said, “the driver will see that it is fixed quickly. On the other hand, if a health-related warning light is going off, chances are they’ll ignore it.” “My job is to help drivers make the best choices while on the road so they can get home safely each and every trip,” Bob said. The 90-day window Bob’s company, Health in Transportation, has launched a new initiative, “Fit to Pass.” The program’s goal is to provide drivers information to remain healthy year-round. If they do remain healthy, when it comes time to renew their CDLs and pass DOT medical exams, they won’t have to worry—something creating more stress and adding to health problems. “Fit to Pass” was largely inspired by a former Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) driver of the year who visited with Bob, noting his poor health had resulted in his being issued a 90-day card. “Here is a national driver of the year—he’s been driving for 47 years with over 5 million accident-free miles—and he’s stuck with a 90-day card,” Bob said. “The industry can’t afford to lose drivers with his level of experience and skill, especially with the problems carriers have in recruiting and retaining new drivers.” Bob coached the driver to make some simple changes in his lifestyle over the 90 days he had before his renewal would be reconsidered. The result? A loss of 35 pounds and a new one-year card. “Fit to Pass” capitalizes on the driver of the year story, and while the program doesn’t encourage drivers to wait until crunch time to get healthy, it is designed to put on a “full press” as exam dates approach. To increase his program’s effectiveness, Bob has teamed up with Espyr, a nationwide company conducting Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) for many organizations. “Espyr has the large call center, professional coaches and counselors and ability to touch base with drivers throughout the year,” Bob said. “Drivers can call any time they need advice or assistance.” Espyr’s services are available to fleets at the cost of one dollar a month per enrolled driver. “Based on experience, I know that we’ve saved carriers hundreds of thousands of dollars in driver turnover costs alone. A dollar a month is insignificant compared to a lawsuit resulting from an accident in which driver health plays a role,” Bob said. He also notes that regardless of how much money a carrier invests in technology to increase safety, it is the driver who makes the difference. Espyr also provides mental health services, something Bob sought as he looked for a partner. Mental fitness—silent key to wellness “There is so much depression in the industry,” he said. Espyr has provided mental health services for over 30 years; in fact, Espyr personnel were on-scene at the El Paso, Texas, Wal-Mart on August 3 following the shooting that killed 22 people and injuring dozens. The staff offered immediate counseling to employees, customers and first responders, helping them process what they had witnessed and preparing them for what they might expect in the months and years ahead. But drivers don’t need to witness a traumatic event to develop mental health issues; sometimes the loneliness of the road is enough. Solutions may be as simple as driving with a pet companion, usually a dog. “If I ask a group how many in the room travel with dogs,” he said. “usually about 40% of the hands go up. Then I ask them if they fed their dogs that morning. The same hands go up. Finally, I ask if they fed their dogs a donut and a cup of coffee for breakfast, then lit up a cigarette for them.” Bob’s point hits home. “Drivers are more concerned about their pet’s health than they are their own wellness,” he said. While Bob Perry hasn’t driven a truck in nearly 40 years, he remains on the road—or at least in the air—logging over 125,000 flight miles a year. He conducts orientation sessions and classes across the country up to three weeks out of each month. And he remains active in promoting driver health and wellness within the industry. Bob served two years as vice-chair of the American Trucking Associations’ Health and Wellness working group followed by four years in the chairman’s slot. He remains active with the organization and is also involved with the American Bus Association Safety Council (after all bus drivers face the same long hours on t the road, and they carry the nation’s most precious cargo). OTR health in an industry taking notice After being featured on many national television and radio broadcasts as well as in the nation’s largest newspapers and magazines, most recently, TravelAmerica Centers (TA) named Bob its “wellness ambassador.” “TA requires all of its locations to provide some sort of fitness area for drivers,” he said. “A walking trail, a basketball court, even a horseshoe pit—anything encouraging exercise is great.” TA also provides health clinics at about 20 locations, with more being added. And access to healthcare while on the road is problematic for truckers and leads them to put off seeking the care they need. “CVS has about 1,500 locations where offering health care services ranging from DOT exams to access to doctors,” he said, noting that at this time the chain is probably a trucker’s best choice when needing immediate health care. So, the question is, as a driver, are you fit to pass? If today is the deadline for your DOT medical exam, can you walk in worry-free, or would it be best if you just didn’t show up? If your answer is the latter, that’s why The Trucker and Bob Perry are joining forces. In future issues of The Trucker, Bob will write a column providing tips you can put to immediate use to improve your health along with information and stories to inspire you to remain focused on wellness As you read, remember, simple lifestyle changes can be the difference between losing your CDL and being “Fit to Pass.”

Sorry, Teddy Bear: Red Sovine’s signature song wouldn’t be recorded today

When it comes to trucking songs of the 1960s and 1970s, listeners recognize few voices as easily as that of Woodrow Wilson “Red” Sovine, a West Virginia native born in 1917. His distinctive songs in which he recited rather than sang the lyrics set a precedent for many country music “storytellers” who followed. And during his heyday, Sovine left his mark on the trucking song sub-genre that rivals any other performer. Unfortunately, as time passes so do the expectations of radio listeners. Politically acceptable verbiage and society’s fears have changed since the ‘70s, and “Teddy Bear,” the song bringing Sovine his greatest fame, would not make a blip on country charts in the 21st century. Red Sovine began his music career at an early age. His mother taught him to play guitar, and during his teenage years, he performed live on a hometown radio station. Sovine eventually formed a group, The Echo Valley Boys, and continued with his audience of a few listeners in West Virginia. After high school, he worked in a hosiery manufacturing plant, a job he gave up for a move to Shreveport and a shot to play the Louisiana Hayride, the second-most popular country music radio show short of the Grand Ole Opry. Prompted by Hank Williams, Sr., Sovine planned a move to a station offering a better time slot in Williams’ hometown of Montgomery, Alabama. Fellow Louisiana Hayride performer Webb Pierce had other ideas. He convinced Sovine to lead his band, and during the ‘50s, the two recorded a duet, “Why Baby Why?” a song topping the country music charts. With a little success in his pocket, Sovine broke ties with Pierce and set out to find success as a solo artist. It’s often said country singers need a niche — something separating them from other artists in Nashville. While Red Sovine didn’t invent trucking songs, in 1965 he recorded the first of many to come with “Giddy Up, Go,” introducing his voice in narrator style with backup instrumentals. In short order, this form of music became his niche. Sovine continued recording, adding the “almost based on a true story ’Phantom 309’” to his discography a couple of years later. Still, it would be 1975 before Sovine reached No. 1 on the charts with the sentimental song, “Teddy Bear.” I’d like to say listeners either love or hate “Teddy Bear,” but as it did occupy the No. 1 slot on U.S. Country charts, most obviously loved it. It’s “sappy-sentimental” lyrics turned some off, but the song offered a fresh image of truck drivers to the general public. Many trucking songs had portrayed truck drivers as outlaws, pill-poppers, and womanizers, but “Teddy Bear” offered an alternate image – one of truckers as heroes with huge hearts, if only on a small scale. What makes “Teddy Bear” so interesting is that today, 45 years after its release, Sovine’s best known recording and one of the most recognized trucking songs on radio would unlikely even make it to the demo recording studio – at least not without some serious changes to the story’s plot and lyrics. In “Teddy Bear,” Sovine introduces himself as an OTR driver spending much of his life on the road. While he doesn’t come out and say it, his voice suggests a lonely life, and he uses the CB radio as an alternative to true friendships. By chance, he contacts a “little boy” over the CB who is known by his handle, “Teddy Bear.” Now, Teddy Bear’s age is never said, but the phrase “little boy” is used multiple times in the song and based the album’s cover art suggests Teddy Bear to be quite young, maybe just nine years old. The simple question of age sets the stage for three fatal flaws that haunt the song’s legacy. Teddy Bear tells the narrator (Sovine) that his father was a truck driver who, a month earlier, was killed in an accident. His mother is not home much as she tries to support what remains of her family. And as Teddy Bear laments, he isn’t much help with his “two crippled feet.” Now, the ‘70s were a different time and people used different words, but consider how often you hear the word “crippled” in describing a person today. Somewhere along the way, “crippled” became offensive and is now all but eradicated from regular conversation. Likewise, consider the last time you saw a 10-year-old using a wheelchair. Did the wheelchair have a sign, “Warning: Crippled Child Aboard”? Hardly. Instead the sign likely read something like “Speed Demon” or “Did you say “disabled”? Who’s disabled?” Over the past 30 or so years, the perception of disabilities has changed in society, and I challenge you to find a little boy lamenting his “two crippled feet.” Based on what we learn in the early part of Teddy Bear’s story, the young boy is generally immobilized by an inability to walk. Yet, his mother, Mama Teddy Bear, leaves him alone all day while she works. Of course, in the situation described, it’s obvious Mama Teddy Bear is in a tight spot. In 1975, ordinary day care had yet to become the multi-billion-dollar industry it would a few years later, and short of institutionalization, parents of “crippled” kids had few options. Still, it’s hard to believe any state child services agency would look kindly on a child like Teddy Bear being left alone all day. In fact, looking back, it’s downright unbelievable, even for the ‘70s. As far as different places and different times are concerned, the 1970s were far more innocent than 2020. When Red Sovine recorded “Teddy Bear,” photos of missing children had yet to appear on milk cartons. Aside from high-profile cases like Patty Hearst, missing children were not high on the list of public concerns; it was almost as if they didn’t exist. Of course, kids did go missing, and years later the issue would be considered just short of a national epidemic. Today, we try to protect our kids against “stranger danger,” but with social media in play, we are caught in a never-ending fight to protect their identities and personal details. So, when Red Sovine asks, “Before you go 10-10, what’s your home ‘20,’ little CB friend?” and Teddy Bear responds with “Jackson Street, 229,” Generation X and young millennial parents’ jaws drop to the floor. The result as described in the song’s conclusion is three city blocks of trucks backed up in front of Teddy Bear’s house and drivers taking the little boy for rides. Mama Teddy Bear is nowhere to be found. In 1975, Teddy Bear returns safely from each ride, and the trucks are gone before Mama gets home. One must question if the 21st century story would have such a happy ending. There you have it. Although I know many of you love “Teddy Bear” (and probably have a few coarse words for me), in today’s society, “Teddy Bear” would still be noticed – as a source of controversy. The sentiment of Red Sovine’s “Teddy Bear” and the reasons for its chart-topping performance in 1975 are hard to argue. The song simply doesn’t transition well in the 21st century. A sequel of little note to the song was recorded years later, and we learn that Teddy Bear does have a daytime caretaker. Other than Teddy Bear’s death at the end of the song, there is little new the sequel offers. In fact, one must question if it was recorded for any other reason than to rectify at least one noticeable flaw in the original song. Love it or hate it, “Teddy Bear” would need a makeover to get airplay today. Society changes, and sometimes it’s even for the better. If Red Sovine was alive, he’d probably recognize it as well. Until next time, keep with the rhythm (and “may God ride with you, 10-4, and good-bye”).