TheTrucker.com

Teamsters: US trucking firm Yellow notifies it of shutdown, bankruptcy

WASHINGTON — The Teamsters said on Sunday, July 30, that the union was served a notice that Yellow Corp is ceasing operations and filing for bankruptcy, leaving 30,000 workers in limbo. “Yellow has historically proven that it could not manage itself despite billions of dollars in worker concessions and hundreds of millions in bailout funding from the federal government,” Teamsters General President Sean M O’Brien said in a statement. Earlier in the day, the Wall Street Journal reported about the closure of the trucking firm’s operations which cited notices sent to customers and employees. Last week, WSJ also reported that the company has laid off a large number of workers. Earlier this month Yellow averted a threatened strike by 22,000 Teamsters-represented workers, saying the company will pay the more than $50 million it owed in worker benefits and pension accruals. The company said on Thursday it is exploring opportunities to divest its third party logistics company Yellow Logistics Inc, and is engaged with multiple interested parties. Its customers include large retailers like Walmart and Home Depot, manufacturers and Uber Freight, some of which have paused cargo shipments to the company for fear those goods could be lost or stranded if the carrier went bankrupt. In 2020, the Donald Trump-led government rescued the company with a $700 million pandemic relief loan in exchange for a 30% stake. Yellow did not immediately respond to a request for comment. WHAT WOULD BANKRUPTCY MEAN FOR YELLOW? According to Satish Jindel, president of transportation and logistics firm SJ Consulting, Yellow handled an average of 49,000 shipments per day in 2022. Last week, he estimated that number was down to between 10,000 and 15,000 daily shipments. With customers leaving — as well reports of Yellow stopping freight pickups last week — bankruptcy would “be the end of Yellow,” Jindel told The Associated Press, noting increased risk for liquidation. “The likelihood of them surviving and remaining solvent diminishes really by the day,” added Bruce Chan, a research director at investment banking firm Stifel. Yellow declined to comment when contacted by The Associated Press on Friday. In a Wednesday statement to The Journal, the company said it was continuing “to prepare for a range of contingencies.” On Thursday, Yellow said it was in talks with multiple parties about selling its third-party logistics organization. Even if Yellow was able to sell its logistics firm, it would “not generate a sufficient amount of cash to keep them operational on any sort of permanent basis,” Chan said. “Without a major equity injection, it would be very difficult for them to survive.” HOW MUCH DEBT DOES YELLOW HAVE? As of late March, Yellow had an outstanding debt of about $1.5 billion. Of that, $729.2 million was owed to the federal government. In 2020, under the Trump administration, the Treasury Department granted the company a $700 million pandemic-era loan on national security grounds. Last month, a congressional probe concluded that the Treasury and Defense Departments “made missteps” in this decision — and noted that Yellow’s “precarious financial position at the time of the loan, and continued struggles, expose taxpayers to a significant risk of loss.” New York City crane collapse linked to company and operator with history of safety violations The government loan is due in September 2024. As of March, Yellow had made $54.8 million in interest payments and repaid just $230 million of the principal owed, according to government documents. Yellow’s current finances and prospect of bankruptcy “is probably two decades in the making,” Chan said, pointing to poor management and strategic decisions dating back to the early 2000s. “At this point, after each party has bailed them out so many times, there is a limited appetite to do that anymore.” In May, Yellow reported a loss of $54.6 million, a decline of $1.06 per share, for its first quarter of 2023. Operating revenue was about $1.16 billion in the period. A Wednesday investors note from financial service firm Stephens estimated that Yellow could be burning between $9 million and $10 million each day. Using a liquidity disclosure from earlier this month, Yellow had roughly $100 million in cash at the end of June, the note added — estimating that the company has been burning through increasing amounts of money through July. “It is reasonable to believe that the Company could breach its $35 mil. liquidity requirement at any moment,” Stephens analyst Jack Atkins and associate Grant Smith wrote. The Associated Press and The Trucker Staff contributed to this report.

Yellow Corp. lays off workers, tells others situation looks ‘increasingly bleak’ for survival

WASHINGTON —U.S. trucking firm Yellow has laid off a large number of workers as the company copes with a cash crunch and weighs options including an imminent bankruptcy filing, people familiar with the actions told the Wall Street Journal on Friday, July, 28. The layoffs include members of the company’s sales force, business operations and technology departments, the report said, adding that Yellow’s unionized drivers and freight handlers weren’t part of the downsizing. The third-biggest U.S. trucking company, which has been in ongoing negotiations with union of Teamsters-represented workers regarding worker benefits and pension accruals, averted a threatened strike on Sunday. Yellow has not yet responded to inquiries about the company’s situation. In a memo issued to local unions representing teamsters working at Yellow Corp.’s YRC Freight, Holland, New Penn and Reddaway, Teamsters officials told employees on Friday, July 28, that Yellow’s survival looks “increasingly bleak.” “As we explained in yesterday’s communication, Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have been working hard to help find a solution to fix Yellow’s financial mess and to help it secure financing to enable it to continue in operations,” according to the memo. “While we are continuing to do so, we have no good news to report, and the likelihood that Yellow will survive is increasingly bleak.” The memo further states that “Yellow continues to clear its system, and it appears to be laying off personnel and closing entire terminals across the country. All Yellow employees should, in our opinion, prepare for the worst, as Yellow appears to be headed to a complete shutdown within the next few days. We recommend that all Yellow employees who have personal belongings and tools at the terminals should take them home today. That way, in case Yellow does shut down over the weekend or next week, the employees’ property will not get lumped in with Yellow’s property and get locked up in a bankruptcy or liquidation proceeding that could result in the employees not recovering their personal property.” Reuters contributed to this report.

Freight rates, volumes poised to rise as fears of recession fade

The bottom. That’s what trucking industry freight forecasters are claiming has been reached. The DAT Truckload Volume Index for June was titled “June signals that spot rates have hit bottom.” The Cass Freight Index press release used “Bouncing along the bottom.” At ACT Research, the chosen title was “US freight market bouncing along the cycle bottom.” Truckers who depend on the spot freight market for most (or all) of the loads they haul might be comforted by the thought that this should be as bad as it gets. That’s small consolation, however, to those who have had to shut down equipment, laid off drivers or closed their doors, in part due to poor freight rates. The Cass Freight Index for Shipments reported June shipment numbers dropped 1.6% from May, which works out to 1.9% when seasonally adjusted. Year over year, shipment numbers dropped by 4.7%, and by 6.8% over the past two years. The Cass Freight Index for Expenditures, the amount spent for all shipments, declined by 2.6% in June and by a whopping 24.5% from June 2022 expenditures. Obviously, when there are fewer shipments, the total amount of money spent on them will also decline. However, when the number of shipments drops and the cost per shipment also drops, the negative numbers get worse. The Cass release specifies declining retail sales and ongoing destocking as the “primary headwinds. The good news, according to the Cass report, is that the economy is coming out of the worst of it. The report also states the current downcycle saw its first decline 18 months ago. That’s significant when we consider that the past three downcycles have lasted 21 to 28 months. The implication, of course, is that we’re getting close to the beginning of the next upcycle for freight rates. It’s important to note that, although expenditures have fallen from the historic high point achieved mid-last year, they have not fallen below rates in the first third of 2021 — and they are still higher than the years prior. Unfortunately, expenses are also up, so all is relative. The Cass Indexes for Shipments and Expense are calculated from billing information Cass processes for its customers and represents multiple modes of transportation, including truckload and less-than-truckload shipping, rail, parcel, pipeline and more. Trucking comprises more than half of the dollars spent. “The volume downturn appears to be in the later innings and, after a long soft patch, we see the U.S. freight transportation industry on the cusp of a new cycle,” said Tim Denoyer, vice president and senior analyst at ACT Research, who writes the Cass report. Denoyer is referring to the Classic Truckload Cycle that shows the correlation between truck sales, rates and shipment volumes. A new cycle begins as the market adjusts to lower freight volumes by shedding trucks, reducing the supply of available transportation to the demand of shipment numbers. The current, “bottoming” cycle hits full swing when the number of available trucks exceeds available freight, driving competition for freight up and rates down. The nontypical part of the cycle picture now is that truck sales numbers are still high, but orders for more new trucks have slowed and more used trucks are hitting the market as carriers trade or turn in equipment. ACT Research’s June Freight and Transportation Forecast pointed out two related statistics for June. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported employment of long-distance drivers is increasing in 2023. At the same time, the U.S. Department of Transportation is reporting record numbers of authority revocations for the same period. Clearly, many drivers and carriers who purchased trucks to take advantage of rising spot freight rates two years ago have sold those trucks or let them go to the financing authority and re-entered the labor market. Fewer owner-operators equals more company drivers. DAT, the country’s largest load board, reported freight volumes and spot rates for loads held firm in June while contract rates continued to fall, reaching their lowest point in almost two years. “The gap between spot and contract rates was the narrowest since April 2022,” said Ken Adamo, chief of analytics for DAT. “Rates for van and refrigerated freight increased for the third straight month, and volumes were almost unchanged from May. These are signs that spot truckload prices have reached the bottom of the current freight cycle.” DAT reported van spot rates rose by an average of three cents per mile. That’s the first increase in five months. Spot refrigerated rates also rose by three cents per mile, while flatbed rates declined by two cents. Keep in mind that averages are just that — averages — and rates in some areas may have risen more while declining in other areas. One potential boon for the truckload industry could be the labor strife between the Teamsters union and UPS. As of this writing, a strike is expected. Should it occur, UPS may need to hire carriers to continue some of its linehaul operations, adding loads to the system. As those loads tie up some of the available equipment, spot rates for other loads could rise as competition becomes lower. However, there is no way to predict how large the impact of a UPS strike might be. Adamo addressed this in the DAT report, saying, “Demand for truckload services typically slows at this time of year, but this could change quickly given the threat of strikes in the parcel and less-than-truckload sectors. Shippers are putting contingency plans in place and would look to freight brokers and carriers on the spot market to keep their line haul operations moving. Demand for trucks would jump, especially around Louisville, Memphis, Indianapolis, Dallas and other major parcel hubs.” Kenny Vieth, ACT’s president and senior analyst, predicts improvements in the near future. “The upward forecast revisions reflect our view that macroeconomic positives will increasingly outweigh negatives as the calendar advances into 2024,” Vieth said. “Next year inventory accumulation should inflect to a freight tailwind, from the current destocking headwind.” Clearly, analysts believe the U.S. freight market is poised to begin an upward trend. Exactly when that will happen is up for debate, but there should be some comfort in the thought that things won’t get worse.

Clean Freight Coalition warns feds of challenges before new emissions rules can be met

WASHINGTON — Leaders from the Clean Freight Coalition (CFC) met with officials from the Joint Office of Energy and Transportation (Joint Office) on Wednesday, July 26, to discuss the challenges and opportunities of transitioning the nation’s commercial truck fleet to low-and zero-emission vehicles. The first meeting between CFC and the Joint Office comes as emerging state and federal regulations aim to push the transportation sector toward decarbonization. The Joint Office was created through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to facilitate collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Transportation on deploying a network of electric vehicle chargers and zero-emission fueling infrastructure. As an alliance of freight transportation stakeholders committed to a zero-emission future, the CFC launched in March to educate policymakers on these issues. During Wednesday’s meeting, the CFC urged the Joint Office to consider the heavy-duty sector when granting federal funds, according to a news release. CFC cites a massive infrastructure gap as one of the largest hurdles to a seamless transition away from carbon-based fuels—one that policymakers need to focus on now, says the CFC. “One of the fatal flaws in California’s electric-truck mandates is that the infrastructure buildout is lightyears behind the hyper-aggressive timelines set forth in regulation,” said CFC Executive Director Jim Mullen. “By trying to force the trucking industry to electrify without the charging infrastructure and power capacity that will be required, the state is setting trucking and the supply chain up for failure. That’s why in our meeting with the Joint Office today we stressed why EPA should not propose ZEV-dependent rules prior to ensuring the necessary resources are actually in place.” In order to realize the scalable deployment of medium- and heavy-duty battery-electric trucks envisioned by Environmental Protection Agency’s GHG3 rulemaking, 15,625 chargers would have to be installed every month between now and 2032, according to a Ricardo analysis. To date, no state has directed any National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) grant program funds to medium- and heavy-duty charging infrastructure. For charging to be compatible with complex truck driving schedules, charging will have to take place at existing truck parking locations along interstate routes, yet the industry already faces a chronic, nationwide shortage of commercial truck parking. “We need to get this right, which frankly the consequences are too great,” said Dan Van Alstine, chairman of the American Trucking Associations and president and chief operating officer at Ruan Transportation Management Systems. “It’s critical that any regulatory framework is connected to the realities of trucking operations. That is the key to success, and that is why we are here in Washington having these conversations today.” Scott McCandless, chairman of the American Truck Dealers, said the trucking industry needs adequate lead times across all market segments to ensure these vehicles are affordable and supported by the necessary infrastructure. “It is troubling that government is pushing the regulation of zero-emission vehicles in a way that could slow down rather than accelerate the adoption by truck customers,” he added. Andy Richard, chief executive officer of Sapp Bros., said policies shouldn’t ignore the lower-carbon fuels that are already at the industry’s disposal. “A market-driven, technology-neutral approach will advance the adoption of alternative fuels without picking winners and losers,” Richard said. “Biodiesel and renewable diesel represent the best option that fleets have today to reduce their carbon emissions, and this will be the case for the foreseeable future. The right policies will encourage fuel retailers to make these investments without sacrificing efforts on electrification, hydrogen or other next-generation fuels.” Truckload Carriers Association President Jim Ward said that the “essentiality of trucking to the supply chain became quite obvious during the pandemic. and our members remain committed to keeping America moving. To continue providing the quality of service the general public has come to expect, motor carriers must have reliable, affordable, and safe equipment available to them.” Ryan Streblow, president and CEO of the National Tank Truck Carriers, cautioned that “the entire transportation ecosystem is at risk.” “The tank truck industry envisions low and zero emission commercial trucks, but current timelines and goals must account for technology availability, affordability, infrastructure overall and a scalable energy source,” he said.

Google-backed Waymo Via downshifts on autonomous trucking — for now

LOS ANGELES — Google parent company Alphabet Inc.’s Waymo has announced that it is shifting focus to its ride-hailing service and pushing back the timeline for expansion of Waymo Via — the company’s autonomous commercial trucking arm. In a blog posting published on Wednesday, July 26, Waymo officials said that they will continue their collaboration with Daimler Truck North America (DTNA) “to advance technical development of an autonomous truck platform.” “Both our companies share the common goal of improving road safety and efficiency for fleet customers, so we’ll follow through with the platform investments we’ve made to create a redundant chassis to facilitate autonomous trucking,” the blog posting stated. “We look forward to continuing to bring together our autonomous tech with DTNA’s autonomous-ready Freightliner Cascadia platform and exploring the potential of future platforms. Our ongoing investment in advancing Waymo Driver capabilities, especially on freeway, will directly translate to trucking and benefit its development efforts.” Autonomous driving software has come under strong regulatory scrutiny at a time when investors are concerned about heavy investments in the technology amid protracted development timelines. The company said it is seeing significant growth and demand for ride-hailing services in San Francisco, Phoenix and Los Angeles, and is focusing on achieving commercial success in the business. Over the past couple of years, Waymo has announced partnerships with major trucking companies on self-driving big rig and mechanic programs, including J.B. Hunt, UPS, C.H. Robinson and Ryder. “Laser-focusing on ride-hailing today puts us, our partners, and our customers in a strong position to be successful in the future across all of the business lines we pursue over time,” Waymo said. The unit’s Waymo Driver technology is used in a variety of platforms, from ride-hailing to trucking. “We continue to see a significant future commercial opportunity for our trucking solution alongside other commercial applications of the Waymo Driver,” Waymo said. Reuters contributed to this report.

Reports: Yellow preparing for bankruptcy

OVERLAND PARK, Kan. — U.S. trucking firm Yellow is preparing to file for bankruptcy, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, July 26, as customers abandon the company amid a cash crunch and union negotiations. The company could seek bankruptcy court protection as soon as this week, though no decision has been made, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter. A company spokesman told The Trucker that “Talks with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters are ongoing. As previously stated, in keeping with the fiduciary responsibility of the company’s executives, the company continues to prepare for a range of contingencies.” On Sunday, July 23,, the third-biggest U.S. trucking company averted a threatened strike by 22,000 Teamsters-represented workers after compensating more than $50 million it owed in worker benefits and pension accruals. Its customers include large retailers like Walmart and Home Depot, manufacturers and Uber Freight, some of which have paused cargo shipments to the company for fear those goods could be lost or stranded if the carrier goes bankrupt. In 2020, the Donald Trump led government rescued the company with a $700 million pandemic relief loan in exchange for a 30% stake. The Trucker Staff contributed to this report.

Big rig trailer customers, dealers endure bumpy conditions in June

COLUMBUS, Ind. — According to ACT Research’s State of the Industry: U.S. Trailers report, clouds on the trailer-market horizon bear watching, while simultaneously recognizing this is the seasonally weakest time of the year for forward-looking metrics. “As expected, production outpaced orders again in June, dropping trailer backlogs 12% sequentially and 10% year-over-year. Dry van, reefer and flatbed backlogs were down month-over-month, while dumps were higher, as net orders slightly outpaced build in that segment,” said Jennifer McNealy, director of commercial vehicle market research and publications at ACT Research. She explained that “Despite the big sequential drop in trailer backlogs, the seasonally adjusted backlog-to-build ratio shed a modest 20 basis points, to 7.1 months in June from May’s 7.3-month level and 8.5 months from last June. While lower, the current backlog essentially commits the industry into the beginning of 2024.” Regarding cancellations, McNealy stated: “Fleet commitments remained mixed in June. Total cancels dropped to 2.8% of backlog, from May’s 4.2% rate. OEMs are still reporting that most cancellations are coming from the dealer network, although fleet and model-year cancellation-rebooks are being reported as the 2024 orderboards begin to open and slots get pushed.” Conversations with industry stakeholders over the past few weeks “revealed that while they remain relatively optimistic about 2024, there was an acknowledgement of increasingly challenging conditions for customers and dealers,” McNealy concluded.

No strike: UPS, Teamsters reach agreement

NEW YORK — UPS reached a contract agreement with its 340,000-person union on Tuesday, July 25, averting a strike that had the potential to disrupt logistics nationwide. “Together we reached a win-win-win agreement on the issues that are important to Teamsters leadership, our employees and to UPS and our customers,” said Carol Tomé, CEO of UPS. “This agreement continues to reward UPS’s full- and part-time employees with industry-leading pay and benefits while retaining the flexibility we need to stay competitive, serve our customers and keep our business strong.” The agreement was announced after UPS and the Teamsters came back to the negotiating table to discuss — and hopefully resolve — issues in the largest private-sector contract in North America. Both sides had already reached tentative agreement on a host of issues but remained at odds on things like pay for part-time workers, who make up more than half of the UPS employees represented by the union. The Teamsters called the tentative agreement “historic” and “overwhelmingly lucrative” in a news release. The agreement includes, among other benefits, higher wages and air conditioning in delivery trucks. “Rank-and-file members served on the committee for the first time, so we got to show up every day to support our fellow Teamsters and share their stories,” said Brandy Harris, a part-time UPS Teamster with Local 174 in Seattle and a member of the Teamsters National Negotiating Committee. “Our hard work has paid off — from those members and leaders negotiating for more at the table to my sisters and brothers building a credible strike threat around the country. Our union was organized, and we were relentless. We’ve hit every goal that UPS Teamster members wanted and asked for with this agreement. It’s a ‘yes’ vote for the most historic contract we’ve ever had.” Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien said, “Rank-and-file UPS Teamsters sacrificed everything to get this country through a pandemic and enabled UPS to reap record-setting profits. Teamster labor moves America.” O’Brien added: “The union went into this fight committed to winning for our members. We demanded the best contract in the history of UPS, and we got it. UPS has put $30 billion in new money on the table as a direct result of these negotiations. We’ve changed the game, battling it out day and night to make sure our members won an agreement that pays strong wages, rewards their labor, and doesn’t require a single concession. This contract sets a new standard in the labor movement and raises the bar for all workers.” Teamsters General Secretary-Treasurer Fred Zuckerman said UPS came dangerously close to putting itself on strike. “But we kept firm on our demands,” he said. “In my more than 40 years in Louisville representing members at Worldport — the largest UPS hub in the country — I have never seen a national contract that levels the playing field for workers so dramatically as this one.” Highlights of the tentative 2023-2028 UPS Teamsters National Master Agreement include historic wage increases: Existing full- and part-time UPS Teamsters will get $2.75 more per hour in 2023, and $7.50 more per hour over the length of the contract. Existing part-timers will be raised up to no less than $21 per hour immediately, and part-time seniority workers earning more under a market rate adjustment would still receive all new general wage increases. General wage increases for part-time workers will be double the amount obtained in the previous UPS Teamsters contract — and existing part-time workers will receive a 48 percent average total wage increase over the next five years. Wage increases for full-timers will keep UPS Teamsters the highest paid delivery drivers in the nation, improving their average top rate to $49 per hour. Current UPS Teamsters working part-time would receive longevity wage increases of up to $1.50 per hour on top of new hourly raises, compounding their earnings. New part-time hires at UPS would start at $21 per hour and advance to $23 per hour. Other provisions include: All UPS Teamster drivers classified as 22.4s would be reclassified immediately to Regular Package Car Drivers and placed into seniority, ending the unfair two-tier wage system at UPS. Safety and health protections, including vehicle air conditioning and cargo ventilation. UPS will equip in-cab A/C in all larger delivery vehicles, sprinter vans, and package cars purchased after Jan. 1, 2024. All cars get two fans and air induction vents in the cargo compartments. All UPS Teamsters would receive Martin Luther King Day as a full holiday for the first time. No more forced overtime on Teamster drivers’ days off. Drivers would keep one of two workweek schedules and could not be forced into overtime on scheduled off-days. UPS Teamster part-timers will have priority to perform all seasonal support work using their own vehicles with a locked-in eight-hour guarantee. For the first time, seasonal work will be contained to five weeks only from November-December. The creation of 7,500 new full-time Teamster jobs at UPS and the fulfillment of 22,500 open positions, establishing more opportunities through the life of the agreement for part-timers to transition to full-time work. More than 60 total changes and improvements to the National Master Agreement — more than any other time in Teamsters history — and zero concessions from the rank-and-file.

Yellow strike averted as Central States Health agrees to extend benefits to workers

WASHINGTON — The Central States Health and Welfare Fund agreed Sunday, July 23, to extend health care benefits for workers at Yellow Corp. operating companies YRC Freight and Holland, averting a strike of Teamsters workers at the freight companies. The strike was slated to begin on Monday, July 24, after Yellow failed to make contractually obligated benefit payments of $50 million to Central States on July 15. According to a Teamsters news release, Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien and General Secretary-Treasurer Fred Zuckerman placed “intense pressure” on the companies to come to an agreement. Central States is giving Yellow 30 days to pay its bills with the understanding the company will do so within the next two weeks, the news release stated. “The intense discussions between Teamsters leadership and Central States successfully convinced fund trustees to reverse their previous decision that health care benefits would end on July 23 if Yellow remained delinquent,” the news release stated. O’Brien subsequently ordered the Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee to meet in-person with Yellow representatives on Sunday evening. Meetings will take place in Washington, D.C., to review the state of the company and the current contract. “Our members at YRC Freight and Holland cannot work without health care, and the Teamsters worked tirelessly to ensure an immediate strike at Yellow could be averted,” O’Brien said. “These discussions were not easy, but Central States has made meaningful movement under pressure from the union. We are seeking a real resolution, but let this solution today serve as a profound reminder that our members can only endure so many sacrifices. Teamsters at Yellow simply work too hard and have already given so much.” On Friday, July 21, U.S. District Court Judge Julie Robinson of Kansas ruled against Yellow Corp.’s request for an injunction to stop a Teamsters strike. Yellow Corporation executives said that a strike by Teamsters would have violated the parties’ collective bargaining agreement.

Federal judge says Yellow’s Teamster workers can strike

KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A U.S. District Court judge in Kansas has ruled against Yellow Corp.’s request for an injunction to stop a Teamsters strike. Senior Judge Julie Robinson issued the order on Friday afternoon. Robinson’s decision will allow Teamsters to strike, possibly as soon as Monday. Teamsters and Yellow officials have been at odds for weeks. Yellow Corporation executives say that a strike by Teamsters would violate the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. In an e-mailed statement released late Friday, Yellow officials said they regret Robinson’s decision. “The company, represented by Marc E. Kasowitz and Ron Rossi, partners at Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, intends to appeal the ruling,” according to the statement. “The court, recognizing a strike would likely kill the company, resulting in the loss of 30,000 jobs, cautioned the Union — that while it won today’s battle, it could very well lose the war.” The issue came to a head this week when The Central States Pension Fund’s Board of Trustees voted on Monday, July 17, to suspend health care benefits and cease pension accruals for Yellow workers after two Yellow operating companies, Holland and Yellow Freight, failed to fulfill their financial obligations. The complaint Yellow filed against the Teamsters alleges that the Teamsters “breached their binding union contract with Yellow, causing more than $137 million in damages by unjustifiably blocking, for over eight months, Yellow’s restructuring plan to modernize its business, which is necessary to compete against non-union carriers that dominate the LTL business today.” Yellow’s complaint further states that “These modernization efforts, known as One Yellow, are essential to the company’s survival.” In a news release, the Teamsters Union said it “categorically denies the baseless allegations made by Yellow Corporation in its frivolous lawsuit….” “Yellow Corp.’s claims of breach of contract by the Teamsters are unfounded and without merit,” said Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien. “After decades of gross mismanagement, Yellow blew through a $700 million bailout from the federal government, and now it wants workers to foot the bill. For a company that loves to cry poor, Yellow’s executives seem to have no problem paying a team of high-priced lawyers to wage a public relations battle—all in a failed attempt to mask their incompetence.” Yellow officials say they “will continue to pursue its breach of contract case where it seeks to recover more than $1.5 billion in lost enterprise value caused by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.” The Teamsters say they have “diligently adhered to the terms of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) signed with Yellow Corp., fully honoring its contractual commitments and obligations,” according to the organization’s news release. “The company is misleading our members and the public. We have a contract with Yellow that expires March 31, 2024, and Teamsters are living up to it. Yellow’s management knows they’ve failed this company and their workforce because they can no longer live up to the terms they once agreed to. This lawsuit is a desperate, last-ditch attempt to save face,” said Teamsters General Secretary-Treasurer Fred Zuckerman. The Teamsters went on to say in their news release that the lawsuit by Yellow “is a blatant attempt to undermine the rights of workers and discredit the Teamsters. The Teamsters are fully prepared to defend the union’s position vigorously and utilize all available legal resources to challenge the meritless accusations put forth by Yellow Corp.” Yellow officials say that “without these crucial reforms, which are standard practice in the industry today, Yellow likely will not survive, 30,000 jobs will be lost, including 22,000 union jobs, and its shareholders, including the federal government, which owns 30.1% of Yellow stock, will be severely damaged.” In a statement, Yellow Corp.’s management team said the union’s leadership left them no choice but to sue. “For many months, we have made good faith efforts to meet with the IBT to propose a path forward that works for all parties, but they refuse even to meet, let alone engage in honest talks,” according to the statement. “We have communicated with all stakeholders in Washington, D.C., including the Biden administration, to apprise it of the imminent loss of tens of thousands of jobs, the significant anti-competitive effects on the American economy and the devastating impact to the supply chain, and to seek their assistance in persuading the IBT to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. We are fighting for the livelihood of our 30,000 employees who are good hard-working people. We will do all we can to save these American jobs and to protect our shareholders, including the American taxpayer.” The complaint also alleges that O’Brien “orchestrated these breaches and has prevented Yellow from meeting with IBT leadership. For several years, the IBT had endorsed the company’s modernization effort and, in fact, approved the first of the effort’s three phases before the IBT reversed itself taking, in Mr. O’Brien’s words, a ‘militant approach’ to blocking Yellow’s modernization.” Yellow executives say completion of One Yellow in 2023 “is critical to Yellow’s ability to survive, particularly given that Yellow faces, among other things, the imminent need to refinance $1.3 billion in debt — a $567.4 million term loan maturing on June 30, 2024, and a $729.4 million U.S. Treasury loan maturing on September 30, 2024.  Nonetheless, as alleged, the Union has blocked Yellow’s completion of One Yellow, triggering grave uncertainty for employees, investors and customers, and has knowingly intended to cause Yellow’s economic ruin.” Yellow executives claim O’Brien “has taken up the role of public agitator for the company’s demise, recently tweeting an image of a headstone in a cemetery with ‘Yellow’ on it.” Yellow’s statement further said that O’Brien “has continued to hide behind numerous false, unconstructive, and irresponsible social media posts maligning the company, while refusing to discuss a path forward with the company itself.” Yellow officials contend they wouldn’t have had to file suit if Teamsters officials had agreed to “negotiate in good faith.” “Yellow must now take immediate steps to try to save itself,” according to the Yellow statement. “Yellow is entitled to $137.3 million (and counting) for the injury the Union has caused Yellow, and continues to cause Yellow, and in the event of its demise, at least $1.5 billion for the loss in enterprise value Yellow is sustaining as a result of the union’s breaches.”

Depleted US diesel stocks are at lowest level since 2004

LONDON — U.S. inventories of diesel and other distillate fuel oils have failed to replenish significantly despite a downturn in manufacturing and freight activity that has so far lasted eight months. Distillate fuel oil inventories amounted to just 118 million barrels on July 14, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration Stocks were 21 million barrels (-15% or -1.15 standard deviations) below the prior 10-year seasonal average and the deficit had narrowed only modestly from 27 million barrels (-19% or -1.65 standard deviations) a year ago. Distillate stocks have increased slightly from last year when they were just 113 million barrels, but otherwise they are at the lowest level for the time of year since 2004. Chartbook: U.S. distillate fuel oil inventories There is not much scope for rebuilding depleted diesel stocks by running refineries harder, shifting them away from producing gasoline, or drawing down diesel inventories in other regions of the world: U.S. refineries were running at 94.3% of their maximum capacity in the week ended July 14, which was 2.2 percentage points above the 10-year average and the highest rate since 2015. U.S. gasoline stocks are also depleted at almost 13 million barrels (-5% or -1.31 standard deviations) below the prior 10-year seasonal average, making it difficult to boost diesel yields at their expense. In Europe, distillate inventories are 30 million barrels (-7% or -0.90 standard deviations) below the seasonal average while the deficit in Singapore is 3 million barrels (-27% or -2.52 standard deviations). U.S. distillate consumption and inventories are both closely geared to the business cycle since more than three-quarters of distillate fuel oil is consumed by trucking firms, railroads and manufacturers. In recent decades, inventories have normally been reset after a period of depletion by a mid-cycle slowdown or a cycle-ending recession, but so far the slowdown has not been deep enough to rebuild them. If the U.S. economy avoids a recession and industrial activity starts to rise, inventory depletion will resume and stocks will quickly fall to critically low levels, putting upward pressure on fuel prices and inflation. Distillate prices and refining margins have already strengthened over the last three months as inventories have remained lower than expected. Futures prices for diesel delivered in September 2023 have risen by more than $16 per barrel from their recent low near the end of April. Prices for diesel have been rising faster than crude with the gross refining margin (the “crack spread”) widening by $10 per barrel over the same period. The actual and prospective tightness of diesel supplies has started to draw interest from hedge funds and other investors. Money managers have increased their combined position in futures and options linked to middle distillates in eight of the most recent 10 weeks by a total of 76 million barrels since May 2. There have been increases in both U.S. diesel (+27 million barrels) and European gas oil (+49 million barrels) over the period. As a result, the combined position is now in the 43rd percentile for all weeks since 2013, up from just the 6th percentile at the start of May. If the U.S. economy avoids recession, this position-building will likely anticipate, accelerate and amplify the rise in distillate margins and prices. Adjusted for inflation, U.S. heating oil prices were close to the long-term average in June (48th percentile for all months since 1990). So far, positions and prices reflect a delicate balance between upside risks from depleted inventories and downside risks from a faltering global economy. But if the economy avoids a recession, diesel prices could escalate relatively rapidly.

US worker safety agency expands injury reporting for ‘high hazard’ industries, including trucking

WASHINGTON — The U.S. workplace safety regulator has finalized a rule opposed by business groups that will require employers in scores of “high hazard” industries to electronically submit detailed data on worker injuries. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published a final rule similar to one that was adopted by the Obama administration and then largely rolled back under former Republican President Donald Trump before it could take effect. The rule, which takes effect Jan. 1, 2024, requires companies with 100 or more employees in industries that OSHA deems hazardous to annually submit forms including details of specific safety incidents. Employers are already required to keep records of injuries, but they are only submitted to OSHA if the agency conducts an investigation. A wide range of industries are covered by the rule including grocery stores and other retail businesses, trucking and transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, nursing homes, waste collection and delivery services. OSHA said it designated industries as hazardous if they averaged at least 3.5 injuries per 100 full-time employees between 2017 and 2019. Doug Parker, the head of OSHA, in a statement said the agency will use the data to inform outreach and enforcement efforts designed to reduce worker injuries and illnesses. “The safety and health community will benefit from the insights this information will provide at the industry level, while workers and employers will be able to make more informed decisions about their workplace’s safety and health,” Parker said. But Ben Brubeck, vice president of construction trade group Associated Builders and Contractors, said the rule will do nothing to achieve those goals while forcing employers to disclose sensitive information that can be mischaracterized and misused. Labor unions, for example, could use the data to make “false or distorted claims” about worker safety, he said in a statement. Brubeck said that because the records required by the rule involve isolated incidents, they “are not reliable measures of a company’s safety record or of its efforts to promote a safe work environment.” OSHA in the rule said it will not collect employee names and addresses or the names of healthcare professionals and facilities.

US Chamber of Commerce’s new nuclear verdict report says trucking industry ‘under seige’

WASHINGTON — A new report from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for Legal Reform says the trucking industry is under siege by litigation. High-dollar verdicts in trucking accident cases — often referred to as nuclear verdicts — accelerated in size starting in the 2000s but have skyrocketed over the last 10 years, despite a decreased rate of serious trucking crashes over that timeframe, according to the report. “Moreover, with the inflation of verdicts and settlements, the search for deep pockets is expanding and the circle of potential defendants is widening,” the report states. “This paper documents the dramatic increase in trucking accident litigation awards across the board, including an analysis of recent verdicts and settlements to document the continuing trend.” A review of 154 trucking litigation verdicts and settlements from June 2020 through April 2023 reveals a mean plaintiffs’ award of $27,507,334 and a median award of $759,875. For settlements, the mean award was $10,608,219, and the median award was $210,000. Although the means are driven up by a handful of extreme verdicts and settlements, trucking companies and insurers alike must account for these significant risks. The paper then discusses the impact of these inflated verdicts on the industry, consumers and the economy. The research also explores the various factors driving this litigation trend, most of which are tactical litigation tools that drive up verdicts. These tactics include: • Medical referral networks and inflated billing practices. • “Reptile” courtroom tactics by plaintiffs’ lawyers. Reptile tactics can be used to present evidence alleging a trucking company’s negligence despite the company admitting responsibility for the driver’s negligence, if any. By doing so, the jury may “assess the (trucking company’s) liability twice or award duplicative damages to the plaintiff.” • A widening circle of defendants to reach deeper pockets. • An ambiguous and exploitable standard of care for trucking operations. The paper then notes the most problematic jurisdictions across the country for trucking litigation. Some jurisdictions are notoriously worse than others, making solutions ever more critical for the consumers in those jurisdictions. After examining these trends and the factors behind them, the paper concludes with a number of solutions intended to prevent the unreasonable inflation of trucking industry verdicts and settlements, while preserving a civil justice system that effectively provides for prompt, just, and reasonable compensation for those involved in trucking accidents. These solutions, according to the report, would: • Require transparency in claiming medical damages. Legislation should limit medical damages to reasonable and customary amounts actually paid instead of inflated amounts billed. State legislatures or courts should ensure evidence of referral relationships indicating bias or conflict of interest is disclosed and available to juries. Law enforcement and professional ethics regulatory bodies should take a more active role in prosecuting fraud or unethical behavior, respectively. • Prohibit the presentation of inflammatory arguments if a defendant trucking firm stipulates responsibility for a driver’s negligence. To ensure awards are tied to reasonable compensation, policymakers and judges should ensure that evidence and arguments intended to inflate the verdicts do not get presented to the jury. Courts and legislatures should generally prohibit presentation of evidence on derivative theories of negligence where a trucking company has stipulated responsibility for its driver’s negligence, if any. Allowing such evidence inflames juries and promotes another, duplicative assessment of fault against a company. • Create reasonable caps on non-economic damages. Non-economic damages, e.g., compensation for pain and suffering, are admittedly difficult to quantify but are an increasingly large portion of verdicts and settlements than more objective damages, like medical expenses for treatment. • Prohibit the practice of “anchoring.” Courts should ensure non-economic damages are supported by evidence and not arbitrarily chosen. Judges (and state legislatures if judges fail to) should prohibit unsubstantiated anchoring, where an award suggestion is argued without evidence simply to plant the number in the jury’s minds. • Permit evidence of non-use of seat belts by plaintiffs in damages calculations. The duty to mitigate damages has long been a component of the common law of torts. With seat belt use mandatory in 49 states, states that do not currently permit evidence of the non-use of seat belts in damages calculations should do so. The goals of a properly functioning civil justice system are not advanced by compensating for serious injuries that may have been avoided or mitigated by compliance with a seat belt law. • Clarify the standard of care for motor carrier selection and failure-to equip claims. Policymakers and judges should defer to federal agencies with a safety remit in deciding whether contracting with a motor carrier is reasonable or whether a truck is properly equipped. Ultimately, the report notes, “A multi-pronged effort is necessary to address the negative impacts of … actions while still providing compensation for reasonably incurred and medically appropriate care.” “The trucking industry strives for safe performance, but accidents that are the fault of the trucking company, although infrequent, do happen,” the report states. “In those instances, the civil justice system should work to efficiently provide a reasonable compensatory award.”

DAT Truckload Volume Index: June signals that spot rates have hit bottom

BEAVERTON, Ore. — Truckload freight volumes and spot rates held firm in June while contract rates fell to their lowest points in almost two years, according to DAT Freight & Analytics. “The gap between spot and contract rates was the narrowest since April 2022,” said Ken Adamo, DAT’s chief of analytics. “Spot rates for van and refrigerated freight increased for the third straight month, and volumes were almost unchanged from May. These are signs that spot truckload prices have reached the bottom of the current freight cycle.” The national benchmark contract rate for dry van freight has not increased for 12 consecutive months. At $2.58 per mile, the rate was 70 cents lower than a year ago. Volumes held steady in June The DAT Truckload Volume Index (TVI), an indicator of loads moved during a given month, decreased marginally for van and refrigerated (“reefer”) freight and increased slightly for flatbed loads: Van TVI: 230, down 1% from May. Reefer TVI: 167, down 3% from May. Flatbed TVI: 267, up 2% from May. Van, reefer rates improved On the spot market, the national benchmark rates for van and reefer freight rose while the flatbed rate declined compared to May: Spot van rate: $2.08 per mile, up 3 cents, the first increase in five months. Spot reefer rate: $2.47 a mile, up 3 cents. Spot flatbed rate: $2.61 a mile, down 4 cents. Van line haul rates averaged $1.65 a mile, up 4 cents compared to May, while reefer line haul rates averaged $2.01 a mile, up 5 cents. The flatbed line haul rate dipped 2 cents to $2.10 a mile. Line haul rates subtract an amount equal to an average fuel surcharge. Lower diesel prices in June pushed fuel surcharges to 17-month lows, averaging 43 cents a mile for van freight, 46 cents for reefers, and 51 cents for flatbeds. Load-to-truck ratios reflected seasonal demand Load-to-truck ratios reflect truckload supply and demand on the DAT One marketplace: The national average van load-to-truck ratio was 2.6, meaning there were 2.6 loads for every van posted to the DAT One marketplace last month. The ratio was 2.5 in May and 3.9 in June 2022. The reefer ratio averaged 3.8, up from 3.6 in May and down from 7.0 in June 2022. The flatbed ratio fell to 9.7, down from 11.7 in May and 37.6 in June 2022. “Demand for truckload services typically slows at this time of year, but this could change quickly given the threat of strikes in the parcel and less-than-truckload sectors,” Adamo said. “Shippers are putting contingency plans in place and would look to freight brokers and carriers on the spot market to keep their line haul operations moving. Demand for trucks would jump, especially around Louisville, Memphis, Indianapolis, Dallas and other major parcel hubs.”

Teamsters president says he’s asked the White House not to intervene if UPS workers go on strike

NEW YORK — The head of the Teamsters said Sunday that he has asked the White House not to intervene if unionized UPS workers end up going on strike. Negotiations between the delivery company and the union representing 340,000 of its workers have been at a standstill for more than a week with a July 31 deadline for a new contract approaching fast. The union has threatened a strike if a deal is not reached by the time the collective bargaining agreement expires. Asked during a webcast with members Sunday on whether the White House could force a contract on the union, Teamsters President Sean O’Brien said he has asked the White House on numerous occasions to stay away. “My neighborhood where I grew up in Boston, if two people had a disagreement and you had nothing to do with it – you just kept walking,” O’Brien said. “We don’t need anybody getting involved in this fight,” he said. The Teamsters represent more than half of the Atlanta-based company’s workforce in the largest private-sector contract in North America. If a strike does happen, it would be the first since a 15-day walkout by 185,000 workers crippled the company a quarter century ago. Before contract talks broke down, both sides had reached tentative agreements on several issues, including installing air conditioning in more trucks and getting rid of a two-tier wage system for drivers who work weekends and earn less money. A sticking point in negotiations is wage increases for part-time workers, who make a minimum of $16.20 an hour, according to UPS. Last week, UPS said it will temporarily begin training nonunion employees in the U.S. to step in should there be a strike.  

Lack of safe truck parking takes center stage as NTSB investigation into deadly Greyhound wreck begins

ST. LOUIS — Federal investigators have begun the task of trying to determine what caused a Greyhound bus crash in southern Illinois that killed three passengers. The accident just before 2 a.m. Wednesday, July 12, happened when the bus carrying a driver and 22 passengers slammed into three tractor-trailers parked along an Interstate 70 exit ramp near St. Louis. Those killed were identified as Juan Vasquez-Rodriguez, 34, of Passaic, New Jersey; Buford Paya, 71, of Supai, Arizona; and Bradley Donovan, 47, of Springfield, Illinois. Madison County Coroner Stephen Nonn said preliminary findings showed all three men died of blunt trauma. The bus was traveling from Indianapolis to St. Louis. It isn’t yet known why it was on the exit ramp that leads to a rest area near Highland, Illinois, about 25 miles short of the Greyhound’s destination. No one in the trucks was hurt. The vehicle was equipped with cameras facing both inward and outward, and their video will be analyzed, National Transportation Safety Board member Tom Chapman said. He added that the 2014-model bus had seatbelts. A team of NTSB investigators is expected to be on-site for up to six days, and Chapman said the trucks’ presence on the ramp “will be a part of this investigation.” Parking spots are at a premium in public rest areas, and truckers often park along exit ramps at night. The practice is illegal in Illinois and many other states, but police often ignore it, understanding the shortage of places for overnight truck parking. The lack of adequate parking for big rigs has been a major issue in the trucking industry for years. Shortly after the wreck, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) issued a brief statement about the accident. OOIDA officials noted that there is only one parking spot for every 11 trucks on the road, creating unsafe parking conditions for truck drivers and the motoring public. Many drivers are forced by their electronic logging devices to shut down wherever they are. Oftentimes, that means a freeway offramp like the one where the Greyhound accident occurred. OOIDA says the only solution is through bipartisan, bicameral legislation in Congress to expand truck parking. The federal government, including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, have said that they are concerned about the issue and are working to help solve it. Buttigieg recently announced that more than $2.2 billion from a grant program will go to 162 different infrastructure projects across the country, including truck parking facilities. Chapman said the NTSB will be “looking at the location, the proximity of the parked trucks, such details as the width, the length of the ramp,” Passenger Edwin Brown, 22, of Friars Point, Mississippi, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that he felt the bus shake as it passed over rumble strips before the side of the vehicle “opened up like a can opener.” The driver was in and out of consciousness after the crash as Brown turned the ignition off with the help of a trucker, he said. The bus driver was hospitalized in serious condition, according to a Facebook post by the Amalgamated Transit Union, which represents Greyhound drivers. Paya, whom friends called Buffalo because he was so burly, was a member of the Havasupai Tribe that is nestled inside the Grand Canyon. Leaving his community meant going by helicopter to the rim or an 8-mile walk or horseback ride, said his niece, Marian Paya Marshall, of Flagstaff, Arizona. Still, he sometimes showed up without warning, calling her from along a nearby highway and asking her for a ride. “How,” she would ask, “did you get here?” Then would ensue a wild tale, which sometimes involved hitchhiking, she said. Other times he would catch a bus or simply walk. “He was so silly,” she said describing him as a jokester, with a love of horses. “And we’d say, ‘How come you didn’t call us?’ And he’ll say, ‘I just felt like exploring.’” A GoFundMe page was set up to raise money to help the family of Vasquez-Rodriguez transport his body to Peru. A family friend who set it up, Gabriela Benitez, wrote in Spanish that Vasquez-Rodriguez left Peru “looking for a future and a better future for his entire family. There are no words to comfort at a time like this and that is why financial aid would help them alleviate the great sorrow a little.” The Trucker Staff contributed to this report.

Report: 57% of all commercial diesel trucks are near-zero emissions models

WASHINGTON — U.S. trucking companies are buying more new, low emission, diesel technology than ever before, a new report from the Diesel Technology Forum (DTF) has found. Research shows the number of new near-zero emission diesel trucks on the road increased 10.2% between 2021 and 2022. Near-zero emission trucks are advanced diesel technology manufactured in the 2010 and later model years. According to DTF’s analysis of S&P Global Mobility TIPNet Vehicles in Operation Data, as of December 2022: Diesel dominates the trucking sector: For the largest commercial trucks (Class 8) in operation, 96.8% are advanced diesel technology; 1.3% are CNG, 0.2% are electric, and the remainder are gasoline or other fuels. For the entire (Class 3-8) commercial truck population of over 15 million vehicles, 75.6% are powered by diesel, gasoline (22.9%), compressed natural gas (0.46%), other (ethanol, fuel cell, LNG, propane, 0.85%) and electric (0.09%). Illinois is the state with the fastest-growing registration of new advanced diesel technology Class 8 commercial trucks, up 4.6% as of December 2022 as compared to 2021. The population of near-zero emissions diesel technology trucks is growing. They comprise 57% of all commercial diesel trucks (Class 3-8) on the roads today. These trucks are equipped with particulate filters and selective catalytic reduction systems (SCR) that achieve near-zero levels of emissions. That’s a 10.2% increase in one year (2022 vs. 2021). A total of 65.7% of all commercial diesel trucks (Class 3-8) on the road are 2007 and newer and are equipped with particulate filters so they achieve near-zero emissions for particulates. Indiana ranks first of the states for the highest percentage of registrations of 2010 and later model year near-zero emission diesel trucks (73.2%). Next in the rankings is Utah (66.2%), Pennsylvania (66.0%), the District of Columbia (65.4%), Texas (63.6%), Oklahoma (62.6%), Florida (62.3%), Illinois (60.6%), Louisiana (59.2%), and Wisconsin (59.1%). California lags the national average, taking the 35th spot (51.6%). There are 125 times more new generation advanced diesel trucks on the road in California than electric trucks. “Nearly 7-million new-technology diesel trucks are on the roads, delivering our goods and services with near-zero emissions,” said Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the DTF “Nationwide, for every electric commercial truck on the road, there are nearly 1,100 powered by internal combustion engines.” According to this most recent analysis, internal combustion engines (diesel, gasoline, natural gas and propane) power about 99.91% of the nation’s trucking fleet. “As the trucking industry explores new fuels, including all electric and fuel cell technology, it is clear that diesel and other internal combustion engines are going to continue to play a dominant role for years to come,” Schaeffer said. The DTF notes that diesel technology has fundamentally transformed over the last decade, with advancements leading to achieving near-zero emissions beginning with the 2010 model year. “Its continued dominance in trucking reflects diesel’s record of continuous improvement and low-cost operation,” the DTF study notes. “And now we can see the next milestone for advanced diesel technology emerging in California in 2024 and other parts of the country in 2027. That next generation of diesel will further reduce NOx emissions by an additional 50-80% over current models.” The study further states that “no other fuel yet matches the full combination of what the newest generation of diesel technology offers: efficient performance, reliability, durability, low-cost operation, high market value for used products, maximum driving range, flexibility in utilization, routing and ready access to servicing, parts and fueling throughout the nation.” DTF researchers said that while alternative technologies may hold promise for the future, they all require some level of compromise, have higher upfront costs and have very limited supporting infrastructure for fueling and service. “Decarbonizing the economy will take time and require many different types of solutions for different sectors,” Schaeffer said. “There isn’t a one-size or one-fuel fits all answer. In the meantime, accelerating the turnover of the existing fleet, continued improvement of internal combustion engines and utilizing low-carbon renewable fuels is just as important as a zero-emission vehicle approach to help achieve meaningful progress toward climate goals.”

New Energy Information Administration report shows diesel prices hovering just below $4 per gallon through most of ’24

WASHINGTON — In its most recent Short-Term Energy Outlook Report, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) outlines predicted trends in the economy, oil prices, renewable diesel production and natural gas prices, noting that crude oil prices are likely to increase heading into 2024 but diesel fuel prices will likely stay below $4 for most of 2024. The national average for on-highway diesel price will be $3.88 per gallon by the end of 2023, then increasing to $3.92 by the fourth quarter of next year, according to the report. U.S. economy EIA officials note that their economic forecast “assumes U.S. GDP growth of 1.5% in 2023 and 1.3% in 2024, which is revised up from last month’s forecast of 1.3% in 2023 and 1.0% in 2024.” The EIA report states that the upward revision is partially driven by an updated estimate of real GDP growth in the first quarter of 2023 (1Q23) resulting from more consumer spending and aggregate investment. Crude oil prices The EIA forecasts that the Brent crude oil spot price will average $78 per barrel in July. Crude oil prices gradually increase throughout the forecast, reaching about $80 per barrel in 4Q23 and averaging about $84 per barrel in 2024 “because we expect that global oil inventories will decline over the next five quarters,” the report notes. U.S. renewable diesel production As a result of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s revised Renewable Fuel Standard rule establishing biofuel volume requirements that was issued on June 21, EIA has reduced their forecast for renewable diesel production growth. However, EIA officials note that they still expect renewable diesel production will grow in the U.S. to reach 219,000 barrels a day in 2024. Natural gas prices EIA officials say they expect the Henry Hub spot price will rise in the coming months as declining natural gas production narrows the existing surplus of natural gas inventories compared with the five-year average. Henry Hub prices in the forecast average more than $2.80 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) in the second half of 2023 (2H23), up from about $2.40/MMBtu in the first half of the year.

3 dead and 14 injured in Illinois crash involving Greyhound bus and tractor-trailers, police say

HIGHLAND, Ill. — A Greyhound passenger bus crashed into three tractor-trailers parked along a highway exit to a rest area early Wednesday in southern Illinois, killing three people and injuring 14 others, some seriously, state police said. The bus was traveling westbound along Interstate 70 in Madison County around 1:55 a.m. when it crashed into the three semis, Illinois State Police said, citing an initial investigation. Four people were taken to the hospital by helicopter and at least 10 others were taken by ambulance, state police said in a news release. Police did not immediately release details about those who were injured and killed. No one in the three trucks was injured in the crash near the city of Highland about 25 miles (40 kilometers) east of St. Louis, police said. State Police spokesperson Melaney Arnold said those killed and injured were all on the Greyhound bus. She was not sure if the bus driver was among those killed or injured or if all of those involved were passengers. The crash closed westbound traffic on I-70. Television footage of the scene shows the badly damaged right front portion of the bus wedged onto the rear of a tractor-tractor. The roof of the bus is crumpled. A second tractor-trailer appears to have made contact with the right rear of the bus while a third tractor-trailer appears to have crashed into the rear of that second semi. Greyhound spokesperson Mike Ogulnick told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch in an email the bus was traveling from Indianapolis to St. Louis, where it was scheduled to arrive at about 2:20 a.m. It was carrying about 30 people, including the driver, he said. “Our primary concern is ensuring we care for our passengers and driver at this time,” Ogulnick said. “We are working closely with local authorities and a relief bus is on the way for passengers.” Another bus was sent to transport passengers who were not hurt, Ogulnick said.

Average US diesel prices on the rise, EIA reports

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Average diesel fuel prices — for the most part — across the nation are up once again, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). This comes after several weeks of declines. According to the EIA’s July 10 report, the price currently sits at $3.806, up from $3.767 on July 3. The only regions of the nation that saw declines were in New England and in the Rocky Mountains, where the average price is down from $4.090 on July 3 to $4.074 on July 10, and from $3.950 on July 3 to $3.939 on July 10, respectively, EIA statistics show. The highest prices are in California, which saw an average gallon rise from $4.762 on July 3 to $4.821 on July 10. The nation’s lowest prices can be found along the Gulf Coast at $3.505 per gallon on average, up from $3.468 per gallon on July 3.