TheTrucker.com

US regulators to seek automated braking requirement for heavy trucks

DETROIT — In a reversal from Trump administration policies, U.S. auto safety regulators say they will move to require or set standards for automatic emergency braking systems on new heavy trucks. The Department of Transportation, which includes the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), announced the change June 11 when it released its spring regulatory agenda. It also will require what it said are rigorous testing standards for autonomous vehicles, and set up a national database to document automated-vehicle crashes. The moves by the administration of President Joe Biden run counter to the agency’s stance under President Donald Trump. NHTSA had resisted regulation of automated-vehicle systems, saying it didn’t want to stand in the way of potential life-saving developments. Instead, it relied on voluntary safety plans from manufacturers. NHTSA had proposed a regulation on automatic emergency braking in 2015 before Trump took office, but it languished in the regulatory process. The agency says it has been studying use of the electronic systems, and it plans to publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register in April 2022. When a regulation is published, it opens the door to public comment. “We are glad to see NHTSA finally take the next step in making large trucks safer by mandating AEB,” said Jason Levine, director of the Center for Auto Safety, which was among the groups that petitioned for the requirement in 2015. “Unfortunately, at this rate, it will still be years until the technology that could help stop the 5,000 truck crash deaths on our roads is required,” he said in an email. A trade group representing independent big rig drivers says the technology isn’t ready for heavy vehicles and can unexpectedly activate without reason. “Our members have also reported difficulties operating vehicles in inclement weather when the system is engaged, which has created safety concerns,” the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association said in a statement. The association says that while the technology is still being perfected, legislators and regulators shouldn’t set time frames for requiring it on all trucks. However, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group supported by auto insurers, found in a study last year that automatic emergency braking and forward collision warnings could prevent more than 40% of crashes in which semis rear-end other vehicles. A study by the group found that when rear crashes happened, the systems cut speeds by more than half, reducing damage and injuries. Cathy Chase, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, another group that sought the regulation from NHTSA in 2015, said the agency is moving too slowly by not publishing the regulation until next year. “I don’t understand the delay,” she said. “I know that might sound impatient, but when people are dying on the roads, 5,000 people are dying on the roads each year, and we have proven solutions, we would like to see more immediate action.” In 2016, NHTSA brokered a deal with 20 automakers representing 99% of U.S. new passenger vehicle sales to voluntarily make automatic emergency braking standard on all models by Sept. 1, 2022. But that deal did not apply to big rigs. The announcement of the requirements comes two days after four people were killed when a milk tanker going too fast collided with seven passenger vehicles on a Phoenix freeway. At least nine people were injured. The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which investigates crashes and makes recommendations to stop them from happening, said Thursday it would send a nine-person team to investigate the Phoenix crash. The agency said it would look at whether automatic emergency braking in the truck would have mitigated or prevented the crash. Since at least 2015 the NTSB has recommended automatic emergency braking or collision alerts be standard on vehicles. At present, there are no federal requirements that semis have forward collision warning or automatic emergency braking, even though the systems are becoming common on smaller passenger vehicles. The systems use cameras and sometimes radar to see objects in front of a vehicle, and they either warn the driver or slow and even stop the vehicle if it’s about to hit something. By Tom Krisher, AP Auto Writer

Changes made to interstate traffic patterns at West Memphis to ease flow across Mississippi River

WEST MEMPHIS, Ark. — The Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) and the City of West Memphis are working together to ease the flow of traffic across the Interstate 55 Mississippi River Bridge. The Hernando de Soto Bridge, which carries Interstate 40 across the Mississippi River between West Memphis and Memphis, is closed indefinitely while repairs are made to a structural fracture found in May. The plan is to reduce merging points which is anticipated to reduce conflicts and improve traffic flow. Weather permitting, the following significant traffic pattern changes will begin at 6 p.m. local time Wednesday, June 9 and continue until further notice. I-55 southbound will be reduced to a single outside lane just before the western I-40/I-55 Interchange. I-40 eastbound already narrows to a single lane at the I-40/I-55 interchange. The exit ramps at Seventh Street and Ingram Boulevard will be closed to I-40 traffic. I-40 traffic will continue in the inside lane and I-55 traffic will continue in the outside lane through Ingram Boulevard. The middle lane will be closed to separate eastbound traffic between the western and eastern I-40/I-55 interchanges. East of Ingram Boulevard, eastbound traffic will transition into two adjacent lanes. The I-40/I-55 on-ramp at Ingram Boulevard will be closed. These traffic pattern changes were developed in collaboration with ARDOT, the Tennessee Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and the City of West Memphis. Traffic will be controlled by traffic barrels and signage. Check TheTrucker.com regularly for updates on the I-40 bridge repairs. In addition, TDOT has created a webpage to keep the public updated of the progress work on the bridge, and ARDOT has a similar webpage.

Biden ends GOP infrastructure talks, but new group emerges

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden ended talks with a group of Republican senators on a big infrastructure package on Tuesday, June 8, and started reaching out to senators from both parties in a new effort toward bipartisan compromise, setting a summer deadline for Congress to pass his top legislative priority. The president is walking away from talks with lead Republican negotiator Sen. Shelley Moore Capito after the two spoke Tuesday, but would welcome her in the new bipartisan group, according to an administrative official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private negotiations. Shortly after the Biden-Capito talks collapsed, 10 senators huddled late Tuesday over pizza — five Republicans, five Democrats — emerging after three hours with some optimism their new effort could create a viable path forward, said a person familiar with the closed-door talks and granted anonymity to discuss them. At the same time, with anxiety running high as time slips by, Democrats are laying the groundwork to pass some or all of the ambitious package on their own. Biden conferred Tuesday with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer about launching the budget resolution process for Senate votes in July, the White House said. “The President is committed to moving his economic legislation through Congress this summer, and is pursuing multiple paths to get this done,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement. The breakdown in the White House’s efforts with GOP senators comes after weeks of prolonged infrastructure talks between the president and Capito as the two sides failed to broker the divide over the scope of Biden’s sweeping infrastructure investment and how to pay for it. The Republican senators offered a $928 billion proposal, which included about $330 billion in new spending — but not as much as Biden’s $1.7 trillion investment proposal for rebuilding the nation’s roads, bridges, highways and other infrastructure, including Veterans Affairs hospitals and care centers. Biden has proposed raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, a nonstarter for Republicans, and rejected the GOP senators’ suggestion of tapping unspent COVID-19 aid money to fund the new infrastructure spending. In a statement, Capito said she was disappointed Biden ended the talks, but also expressed interest in ongoing bipartisan work. “While I appreciate President Biden’s willingness to devote so much time and effort to these negotiations, he ultimately chose not to accept the very robust and targeted infrastructure package, and instead, end our discussions,” she said. “However, this does not mean bipartisanship isn’t feasible.” As Biden aims for a compromise deal, he has begun reaching out to other senators, including Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and two key centrist Democrats, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, whose votes will be crucial in the evenly split Senate. Those senators receiving phone calls from Biden were among the group of 10 assembled with Sinema and Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) late Tuesday in Portman’s office for what was described as a productive meeting, the person familiar with the session said. Portman and Sinema have been engaged for months with Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) on a sizable infrastructure proposal that is expected to include proposed ways to pay for it. The senators’ group has expanded in recent weeks to include the others from both parties. Romney has described it a “back burner” group, in case the administration’s talks with the GOP senators faltered. Psaki said the president urged the senators in his conversations to continue their work “to develop a bipartisan proposal that he hopes will be more responsive to the country’s pressing infrastructure needs.” Biden tapped Cabinet and White House aides to meet with the senators in person. Ahead of Biden’s announcement, the White House had also spoken to other lawmakers, including from the House. Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), the co-chairs of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, spoke late Monday with Brian Deese, director of the White House National Economic Council, about bipartisan efforts to reach an infrastructure deal, according to an aide who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private conversations. The Problem Solvers group has agreed to $761.8 billion in new spending over eight years as part of $1.2 trillion plan, according to a draft obtained late Tuesday by The Associated Press. The one-page draft does not include any proposed ways to pay for the package. Gottheimer is also working with Cassidy and Sinema from the senators’ group, the aide said. With the narrowly split House and the 50-50 Senate, the White House faces political challenges pushing its priorities through Congress with Democratic votes alone. Biden’s party holds a slight majority in the Senate because Vice President Kamala Harris can break a tie. The special budget rules could provide Biden with an alternative path, particularly in the Senate, because they allow legislation to be approved with a 51-vote threshold, rather than the 60 votes typically needed to advance a bill past a filibuster — in this case, led by Republicans against the Biden package. Democrats are watching warily as time passes and anxiety builds toward an agreement, with many lawmakers worried they are not fulfilling their campaign promises to voters who put the party in control of Congress and the White House. During a private discussion of Democratic senators at lunch Tuesday, there were differing views over whether they should keep talking with Republicans or pursue an approach that would allow them to pass a bill on their own, through the budget reconciliation process. Schumer told reporters afterward that Democrats are pursuing “a two-path approach.” The bipartisan talks led by Sinema with the other senators are underway, Schumer said, while the budget committee is preparing the legislation that would allow passage through the reconciliation process. “It may well be that part of the bill that is passed will be bipartisan, and part of it will be in reconciliation,” he said. “But we’re not going to sacrifice bigness and boldness.” The president is expected to engage with lawmakers while he sets out this week on his first foreign trip for an economic summit of the Group of Seven industrialized nations in Europe. By Lisa Mascaro and Josh Boak, The Associated Press

Colonial Pipeline CEO: Ransom payment among my ‘toughest decisions’

WASHINGTON — The chief executive of the massive fuel pipeline hit by ransomware last month told senators Tuesday, June 8, that authorizing a multimillion-dollar payment to hackers was the right thing to do to bring an end to fuel shortages affecting much of the eastern United States, even as authorities have discouraged such payments. “I made the decision to pay, and I made the decision to keep the information about the payment as confidential as possible,” Colonial Pipeline CEO Joseph Blount told the Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing about last month’s attack. “It was the hardest decision I’ve made in my 39 years in the energy industry, and I know how critical our pipeline is to the country — and I put the interests of the country first.” Asked how much worse it would have been if Colonial Pipeline hadn’t paid to get its data back, CEO Joseph Blount said, “That’s an unknown we probably don’t want to know. And it’s an unknown we probably don’t want to play out in a public forum.” Blount’s testimony, his first since the May 7 cyberattack that led the pipeline to halt operations, underscored the dilemma facing both the private industry and the federal government as ransomware attacks have proliferated in scale and sophistication. U.S. authorities have cautioned against payments for fear of encouraging additional attacks, but Blount’s remarks made clear the enormous economic consequences if ransoms aren’t paid and critical infrastructure is shut down. In this case, the Justice Department was able to recover much of the $4.4 million ransom after seizing a virtual bitcoin wallet used to hide the proceeds. Though officials said they may be able to achieve similar success in future ransomware attacks, that is hardly guaranteed. The May 7 attack on Colonial Pipeline — which supplies roughly 45% of the fuel consumed on the East Coast — has been attributed to a Russia-based gang of cybercriminals using the DarkSide ransomware variant, one of more than 100 variants the FBI is currently investigating. The attack began after hackers exploited a legacy virtual private network that was not intended to be in use and has since been shut down, Blount said. Blount said the Georgia-based company began negotiating with the hackers on the evening of the May 7 attack and paid a ransom of 75 bitcoin — then valued at roughly $4.4 million — the following day. The hack prompted the company to halt operations before the ransomware could spread to its operating systems. Though the FBI has historically discouraged ransomware payments for fear of encouraging cyberattacks, Colonial officials have said they saw the transaction as necessary to resume the vital fuel transport business as rapidly as possible. The encryption tool the hackers provided the company in exchange for the payment helped “to some degree” but was not perfect, with Colonial still in the process of fully restoring its systems, Blount said. “If you start to look at the fact that it took us from Friday (May 7) all the way to Wednesday afternoon the following week (to resume operations), and we already started to see pandemonium going on in the markets, people doing unsafe things like filling garbage bags full of gasoline or people fist-fighting in line at the fuel pump, the concern would be what would happen if it had stretched on beyond that amount of time,” Blount said. “What would happen at the airports where we supply a lot of jet fuel, let alone what might happen at the gas pump,” he added. The operation to seize cryptocurrency paid to the Russia-based hacker group is the first of its kind to be undertaken by a specialized ransomware task force created by the Biden administration Justice Department. It reflects a rare victory in the fight against ransomware as U.S. officials scramble to confront a rapidly accelerating threat targeting critical industries around the world. “By going after the entire ecosystem that fuels ransomware and digital extortion attacks — including criminal proceeds in the form of digital currency — we will continue to use all of our resources to increase the cost and consequences of ransomware and other cyber-based attacks,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said Monday in announcing the operation. The Bitcoin amount seized — 63.7, currently valued at $2.3 million after the price of Bitcoin tumbled— amounted to 85% of the total ransom paid, which is the exact amount that the cryptocurrency-tracking firm Elliptic says it believes was the take of the affiliate who carried out the attack. The ransomware software provider, DarkSide, would have gotten the other 15%. “The extortionists will never see this money,” said Stephanie Hinds, the acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California, where a judge earlier Monday authorized the seizure warrant. Ransomware attacks — in which hackers encrypt a victim organization’s data and demand a hefty sum for returning the information — have flourished across the globe. Last year was the costliest on record for such attacks. Hackers have targeted vital industries, as well as hospitals and police departments. Weeks after the Colonial Pipeline attack, a ransomware attack attributed to REvil, a Russian-speaking gang that has made some of the largest ransomware demands on record in recent months, disrupted production at Brazil’s JBS SA, the world’s largest meat processing company. The ransomware business has evolved into a highly compartmentalized racket, with labor divided among the provider of the software that locks data, ransom negotiators, hackers who break into targeted networks, hackers skilled at moving undetected through those systems and exfiltrating sensitive data — and even call centers in India employed to threaten people whose data was stolen to pressure for extortion payments. By Eric Tucker and Ben Fox, The Associated Press. Associated Press writer Frank Bajak in Boston contributed to this report.

Transportation secretary to visit closed interstate bridge

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg will visit the Interstate 40 bridge connecting Tennessee and Arkansas on Thursday, June 3. The span was closed lasts month when a fracture was found in one of its steel beams. The bridge visit comes as President Biden is pushing for a major infrastructure package, while Republican senators want a more modest investment in roads, highways and other traditional public works projects. The I-40 bridge connecting Memphis and the Arkansas city of West Memphis was shut down May 11 after inspectors found a crack in one of two 900-foot horizontal steel beams that are critical for the bridge’s structural integrity. Officials have said the bridge could be closed for months. The first phase of repairs to the bridge were completed last week, and Tennessee transportation officials said they hope to release a schedule this week for the bridge’s reopening. An Arkansas inspector was fired for missing the crack in the bridge’s 2019 and 2020 inspections. Photos taken by a Mississippi River kayaker in 2016 appear to show the fracture, raising questions about how early it first appeared.

Fuel outlook: Availability and pricing should be stable through summer months

Trucks powered by electricity may be making the headlines, but trucks burning old-fashioned diesel fuel are still moving the freight. As summer approaches, diesel fuel pricing and availability are on the minds of a lot of truckers. President Joe Biden’s newly installed administration has received plenty of criticism related to increasing fuel prices, especially when it was announced he had signed an executive order halting construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline, which was slated to bring crude oil from Western Alberta, Canada, to U.S. refineries. The administration also announced its intent to stop issuing new leases for oil exploration and drilling on public lands, and to decline renewals on current leases. A look at the historical data, however, suggests that Biden’s policy isn’t to blame. According to reports from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the national average diesel fuel price was $2.37 per gallon Nov. 2, 2020, the day before the U.S. presidential election. Each Monday for the next 20 weeks, the EIA reported that the average price had increased. Diesel prices had already risen for 11 consecutive weeks before Biden’s inauguration. More likely, diesel fuel prices were simply rebounding from the recession caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. As of the first week of May this year, the national average price of diesel was $3.14 per gallon. A year ago, in the worst of the recession, the average was $2.40. Go back another year however — to the first week of May 2019 — and the average fuel price of $3.17 was similar to today’s market. In 2018, it was $3.16 per gallon. It’s doubtful the upcoming summer will bring diesel fuel prices of $2.43 per gallon (that was the 2020 summer average). In the summer of 2019, fuel averaged $3.02. In 2018, summer prices averaged $3.23. While Biden’s policies could eventually slow future fuel production, pushing prices upward, significant increases aren’t likely in the short term. For the longer term, Biden has clearly outlined a desire to move the country away from petroleum fuels and toward newer technologies. The fuel market is not, however, without threats. In May, a Russian hacking group claimed credit for launching a ransomware attack against Colonial Pipeline, the largest mover of petroleum products in the U.S. Typical ransomware attacks entail encrypting the owner’s files so they can’t be accessed, meaning the programs that operate the pipeline can’t be run. Colonial Pipeline owners immediately shut down the line, which runs from the Gulf Coast through the Southeast and into New England, to prevent further damage. Within hours of the shutdown announcement, panic-buying was widespread, and many gas stations and truck stops were running out of fuel. Colonial’s 5,500 miles of pipeline carry about 100 million gallons of refined petroleum products per day. Replacing the pipeline’s capacity would require about 12,500 trucks pulling tank trailers, or 3,100 rail car deliveries, every day. Longer trips would require multiple days to complete, adding to the number of trucks needed. Another potential threat to fuel pricing is the shortage of available drivers. The majority of petroleum delivery positions are local, home-every-night jobs that could be popular among over-the-road drivers who want more time at home. But the negatives can add up quickly. Work schedules often include 12- to 14-hour days with few days off falling on the weekends. Many routes are subject to heavy traffic congestion in metro areas, and some venture into neighborhoods where protests have erupted into lawlessness over the past year. In addition, qualifying for the job isn’t easy. Because of the physical aspects of the job, like lifting and carrying hoses and climbing the ladder to the top of the trailer, many carriers require a physical agility test prior to hire. A hazmat endorsement is mandatory, which requires testing, completion of a background check and extra expense. Compensation, often paid per completed load, can be considerably less than drivers earned over the road, adding to the difficulty of finding and keeping drivers. Weather can also play a role in diesel availability and pricing. In February this year, a polar vortex shut down Texas and Louisiana refineries when freezing water vapor in petroleum pipelines fouled valves and filters. Fortunately, the deep freeze only lasted a few days, but it was enough to slow production and put pressure on prices. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the “official” hurricane season begins June 1 and continues through November. Last year brought a record 30 named storms, including two tropical storms that formed in May. A total of 12 made landfall in the U.S., with six of those reaching Category 3 or higher. The storms broke another record, racking up damages to the tune of nearly $65 billion. A large number of refineries are located along the Gulf Coast in Texas and Louisiana, with a few more in Mississippi and Alabama. Proximity to the Gulf makes refineries accessible to tankers bringing in crude or leaving with refined products. It also makes them vulnerable to hurricane damage. Even temporary, precautionary shutdowns could impact the fuel supply. Recent unrest in the Middle East could be another factor. If the conflict escalates to include oil-producing countries in the region, the world oil supply could be impacted. Finally, summer months are known for Americans hitting the road. After a year of COVID-19 shutdowns and sheltering at home, the highways may be crowded this year with people eager to make up for vacations they missed last year. More jet fuel will also be needed, for those who prefer flying. The increased number of travelers this summer, especially during peak travel times such as holidays, could increase demand for petroleum products and push prices higher. Truckers will do their part, too. The current economic recovery is different than those of the past. In a typical recession, manufacturers keep plants open, stockpiling products to sell when things are better. This recession brought shutdowns everywhere, with no chance to increase inventories. Depending on the product, some inventories were taken down to zero while suppliers were closed. As the economy rebounds, record shipment numbers are expected throughout the summer, keeping trucks busy — and consuming diesel fuel. Despite the threats, fuel should remain plentiful and prices stable through the summer months.

Dash cameras can provide inexpensive and effective protection to drivers

If you’re still driving without a dash camera, you’re missing out on some of the best protection you can get for your driving record. Dash cameras can provide exoneration for the driver at the scene of an accident and can help defend against liability claims later. They can very quickly remove the “he said/she said” from accident claims by showing events exactly as they occurred. Some motor carriers require dash cameras in their trucks. Some install video systems with multiple cameras to record what’s happening in front of, alongside, behind and even inside the cab of a truck. Although many drivers object to being recorded while they work, the information provided by these systems can be invaluable in protecting the carrier. The issue with most of these systems is that the cameras — and the video they record, along with data saved with it — belong to the carrier or company providing the service rather than to the driver. The driver may or may not have access to the videos. Owning your own dash camera is a good way to ensure you’ll have access to some video of any incidents or events. Dash cameras can do more than keep you out of trouble after an accident. Regularly reviewing the recorded incidents and documenting what you learned and corrected may also help with your insurance rates. Most dash cameras constantly record video, breaking it into small segments that can be anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes long. Video is saved when an “incident” is detected or when you specify. Depending on the camera, an incident can be anything from a hard brake or swerve to an impact with another object. Video that isn’t saved is eventually recorded over when the camera’s memory card fills up. Saved videos may be placed in different files, depending on whether the device detected an incident, or the driver deliberately saved it. Although you can find cameras for sale in truck stops, there are none that are made especially for trucks. Any quality camera will do, but there are a few things to look for. The process of saving video on a camera should be easy to remember. In addition to accidents, dash cams have recorded things like airplane crashes, volcano eruptions and even meteors flashing across the viewing area. Make sure the process for saving video is easy to perform, such as pushing a single button. Some systems will continue recording after the vehicle is parked, but most have a very small amount of battery power and will shut down quickly if the power supply is disconnected. To record incidents that happen while you are parked, be sure the power supply does not switch off with the ignition. Consider the camera’s field of view. While the camera may be aimed to the front, incidents can happen in adjoining lanes alongside the hood. A camera with a 140-degree field of view won’t cover as wide an area as one with 170 or 180 degrees. Resolution is important, too. The higher the resolution, the more detail is recorded, and the more the video or photo can be enlarged. This could be important in capturing a vehicle’s tag number or even identifying the driver of a vehicle. You’ll want a 1,080 resolution at a minimum. Be careful of terms like “HD” — they don’t always relate to a higher resolution. The type of memory used by the camera is another consideration. Choose a model that records to an SD or mini-SD card. Often, it’s much faster and easier to remove an SD card and plug it in to your laptop or tablet than to download everything on the camera. Most importantly, the video on the card belongs to you, so you’ll have the choice of whether to share it with others. Plan to replace the SD card every year or so, since the process of recording over and over will eventually cause the card to fail. Another feature to look for is a smartphone app that connects with the camera. The camera will be equipped with either a Bluetooth or Wi-Fi connection that allows you to change camera settings, delete video and perform other functions. The display screen on the cameras is often very small, so viewing video on your phone provides a better view. If you’re within range, you can even show the video to a law enforcement officer or someone else while you’re outside of the truck. Smartphone apps can also make it easy to email photos or videos to safety officials and insurance companies, should it be necessary to do so. Many cameras are equipped with GPS systems that can embed your location, speed and other details into the video. This additional evidence can be helpful — but it can also harm your case. For example, an accident may be entirely the fault of the other driver, but the video recorded your speed at just a few miles over the limit. That information might be used against you in court and could impact the verdict. Some dash cameras allow you to turn this feature off. If it’s important to you, look for this ability. Audio is another feature offered by some cameras. Some drivers prefer audio recording for conversations with law enforcement officials or others, but beware: Recording conversations may not be legal in all jurisdictions. It’s also possible the audio feature could record something you don’t want a jury to hear, such as a phone conversation you were having or the unkind words you were screaming just before impact, or even that awful music you were playing on the radio. Make sure you can turn off the audio recording. If your truck has to be towed following an incident, remember to remove the SD card — or the entire camera — before leaving the truck. Many towing companies do not allow access to a towed vehicle until all towing and storage fees are paid in full, and you might not be able to retrieve the video you need. Dash cameras offer inexpensive and effective protection. Every driver should be using one.

Tennessee, Arkansas DOTs select repair strategy for I-40 Memphis bridge

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — The Tennessee and Arkansas departments of transportation have selected a repair strategy for the Interstate 40 Hernando DeSoto bridge that links the two states, according to a statement from TDOT. Working with Kiewit Infrastructure Group, TDOT developed two repair concepts this week. One concept requires removing the entire fractured steel box member (tie girder) and replacing it with new components. The second adds additional steel plating adjacent to the damaged area, bypassing the fractured components, removing a smaller section of the fractured piece, and leaving the bulk of the box section in place. According to TDOT, the availability of steel materials and fabrication times for the components required have a bearing on the bridge’s opening date. With that in mind, both state DOTs agreed to proceed with the second strategy, using the plating concept. This design will require less fabrication time and offers the advantage of getting the bridge open to traffic two to three weeks sooner than replacing the damaged steel box assembly in its entirety. The final design drawings are in the works, and the contractor is sourcing the steel components for the repairs. TDOT says it plans to have a schedule for the bridge opening next week. The bridge was shut down Tuesday, May 11, after the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) found what was then described as a “crack” during a routine inspection. Subsequent inspections revealed the damage to be a significant fracture to the one of two 900-foot horizontal steel beams that are crucial for the bridge’s integrity, said Lorie Tudor, director of ARDOT. While ARDOT is responsible for routine and special inspections of the structure, TDOT is responsible for physical maintenance and repairs. While the I-40 bridge is closed, all interstate traffic in the Memphis area is being rerouted to I-55, which crosses the Mississippi River a few miles south of I-40. TDOT said that currently an average of 67,000 vehicles are crossing the I-55 daily; this data is generated from a radar station located just off the east side of the bridge. Travelers can check for live traffic information through TDOT’s SmartWay cameras posted at the east and west approaches of I-55 to the bridge; click here for the west approach, and here for the east approach. Because of the dramatic increase in traffic crossing the I-55 Mississippi River Bridge, a special inspection was conducted to make sure the structure can withstand the added use. In its May 27 statement, TDOT noted that inspectors continue to review hours of drone video and numerous pictures of the I-55 bridge, noting, “So far, there is nothing of concern. We will release the final report when available.” Check TheTrucker.com regularly for updates on the I-40 bridge repairs. In addition, TDOT has created a webpage to keep the public updated of the progress work on the bridge, and ARDOT has a similar webpage.

Phase 1 repairs to I-40 Memphis bridge complete

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Phase 1 of repairs to the Interstate 40 Hernando DeSoto Bridge, which spans the Mississippi River between West Memphis, Arkansas, and Memphis, Tenn., are complete, according to a May 25 statement from the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT). Work on Phase 1 began over the weekend and continued into Monday. According to TDOT, crews from Kiewit Infrastructure Groups worked 24-hour shifts to install steel plates on either side of the damaged 900-foot beam, providing the stability required to install the equipment needed for Phase 2 of the repairs. Crews are now cleaning up the worksite and extending the platform. Design plans for Phase 2 — the removal and replacement of the damaged piece — are being finalized. TDOT has not offered an estimated reopening date for the bridge. The bridge was shut down Tuesday, May 11, after the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) found what was then described as a “crack” during a routine inspection. Subsequent inspections revealed the damage to be a significant fracture to the one of two 900-foot horizontal steel beams that are crucial for the bridge’s integrity, said Lorie Tudor, director of the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT). While ARDOT is responsible for routine and special inspections of the structure, TDOT is responsible for physical maintenance and repairs. While the I-40 bridge is closed, all interstate traffic in the Memphis area is being rerouted to I-55, which crosses the Mississippi River a few miles south of I-40. To help alleviate congestion along I-55 because of the additional traffic, TDOT completed a restriping project and closed ramps around the I-55/Crump Interchange. Click here for a list of ramp closures and detours. Travelers can check for live traffic information through TDOT’s SmartWay cameras posted at the east and west approaches of I-55 to the bridge; click here for the west approach, and here for the east approach. TDOT reported a 40% reduction in travel time on the I-55 bridge, with a 27-minute delay on May 24 compared to a 47-minute delay on May 17. Check TheTrucker.com regularly for updates on the I-40 bridge repairs. In addition, TDOT has created a webpage to keep the public updated of the progress work on the bridge, and ARDOT has a similar webpage.

Work ‘well underway’ on Phase 1 repairs to I-40 Memphis bridge

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Work is “well underway” on Phase 1 of repairs to the Interstate 40 Hernando DeSoto bridge spanning the Mississippi River between West Memphis, Arkansas, and Memphis, Tennessee, according to a May 24 update from the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT). The bridge was shut down Tuesday, May 11, after the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) found what was then described as a “crack” during a routine inspection. Subsequent inspections revealed the damage to be a significant fracture to the one of two 900-foot horizontal steel beams that are crucial for the bridge’s integrity, said Lorie Tudor, director of ARDOT. While ARDOT is responsible for routine and special inspections of the structure, TDOT is responsible for physical maintenance and repairs. Phase 1 of the repairs, conducted by Kiewit Infrastructure Group, involves installing steel plates on either side of the fractured beam. This will provide the strength and support required for the installation of the equipment that will be used during Phase 2 of the repairs — removing and replacing the damaged beam. According to TDOT, Kiewit work crews will be working 24/7 to complete Phase 1 of repairs on the bridge, which is a vital link for east-west freight transport. Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) described the bridge as “critical” in a May 18 press conference. “Whenever you see a break in the commerce, whenever you see a defect in a bridge, then you realize how dependent you are on that flow of commerce,” he said. TDOT has not provided an estimated date for the reopening of the bridge, but travelers should expect a long-term closure. “Certainly, it’s plausible that (the closure) could be months rather than weeks,” said Paul Degges, chief engineer for TDOT during a May 12 press conference. Over the weekend, Kiewit completed staging the work area and began the task of positioning and securing steel plates. According to a May 24 update from TDOT, “the drilling and bolting of 315 holes for the outside steel plate were completed last night.” The next step is to install brackets and begin drilling holes on the back plate. While the I-40 bridge is closed, all interstate traffic in the Memphis area is being rerouted to I-55, which crosses the Mississippi River a few miles south of I-40. To help alleviate congestion along I-55 because of the additional traffic, TDOT completed a restriping project and closed ramps around the I-55/Crump Interchange. Click here for a list of ramp closures and detours. Travelers can check for live traffic information through TDOT’s SmartWay cameras posted at the east and west approaches of I-55 to the bridge; click here for the west approach, and here for the east approach. In addition, special inspections of the 71-year-old I-55 span were conducted last week, and inspectors are reviewing the drone footage. According to TDOT, “so far, there is nothing of concern.” The results of the latest inspections are expected to be available later this week. Check TheTrucker.com regularly for updates on the I-40 bridge repairs.

FAST lanes for commercial trucks planned at World Trade Bridge

LAREDO, Texas — U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the General Services Administration (GSA) and the City of Laredo announced a formal partnership May 21 to facilitate commercial truck processing at the World Trade Bridge in Laredo by constructing Free and Secure Trade for Commercial Vehicles (FAST) lanes. Under CBP’s Donations Acceptance Program, CBP, GSA and the City of Laredo will construct four FAST lanes at the World Trade Bridge over the next 15 to 18 months to provide faster processing for commercial truck drivers who participate in the FAST program. The City of Laredo will outfit the lanes with the necessary infrastructure and technology. “The Donations Acceptance Agreement with the City of Laredo is another strong example of federal and local governments working together to create opportunities for American workers and businesses,” said William A. Ferrara, executive assistant commissioner of the CBP Office of Field Operations. “The construction of FAST lanes at the World Trade Bridge will address longstanding infrastructure challenges and facilitate flows of cross-border trade and travel that are vital to our economy.” The current port layout and the high volume of commercial truck traffic at the World Trade Bridge causes severe bottlenecking that stretches into Mexico, according to the CBP. The FAST lanes will reduce wait times for all travelers at the port by diverting pre-approved, low-risk commercial carriers to designated lanes for expedited processing. “Partnerships with CBP and local stakeholders on donations projects like this one align with GSA’s vision to provide effective and efficient government for the American people,” said Giancarlo Brizzi, acting regional administrator for GSA. “Expedited processing of commercial trade with Mexico helps to boost the U.S. economy while supporting CBP’s mission to protect and safeguard our borders while enhancing the nation’s economic recovery.” To further facilitate and expand cross-border trade and travel, the City of Laredo submitted a formal proposal under CBP’s Donations Acceptance Program (DAP) in November 2016 for infrastructure improvements to reduce congestion at the Laredo World Trade Bridge. This Donations Acceptance Agreement formalizes a project that has been years in the making and allows the parties to move forward with constructing the new FAST Lanes. “This expansion will allow us to continue to be the No. 1 land port in the nation, something we are very proud of,” said Laredo Mayor Pete Saenz. “The City of Laredo, along with the trade industry, welcomes such partnership under CBP’s DAP.”

Kayaker’s photos show crack in closed I-40 bridge in 2016

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Photos taken by a Mississippi River kayaker about five years before a crack was found in the Interstate 40 bridge linking Tennessee and Arkansas appear to show the fracture that led transportation officials to close the span indefinitely last week. Arkansas transportation officials said they cannot confirm or refute what’s shown in the 2016 photos, which raise questions about how early the crack appeared. The I-40 bridge connecting Memphis and the Arkansas city of West Memphis was shut down May 11 after inspectors found a crack in one of two 900-foot horizontal steel beams that are critical for the bridge’s structural integrity. River barge traffic under the span was closed that day but reopened three days later on May 14. Road traffic has been rerouted to the nearby Interstate 55 bridge. Repairs to the heavily used, six-lane I-40 bridge are expected to begin this week, but a long-term fix could take months, officials said. The states are relying on the four-lane, 71-year-old I-55 bridge to get cars and trucks across the Mississippi River and maintain the flow of commercial vehicles. Engineers are inspecting the I-55 bridge to make sure it can withstand the heavier traffic. Barry W. Moore, 64, told The Associated Press on Wednesday, May 19, that he took the photos while kayaking on the Mississippi River in August 2016 with a group of friends from the Boy Scouts, where he volunteers. Moore said he stored the images in his computer after the trip and went back to look for them after he heard about the discovery of the crack. Moore said he zoomed in on the photos, found the crack and showed them to his brother. “Our jaws dropped,” Moore said. An Associated Press photo editor inspected metadata from one of Moore’s photos and determined it was shot on Aug. 6, 2016, verifying its authenticity. Moore said he sent the photos to the state transportation departments in Tennessee and Arkansas. He heard back from the Arkansas Department of Transportation this week, he said. Arkansas Department of Transportation spokesman Dave Parker said the agency went back through its photos of the bridge dating back to the early 2000s and couldn’t find any confirming or refuting the 2016 pictures. The department, which inspects the bridge at least annually, did not have access to drone videos for its inspections before 2019. “I can’t really comment as to the accuracy of these photos,” Parker said. The kayaker’s pictures, which were first reported by WMC-TV in Memphis, bring into question just how long the crack had been visible in the bridge’s structure. Adel Abdelnaby, an engineer and University of Memphis professor who has been closely watching the I-40 bridge situation, reviewed the photos for the AP. He said it appears the break in the beam could have been present before 2016 because fatigue cracks take time to develop, and the beam shown in Moore’s photo was already corroded. “Based on research and science, this crack took so much time,” said Abdelnaby, who has inspected bridges and performs fatigue tests on bridge beams as part of his research. “It developed as a very small crack before 2016, and it took its time to propagate.” The cause of the crack has not been officially determined, but Tennessee Department of Transportation chief engineer Paul Degges has said that fatigue of having 50,000 vehicles pass daily on the bridge could be a contributing factor. On Monday, May 17, the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) fired the inspector who missed the crack in the bridge’s 2019 and 2020 inspections. Documents released Thursday by ARDOT under a Freedom of Information Act request identified statewide bridge inspector Monty Frazier as the employee fired for missing the crack, which a memo said put the span “in jeopardy of falling.” “Mr. Frazier, neglecting his responsibilities to follow proper fracture critical inspection techniques by getting within arm’s length of the outside of the tie girder, was why the crack was not discovered,” State Heavy Bridge Maintenance Engineer Michael Hill wrote in a memo recommending Frazier’s termination for dereliction of duty. Frazier did not immediately return a message left at a number listed for him. He began work with ARDOT as a mechanic in 2006 and had served as statewide bridge inspector since 2016. According to the memo, Frazier said he did not believe it was safe to use the under-bridge unit to inspect along the outside of the tie girder, despite it being standard procedure to do so. Hill wrote that the machinery had safety features to keep it stable. ARDOT has also referred the incident to federal investigators and said it is reinspecting all the “fracture critical” bridges that had been reviewed by the fired employee. Moore said he feels like he performed a public service by sharing the photos. “I’m just glad I took photos,” said Moore, who lives in the Memphis suburb of Collierville and is retired. “I think the engineers need to know what state it was really in five years ago.” By Adrian Sainz and Andrew DeMillo, The Associated Press

With I-40 Mississippi River bridge closed, backup route gets inspection

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — An inspection of the Interstate 55 bridge connecting Tennessee and Arkansas began Tuesday, May 18, a week after the span became the states’ primary Mississippi River crossing when a cracked steel beam prompted the indefinite closure of the nearby Interstate 40 bridge. Inspectors using drones were looking closely at the 71-year old I-55 bridge to ensure it is structurally sound and can withstand the higher volume of road traffic it has seen since the I-40 bridge was closed May 11, said Clay Bright, commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Transportation. Repairs to the heavily-used I-40 bridge are expected to begin this week, but a long-term fix could take months, officials said. The states are relying on the I-55 bridge to get cars and trucks across the Mississippi River and maintain the flow of commercial vehicles. During a May 18 news conference in Memphis, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee and Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said the two states, along with federal agencies, were working together to repair the I-40 bridge. Both Lee and Hutchinson are Republicans. “We will work to repair this in the shortest time possible, but we will not compromise the safety of the workers or the safety of the citizens that will drive across that bridge for the sake of finishing early,” Lee said. Officials called for the I-55 bridge inspection out of an “overabundance of caution,” Bright said. Should problems be found by Tennessee inspectors on the I-55 bridge — which lies about 3 miles south of the I-40 bridge — it could lead to its closure and send motorists to river crossings 100 miles to the north near Dyersburg, Tennessee, or 60 miles to the south near Lula, Mississippi. The new inspection comes a day after Arkansas transportation officials said an inspector who failed to find the defect in the I-40 bridge had been fired. Drone video showed the crack on the bridge spanning the Mississippi River in May 2019, Arkansas Department of Transportation Director Lorie Tudor said Monday, May 17. Tudor said the crack was not noted by the inspector in his reports that fall or the following year. She called the mistake “unacceptable.” The department did not immediately name the employee and said the incident is also being referred to federal investigators. Opened in 1973, the I-40 bridge connects Memphis and the Arkansas city of West Memphis. The span was shut down May 11 after inspectors found a fracture in one of two 900-foot horizontal steel beams that are critical for the bridge’s integrity. River traffic under the span was closed that day, but reopened May 14. Road traffic was rerouted to the I-55 bridge, and traffic there has been heavy. The I-40 bridge closure has raised concerns about shipping and delivery costs. The Arkansas Trucking Association has estimated the closure would cost the trucking industry at least $2.4 million a day.   “This is a critical, critical link for Arkansas,” Hutchinson said of the I-40 bridge. “Whenever you see a break in the commerce, whenever you see a defect in a bridge, then you realize how dependent you are on that flow of commerce.” Hutchinson called the closed I-40 bridge “a federal link that is important for our national security, whether it’s the flow of fuel or whether it is the flow of other necessary items across our country.” The I-40 bridge repair could take several months, Bright said. It will be conducted in two phases, and both steps must be completed before the bridge can be reopened. The first step is installing steel plates on each side of the fractured beam to provide stability for crews to permanently replace the damaged parts. The second phase involves removal and replacement of the damaged piece of the bridge. The bridge’s closure comes as the White House is negotiating with a group of Senate Republicans on an infrastructure package. Democrats have called the I-40 bridge damage an example of the urgent need for additional funding to fix the nation’s infrastructure. Republicans have called for an infrastructure plan with a smaller price tag than President Joe Biden’s and with a narrower definition of public works. In Arkansas, all “fracture critical” bridges that were inspected by the fired employee will be re-inspected, Tudor said. The department is changing its inspection program to add additional checks, including the use of a new drone to aid in inspecting bridges, she said. Tudor has said that the I-40 bridge’s damage could have led to a “catastrophic” event. Hutchinson said Tudor “took quick action” in firing the employee and did not make excuses for the mistake. “I think she handled it perfectly well,” said Hutchinson. Tudor told Arkansas lawmakers the inspection of the I-55 bridge may be completed by Wednesday, May 19. By Adrain Sainz and Andrew DeMillo, The Associated Press

Tanker truck driver shortage, combined with pipeline disruption, is ‘bigger than gas’

As if the disruption of the Colonial Pipeline caused by a ransomware attack wasn’t bad enough, many of those in the states affected by the disruption began panic-buying gas. This has placed a strain on the transportation of fuel to not only the states affected by the pipeline, but also other areas of the country. Combine this with the major traffic disruption with the closing of the Interstate 40 bridge (link) spanning the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Tennessee, and the tanker truck industry is experiencing what might seem to be a perfect — and unfortunate — storm. This has prompted the shortage of drivers to take center stage as the nation’s attention turns to a single topic: fuel. Industry leaders are warning that the years-long driver shortage in the tanker truck industry is likely to hit home for millions of Americans in a very personal way this summer, as families prepare for vacation trips and taking one more step toward pre-pandemic normalcy. In early May, national news outlets reported what industry professionals have long known: Lack of drivers will likely mean higher prices and even shortages of gas, chemicals and food components hauled by tankers. Holly McCormick, vice president of the talent office for Oklahoma-based Groendyke Transport, said the headlines “screaming” about gas shortages only tell part of the story. “The sensationalism the headlines spun up was, ‘Oh my God! Now we can’t have summer vacation because we’re not going to be able to get gas,’” she said. “I want to mention that it’s bigger than gas, although that’s what’s getting the headlines right now. “We also haul a lot of chemicals that go into building products, makeup, soaps and hand sanitizers. It’s jet fuel, too. I mean, all kinds of things, anything and everything you can imagine,” she continued. “It’s not a supply issue, it’s the ability to transport it.” Groendyke, which runs tankers exclusively through the lower 48 United States, Canada and Mexico, employs 865 drivers at present. But if afforded the chance, McCormick said the company would add to that number substantially just to meet current demand. “I could employ an additional 150 drivers without even blinking an eye,” she said. “That’s just current business capacity. There is more business available that we can’t even consider, at this point.” Other trucking companies are in the same boat, even if they don’t haul fuel, including J&M Tank Lines of Birmingham, Alabama. Eric Hanson, J&M’s vice president of human resources, said he’d put on 50 more drivers immediately to join the 400 already in service if he could. “It’s hard, you know,” Hanson said. “We have more freight than we can handle because we’ve got customers coming out of the woodwork, wanting us to haul all of their loads. The opportunity is there. and it becomes frustrating when you can’t service customers at the level you’re used to doing. “Trucking is a low-margin business, and when the opportunity is there, you always want to be able to seize the moment,” he added. “Having so much opportunity and not enough resources to capture it all, I think, is the main cause of stress in the industry right now.” Driver shortages in general have plagued trucking companies for years, but tanker trucking is arguably the most vulnerable segment of the transportation industry. McCormick said tanker trucks make up the smallest percentage of rigs on the road, yet account for one-third of the total tonnage hauled. National Tank Truck Carriers (NTTC) reported through national news outlets that year over year, the number of parked rigs has grown by 15% to now include a quarter of all tanker trucks. And analysts are quick to point out that what’s coming in the summer vacation season is only going to get worse. “This is just getting started,” Phil Flynn, senior executive and market analyst of the Price Futures Group, told FOX Business on May 5. “We’re seeing this huge surge in demand. People want to go on vacation and vacation areas could be the hardest hit.” There’s not one root cause of the shortages. Retirement of aging drivers is one drain on numbers, as are the stimulus checks and enhanced unemployment payments that have kept people at home instead of on the job — whether that job is behind the wheel or somewhere else. What’s more, tanker truck drivers face more training and certification requirements than their peers driving other rigs. The licensing and certification process can take up to six months, during which time tank truck drivers must get their CDL and various other credentials. “Our drivers have to have tanker endorsements, hazmat endorsements. The majority of our chemical drivers are also required to have a TWIC, which is the transportation workers information card that is required for ports of entry,” McCormick said. Another hurdle is, simply put, that tanker truck driving isn’t for everyone, according to Bailey Glendenning Stark, CEO of Illinois-based Glendenning Brothers Inc. A small, family-owned operation, Glendenning Brothers’ fleet of 10 tankers hauls food-grade products. “Tanker is very specialized,” she said. “One of the problems that we encounter with that is we get people who come out of vans who don’t like liquid, they’re not used to the (load) movement. They’ve not learned how to accommodate the shift and they don’t like it. Or they’re like, ‘Oh gosh, I’m going to have to do hazmat.’ They’re afraid of it. “Plus, with tanker we do the customer service,” she continued. “We often are responsible for loading and unloading, we’ve got to communicate with plants, we have to scale. We’re not just dropping and hooking, we’re not just bump and dock.” None of the three executives we talked to have been sitting still on the issue of attracting more drivers. Instead, they’re doubling down on job fairs and accelerating programs in local schools to try and sell students on a career in truck driving. However, such efforts are hampered by driver minimum age restrictions demanded by insurance companies, as well as by the image problems that trucking faces overall. “First of all, it’s probably one of the best-paying jobs you can get without a post-secondary education,” McCormick said. “At the same time, you don’t hear a lot of parents telling their kids, ‘You should be a truck driver. That’d be a great career opportunity for you,’ because home time isn’t flexible and some of the things that are more appealing to a younger generation, truck driving doesn’t really offer that.” Glendenning Stark concurs. “When we try to say, ‘Hey, come drive with us. You’re going to make great money, but you’ve got to be gone.’ They don’t want to be gone,” she said. “They’d rather make $30,000, $40,000, $50,000 dollars a year and be home every night than work 14-hour days and potentially be gone, even though our people make significantly more. That, I think, has been one of the significant struggles with getting younger people.” With that said, there have been inroads made to maximize new and under-tapped sources of drivers, such as among veterans and women. State legislators and economic development groups are starting to get the message as well. “J&M’s always been actively involved in a lot of associations and the programs that they support,” Hanson said. “Here recently though, we have been even more active. We’ve doubled down on workforce development programs, specifically here in Alabama — promoting the industry to younger people in high school, middle school. We just did an event with Women in Trucking and even the Girl Scouts to promote opportunities in the industry.” All three of the executives are also working on possible solutions at the national level. McCormick and Glendenning Stark co-chair the NTTC’s workforce development committee, of which Hanson is also a member. One initiative that body is considering in particular is a nationwide apprenticeship program. “There is no nationally recognized apprenticeship program available for truck driving and what we’re working on is one specifically geared to tank truck drivers,” said Glendenning Stark, who is spearheading the effort. “We’re trying to get the government to let us take younger people and people who are displaced from other trades and train them under a very strict two-year program. “If they give us the chance, we’ll prove we can put out safe drivers, by taking people without any driving experience and training them the correct way,” she said. “We’re hoping we can convince the Department of Transportation that it’s worth a shot.” Amid all the new thinking and recruitment, Hanson said, companies also need to remember the absolute importance of taking care of the drivers they already have. “I think sometimes as an industry we try to overcomplicate it,” he said. “‘What does the driver want? What can we do?’ My message has always been that the drivers want what you want and what I want. Everybody wants to have a voice; everybody wants to know that they’re being heard. You would call that respect. “I don’t think the job is just a commodity; I believe that (drivers) have a very important role in the whole economy. We know that. That’s nothing new,” he continued. “But I also think everybody, from the CEO down, needs to feel that way. And then, you have to see the appreciation there, too, actually appreciating what people do. Everybody wants fulfillment in their job, and I believe companies can make that happen for our professional truck drivers.”

Republican senator calls for ‘urgent’ approach to shutdown of I-40 bridge at Memphis

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — A U.S. senator from Tennessee is calling on President Joe Biden to take an “urgent, all-hands” approach to the shutdown of a bridge that connects Tennessee and Arkansas. Republican Sen. Bill Hagerty said May 15 in a letter to the president that the shutdown is “affecting the lives and livelihoods of real people right now.” Hagerty said the fix to the Interstate 40 bridge should not wait for a proposed infrastructure bill being debated in Washington. River traffic reopened on the Mississippi River on May 14, three days after it was closed when a crack was discovered in the bridge. The span will remain closed to vehicles indefinitely, and road traffic is being rerouted. Hagerty said he has spoken with U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and “conveyed the urgency of the matter.” Democrats have said the shutdown highlights the urgent need for more infrastructure funding. On May 17, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics issued a report outlining the impact of the bridge closure on multimodal freight. According to the BTS report, “rerouting traffic from the I-40 crossing to the nearby I-55 bridge is creating significant travel time increases, costing tens of thousands of trucks and commuters each day delays greater than an hour.”

Colonial Pipeline crisis results in diesel, gas shortages at truck stop chains

Shortages of gasoline and diesel fuel continue to affect drivers in parts of the Southeast on Thursday, May 13, even though Colonial Pipeline announced Wednesday that it has initiated the restart of pipeline operations following a shutdown caused by a ransomware attack. Two major truck stop chains — Love’s Travel Stops and Pilot Flying J — have posted lists of diesel and gasoline shortages that could affect commercial drivers. LOVE’S TRAVEL STOPS As of 8 a.m. central time Thursday, the following Love’s locations are experiencing shortages or are in danger of shortages: Temporary diesel outages: Alabama Moody: Love’s 530 Ozark: Love’s 566 Georgia Calhoun: Love’s 735 Cordele: Love’s 801 North Carolina Mebane: Love’s 667 Temporary gasoline outages: Alabama Ozark: Love’s 566 Florida North Fort Myers: Love’s 495 Georgia Calhoun: Love’s 735 Dublin: Love’s 320 Emerson: Love’s 359 Mississippi Canton: Love’s 208 Vicksburg: Love’s 776 North Carolina Charlotte: Love’s 714 Marion: Love’s 308 Mebane: Love’s 667 Newton: Love’s 697 Reidsville: Love’s 741 Statesville: Love’s 497 South Carolina Blacksburg: Love’s 397 Dillon: Love’s 371 Elgin: Love’s 751 Fair Play: Love’s 387 Fort Mill: Love’s 333 Lexington: Love’s 424 Newberry: Love’s 396 Tennessee Charleston: Love’s 364 Nashville: Love’s 429 Virginia Franklin: Love’s 560 Providence Forge: Love’s 705 Covington: Love’s 707 Love’s also reports that numerous locations are at risk of fuel outages in Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, South Carolina and Tennessee. Love’s will update the list at 8 a.m., noon and 5 p.m. central time. Click here to check for the latest outages at Love’s Travel Stops. Pilot Flying J Pilot Flying J at 10 a.m. Thursday reported that all locations remain open; however, the following locations are out of either diesel or gasoline: Temporary diesel outages Georgia Savannah: Mr. Fuel #72 Tallapoosa: Pilot #312 Vienna: Pilot #398 South Carolina Florence: Pilot #62 Graniteville: Pilot #4568 George: Pilot #4576 Summerville: Mr. Fuel #64 Temporary diesel AND gasoline outages South Carolina Blacksburg: Flying J #711 Latta: Flying J #713 Prosperity: Pilot #4580 Lugoff: Pilot #346 Rock Hill: Pilot #4567 Florida Marianna: Pilot #374 Quincy: Flying J #623 Georgia Carnesville: Pilot #4557 Temple: Flying J #634 North Carolina Kenly: Pilot #6990 Troutman: Pilot #7976 Warsaw: Pilot #6996 Temporary gasoline outages Georgia Pilot #66, Braselton, GA Pilot #417, Temple, GA Pilot #420, Madison, GA North Carolina Kannapolis: Pilot #56 Kenly: Flying J #683 South Carolina Bishopville: Pilot #4581 Winnsboro: Pilot #4578 Tennessee Morristown: Pilot #295 Click here for updates on outages at Pilot Flying J locations.

‘Insurance act’ brings discussion of safety measures to lower rates

To no one’s surprise, Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia (D-Ill.) in mid-April reintroduced his “Insurance Act” that would increase minimum liability insurance coverage mandates for motor carriers. The bill is designed to bring coverage minimums in line with what sponsors claim are current medical costs. The current $750,000 financial responsibility requirement, implemented in 1980, would need to rise to nearly $4.9 million to keep pace with medical cost increases since that time, sponsors say. Additionally, the bill calls for periodic adjustment of the minimum based on medical cost inflation. Garcia had previously introduced the bill in 2020, with an amended version included in the failed Democrat infrastructure “Moving Forward” bill that was not considered in the Republican-controlled Senate. This year, with Democrats having control of both houses of Congress and the White House, backers are confident of approval. Although the text of Garcia’s current bill was not yet available at press time, the details of the reintroduced bill are presumed to be the same as last year’s attempt. The bill, co-sponsored by eight other representatives, is backed by the usual assortment of safety organizations. Many carriers already have coverage higher than the legal minimum to comply with customer requirements or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulations for hazardous materials or other hauling. Regardless of the coverage, or the amount paid for it, there are actions that every carrier, large or small, can take to keep insurance costs as low as possible. “The biggest factor is to keep losses low,” explained Brian Runnels, director of safety at Reliance Partners, a provider of insurance services. “Zero is best. The longer you’ve been in business with low or no losses, the better.” If you’re an owner-operator, leasing to another carrier often means you’re covered by that carrier’s liability policy rather than your own — and that could be a problem later. Obtaining and running under your own authority can result in higher insurance premiums because, despite your experience, your company is considered “new.” “If the DOT number listed on the policy keeps changing — that’s what they look at — the underwriters can consider it as a new business each time,” Runnels said. Other factors can also cause higher premiums for owner-ops. Larger carriers have safety programs that monitor driver performance and offer regular training. When you’re on your own, there is no safety department … or is there? “Consider the value-added services agencies can provide in areas like safety, claims, CSA (compliance, safety, accountability) and regulations,” Runnels said. “For example, we can assist with Data Q requests for CSA. We’ll be able to tell you that we can help or that you’re kind of stuck with whatever is on your record.” Insurance agencies can often help with training and recordkeeping, too. The DOT is strict on which documents belong in driver files, for example, and a good agency may be able to provide guidance. Mark Murrell, co-founder of CarriersEdge, a marketer of online training, content creation and record keeping, says there is no reason a small trucking company can’t have a strong safety presence. Murrell and partner Jane Jazrawy created and administer the “Best Fleets to Drive For” program. “Have a safety program documented, and don’t think you can’t do it because you’re a small fleet,” Murrell emphasized. “Don’t get the idea that that’s something that’s only for big companies.” Documentation is essential for convincing insurance underwriters that a safety program is in place, according to Murrell. “The biggest challenge for the fleet, when it comes time to dealing with the insurance company, is that they don’t have any documentation of the things that they’re doing,” he said. Runnels agrees. “You might be a safe driver, but your safety program, even if it is only for yourself, matters,” he said. “Are you reviewing available information? Are you keeping up with best practices, through safety videos, subscriptions to safety publications, reviewing data from cameras and ECMs (engine control modules)?” There are resources that can be used to achieve some of the benefits of a safety department. The internet, for example, has made training accessible to anyone who has a smartphone or computer. “For smaller companies, for $20 a month, you can be having a service like ours,” Murrell said. CarriersEdge offers more than 80 training titles, with new titles added regularly. A solo operator can obtain a subscription and participate in a couple of modules per month. “We pitch our service as ‘Netflix for training,’” Murrell explained. “It’s cost-effective enough that you can show that you’re diligent and doing something.” CarriersEdge keeps a record of training provided for its clients. “When it comes time for insurance renewal or when they’re shopping around for policies, it’s very easy for the insurance people to come in and look at the history and see those records, and it’s way cleaner and way more organized and having to pull together a pile of papers,” Murrell said. Reviewing data from cameras and ECMs, as Runnels suggested, requires documentation. For example, you can review each “saved” video on your dash cam — those triggered by an impact, hard stop or other action — to see if your actions in each case could have been improved upon. A list or table of the date reviewed, incident type and what you learned could help convince an insurance company that you have a program for continuous improvement in place. “The very first thing that’s pulled after an accident is ECM data,” Runnels explained. “You should be using the data to get better. If you’re solo, look at the data, use it to make yourself better.” Again, the date of the review and other information must be documented to show that a review occurred. “Document reviews and actions taken, even if it’s only on yourself,” Murrell said. That documentation helps demonstrate an effective safety-management strategy and can help on insurance rates and even in litigation, should you need a defense after an accident. “It looks different with one truck than it does with 200, but if you’re doing something that says, ‘Here’s my process for figuring out my problem and making improvements, and here’s where I’ve made changes as a result,’ that’s a good story for the insurance people,” he continued. There may not be many truckers in favor of paying higher insurance premiums, but any trucker can take steps to keep liability insurance costs as low as possible.

West Virginia added to FMCSA’s emergency exemption following interruption of Colonial Pipeline

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (USDOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) on May 11 added West Virginia to the list of states covered under an emergency waiver issued May 9 following a ransomware attack on Colonial Pipeline. The temporary exemption from Parts 390 through 399 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) applies to motor carriers and drivers providing direct assistance supporting emergency relief efforts transporting gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other refined petroleum products to Alabama, Arkansas, District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and — now — West Virginia. The FMCSA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are tracking two states — Georgia and North Caroline — that have issued emergency declarations that include weight waivers for trucks on state roadways. Other states are considering similar action. FMCSA and FHWA are working with the full list of potentially effected states to share information and best practices and try to harmonize and align their efforts. According to a May 11 statement from USDOT, the agency’s “top priority is safety, and while current circumstances dictate providing industry flexibility, FMCSA will work closely with its state and industry partners to monitor driver work hours and conditions for the duration of the exemption.” The USDOT statement also noted that the Biden-Harris administration continues to assess the impact of the Colonial Pipeline incident on fuel supplies for the nation’s East Coast and Southeast regions, and is taking steps to evaluate resources that can be used to mitigate potential impacts. On May 11, USDOT’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) initiated a survey of Jones Act-qualified vessels to determine the availability and capacity of vessels in the Jones Act Fleet to carry petroleum products within the Gulf, and from the Gulf up the Eastern Seaboard. The survey will help determine whether there is sufficient capacity on Jones Act-qualified vessels to carry the product and to if a waiver is warranted. The final authority to receive requests for and to approve waivers to the Jones Act belongs to the Department of Homeland Security. In addition, USDOT’s Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is working to determine the capacity of rail operators to help transport fuel products inland from ports. USDOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) assisted Colonial Pipeline’s efforts to get Line 4 up and running yesterday on a manual basis and is continuing to support efforts to ensure safe movement of fuels manually, while concurrent efforts to restore the system’s operation continues. The FBI on May 11 issued confirmation of the identity of the cyberattacker as Darkside ransomware, noting that the agency is working with Colonial Pipeline and government partners to investigate the case.

McConnell says GOP open to $600 billion for infrastructure

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Monday, May 3, that Republicans are willing to spend up to $600 billion on infrastructure, far less than President Joe Biden is seeking, even as he ruled out supporting a higher corporate tax rate to pay for it. Instead, McConnell is endorsing the $568 billion public works plan from his Republican colleagues that has a smaller price tag, a narrower definition of infrastructure and is funded by fees rather than tax increases. “We’re open to doing a roughly $600 billion package, which deals with what all of us agree is infrastructure and to talk about how to pay for that in any way other than reopening the 2017 tax reform bill,” McConnell said May 3 at the University of Louisville. McConnell had been clear before May 3 that Senate Republicans would not go along with Biden’s initial $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal, but his remarks were the strongest signal yet that a smaller deal is possible. Yet a core dividing line remains Biden’s effort to pay for infrastructure by undoing Donald Trump’s tax break for corporations, which GOP lawmakers consider a signature achievement. With Democrats holding only slim majorities in the House and Senate, Biden and congressional leaders will soon have to decide how they plan to muscle the president’s priority legislation into law. Biden has been reaching out to Republicans and seeking their input, even as some in his party agitate to move ahead without GOP support. McConnell said that raising corporate taxes would lead to job losses to overseas competitors with lower rates. He said “users” of the infrastructure should help pay for it. One example is the federal gas tax, which pays for road and bridge improvements and has not been increased since 1993. McConnell was not specific about what user fee increases Republicans could back. “So how to pay for the infrastructure bill, on our side, is we’re not going to revisit the 2017 tax bill,” McConnell said. “We’re happy to look for traditional infrastructure pay-fors, which means the users participate.” McConnell cited concerns about the federal debt, even though deficits grew substantially every year of Trump’s presidency, when the GOP was also in control of the Senate. “I think it’s time to take a look at our national debt, which is now as large as our economy for the first time since World War II,” McConnell said. Biden’s infrastructure proposal would lead to an eventual reduction of the debt if the tax hikes are fully enacted. He would raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28% to pay for it, reverting to what had been the corporate rate before the 2017 GOP tax cut was enacted. The 2017 GOP tax bill, which all the Republicans voted for, slashed the corporate rate from 35% to 21%. It was supposed to usher in a new era of American investment and job creation, yet growth never came close to the promised levels. The deficit came in at $587 billion for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2016, and then shot to $668 billion in Trump’s first year. It nearly hit $1 trillion in Trump’s third year, and jumped to $3.1 trillion in 2020, in large part because of the country’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. This year, the deficit has continued its surge. Nancy Vanden Houten, senior economist at Oxford Economics, said she expects the deficit for this budget year will total $3.3 trillion, an all-time high — and up 6.5% from last year’s record shortfall. Federal debt levels hit nearly $27 trillion at the end of the latest fiscal year. Democrats counter that Republican lawmakers didn’t seem as concerned about deficits when Trump was president. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in late April that investments in education “brings more money than anything back to the Treasury.” “All of a sudden, they’re deficit hawks when they were giving away money to the wealthiest people in our country under President Trump,” Pelosi said in a CBS interview. Written by Bruce Schreiner and Kevin Freking, The Associated Press. Freking reported from Washington.

States see potential federal windfall, go slow on road taxes

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Raising state taxes to improve roads and bridges is one of the few things many Republican and Democratic lawmakers have agreed on in recent years. Those efforts have slowed this year, even as lawmakers acknowledge a widening gap between needed work and the money to pay for it. One reason — the federal response to the coronavirus pandemic. Some states are “waiting to see what direction the federal government is going to be taking,” said Carolyn Kramer, an advocacy director with the American Road & Transportation Builders Association. State lawmakers across the country have proposed fewer than 170 transportation funding bills this year — barely half the amount proposed during the last post-election year of 2019, according to the association. So far, not a single transportation tax increase has passed, though several are pending. Kramer said states are still assessing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on their economies, but also are watching for a potential gusher of federal money. Numerous avenues exist for new federal road funding: President Joe Biden signed a coronavirus relief package that includes $350 billion for state and local governments. Some states, such as Indiana and Maryland, already are planning to spend part of that on transportation projects; others are awaiting federal guidance on using the money. Biden also has proposed at least $135 billion for roads and bridges as part of a $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan. Senate Republicans have countered with an infrastructure proposal that would dedicate $299 billion to roads and bridges. Congress is working on a long-term renewal of the nation’s main highway program that could direct billions more annually to states. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials has urged Congress to essentially double existing funding, with a $200 billion road-and-bridge stimulus, plus an additional $487 billion in a five-year highway program. The proposals could add up to more federal road-and-bridge aid than at any time in years. “It looks like a cruise ship sitting in a pond — that’s how much money we’re getting flowing into the state of Colorado from the federal government,” said Colorado state Sen. Ray Scott, a Republican. “If Biden does get this pushed through and we have additional funding coming our way, why would we go after the taxpayer when we have ways we can handle it right now?” While Scott wants to base any transportation plan on an influx of federal money, Colorado’s Democratic Gov. Jared Polis and the state’s Democratic legislative leaders want to raise fees on gasoline sales, electric and hybrid vehicles, ride-sharing companies and retail delivery services. ”Colorado’s transportation system is so far behind that we need federal investment and we need state-level investment,” said Democratic state Sen. Faith Winter. Colorado’s gas tax has remained unchanged since 1991, while per capita spending on transportation has fallen by almost half. The new funding plan has yet to receive a legislative hearing, though Democratic lawmakers could still speed it through if they desire. Bills to raise gas taxes already have failed this year in Arizona, Kentucky, Mississippi and Wyoming. After the North Dakota House passed a 3-cent gas tax increase, the Senate solidly defeated it. The Legislature instead passed a $680 million infrastructure bonding plan aimed primarily at flood-control projects that also includes $70 million for roads and bridges. The bonds will be repaid with earnings from the state’s oil tax savings account. North Dakota state Senate Majority Leader Rich Wardner said the lucrative oil fund makes a gas tax increase unnecessary. He said the state’s road and bridge spending could be supplemented with federal COVID-19 relief money and, if passed, a federal infrastructure bill. “That money is frosting on the cake,” Wardner said. Louisiana state Rep. Jack McFarland, who spent months traveling the state to pitch a gradual 22-cent gas tax increase, decided to drop the idea in the face of opposition from fellow Republicans. He said it was hard to persuade people to support a gas tax when the state is getting several billion dollars from the federal coronavirus relief package. Economic restrictions ordered by governors to slow the virus’ spread provided an initial hit to state revenues. But some states have rebounded to post budget surpluses buoyed by stronger-than-expected income tax revenue and federal aid. “You cannot sell a tax increase to the public at a time when you’ve got something like $4 billion sitting in your checkbook. That’s just not going to happen,” said Minnesota state Sen. Tom Bakk, an independent who is a former Democratic majority leader. The Democrat-controlled Minnesota House passed a transportation funding measure that would raise the vehicle sales tax and link the gas tax rate to inflation. But the Republican-led Senate scrapped all tax hikes while passing its own transportation bill. Unlike many types of taxes, gas tax hikes for roads and bridges had garnered bipartisan support in recent years. Since 2013, at least 29 states — some led by Republicans, others by Democrats — have raised fuel taxes. But none have done so since Virginia lawmakers passed a gas tax increase in March 2020, shortly before the coronavirus shutdowns. Washington state lawmakers gave themselves a nudge toward a future gas tax hike. The Democrat-led Legislature recently passed an environmental plan capping carbon pollution that will take effect in 2023 only if lawmakers pass a new transportation spending plan that raises gas taxes by at least 5 cents a gallon. Fuel tax increases also have been proposed this year in Alaska and Missouri, which have the nation’s lowest gas taxes. A bill to double Alaska’s 8-cent-per-gallon gas tax advanced from a House committee in March but has not gone further. Republican state Rep. Kevin McCabe, who opposes the increase, cited an economy still struggling from the pandemic and Alaska’s high cost of living. “Adding another almost 10 cents a gallon to the price of their commute, they just wouldn’t be able to handle it,” he said. A proposal to phase in a 12.5-cent-a-gallon gas tax hike passed the Missouri Senate with bipartisan support and is pending in the House, where the top Republican has expressed resistance. The state’s 17-cent-a-gallon rate hasn’t changed since 1996. At a recent House hearing, a lobbyist for Missouri gas stations highlighted Biden’s infrastructure plan while suggesting lawmakers could pare back the proposed gas tax. Missouri Senate President Pro Tem Dave Schatz, who is sponsoring the bill, said he doesn’t want to wait for a potential federal windfall to start closing Missouri’s estimated $745 million annual funding gap for roads and bridges. “I don’t think there is a program or plan coming from Washington, D.C., that will address the kind of shortfalls that we’ve seen,” Schatz said. By David A. Lieb, The Associated Press