TheTrucker.com

A year to remember: Outgoing TCA chairman John Culp reflects on his tenure

During the Truckload Carriers Association’s (TCA) annual convention, slated for March 15-18 in Phoenix, chairman John Culp will pass the torch to incoming chair Karen Smerchek, president of Veriha Trucking Inc. As he prepares to transition to the role of immediate past chair, Culp took time to reflect on his tenure as chairman and share his thoughts on the state of the trucking industry. “I’ve loved my time as TCA chairman. I love our industry. I love to talk about it,” he said during a visit with Linda Garner-Bunch, managing editor of Truckload Authority and The Trucker Media Group, one February afternoon. Anyone who’s spent more than five minutes conversing with Culp would agree that not only does he love trucking; he is also an expert on the many aspects of the industry. As his year as chairman comes to an end, the Truckload Authority and Trucker Media Group teams extend a word of thanks to John Culp for making this a year to remember.   Linda: Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman, and thank you for joining us today. It’s hard to believe it’s been a year since our first visit and that this is your last Chat with the Chairman! What have been some of the highlights of the past year for you? John: The highlight for me has been working with the team at TCA. It’s been a great year. It’s been challenging, it’s been fun, and it’s been rewarding. Working with TCA is always a great experience altogether, not just the past year, but every year. When I first became chairman, someone asked me, “Well John, what are you going to do? What do you want to accomplish as chairman?” My answer was that I want to do keep doing the same thing I’ve been doing with TCA over the years. I want to continue what we’re doing as an organization, and I want to work to make it even better — I’ll just be sitting in a different chair. And that’s exactly what we’ve done. Note that I said “we.” It’s not just me; it’s the entire organization, from the staff to the officers and members. Our officers this year have been awesome, and our TCA staff is stronger than it’s ever been. We’re well aligned with the objectives we’re trying to reach, and we’ve got a lot of momentum. Having the opportunity to work closely with these people has been amazing. I have been truly blessed with the relationships I’ve developed and the friends I’ve made — and it’s been extremely rewarding to be a part of TCA’s leadership and to continue the efforts to amplify the “voice of truckload” on Capitol Hill. Our membership has grown stronger, and together we have worked through the challenges and uncertainties of the past 12 months. We continue to grow stronger. It has been an honor to be a part of this team effort. To sum it up, it’s been a great year to be part of TCA.   Linda: What would you say has been your greatest challenge in the past 12 months, and what accomplishment are you most proud of? John: The biggest challenge is pretty universal: Time. There’s just never enough of it. But that’s where teamwork comes in, and the TCA staff and officers really stepped up to help make sure all the wonderful educational offerings and meetings provided the added value our members have come to appreciate and expect.   Linda: Earlier you mentioned amplifying the voice of truckload on Capitol Hill. During his first few weeks in office, President Trump has already signed countless executive orders, some of which relate to the trucking industry. How do you believe the new Trump administration will impact TCA’s efforts to enact legislation that will benefit trucking and the supply chain? John: Executive orders are great, and they serve an important purpose — but issues really need to be addressed at the congressional level through legislation. That’s one of the key benefits of TCA membership. We allow the stakeholders to actually have input on what is presented in Washington. If you haven’t already, check out the story on Page 6; TCA’s Dave Heller does a great job of explaining how the association works to make sure our members have the ear of the nation’s decision-makers. Any time you have an administration change at the federal level, it’s going to have an effect on every industry in every sector. TCA’s leadership has a history of working closely with whoever’s in the Oval Office, or whatever party has control of the House and Senate, to help promote legislation that benefits our industry. We work to bring about changes that will benefit our members as well as the rest of the nation. To that end, it doesn’t matter which party is in power — our goal remains the same: To educate the lawmakers about how different issues, such as emissions mandates and a lack of truck parking, impact the transportation industry as a whole, especially the hundreds of thousands of truck drivers that make sure products are delivered safely every single day.   Linda: I’m glad you mentioned the emissions mandates. One of the first executive orders President Trump signed back in January called for a halt to what he termed as Environmental Protection Agency’s “EV mandate.” Since then, the EPA has announced further changes that could impact the previously-called-for transition to zero-emission Class 8 trucks. What are your thoughts? John: The Advanced Clean Fleet Rule being put to bed, so to speak, is great news. It offers a reprieve for the industry to develop a realistic, commonsense approach to addressing the trucking industry’s environmental responsibilities.   Linda: One thing you and I have discussed in the past is the possibility of using alternative fuels to achieve zero emissions for heavy-duty vehicles. What have you heard lately on this front? John: The industry definitely needs to continue to look at alternative fuel sources. However, much like the charging facilities for electric vehicles, it’s going to take time to develop the infrastructure to produce the alternative fuels, such as renewable diesel, needed to meet the demands of the trucking industry and other sectors. Bruce Guthrie recently wrote a very informative story about the progress of internal combustion engines designed to burn alternative fuel, along with information about the fueling infrastructure. Check it out here. The industry needs to continue to work towards zero emissions and create a realistic path to our objectives — and it WILL happen; it will just take time.   Linda: What other issues do you see facing the trucking industry in the near future? John: Parking is still a huge issue. We’re working with Congress to develop solutions, and I believe we made great progress last year. I believe there will be some real movement on parking this year. Of course, one of the primary goals at TCA is to promote safety on the roads, and that means safe drivers. We want to see well-trained, drug- and alcohol-free drivers on the highways. That brings us to the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse and the admission of additional testing methods, including hair follicle and oral fluids testing. Progress is still needed on oral fluids testing, but the process of approving laboratories to conduct the testing needs further development. Hair follicle testing results are proven and accurate — but are still not accepted by the Clearinghouse. The guidelines for this testing were mandated eight and a half years ago, but we are still fighting shameful bureaucratic red tape that is preventing implementation.   Linda: What do you see as some of the top legal issues facing the trucking industry? John: Insurance costs have shot well above the rate of inflation, and high-dollar verdicts — often referred to as “nuclear” verdicts — have been the driving force behind those increases. We need litigation reform to help curtail that, to ensure reasonable verdicts. Without tort reform, many trucking companies will be forced out of business, either because they can’t afford insurance or because of the unreasonably high verdicts themselves. In the end, these skyrocketing costs are passed along to the consumers in the form of higher prices. For perspective, the current minimum insurance level is $750,000. That figure was set back in 1980 — 45 years ago — and it hasn’t changed. Today most carriers carry $1 million policies, but even that isn’t enough to cover a carrier’s financial responsibility. As an industry, we carry insurance because it’s the right thing to do. We’re not trying to shirk any responsibility, but the premiums, as well as payouts to plaintiffs, should be reasonable. On the plus side, I believe we’re going to see some real effort to have trucking accidents involving a certain monetary value being adjudicated in a federal court, regulated at the federal level.   Linda: Let’s talk about the freight recession. Many analysts predict that conditions will slowly improve over the course of 2025 after bouncing along the bottom for the past two to three years. What are your thoughts? John: I would say we’ve been in a recession for about two and a half years now, and it’s been very painful. Many trucking companies are struggling to keep their doors open, and countless others have shut down. The challenges are very real. We’re hoping to move toward a more robust economy, and that we’ll see some relief from inflation. The economy always goes up and down; it’s a cycle, like a pendulum swing. It’s not a question of IF things will change, it’s a question of when. I believe there’s reason for optimism, that the pendulum will swing in our favor this year.   Linda: As your time as chairman of the board comes to an end, it’s tradition to offer a few words of advice to the incoming chair. What wisdom would you like to share with incoming chairperson Karen Smerchek? John: First of all, let me say how pleased I am that Karen will be succeeding me as chair of TCA. She is the first woman to lead the board in the association’s nearly 100-year history. Rather than offering advice, I’d like to express my support. Karen became an officer on TCA’s board at the same time as I did. We’ve worked together, and I know how good she is. She’s a strong leader, a smart trucking industry stakeholder, and she’s going to do a great job leading the association’s board of directors.   Linda: Thank you for your time, Mr. Chairman. It has been an honor working with you over the past year.

Keep on trucking: A conversation with TCA Chairman John Culp

What changes will 2025 bring? That question is probably top of mind for anyone in the trucking industry, from the driver’s seat all the way to the C-suite. With a new administration stepping into power at the White House and the fate of key pieces of legislation hanging in the balance, one thing’s for sure. The Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) will continue to amplify the voice of the truckload industry on Capitol Hill. And, according to TCA Chairman John Culp, motor carriers throughout North America will keep doing what they do best — move freight from Point A to Point B (and often Points C, D and E, as well) as efficiently and safely as possible. Read on as Culp shares a few insights about factors impacting the industry.   Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman. It’s good to visit with you again! As we bid farewell to 2024 and embark on a new journey in 2025, what are your thoughts on the state of the freight industry? Most of us would agree that 2024 was a challenging year for the trucking industry as much of the industry has been operating below cost. The cost increases seen in transportation are very real, but keep in mind that depressed rates can only last so long. The economy is bouncing back — and trucking is resilient. Even though consumers were still cautious during the last quarter of 2024, we saw a definite uptick in consumer demand and spending leading up to the Christmas holidays, particularly on Black Friday and Cyber Monday. We are a consumer-driven society, and that will always be a positive thing for trucking. A lot of financial analysts noted that the third quarter of the year wasn’t that great compared to 2023, but we did see some of the first positive year-over-year reports. That’s a start. I believe we’re going to see improvement in most industries, and in trucking in particular, during the first half of 2025. We’ve still got challenges to face, but I think the pendulum is starting to swing in our favor. We have a new administration in Washington, effective with the swearing-in of President Donald Trump this month. According to reports I’ve seen, “Trump 2.0” is going to involve some pretty big policy changes. With Trump’s support of the oil and gas industry, do you see any possibility for changes in the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) zero-emissions regulations and timeline? There’s a lot of attention on that right now. I anticipate that, at a minimum, the EPA’s timeline will be pushed back — and that will give the industry some breathing space.   The general public, as well as many environmentalists, view the trucking industry as being one of the biggest contributors to air pollution and global warming, and even as being indifferent to environmental issues. Can you comment on this perception? First of all, it’s important to note that the trucking industry very much wants to be environmentally responsible; however, we feel strongly that we need a long-term comprehensive strategy that achieves our common objectives in a realistic, economically responsible way. Zero tailpipe emissions are simply not feasible in the truckload business.   Still, we’re seeing a big push for electrification of both passenger and commercial vehicles from environmental groups as well as from vehicle manufacturers. What are some viable options to electric engines? People are beginning to understand that there ARE alternative fueling solutions that need to be explored. We’ve seen a lot of progress with renewable diesel using current internal combustion engines. Options like this can move the emissions needle a lot better than full-scale adoption of electrification — and in a much more affordable and sustainable manner. It’s going to be very interesting to see where it all goes. At TCA’s Fall Business Meetings just a few months ago, we heard from a representative of the EPA. It was a very productive session, and I believe the feedback TCA members gave the EPA about the feasibility of the impending emissions standards were well received. In short, our industry wants to do the right thing as far as the environment is concerned — but we want to do the right thing in the right way. I feel like we’ve got some momentum heading in the right direction.   With the implementation of Phase II of the FMCSA’s Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse in mid-November, state driver licensing agencies are required to revoke the commercial driving privileges of any drivers in a “prohibited” status. How is this impacting the driver pool? I haven’t seen any specific numbers on drivers who were downgraded, but it’s just common sense to assume that there were quite a few drivers flying under the radar who shouldn’t have been behind the wheel of a truck because of drug and alcohol violations. Now they can’t slip through the system and go to another state and apply for a job, because information from each state is submitting data to the Clearinghouse. The Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse regulations are a good thing. Making sure we have drug- and alcohol-free professional drivers in commercial vehicles makes the road safer for everyone. For drivers who are prohibited from operating a CMV due to a violation, there is a return-to-duty process for them to pursue if they want to remain in the industry. If you need a refresher, Truckload Authority’s Cliff Abbott provides a good overview of updates to the Clearinghouse.   Finding — and keeping — qualified drivers must be more important than ever for motor carriers. Do you have any advice for hiring managers and company executives? There’s actually a good piece about driver recruiting and retention in this edition of Truckload Authority. If you haven’t already, check it out! In short, though, company culture is the most important factor when it comes to driver retention. Drivers want to be heard and know that they are valuable members of the company. That doesn’t mean you can give them everything they want or that drivers shouldn’t be held accountable for their performance. But even if you can’t give drivers exactly what they want, you can let them know that you truly hear their concerns. Most importantly, you’ve got to be honest with your drivers. They want transparency; they want open communication. Drivers leave a company for many different reasons — pay, routes, benefits — but if your drivers feel that they are valued and that management cares about them and their needs, that’s when you build retention.   The Biden administration’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, or BIL, is set to expire in September, and the administration made a flurry of allocations in late 2024 for various projects. While progress has been made in many areas, improvements to truck parking availability around the nation don’t seem to be happening at the rate that’s needed. What are your thoughts? Recently TCA’s Dave Heller noted that the BIL omitted funding for truck parking and that a lack of facilities is reaching epidemic proportions. Truck parking remains an issue for the industry, and like most problems, it’s not going to be solved overnight. This is one of the primary issues TCA is working very hard to make improvements on at the federal level. However, there are some positive things happening in Washington as far as the need for safe parking for our drivers. I’m encouraged. Access to truck parking isn’t just about productivity, even though data shows that each driver spends an average of 56 minutes looking for parking on a daily basis. That’s nearly an hour of lost time every single day! It’s also a matter of safety for our drivers, as well as the general motoring public. TCA will continue to advocate for additional truck parking, and as private businesses work to offer solutions, we will make progress.   Are there other issues you’re hoping will be addressed by Congress in the near future? The attack on the independent contractor model (IC) at both the state and federal levels is very much at the forefront of the trucking industry right now. For so many people, the American dream is to be independent business owner. In the trucking industry, that means owning your own truck and having some control over how you run your business. As with any system, there have been “bad actors” that haven’t done things the way they should, but the IC is most definitely a valid business model; it has been for years. I hope that together we can make sure it remains a viable option and opportunity for drivers. It is vitally important to our industry.   Overall, what do you believe the future of trucking will look like under the new presidential administration? Any time there’s an administration change in Washington there will be some degree of uncertainty. The most important thing for TCA to do is to work with whoever is leading the nation and to continue to advocate and advance the issues that are important to our industry. We will continue to do just that and work for our members to address our business challenges and to work to improve the driving job, and by doing this, to make our industry stronger. You can count on this: TCA will fight and battle every day for the truckload industry and provide value to our members. I’m optimistic that we will see opportunities for some successes in 2025.   On a different topic, TCA’s annual convention is coming up in just a couple of months. Can you share any details about this year’s agenda? Truckload 2025: Phoenix is scheduled for March 15-18 at the Phoenix Convention Center. It’ll be great to see some sunshine and warm temperatures after the winter! A large part of TCA’s value is helping members be financially sustainable. We’ve got some important educational sessions and panel discussions lined up, and there will be great benchmarking opportunities. In short, it’s all about making the trucking industry better. Convention is a wonderful time for trucking industry professionals to gather together, share industry insights and, of course, enjoy a bit of socializing and networking. If you haven’t already registered, don’t waste any more time — visit tcaconvention.com to sign up and see the agenda.   Can you tell me a little about this year’s speakers and entertainment? On Monday morning (March 17), Bob Costello, the American Trucking Associations’ chief economist, will present the 2025 Industry Economic Review. The entire industry is looking forward to better times ahead, and this session will help us make the most of the changes on the horizon. This year’s keynote speaker is Oz Pearlman, a renowned mentalist, magician and athlete. It promises to be very entertaining! And our featured speaker, Jeremy Gutsche, will share insights and tips on how to harness the power of AI in your business. To cap off the event, attendees will be treated to a private performance by the Gin Blossoms after Tuesday night’s closing banquet and awards ceremonies.   As we close, do you have any additional thoughts to share with TCA members? On behalf of TCA’s leadership and staff, I’d like to thank our members for their continued participation and support. As an industry, we continuously work to keep the nation’s supply chain moving, regardless of the economy. Change is always on the horizon, but we will continue to work hard and to do what we do. The nation depends on us. To borrow an old phrase, we will “keep on truckin’.”   Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It has been a pleasure visiting with you.

Back in the Game: Modern ICEs will play vital role in the future of zero emissions

While much of North America is focused on electric vehicles (EVs) in the push toward zero emissions, another player is back on the field and rapidly gaining ground: the internal combustion engine (ICE). The freight industry is grappling with the adoption of electric heavy-duty trucks for numerous reasons. Their limited range makes them suitable for use only where charging is accessible, typically at carrier terminals or vendor sites. Irregular route carriers have difficulty finding a use for vehicles that must return to the terminal each night. Power grid issues are problematic for carriers trying to install charging infrastructure for their fleets. Finding qualified technicians to keep the trucks working — and drivers to drive them — are added issues. Luckily, advances in technology and alternative fuels are bringing ICEs back into the game. In September, the Engine Technology Forum gathered experts from half a dozen related industries to discuss taking the ICE to the next level. They shared an encouraging message: ICE technology can deliver the lower emissions benefits of EVs more quickly, at less expense and with fewer changes to the national infrastructure. At a minimum, the new ICEs offer a viable bridge to a zero-emissions future. According to Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the Engine Technology Forum, reaching the goal of zero emissions in trucking requires a combination of solutions — not just a rapid-fire switch to EVs. “Internal combustion engines, those powered by gasoline, diesel, natural gas and propane, really are key to our current economy, and we see them also as a key part of our energy future,” he said. One method of reducing emissions that is already available is the use of biomass-based diesel fuel, according to Steve Howell, founding partner of M4 Consulting and Chair of the ASTM Biodiesel Task Force. Renewable diesel and Biodiesel are both products that Howell refers to as “liquid solar energy.” “The major driving force now is carbon,” Howell said. “When you look at biomass-based diesel, it takes CO2 from the air to grow oil or fat. When we burn that oil or fat, there’s a net life cycle reduction of carbon in the atmosphere about 70%.” In other words, burning petroleum-based diesel adds carbon to the air, but the process of growing the soybeans or other crops used in biomass-based fuels actually removes CO2, helping to balance the scale. The end result is a 70% reduction in total carbon emissions. The remaining 30% comprises mostly the diesel fuel burned to grow, harvest and transport the crops needed to produce the biofuel. If the crops were grown and transported using only biomass-based diesel, that 30% could be reduced to zero, Howell noted. Soybeans, corn, canola and animal fats can be used to manufacture biomass diesel fuel, but Howell focused on the additional benefit of using soybeans. Because the beans are 80% protein and 20% oil, the protein meal left after the oil is extracted could decrease the price of the product by $20 to $40 per ton. Last year, about 4.5 billion gallons of biomass-based diesel were produced, about 10% of the distillate demand in the U.S. (70% in California). The industry plans to increase production to over 6 billion gallons by 2030 and 15 billion gallons by 2050. Time, however, is of the essence. According to Howell, atmospheric CO2 builds each year. For each five year of delay, CO2 reductions will need to increase by a factor of 13 times. New engine and aftertreatment technologies are already reducing tailpipe emissions of NOx and particulate matter to near-zero levels. Replacing the current mixture of biomass-based and petroleum-based fuels with 100% biomass-based fuels will soon be viable options for low-carbon combustion. Fuel additives also play a part in emissions reductions, according to Mary Dery, PhD, who is the performance additives technical director at Innospec. Noting that fuel filter plugging, fouled injectors and saturated diesel particulate filters all contribute to increased emissions, Dery highlights the benefits of adding detergents to diesel fuel. Cleaner injectors, she says, provide better fuel economy and reduced DEF consumption, while cleaner particulate filters mean more time between fewer regens and less fuel use. Propane, while not a new fuel option, has typically been used in its gaseous form. Srinu Gunturu, chief engineer at Stanadyne, is excited about advances in the use of liquid propane as vehicle fuel. By developing high-pressure liquid fuel systems and specialized direct injectors, Gunturu sees liquid propane as a bridge to achieving zero carbon. “We believe that liquid propane is going to be a great alternative, and we see that direct injection is going to result in a huge efficiency improvement and also improved emissions,” he explained. The fuel has lower greenhouse gas emission levels than either gasoline or diesel and close-to-zero particulate matter emissions. “We see that liquid propane and direct injection emissions results are promising compared to diesel and gasoline, Gunturu said. “We believe that this technology will improve the efficiency of the engine significantly in the current market.” There’s no question that the goal of zero-emissions vehicles is desirable for all forms of transportation. The question, then, is this: Are EVs the best answer right now? While battery power represents the cleanest option for tailpipe emissions, battery-electric vehicles won’t be truly “zero emissions” until the electricity used to charge them is also free of emissions — and that day is a long way off. On top of that, mining and transporting the rare substances needed to construct batteries for them also requires carbon emissions. In reality, unless someone figures out how to safely install and operate a small nuclear powerplant under the hood, solving vehicle emissions will take a combination of different technologies. Back in the early days of the automobile age, the internal combustion engine turned out to be the power choice over steam, electric and other technologies. For many applications, it still is.

What’s coming in trucking? A conversation with TCA Chair John Culp

By the end of the first week of November, a new administration will be set to take charge of the White House. The outcome of this year’s election is sure to be a topic of hot debate. Regardless of who sits in the Oval Office and what party controls the House and Senate, members of the trucking industry will remain focused on business as usual. The nation’s 3.6 million truck drivers will still be moving freight from Point A to Point B, working to ensure consumers have food on the shelves and that medical facilities are properly supplied. In this Chat with the Chairman, TCA Chairman John Culp shares insights on issues impacting the industry.   Q: In the past weeks, Hurricane Helene has had a huge impact on the Southeastern U.S. with widespread destruction and highways washed away. In what ways is this impacting the trucking industry? A: I believe companies have been able to reroute most traffic lanes around road closures and freight is moving again, but only essential travel into and within western North Carolina is allowed. The North Carolina DOT is saying that all roads in Western North Carolina should be considered closed, including I-40 and I-26 to Tennessee. Hopefully a few routes will be available by the time this edition of Truckload Authority is out. The supply chain will remain disrupted, and the route changes come with more miles and time. It will get better as bridges and roads are repaired — but the reality is it is going to take a long time to fully recover. Some reports say it will take over a year to reopen I-40. The roads WILL be repaired, and the supply chain WILL recover, but the losses to the people and families impacted by this devastating and deadly storm are still being felt now, and for many, will be forever.   Q: With heavy trucks unable to even access many storm-damaged areas, how can members of the trucking industry help the victims of this and other disasters? A: During natural disasters, I am proud to say that the trucking industry is always among the first to respond with relief, delivering water, food, gas, clothing, supplies and building materials. I have seen reports from state trucking associations in Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina and Alabama where truckers have responded and worked around the clock to deliver essential and critical supplies to people in need. I know that other state associations and truck drivers from all across the country are giving their time and resources also to help our fellow Americans in this time of need. There are food shortages, water shortages, fuel shortages — basically everything. Many people have lost not just their homes and material possessions, but also family and friends to Helene. Assistance will be needed for a long time. If you want to help, there are many great charitable organizations on the scene that need your support. One organization that I support is Samaritan’s Purse which is based in Boone, North Carolina. They are responding and providing relief in six locations across four states. There is also a supply chain logistics organization that was created subsequent to Hurricane Katrina, the American Logistics Aid Network (ALAN). They do this with the help of the logistics community who make essential donations of transportation, warehousing, material equipment or expertise. The cold, hard reality is that this is a long-term deal — and the hurricane and storm season isn’t over yet. It’s going to cause delays and added costs.   Q: At 12:01 a.m. on October 5, with the nation still reeling from the impact of Hurricane Helene, members of the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) union at ports along the East and Gulf coasts went on strike. For now, the strike has been put “on hold” and the existing contract extended to January 15, 2024. What are your thoughts on the timing of the strike and its potential impact on the supply chain, and on the truckload industry in particular? A: First of all, a prolonged strike would have a tremendously negative impact on every link in the supply chain, including the trucking industry. The ILA represents about 45,000 workers in 36 ports from Maine to Texas, and workers from about a dozen of those ports walked. A temporary truce was called on Oct. 4, and the ILA ordered its members to return to work, at least until after the first of the year. This averted a major crisis during the world’s peak shipping season, when the freight industry is already scrambling to meet the demands of shippers and consumers. While I respect the union’s right to strike, I do not believe they should be allowed to severely disrupt our country’s supply chain and hold the entire nation hostage — and that’s exactly what they will do if they strike again. According to various sources, it would cost the U.S. economy anywhere from $3.8 to $4.5 billion a day. If an agreement is not reached by the mid-January deadline, the impact could be staggering.   Q: As a refresher, please review the issues between the ILA and the U.S. Maritime Alliance. A: Certainly. In a nutshell, it comes down to money and job security. The ILA rejected the Alliance’s offer of a 50% wage increase, holding out for a 77% increase over the contract period. The strike was suspended when a tentative agreement was reached that would increase worker’ wages by 62% over the life of the six-year contract. But they still oppose the implementation of any form of automation that could replace human workers. To me, that simply is not feasible! Technological advances and at least some degree of automation are now a part of everyday life. I don’t have any sympathy for them if they choose to strike again. They have a great deal that will take them through any economic ups and downs for six years. There is no way that truckload trucking companies would or could negotiate a 62% raise to its employees, especially in the difficult economic times we are navigating in.   Q: That leads to my next question. In your opinion, should the federal government involve itself in these or any labor negotiations? A: The government has the authority to call a halt to strikes and step in to settle labor disputes, and they have done so before. Generally, it’s best for all parties involved that the government NOT be involved. However, when a dispute puts the entire nation’s supply chain at risk, it’s a different situation. Obviously, if the ports are shut down it prevents both imports and exports, and that can easily lead to disaster around the globe. When the possible impact of a labor dispute is this widespread, I believe the government’s involvement is needed. I’m hopeful the ILA and the Alliance will reach an agreement and that there won’t be any further disruptions to the supply chain. Time will tell.   Q: Another issue that remains top of mind for the trucking industry is the prevalence of “nuclear” verdicts. We’ve discussed the topic before, but it bears revisiting, especially in light of recent reports of high-dollar awards against transportation companies and equipment manufacturers. Do you have any insights to share? A: There are three recent cases that immediately come to mind — two equipment manufacturers and a motor carrier. On September 5, a St. Louis jury awarded a total of $462 million — $450 million in punitive damages and $6 million each to the families of two men who were killed in 2019 when their car crashed into the rear of a tractor-trailer. The suit claimed the manufacturer of the 2004-model trailer, Wabash National, was liable because the trailer did not meet current safety standards. However, Wabash says, the trailer exceeded safety specifications at the time of its manufacture. In addition, there were extenuating circumstances under which no rear underride guard could have prevented the deaths. The judge did not allow the defense to introduce relevant information that could likely have resulted in a different verdict. According to police records, the car was traveling at 55 mph when it struck the stopped trailer, neither occupant was wearing a seat belt, and the driver was intoxicated. On September 6, an Alabama jury found Daimler Truck liable to the tune of $160 million in a case filed by the driver of a 2023 Western Star 4700 who was rendered a quadriplegic following a rollover accident. The lawsuit alleged that both the driver’s seat and the roof of the cab were defective and did not meet safety standards. Daimler maintains that its products actually exceed safety standards. Our legal system is really messed up when juries award “lottery jackpot” verdicts to victims involved in accidents where companies that manufacture goods that meet government safety standards and have no fault in the accident or fatalities. More recently — and I don’t have all the details — an Arkansas jury hit Kroger Logistics with a $150 million verdict in the death of a 20-year-old firefighter who was struck and killed by a semi-truck after stopping to assist at the scene of an accident. Unfortunately, accidents happen and sometimes people are seriously or fatally injured. When this happens, our legal system allows the injured party to seek recovery and/or damages from the party who was responsible for the accident. This is a good thing, but nuclear verdicts are out of control and are unsustainable for trucking companies. Our industry must educate the public on what is happening and the impact it has on consumers. These exorbitant costs are being passed on and are showing up in every product that trucking companies haul. Tort and litigation reform are sorely needed, but it’s an uphill battle. It is generally a state issue, but trucking is regulated by the federal government because of its importance to interstate commerce and trucking accidents should be adjudicated in the federal court system also. This would be a great step forward.   Q: The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2027 deadline in the journey to zero emissions is growing closer. What are your thoughts on shifting the trucking industry away from diesel engines toward battery-electric power? A: First of all, the price of a battery-electric truck is two to three times more than a regular diesel, so of course, the cost of transportation is going to jump. Then there’s the fact that the nation’s power grid is nowhere near ready to handle the charging stations. Different parts of the country struggle with electricity shortages on a regular basis, so where will all the power needed to charge these trucks come from? Even if the charging infrastructure were already in place, there are other problems. These batteries take several hours to charge, and today drivers can’t be in the vehicle while it’s charging. So, those four to 10 hours of charging time will have to be logged as on-duty time for drivers. That’s a tremendous loss of time, especially when the range of electric trucks is so limited. There are countless other hurdles too, like the cost of tires. Electric vehicles are hard on tires, with all the starting and stopping, plus the added weight of the battery. I’ve talked to a few drivers who are running electric trucks, and they’ve mentioned that the tire wear is awful.   Q: We’ve been hearing a lot about advances in the field of the internal combustion engine (ICE), with manufacturers working to produce engines that can be powered by alternative fuel sources. Could this be a viable alternative to reduce emissions in trucking? A: Engines powered by renewable diesel will literally give us the most bang for the buck — and in addition, offer a substantial reduction in life cycle carbon emissions over battery electric vehicles. ICEs should be an integral part of a comprehensive long-term solution in meeting our environmental responsibilities.   Q: How is TCA working to find solutions for the trucking industry, not only regarding emissions, but also other issues? A: At TCA, we’re working very hard to bring issues to light on Capitol Hill. In addition to meetings throughout the year, we set aside a day each fall for our Call on Washington and visit with legislators and their staffs about real-world solutions. Emissions and EPA regulations were a huge part of this year’s conversations on the Hill. As an industry, it’s very important that we work with the leaders in Washington to advance the issues that are important to us. Our job is to work with whoever is in power to provide information relevant to trucking and advocate for the industry and the supply chain as a whole. I would say that one of TCA’s best value propositions for our members is providing a voice in Washington. Effecting change takes time and effort. We want to bring about productive safety improvements in the industry. We want the supply chain to be more efficient.   Q: I’m sure the TCA team is already hard at work to plan next year’s annual convention. Do you have information to share? A: Truckload 2025 is set for March 15-18 in Phoenix. It’s going to be a great program, and I encourage every member to attend. In addition to unbeatable educational opportunities, we’ll be featuring inspiring speakers and plenty of opportunities for benchmarking and networking. As always, the exhibit hall will showcase the latest trends and technologies, along with business solutions to help your company thrive. One of TCA’s primary objectives is to help our members be financially sustainable. With that in mind, we work to ensure our meetings and conventions are beneficial as well as entertaining.   Q: The holidays are almost upon us. Do you have any thoughts to share with TCA members? A: It’s been a challenging year, and the truckload industry is facing more uncertainty in the coming year. I don’t know when things will get better, but I know that they will. As I think about the blessings I’ve been given, I’m thankful for the TCA membership, the trucking industry as a whole and, especially, the drivers who are out there on the nation’s highways delivering freight every day. We have a lot to be proud of in trucking, and a lot to be thankful for. I hope everyone has a blessed holiday season through Thanksgiving, Christmas and the many other observances through the new year.   Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wish you the happiest of holidays, and I look forward to our first visit in the New Year.

Autonomous tech helps make trucking safer, keep drivers healthier, developers say

Thinking about adding an autonomous truck or two to your fleet? If so, chances are that drivers’ reactions will be mixed, at best. Thinking about adding an autonomous truck or two to your fleet? If so, chances are that drivers’ reactions will be mixed, at best. After all, many drivers have expressed worries about the growing number of AI features in today’s Class 8 trucks, from inward-facing dash cam recorders to lane-assist sensors and automatic emergency braking. Perhaps the biggest concern heard from drivers is fear that autonomous trucks will lead to companies snatching the steering wheel from their hands, shifting them from cabs to unemployment lines. How can you integrate AI into your fleet without upsetting the proverbial apple cart? According to Walter Grigg, director of industry partnerships at Torc Robotics, professional drivers have nothing to fear. In fact, he contends, drivers will be the ones who benefit most from this technology — simply because they won’t have to spend as many hours behind the wheel. “Contrary to what many people may think, rather than leaving truckers without jobs, self-driving truck leaders plan to roll out hub-to-hub transportation models that take the long-haul tedium out of the picture, allowing truck drivers to handle the shorter, albeit more complex and engaging, routes,” he said. “Human drivers will be on either end of hub — and they will be closer to home,” he said. While full implementation of the hub-to-hub model featuring fully autonomous rigs is still many years away, Grigg says his company is working to ensure professional drivers will continue to play an integral role. “If you are a professional driver today and you are safe and good at your job … you will have a job for as long as you want one,” he noted, adding that Torc’s target year for putting driverless rigs on the highways is 2027. For drivers like Samuel Carter of Arkansas, who runs a route between Dallas and Little Rock on a weekly basis, the fear of being replaced by technology is there, but it’s not something he dwells on. “I am young, 27, so I know that in my lifetime I will likely have to deal with self-driving trucks and see how that plays out in my career,” he said. “I am not really worried about being replaced as a driver, but it is a little concerning. I just try not to worry about it and will deal with that when it comes time to.” Of course, there are numerous questions about the safety of autonomous systems. Phil Koopman, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, specializes in studies of vehicle automation safety. He agrees with Grigg that self-driving trucks can theoretically be safer than human-driven ones — for the very reason that they lack drivers who might become distracted or impaired. However, he cautions, computers will inevitably make errors. Just how the trucks will fare in real-world situations will depend on the quality of their safety engineering, he says. With billions of dollars in investments at stake, Koopman wonders how the companies will balance safety decisions against cost concerns. “Everything I see indicates they’re trying to do the right thing,” he said. “But the devil is in the details.” On the test track, reporters recently saw autonomous trucks powered by Aurora technology successfully avoid simulated road obstacles, including pedestrians, a blown tire and even a horse. Keep in mind, however: In these tests, the trucks were running at only 35 mph in a controlled environment, with no unexpected occurrences. These same trucks are being tested by Aurora — with human safety drivers on board — at speeds of 65 mph or higher on Texas freeways. Attorney Amy Witherite, founder of a law firm that specializes in vehicle accident cases, recently spoke out about what she calls “the dangers of driverless vehicles on the road.” “We have already seen problems with both autonomous trucks as well as vehicles such as Tesla with an autopilot feature,” she said. “The danger and severity of accidents will be multiplied a hundredfold when the accident involves a tractor-trailer versus a car.” Witherite points to recent reports of autonomous vehicles posing unnecessary risks to the general public. The state of California just this year called a halt to the use of autonomous taxis in the San Francisco area after the vehicles were involved in several incidents. Compounding these concerns, self-driving truck company Waymo recently recalled 444 self-driving vehicles after two minor collisions in quick succession in Arizona because a software error could result in them inaccurately predicting the movement of a towed vehicle. Alain Kornhauser, head of autonomous vehicle studies at Princeton University, recently told the Associated Press that he drove a borrowed Tesla for two weeks and found that it consistently spotted pedestrians and detected other drivers. While the software performs well most of the time, Kornhauser said he had to take control when the Tesla made moves that “scared” him, warning that self-driving vehicles aren’t ready to be used without human supervision. “This thing,” he said, “is not at a point where it can go anywhere.” The software that enables automated driving in passenger vehicles mirrors that being installed and tested in larger vehicles like semi-trucks. Tech developers note that automated sensors provide advance warning of dangers. During the previously mentioned test runs, Aurora trucks “spotted” obstacles more than a quarter mile away and acted immediately to avoid them. Chris Urmson, CEO of Aurora, says the trucks’ laser sensors can detect people walking on a highway at night, far beyond the distance of headlights. Already, several trucking companies are partnering with autonomous tech providers to roll out self-driving Class 8 rigs on test runs between major cities. Aurora and Torc are among the tech firms working on autonomous semis and trucking hubs. Kodiak Robotics and truck stop giant Pilot Co. have planned a Pilot travel center in Villa Rica, Georgia, which will be used by Kodiak to launch and land autonomous trucks. Company officials say the facility will serve as a hub for drivers to pick up and drop off first-and last-mile deliveries. The Villa Rica truckport will support Kodiak’s 18,000-mile-long autonomous deployment network, the industry’s largest and most robust set of mapped routes for self-driving trucks. Last summer, Torc announced plans to collaborate with C.R. England on a pilot program using C.R. England’s temperature-controlled loads and Torc’s fleet of Level 4 autonomous test trucks for long-haul applications. At Level 4, the interaction between human and machine lowers as the vehicle’s capability increases. Steering, braking, accelerating and monitoring the environment are taken out of the driver’s hands, as well as changing lanes, turning and signaling, according to navigation company TomTom. However, with Level 4 technology, a human still has the option to manually override the system. Chad England, CEO of C.R. England, says he believes autonomous trucking will eventually lead to the company expanding its network safely, with high levels of service to its customers, all while enhancing the quality of existing driver jobs. “Specifically, by adding autonomous lanes to our network, we can expand our customer offerings and create more structured jobs for drivers at both ends of autonomous runs,” England said. “Torc’s deep integration with Daimler Truck AG makes our two organizations a perfect fit for piloting this new technology.” Back at Torc’s headquarters, Grigg, a CDL holder himself, seeks to reassure drivers who think they’ll be replaced by technology. He’s been out on the road many times in a big rig and says he understands the way drivers think. He appreciates their points of view. In short, he says, part of Torc’s goal is to help make truckers’ lives easier and healthier. Bringing autonomy to trucking can help drivers by taking them out of the cab for days on end and allowing them to work closer to home, with shorter routes. That means less sitting and more body movement, which is better for the heart and overall health, he said. “Truck drivers are the heartbeat of the American economy and our supply chains — but what does the average heart health of a trucker look like?” Grigg said. “There’s quite a bit of historic data … that point out the higher likelihood of diabetes, heart disease and unhealthy habits like smoking that are prevalent in the truck driver population as a result of long, arduous hours on the road. “Rest assured, we have the best interests of the drivers in mind with all of our plans,” he concluded.

What will the landscape of Washington look like in mid-November?

At the time of this writing, the outcome of the 2024 presidential election remains a mystery, as does the question of which party will have control of Congress. Even after Election Day, when all the votes have been tallied and — barring a repeat of the events surrounding the 2020 election — a new president is set to take office, no one can truly predict what the landscape in Washington will be like for the next four years. Missy Edwards, a lobbyist for the trucking industry on Capitol Hill, shared her thoughts. She describes the 2024 election season as “historically tumultuous,” pointing to widespread media coverage of assassination attempts on Republican candidate and former president Donald Trump. Another first was the withdrawal of incumbent President Joe Biden from the Democratic ticket; he was quickly replaced with current Vice President Kamala Harris. “While polls consistently predicted a very close election, the race is now tighter than ever,” she said. After months of polls trending in Trump’s favor, Harris’ last-minute entry completely reshaped the race and altered the electoral map. Edwards cited the Cook Political Report which now rates seven battleground states as toss-ups — Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and North Carolina. Edwards says both campaigns will dedicate nearly all their time and resources in the campaign’s final sprint building support in those seven states. See graphic below for a few key state races to watch. In a final significant move before ballots are cast, the Federal Reserve took an unprecedented step to cut interest rates just 47 days before Election Day, a move Edwards says is unlikely to have a significant impact on the economy before voters head to the polls. However, she says, it could improve perceptions of the Biden-Harris administration’s economic stewardship. State races may be a bit more convoluted, however. Edwards says the 2024 Senate map continues to heavily favor Republicans. The biggest news is that Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown’s polling lead remains within the margin of error against Republican Bernie Moreno. In Montana, and Democratic Sen. Jon Tester is continuing to lose ground to Republican Tim Sheehy. Edwards provided the following breakdown of a few key races and issues in a handful of states. “After the election we expect the conversations around the Highway Fund Reauthorization to pick up,” Edwards noted. “Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) is expected to replace Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) as the top Democrat on the Senate EPW (environment and public works) Committee — a key committee of jurisdiction for the trucking industry.” Meanwhile, in the House, Democrats need to pick up four net seats to take majority. A September 8 Average Generic Congressional Poll by 538 showed Democrats at 47.2 and Republicans at 44.6. Republicans hold 16 seats in districts carried by President Biden, and Cook Political Report rates 24 seats as Toss Ups — 13 Republicans 11 Democrats. Of these seats, five are in California and three are in New York. Since Harris replaced Biden in the presidential race, a fundraising surge has created a resource advantage for Democrats. The Harris campaign announced a $10 million transfer to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). The Republican party was successful in its 2024 redistricting efforts, gaining a net single seat before the general election in California, North Carolina and Ohio. Republicans in the North Carolina legislature crafted a map that wiped out three battleground Democrats by turning their seats into “safe red districts. In addition, voting-rights groups won legal challenges to racial gerrymandering in Alabama and Louisiana that each created a new seat likely to flip to Democrats. As the candidates continue to campaign ahead of Election Day, the trucking industry can only wait to see what happens — and then work with whatever administration takes power.  

TCA Chair John Culp speaks out about current issues in trucking

Change of Seasons: An interview with TCA Chairman John Culp Fall is a busy season for the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) as well as for motor carriers and other industry stakeholders. Shorter days, cooler temperatures and hints of the glorious autumn foliage to come set the stage for September, when the trucking industry and the general public take time out to extend a special word of thanks to the nation’s professional truck drivers. Also in September, TCA’s staff and members converge on Capitol Hill for the association’s fall business meetings and the annual Call on Washington. On a hot, muggy Friday morning in late August, I had a chance to sit down with TCA Chairman John Culp. In addition to visiting about upcoming events, we discussed several critical issues that impact not only members of the trucking industry, but also the nation’s supply, the global economy and the everyday lives of North American residents. Read on as Culp shares his thoughts and insights. Linda: As pretty much anyone with ties to the trucking industry knows, September is traditionally a time set aside to celebrate drivers. While National Truck Driver Appreciation Week actually takes place September 15-21 this year, many carriers plan special events and ceremonies throughout the month. What are some ways employers can show their appreciation to these hard-working men and women? John: National Truck Driver Appreciation Week is a great week and it’s fun to celebrate. I hope that carriers appreciate their drivers every week of the year — but it’s great to have a specific time of the year for companies to host special events and recognize drivers. A lot of carriers, including Maverick Transportation, prepare meals for drivers. These may be buffet-style cookouts, meal cards or to-go meals packaged for drivers whose schedules don’t allow them to attend the on-site events. At Maverick, the company leadership makes a point of visiting our terminals and firing up the barbecue grills. It’s a great way to visit with drivers, answer questions they might have and just tell them, “Thank you.” We also shoot a video every year featuring our non-driving employees celebrating and thanking our drivers for what they do for our company. Some of our customers also enjoy taking part in National Truck Driver Appreciation Week at their shipping locations or at one of our terminals. They know drivers are critical to their success, and they want them to feel appreciated. Many give away hats, travel mugs or other swag. It’s a great way for them to let drivers know they want to be a shipper of choice. As I mentioned previously, I hope the nation’s truck drivers feel appreciated every day of the year. They are not only critical to our nation’s supply chain, but they are also the backbone of our companies. They are our customer-facing representatives with our clients where the rubber meets the road.   Linda: That’s a great point! How can companies make sure their drivers know that driver appreciation isn’t just a once-a-year event? John: I believe the best way is through driver engagement in the company. This is vital at all levels of the company, from the corner office to the back office to the safety team — drivers need to know they’re valuable employees. When you’ve got a mobile workforce, like drivers, you have to look at engagement strategies that are different from the ones you use with the office crew. In short, it’s all about communication — and that can be challenging when you don’t have a chance to visit with drivers face-to-face on a regular basis. For in-depth insights from human resources and retention specialists at various sizes of carriers about how to give, check out this story.   Linda: In addition to driver appreciation, TCA has some pretty big events planned for September — namely the Fall Business Meetings and the annual Call on Washington scheduled for September 11-12. Are the meetings just for committee and board members, or can anyone take part? John: You do not need to be a member of a committee to attend the committee and board meetings on Wednesday, September 11. At these meetings, we’ll be talking about numerous issues that impact the truckload industry, including cargo theft, truck parking, employee misclassification, EPA emission rules, hair follicle testing, and much more. All of our members are encouraged to take part in helping shape the future of TCA. In addition, during Wednesday night’s reception, attendees will have a chance to hear insights from political analyst Nathan Gonzales, editor and publisher of Inside Elections and political commentator on NBC’s Meet the Press and Nightly News. We also will have our 2023 Professional Drivers of the Year joining us for the meetings and our visits on the Hill.   Linda: That sounds like a great initiative, and it’s great that the drivers have a chance to tell members of Congress what it’s actually like out there on the road. The visits to Capitol Hill are the day after the meetings, correct? John: Yes, this year’s Call on Washington is on Thursday, September 12. It’s going to be a great day to be on the Hill! The voice of the truckload industry is gaining momentum in Congress, and it’s because of TCA and its members working to bring important issues to the forefront in Congress. It’s an amazing experience to visit with senators and representatives who help shape the nation’s laws and regulations, and to be able to share with them the goals and needs of the trucking industry. The importance of our industry is not well understood by many of our legislators, and we’re working to increase awareness of the challenges we face and the impact they have on our nation’s economy.   Linda: Your mention of regulations brings us to another topic that we’ve visited before — the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s emissions mandates and the industry’s response to the pressure. In recent weeks, other industries, and even some U.S. legislators, have voiced opposition to the timeline for implementation. John: That’s true, and if you check out Gloves Off, written by Truckload Authority’s John Worthen, you’ll see an overview of those complaints. It’s important to keep in mind that the trucking industry is not dismissing the issue of pollution caused by emissions. Unfortunately, the public seems to believe we don’t care about the environment. That’s not true at all! Environmental stewardship is important to our industry, and we have made a lot of progress over the past few decades in reducing our engine emissions — and we are continuing to do so. For example, if you compare the emissions of a Class 8 truck manufactured in 1988 to a modern truck, it takes 60 new trucks to produce the amount of emissions caused by just ONE truck in 1988. Even since 2010, manufacturers have made great progress in reducing emissions. However, pre-2010 trucks make up a large percentage of the total trucks on the highway. If we could incentivize fleets and truck owners to replace those old engines with modern, cleaner-burning engines, I believe it would have an immediate — and obvious — impact. The short answer is that EPA’s timeline for implementation is not achievable and needs to be adjusted to allow manufacturers to develop the technology that is needed to meet the mandates. Until then, we need to focus on real-world steps we can take now as a part of a long-term strategy to protect our environment.   Linda: Another area of focus lately has been on the budget items noted in the House Appropriation Committee’s bill for fiscal year 2025, which were released back in June. For the most part, I’ve seen positive response from the industry about the items pertaining to trucking. John: Absolutely. There certainly seems to be some movement on issues TCA and other industry groups have been working to raise awareness of, like the truck parking issue. The bill earmarks $200 million in grants for public parking for commercial trucks. If you haven’t already, take a look at this update on predatory towing legislation for more information. It’s too early to say where all that funding will end up, but it’s encouraging that legislators at both the federal and state levels are understanding the need for truck parking. Another issue addressed in the bill — and something that up until now has mostly been addressed on a state-by-state basis — is the issue of predatory towing. This is a very real issue for the trucking industry, and it’s not limited to just exorbitant rates and junk fees. Towing companies and impound lots holding shippers’ cargo hostage and refusing to release it to its rightful owner (which is NOT the trucking company) is another big problem that TCA and others are working to correct. Now, I’m not saying that the towing industry is bad; in fact, it’s an integral part of the trucking industry. And there are a lot of very reputable, very good towing companies. But, as in any area of business, there are bad players, there are bad practices and procedures that need to be addressed. Under the bill, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMSCA) would work to develop guidelines and regulations at all levels of government. It’s a step in the right direction.   Linda: Also in June, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Advisory Committee on Underride Protection filed a report that has caused consternation in the trucking industry. In my understanding, the committee recommends that new and existing trucks and trailers be fitted with side underride guards. What are your thoughts? John: I have not read the report but know that the cost of implementing side underride guards on new and existing trucks and trailers is astronomically expensive — and when compared projected benefits, it is simply not economically feasible to implement. There are many technologies that this money could be used for that can produce a far greater impact on highway safety. We need to make smart economic decisions on how we invest in safety, for the good of the motoring public and for the consumers in our country who depend on efficient transportation of the goods they purchase. (For information about the report and industry reactions, check out this story.)   Linda: It sounds like there are a lot of issues on the table right now — all the more reason for TCA members to take advantage of the Call on Washington! But moving on to less “weighty” issues, what are some upcoming programs you’d like to bring to members’ attention? John: We have a couple of big events throughout the year that honor the men and women who have served or are serving in our nation’s military — The Wall That Heals and Wreaths Across America. THE WALL THAT HEALS TCA member carriers, in partnership with the Vietnam Veteran Memorial Fund (VVMF), transport The Wall That Heals to communities for display throughout our country all year. It is a traveling memorial exhibit including a three-quarter scale replica of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C., bearing the names of the 58,281 men and women who gave the ultimate sacrifice in Vietnam. The last stop this year will be in Panama City, Florida, November 14-17. Transporting and helping construct The Wall That Heals during its annual tour is an unforgettable experience that involves entire communities, and it honors a group that did not receive proper recognition for many years. If you would like to learn more, check out the VVMF website, vvmf.org. WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA The other event is Wreaths Across America. TCA members have participated in transporting wreaths to veteran cemeteries since 2008. This year the laying of the wreaths will be on November 14. This has been said by others many times before, but it’s true: Freedom has never been free — and it never will be. We should never forget the sacrifices that people have made for our country and our freedom. I’m always proud to see the number of companies that participate in these efforts and that encourage their employees and drivers to take part. And, of course, drivers love working with Wreaths Across America, whether they’re transporting the wreaths to the national cemetery in Arlington or to veteran cemeteries in their own communities. While Wreaths Across America Day comes around once a year, the mission continues all year long. If you’re not already involved in these or other community-service initiatives, I strongly encourage you to do so. In addition to giving back, it’s a great way to promote the image of the trucking industry in the eyes of the public.   Linda: I believe our time is nearly up. Do you have any other news you’d like to share with TCA’s membership? John: I do. Our new TCA Elite Fleet program will kick off soon. The program is designed to recognize carriers who offer a best-in-class workplace for drivers and independent contractors in the North American truckload industry. It’s a certification program that will not only recognize the 2025 Best Places to Drive, but will also provide our members companies with opportunities to Improve the job of the professional driver, which is a key component of our membership value proposition.   Linda: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to our next visit. This story originally appeared in the September/October 2024 edition of Truckload Authority, the official magazine of the Truckload Carriers Association.

Work is underway in DC to lower the boom on predatory towing

Predatory towing ranks high among the major issues that create headaches in the trucking industry. But the federal government is working to change that. On July 10, the House Appropriations Committee voted 31-26 to advance a bill to the House floor that aims to crack down on predatory towing as part of the fiscal year 2025 transportation funding bill. The bill would direct the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) to facilitate discussions with local, state and private-sector stakeholders to develop guidelines for towing and recovery regulations at all levels of government. Predatory towing entails any incident in which a towing operator severely overcharges, illegally seizes assets, damages assets by use of improper equipment, or illegitimately withholds the release of a truck, trailer and/or cargo. Already the issue has gained support from top levels of government. “When a truck driver’s vehicle is towed, they can’t earn a living until they get it back — leaving them vulnerable to predatory junk fees from towing companies,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. “We support the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) efforts to stand up for truckers by acting to ban junk fees and prevent predatory towing fees that can cause significant financial harm.” In October 2023, the FTC proposed a ban on junk fees that would prohibit businesses from charging hidden and bogus junk fees by requiring them to include all mandatory fees when quoting a price. FMCSA officials say they believe that predatory towing fee practices fall within the purview of FTC’s proposed rule, which would greatly benefit truckers if finalized. In its comment to the FTC, FMCSA expresses strong support for the important protections and offers suggestions for additional restrictions that would further help protect truckers from predatory towing junk fees. These suggestions include: Banning junk fees for unnecessary goods or services: The FMCSA suggests adding a provision that prohibits companies from charging any fee for an ancillary good or service that has no value, costs nothing extra to provide, or that reasonably would be assumed to be included in the upfront price of the good or service. For example, towing companies often charge “equipment fees” for using equipment that they already own and use routinely to provide towing services. Prohibiting or restricting excessive junk fee practices: The FMCSA encourages the FTC to consider prohibiting or imposing restrictions on excessive fee practices. These practices include charging an excessive number of fees, charging excessive amounts for a fee, or charging variable fees for fixed costs. The provision on excessive fees could focus on consumers who have little to no ability to avoid, negotiate, decline, anticipate, or limit the number or cost of the fees, or consumers who are vulnerable, in distress, or otherwise limited in choice by their circumstances. Treating each illegal junk fee as a violation: The FMCSA suggests that the final rule treat each illegal junk fee as a separate violation and that the rule expressly prohibit companies from charging or collecting mandatory fees that are not appropriately disclosed, are not included in the total price, and/or cannot be fully calculated upfront. According to a recent study by the American Transportation Research Institute, the most common types of predatory towing are: Excessive rates, experienced by 82.7% of motor carriers, and Unwarranted extra service charges, experienced by 81.8% of carriers. A majority of carriers reported encountered additional issues, such as truck release or access delays, cargo release delays, truck seizure without cause and tows misreported as consensual. David Heller, who serves as senior vice president of safety and government affairs for the Truckload Carriers’ Association gave a huge thumbs up to the House committee’s July measure. “I think it stands to reason that unscrupulous towing companies certainly need to be held accountable for their actions and the House language is a start in the right direction,” Heller said. “There continues to be success stories at the state level that address these issues, and the apropos language will go far in beginning the process federally for FMCSA to instill more transparency in the process,” he continued. “We support the efforts of the appropriators in directing the agency to develop stronger guidelines that will hopefully eliminate the bad actors to operate on our highways.” In a column published June 25 on FleetOwner.com, Heller further explained his disdain for predatory towing, writing that “trucking companies nationwide are being hit with massive tow charges that, in some cases, are more than the truck’s value. … Predatory towing has become the new normal. Our industry must find ways to keep this in check out of fear of being faced with a tow bill that creeps into six figures.” Heller also noted that carriers across the country have also been dealing with the issue of holding cargo ‘hostage’ during towing incidents. “In what basically amounts to theft, in predatory towing situations, the cargo on a towed trailer simply isn’t released to the carrier required to deliver it, creating even more significant problems by further disrupting the supply chain,” he wrote. “I have heard of instances where, even when the cargo is released, it is difficult at best to reclaim it.” Over at the American Trucking Associations (ATA), president and CEO Chris Spear echoed Heller’s thoughts. “ATA and our federation of state associations are fighting back against these predatory towers and ransom payments that target the truckers we depend on to deliver our nation’s goods,” Spear said. “We welcome this important step forward to develop commonsense reforms that will inject more transparency and fairness into the system and hold unscrupulous companies accountable.” This story originally appeared in the September/October 2024 edition of Truckload Authority, the official magazine of the Truckload Carriers Association.

Seeing employees as more than ‘just a number’ is key to attracting, retaining quality drivers

Truck drivers are a vital link in the supply chain. In fact, it could well be said that they’re the backbone of America’s economy. These men and women navigate tractor-trailers packed with cargo up and down the interstates, along the back roads and through crowded city streets at all hours of the day and night. And even when the rest of the world stops because of an emergency or disaster, truck drivers … well, they keep on trucking. Each September, the industry celebrates National Truck Driver Appreciation Week. This year, it’s September 15-21. It’s a time when motor carriers, shippers, receivers and the general public honor these hardworking professionals. While the average citizen might think a week is plenty of time to thank drivers for doing their jobs, others — such as truckload carriers — know that it takes a 365-day approach to make sure drivers feel appreciated. Turnover rates in the trucking industry are an ongoing concern. A recent survey of truck drivers, conducted by Conversion Interactive Agency, found that 40% are looking for a new job, and it’s estimated that empty seats at motor carriers could double by 2031. A few of the reasons for drivers’ unrest include a lack of feeling appreciated, concerns over health and safety, and low pay. Find a balance Many carriers — especially the successful ones — recognize the importance of finding a balance between the company’s bottom line and creating an atmosphere that attracts (and keeps) qualified drivers. Michelle Duggins, a driver for Boyle Transportation, jokes that early in her career she felt like “just a monkey holding the steering wheel.” That changed once she started driving as part of a team for Boyle, she says. “I feel — and they make me feel — like they appreciate me all the time. It’s all about knowing that I did the job, I did the job well — and them knowing it as well,” she said. “It’s not just about one week out of the year. It’s about the recognition all the time of the fact that you’re out here doing a job. “You’re putting your life on the line (out here on the road),” she continued. “And then, when you walk into the office, you get a smile from everybody and they’re like, ‘I’m so glad you’re here! Let us buy you lunch.’” Laura Duryea, director of driver recruitment and professional growth at Boyle, and a former driver herself, knows the importance of making drivers feel valued every day of the year. “Think about it,” she said. “A driver appreciation picnic is once a year. If you’re not extending that support and that hand up and those encouraging words (the rest of the year), then your drivers aren’t going care about doing a good job for your company.” Not just a number Graig Morin, president and co-founder of Brown Dog Carriers and Logistics, says he remembers feeling like “just another number” when he began his trucking career as a driver. “My number was 301, and that absolutely drove me crazy,” he said. “And I said, ‘When I have my own company, I will not have a driver that is a number.’ Here, everyone has a name.” Pat French, director of recruiting and retention at Modern Transportation, agrees. “There’s a phrase that gets thrown around in the trucking industry: ‘We’ll treat you like family.’ Here, it really feels that way,” he said, adding that some companies have so many drivers that they’re assigned a number for easier tracking. “Here, we have the luxury of asking for a name,” French said. “If a driver calls in, nobody asks for a driver number. We ask for their name. “We need as an industry to treat the driver as a partner, not just an employee,” he continued. “You have to be there for them. And if you’re going to make a promise to a driver, you need to deliver on that promise. Do what you say, say what you mean.” The most important thing, French says, is to always remember the vital role drivers play at a motor carrier. “The corporate and office staff don’t generate any revenue,” he said. “The revenue’s generated by the drivers. If we don’t have any drivers, we don’t have a company.” Provide support Duryea says it’s also vital that motor carriers give drivers the support they need. “When drivers are able to do their job effectively, it affects your business in the end, because you have happy drivers,” she said. “If you don’t have high turnover and you retain drivers, then those drivers become more experienced. They get to know your customers and can provide a better customer service experience for your customers,” she said. “It’s all interconnected.” Company culture For David Pike, director of recruiting for NFI, culture is the name of the game — and culture is all about human interaction, something he says is sometimes all too easy to forget. “People leave companies because of people. Not because of home time, not because of anything else. They leave because of people,” he said. Because of this, he says, NFI works to provide drivers with the resources they need to succeed both professionally and personally. “It all starts with human engagement from our management teams across all business units and platforms,” he said. “You have to engage your people, you have to engage them frequently, and it has to be genuine.” Often, when management asks drivers what they want, the first answer is “more money.” However, Pike notes, money is no substitute for company culture that places personal value on each employee — and that begins at the top, in the “corner office,” so to speak. Pike says the NFI team has a mantra, one he attributes to Bob Knowles, the company’s president of transportation. “Culture beats out strategy every time,” he said. “This is something we all believe in. As a people leader, our boss has allowed us to embrace this concept.” Drivers, Morin said, just want to feel respected, and Brown Dog’s way of doing that is by getting to know each employee. “You’ve got to learn who each driver is — what they like and what they don’t like,” he said. “Some drivers like Oreos, some like chocolate chip cookies. Some drivers don’t mind working in the city, some hate working in the city.” Open communication Like French, Duryea and Pike, Morin believes that maintaining open lines of communication is vital to driver satisfaction and productivity. “Our door is open. If we’re here, drivers know they can come in and chat, even if it’s just to say hi,” Morin said. “I’m trying to build a company that, as a driver, I would want to work for. I spent 20 years driving a truck for other people — and some of it was great and some not so great.” The most important thing, according to many retention specialists, is to be aware of drivers’ needs and wants. Drivers need more than just a day or week filled with parties, prizes, gifts and free food. “I don’t care how many cookouts you have, if you don’t hop on the phone and spend time learning about your drivers — asking about their families and what’s going on — and then doing things to help support their values, you’re missing the mark,” Pike concluded. Co-written by John Worthen and Linda Garner-Bunch This story originally appeared in the September/October 2024 edition of Truckload Authority, the official magazine of the Truckload Carriers Association.

HEROES FOR HIRE: Military veterans bring valuable skills to jobs in the civilian sector

Since the Class B Standardized Military Truck, also known as the “Liberty Truck,” debuted at the start of World War I, skilled operators have been needed for military operations. As trucks improved during and after the war, they became vehicles society relied on for the rapid advent of new technologies and transportation systems. In fact, at the time, the military offered some of the best training available for operators of heavy vehicles. It’s likely no surprise that, as the war came to an end and soldiers returned home to their families and civilian life, many veterans found employment as drivers, navigating delivery trucks through city streets and along the nation’s highways. Today, the various branches of the U.S. military operate more than 170,000 non-combat trucks in dozens of models. Each of these trucks has one thing in common: There is a skilled driver behind the wheel. It is for this reason that many commercial motor carriers so highly prize drivers who have served in the military. When reviewing applications from military veterans, carrier recruiters should consider the valuable skills, characteristics and personality traits that are typical of service members and carefully evaluate each candidate. At the same time, it is also important that human resources professionals set aside any preconceived stereotypes surrounding the term “veteran.” The fact is, despite veterans’ service to their country, it is commonly believed that most carry “baggage” because of their experiences, especially those who have seen active combat. However, the truth is that every potential driver, whether civilian or military, has challenges and issues to overcome. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is not limited to soldiers and law enforcement officers. See beyond the surface. It’s the HR professional’s job to see through those challenges and find the quality employee within. Earlier this year, the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) presented a webinar on the topic, “The Veteran Among Us.” In the webinar, panelists discussed the challenges and opportunities veterans have when leaving the military and finding jobs in the civilian sector. One staggering statistic noted is that, upon discharge, 86% of those leaving the military service do not know what they want to do career-wise. That’s a huge pool of talent just waiting to be guided along the best path. When employers learn the intangible and transferable skills the typical veteran possesses, they often realize those qualities make former service members ideal job candidates for motor carriers and other transportation-oriented businesses. In the end, it is up to trucking industry recruiters to recognize those skills and help transitioning soldiers embark on successful careers. Change is never easy. This is a truth for the workforce in general, but it can be especially true when recruiting veterans. Many veterans emerge from the military with unique challenges. Some walk out the gate into civilian life with no home to go to. Some face daunting financial issues. And some are dealing with substance abuse. Whether a former service member is struggling with such challenges or not, an employer can play an important role in helping a veteran conquer what can be a difficult transition to a civilian career. One of the best ways to take advantage of a veteran’s unique skillset is by placing them in a recruiting role, working to help other service members step into a successful career. Veterans know veterans best, and they know what motivates them. One in four veterans is currently employed in the transportation and logistics industry. Why do former military personnel often find trucking so appealing? First, the industry is an excellent example of civilian employers taking advantage of transferable skills. Just as the periods following World Wars I and II were marked by a stream of motor pool operators entering civilian life, the same holds true with the military today. Intangible, transferable, skills possessed in abundance by veterans are just waiting to be retargeted in the trucking industry. It’s up to HR leaders to be prepared — to have programs already in place that attract veterans and to offer attractive benefits. Look for transferable skills. The transferable skills possessed by former service members are varied, and they are attractive to employers in all sectors. First, consider the intangibles. Veterans typically possess empathy and critical thinking skills, and they are adept at decision making, even under pressure. When it comes to work ethic, teamwork, leadership, mental toughness and ability to adapt to various situations, it’s can be hard to find job candidates as well-qualified as veterans. In fact, studies show that more than 75% of veterans exhibit each of these traits upon exiting the military. One of the issues facing recruiters when reviewing veteran’s resumes is the way the skills are listed and how they transfer to the civilian job description. Typically, recruiters find that veteran’s resumes focus on teamwork, how they fit into a team environment, their role within a team, and their importance to team success. What veterans don’t realize is that in the civilian workforce, while being able to work within a team is important, it is not the same as the military. Recruiters are looking at resumes of specific candidates who will fill specific roles. They want to know the candidates on an individual level. It is important that veterans realize the employer is interested in the skills that represent the individual. Look at the individual. Viewing a veteran as an individual rather than a stereotype is especially important in the transportation sector. Consider truck drivers. They most often work alone, sometimes in the overnight hours when the world around them is asleep. It can be a lonely career. It is important that motor carriers implement ways to interact with truck drivers aside from just seeing them in the office once a week. They must monitor the mental health of all employees who are living and working alone — whether they are military veterans or lifelong civilians. Leading companies implement mental health services into their HR departments. This has been especially important since the COVID-19 pandemic, and employers have heeded the call. Coming out of the pandemic, only 30% to 40% of companies in any sector offered mental health services. Today that number has increased to 90%, a testament to the ability of corporate America to react to changing times and worker needs. Create a set of best practices. The overriding need in the transportation industry is a set of best practices for recruiting military veterans. Such practices should include guidelines and expectations, personal and professional development opportunities, and mentoring programs (preferably with a veteran-veteran relationship). The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) recognizes the value of bringing skilled veterans into the trucking industry. To help streamline the transition from the military to trucking, FMCSA is implementing programs allowing veterans to skip the written and/or skills tests to earn a CDL — provided a set of specific requirements is met. Likewise, the agency continues to experiment with allowing veterans under age 21 to drive interstate routes. Ultimately, the success or failure of a carrier’s veteran recruitment effort is based on support from company leadership. When CEOs prioritize recruiting and retaining military veterans, they hire HR employees with dedication and determination to implement veteran recruitment programs. Working together, the industry can pave the way for a new wave of veterans to drive a new breed of “Liberty Truck” across North America.

Addressing the issues with TCA’s John Culp

As Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) Chairman John Culp enters the second quarter of his term, motor carriers continue to face challenges posed by rising costs in and an economy that might best be described as “stagnant.” Recently we had a chance to sit down and visit with Culp about a few of the issues driving the overall cost of trucking upward, from zero-emissions regulations and alternate fuel sources to the prevalence of high-dollar awards to plaintiffs against motor carriers and truck drivers, the continuing debate about classifying works as independent contractors or company employees, and more. Settle in for an in-depth discussion!   Linda: Good morning, Mr. Chairman. As you begin the second quarter of your tenure as TCA chairman, what issues stand out in your mind as the highest priority for the truckload segment of the freight industry? John: I would say the biggest issue for the industry is dealing with increasing costs in a very challenging rate environment. Contract rates are hurting, and spot rates are unsustainable. The market will shift, but it will be a battle until it does. The rising cost of liability insurance is one cost that is particularly bad. Unfortunately, it is going to take litigation reform to reign it in — and that is not something that will happen quickly. It will take a concerted effort at both the national and state levels. TCA is working to help keep this issue at the forefront of stakeholders’ attention at both levels.   Linda: The push for zero-emission commercial vehicles continues, and it seems many groups are focusing on battery electric trucks as an “immediate” solution. What other options should the industry consider? John: Another big issue we are working on is educating the public on the cost of both battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and the electric infrastructure needed to power them. Our country is enamored with battery electric vehicles as THE solution to protecting the environment, and while it will be part of the solution, the cost and targeted time frame for our industry to implement is simply unrealistic. BEVs can be part of a long-term comprehensive solution, but it is imperative that we also utilize other options available that have more immediate impact, especially for the trucking industry. The focus on “zero tailpipe emissions” ignores the massive carbon generation that occurs on the BEV mining and production side. These issues are clearly articulated in new research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), which released a report just this spring on Renewable Diesel. The report identifies and highlights substantial environmental and cost benefits that internal combustion renewable diesel (ICE RD) engines have in truck life-cycle CO2 over the truck life-cycle CO2 of BEVs. According to the report, an ICE RD provides a 67.3% decrease in per truck life-cycle CO2 compared to an ICE diesel, with no operational changes. A BEV using today’s technology, on the other hand, offers only a 30%-39.5% decrease in per truck life-cycle CO2 — with a limited range and cargo capacity on top of substantial operational challenges. The projected cost to reach a 22.6% CO2 decrease over a 15-year period is $203 billion for ICE RD, as opposed to $1,190 billion for BEV. That’s a cost of $8.982 billion per percentage point for ICE RDs compared to $52.654 billion for BEVs.   Linda: That’s a pretty significant cost difference. Why isn’t the entire nation jumping on the idea of converting to ICEs fueled by RD? John: While these numbers might look like a no-brainer, the adoption of RD does face political headwinds, particularly because of the zero-tailpipe emissions aspect. That will take time to resolve because of a few factors. Feedstocks are needed to produce RD. While current production has kept up with growing demand, second- and third-generation feedstocks will have to be developed to meet the demand of the future. While the full impact of subsidies on the RD market is not known, they are clearly encouraging production. Should subsidies be removed from the market too early, supply may decrease. Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF). Interest is growing in SAF, which uses similar feedstocks and processes for production. It is possible that public policy could shape the SAF market and divert RD from the trucking industry, thus working against industry efforts to decarbonize.   Linda: What other possible solutions can be explored? John: Converting to RD is not the only other option for consideration in our comprehensive long-term solution for environmental sustainability. Hydrogen fuel cells or other alternative fuels can play a role — but one thing we can do in the immediate/short-term horizon is to promote and incentivize replacement of pre-2010 engines, which represent approximately 45% of the nation’s heavy-duty trucks with modern engines. Replacing those trucks with modern engines would reduce truck emissions by over 80%. That would be a massive reduction! Another idea is to incentivize truckers to upgrade their older vehicles. Both TCA and the American Trucking Associations (ATA) are advocating the repeal of the Federal Excise Tax (FET) of 12% that is charged on the purchase of new tractors. The 12% equates to almost $17,000 on a truck that costs $140,000. The FET is an outdated, regressive tax that increases every year with inflation and needs to be repealed. It would be good for both our industry and the environment.   Linda: Lawsuits resulting in exorbitant penalties against trucking companies continue to plague the industry. In fact, numerous states have considered bills to address the problem, with varying degrees of success. In your opinion, what is the biggest hurdle that is preventing the passage of such legislation? John: Exorbitant jury awards and settlements, aka “nuclear verdicts,” are a tremendous problem for the entire trucking industry. Unfortunately, accidents happen, and sometimes people are seriously or fatally injured. When this happens, our legal system allows the injured party to seek recovery and/or damages from the party that was responsible for the accident. This is a good thing, and that is what insurance is for. Trucking companies are required to carry a minimum of $750,000 of insurance coverage. That figure was set in 1980 and has not been updated since. It is well below what is needed to cover the cost of serious accidents today. If adjusted for inflation using CPI and medical cost inflation numbers, it is fair to say that today’s minimum liability limits would reasonably fall within the range of $3-$5 million. But that’s an issue for discussion at another time. To answer your question about the biggest hurdle preventing passage of legislation: It’s opposition from plaintiff attorneys and their massive lobbying dollars. Have you noticed the TV commercials and billboard advertisements from personal injury attorneys targeting “big truck accidents”? You can’t miss them; they’re everywhere! It’s big business and has become a specialty industry. The plaintiffs’ bar is highly organized and very good at what they do. I’m not saying personal injury attorneys are bad people, but the big boys who are driving the problem are specialists who focus on big cases involving trucking companies who have lots of insurance and/or assets. They game the legal system, disparaging our industry and convincing juries that truckers are bad actors that need to be punished. Some might be, but not even that justifies the lottery jackpot verdicts and settlements that have gone ballistic over the last 10 years or so. The awards are so big that they have investors who will finance the cost of multi-year litigation for big returns on their investment. They venue-shop for states that have favorable judicial procedures, precedents and big-verdict judgements and that do not have noneconomic damage limits. Educational opportunities promote litigation. These parties also provide educational opportunities to teach other attorneys how to maximize their jury awards and settlements in big truck accidents. I recently saw an advertisement for an upcoming seminar, the “2024 Big Truck and Auto Summit,” for plaintiffs’ attorneys. The event has 24 expert speakers, three of which boast a combined total of $2.1 billion in awards and settlements. I would agree that they are experts indeed. I don’t know what they will be teaching, but a common method used for obtaining big verdicts and judgements since 2009 has been known as the Reptile Theory. An article from Courtroom Sciences, Inc., titled “Reptile Theory at Deposition: Extinct or Evolved?” examines the misunderstanding of Reptile Theory and exposes the psychological principles plaintiff attorneys use to achieve disproportionately high dollar settlement and trial verdicts. Reptile Theory has been around a long time and has now been rebranded as the “Edge,” brought to you by the Keenan Trial Institute (KTI) and directed by original Reptile co-founder Don Keenan. Litigation reform is desperately needed. We need litigation reform in the worst way. Runaway “jackpot justice” has to be throttled back. It is unfair to the hundreds of thousands of trucking companies that move America’s freight and have to pay higher insurance premiums because of it. Airlines and railroads have protections that limit awards, but transportation litigation is like the Wild West. Progress is being made in several states, but we have a long way to go. If we are going to be able to overcome the plaintiffs’ bar and their war chest of money, we need the public to support our efforts by talking to legislators and voting on litigation reform initiatives. We need to educate them on what is happening and how they are impacted. The truckload industry moves 73% of freight in the U.S., and these lottery award verdicts and settlements have and will continue to raise the cost of transportation that ultimately is passed on to consumers.   Linda: Is there hope for a solution at the federal level for the issue of nuclear verdicts? John: I think there is some hope. It may be a pipe dream, but the trucking industry is critical to our nation’s supply chain. It is regulated by the federal government and should be adjudicated in the federal court system. In my opinion, this would be a huge step in the addressing litigation abuse. The federal government could also apply some type of noneconomic damage protection as it has done for airlines and railroads.   Linda: It’s no secret that times are tough in trucking, and most analysts predict that recovery will be excruciatingly slow. In your opinion, what are the key factors slowing this recovery? John: Inflation and interest rates. Our economy is consumer-driven and continued inflation, especially for groceries, is hurting families. While the high interest rates impact businesses also, it has a much harder impact on consumers with credit card debt. Home sales for new and existing homes are at the lowest levels we have seen since prior to COVID. In my opinion, higher mortgage rates are the biggest reason.   Linda: On another topic, the independent contractor vs. employee classification debate continues across the country and impacts numerous industries. From a business perspective, how would reclassifying current independent contractors as an employee impact a company’s bottom line? John: I’m not sure how to answer that because I think it would depend somewhat on the mix of independent contractors vs. company drivers for individual companies. The big issue is that independent contractors and employment do not fit together. The independent contractor model is a very important part of our industry, and it will go away if this happens. Nobody wins.   Linda: Looking forward to association events, TCA is holding the annual Refrigerated Meeting in Stowe, Vermont, in July. What topics will be addressed, and what benefits can carriers gain from this event? John: At the TCA Refrigerated Meeting we’ll tackle key industry issues affecting those hauling temperature-controlled freight. Educational sessions range from panels focusing on current and future supply chain challenges and opportunities to perspectives on the economic outlook of the segment, several interactive discussions on innovative technology with real-world carrier case studies, building successful customer-carrier relationships, and driver retention. Many of the sessions will encourage audience interaction and discussion so it’s a great way to learn from the experts as well as connect with peers. There is also a golf tournament in the beautiful Green Mountains of Stowe, Vermont, and unique networking receptions and dinners. It’s a great chance to learn, connect, and stay ahead in the industry.   Linda: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for your time and your insights. I look forward to our next visit.

Laying a foundation for success with John Culp

On March 26, 2024, during the closing banquet of the Truckload Carriers Association’s (TCA) annual convention, John Culp, president of Arkansas-based Maverick Transportation, officially stepped into the role of the association’s chairman. As he stepped to the podium, he thanked outgoing chairman Dave Williams for his service, noting that Williams “set the bar high” during his tenure. Culp continued, sharing thoughts about the value TCA brings to its members, including the group’s power as advocates for the truckload industry on Capitol Hill. “It’s an ongoing team effort for our staff, our members, and our lobbyists. Together, we are making a difference,” he noted, urging any members who have not participated in TCA’s annual Call on Washington to add their voices to this year’s efforts. Outlining goals for the coming months, he touched on numerous issues facing the industry. In closing, he noted that industry leaders should invest in their greatest assets. “We all have big investments in rolling stock buildings, computers, and technology, but our most important asset is our people — more importantly, our people working as a team is what makes us successful,” he explained. “In my opinion, investing in our people is more than just time and money well spent; it’s critical for building the foundation for continued success in the future.”   Linda: First of all, congratulations on stepping into your new role as TCA chairman! What does this new responsibility mean to you, both personally and professionally? John: Thank you, Linda. It’s an honor to have the opportunity to serve as TCA’s chairman. Dave Williams leaves big shoes to fill, but our association is in great shape, and our officers and staff are aligned and on board with the vision and objectives we’ve been working on for the past several years. We don’t need to change what we’re doing, but we know we can get better and that is what we want to do.   Linda: You were formally introduced as this year’s chairman during TCA’s 2024 convention in Nashville just a few weeks ago. How did it feel to step up to that podium, look out at the association’s members, and realize that all those people will be looking to you for advice, opinions, and solutions during your tenure as chairman? John: It felt good to see a full house. Our annual conference attendance has been growing over the past several years, and it was great to see so many people staying for the closing banquet. My position responsibilities are changing, but we have a great staff and officer group and we work together as a team in everything we do. I anticipate business as usual for Team TCA.   Linda: For members who haven’t had a chance to get to know you yet, how and when did you first become interested in the trucking industry? John: I had been working in public accounting for a couple of years after graduating college when I decided I wanted to move to the private sector. The first opportunity I had was with Chandler Trailer Convoy, a small carrier in Little Rock, Arkansas. I made a couple of moves for better opportunities with other trucking companies in town before I found my dream job at Maverick. I learned a lot at every company I worked for and am still grateful for the opportunities I had. I guess it is safe to say that trucking has been my career of choice since I was young and green between the ears.   Linda: When did you first start working for Maverick, and in what capacity? What roles have you held with the company? John: I joined Maverick in September of 1989 as vice president of finance and became part of the company’s four-person officer group. We had 70 company trucks and 26 owner-operators at the time. The only other position I have held since then before becoming president was executive vice president and CFO.   Linda: How long have you been part of TCA, and what roles have you held within the association? John: I don’t remember exactly the first time I attended a TCA conference, but it was sometime in the mid ’90s. Maverick’s founder, Steve Williams, felt it was important for our leaders to become involved in state and national trucking organizations for educational purposes and industry knowledge — but also to be actively involved in the efforts of these organizations to make our industry and our company better. I have served in various positions in other associations, but my first role at TCA began when I became an officer in 2019.   Linda: In your opinion, how do industry associations like the TCA benefit their members? The industry as a whole? John: For our members at TCA, we have a value proposition matrix of five key objectives that form the foundation of our efforts to deliver membership value: Improving the driving job; Improving roadway safety; Improving financial sustainability for our member companies; Improving our industry image; and Promoting industry environmental stewardship. In each of these areas, we provide a combination of meetings, events, programs, and educational opportunities designed to provide value for the dues members pay and the time they invest in TCA. For me personally, the most valuable and rewarding benefit of TCA membership is networking and developing relationships with peers and vendors. It’s helped me tremendously in my career and I feel it has made me a better leader. But the icing on the cake has been the incredible friendships I have made, and with that, I have been truly blessed. For our industry, I would say that our advocacy efforts on The Hill to address the important issues that impact our industry would be the biggest value. Our voice is strengthening, and we have plenty of issues to work on.   Linda: In your opinion, what is the biggest issue faced by the industry today, and what are some possible solutions? John: I really worry about the ever-increasing cost of liability insurance. Both trucking and insurance companies alike are fighting nuclear verdicts that are unsustainable. As an industry, we must lead the charge for lawsuit reform, state by state, to place reasonable limits on non-economic damages for parties injured in accidents. As an industry, taking responsibility for injuries we cause is the right thing to do. Every trucking company should carry adequate insurance to do so; we are not trying to change that, but today’s out-of-control “jackpot justice” is simply wrong and needs to be addressed.   Linda: Emissions regulations calling for the trucking industry to convert to zero-emissions trucks remain a hot topic. Many groups appear to promote battery-electric vehicles across the board, while some suggest other options, such as hydrogen fuel cell batteries or diesel engines powered by renewable natural gas. What are your thoughts on the proposed timeline for zero emissions and the available options? John: Short answer: It is unreasonable and unrealistic to reach the zero-emissions targets that have been laid out for our industry. TCA supports zero-emissions for trucks, but it is going to take a long time. We need commonsense leaders to realize this and set realistic timelines with an affordable path. A recent independent study by Roland Berger, a global consulting company, estimated the cost to build the electric grid needed to charge an all-electric truck fleet in the United States is $1 trillion. For most people, that is “monopoly money,” because it is hard to comprehend exactly how much that is. One trillion is one thousand times a billion. We have approximately 333 million people in the US. That equates to a cost of $3,000 for every person in the country. That’s a lot of money, and it is real. TCA has been a founding partner in the Clean Freight Coalition in its effort to advocate for sound public policies that transition toward a zero-emission future in a manner that strategically assures affordable and reliable freight transportation and protects the nation’s supply chain. If you want to know more, please feel free to visit cleanfreightcoalition.org.   Linda: It’s now been nearly four-and-a-half years since the FMCSA launched the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse as a national database for the results of commercial drivers’ drug and alcohol screenings. In your eyes, how has having access to this information changed the face of driver recruitment and retention? John: The Clearinghouse has been very effective in removing drivers who have tested positive for drug and alcohol violations from our highways. The change in driver recruitment is a big win for trucking companies in that drivers are no longer able to beat the system when they fail a drug test at one carrier and later fly under the radar with another company. I don’t think any carrier wants to hire a driver who has failed a drug test. The only problem I know of with the Clearinghouse is that the FMCSA still won’t allow companies that utilize hair follicle testing to report their results to the Clearinghouse.   Linda: That leads us straight to my next question: Even though proposals to allow alternate forms of testing, such as oral fluids and hair follicles, have been introduced, no clear decision has yet been made. How would allowing the use of such testing impact the driver workforce? John: Maverick is part of a group of carriers that have been utilizing hair testing for years. Out of 460,568 drivers who underwent both hair follicle and urine testing from 2017-2022, we have personal knowledge of positive drug tests for 23,601 drivers who passed urine tests at the same time. That means 23,601 habitual drug users were likely able to immediately go to work for a carrier that does not utilize hair testing. Hair follicle testing identifies drug users nine times more effectively than urine testing. Researchers estimate that if that rate were applied to the entire truck driver population, it is reasonable to estimate that up to 250,000 drivers who passed a urine test would have failed a hair test at the same time. Congress passed the FAST Act in December of 2015, directing the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to write the guidelines for hair follicle testing to enable the FMCSA to add it as an approved testing method for DOT compliance. Since then, HHS has delayed the process, blocking the ability for companies that utilize hair testing to submit known positive drug tests to the Clearinghouse. Why, you ask? They claim they have concerns the test may be racially biased — but there is no research to verify it. On the other hand, a study analyzing over 70,000 drivers where ethnicity information from hair testing data was available determined hair follicle testing is not racially biased. It seems to me the powers that be at HHS don’t care when carriers must let someone we know has tested positive for opioids or fentanyl go unreported to the Clearinghouse and be able to go to work for a company that does not hair test. For me personally, it is infuriating when we have to let that happen! It is irresponsible for the government agencies responsible for the safety of our motoring public to sit on their hands for nine years and continue to do nothing. For the record: TCA supports carriers’ ability to submit hair test results into the Clearinghouse. A University of Central Arkansas study came to the following conclusion regarding a person’s race as it pertains to hair follicle testing: “Utilizing independently provided urine and hair pre-employment drug screen data, Researchers were unable to find disparate impacts of hair testing among the ethnic groups analyzed. Results for each test in each sample met the required Four-Fifths Rule threshold. Chi-square tests independently examine urine and hair tests. Chi-square results indicate that the proportion of drug test failures (positives) are higher for hair testing across all ethnic groups, but pass/fail rates are significantly different irrespective of testing method. Given these findings, Researchers find no disparate impact among ethnic groups by testing method.”   Linda: Here’s another related question: While the federal government has not changed its policies on the use of cannabis products, many states have legalized the drug for both medicinal and recreational use, creating yet another hotbed issue for the trucking industry. What are your thoughts on this? John: The problem with cannabis is very real. Usage is increasing, and there is no way to test for real-time impairment that law-enforcement officers can use like they can with alcohol. Until there is, the problem will continue to grow. Hair follicle, urine and oral testing can detect THC in a driver’s system but not impairment at the time of the test. At a minimum, until impairment can be measured, cannabis needs to stay a Schedule 1 drug for all drug tests for drivers.   Linda: Let’s take a look at another topic the trucking industry is watching closely. In 2021, the Modern, Clean, and Safe Trucks Act reintroduced industry efforts to repeal the federal excise tax (FET) on heavy-duty trucks and trailers. Since then, both House and Senate versions of the bill seem to have stalled out in committee. Do you predict any movement on these measures over the next year? Why or why not? John: Unfortunately, no. The FET is an outdated tax that goes up every year as tractor and trailer prices go up. And, with the cost to purchase new equipment being at an all-time high, it is a very regressive tax that makes it difficult — if not impossible — for many small truckers to purchase new equipment. If the tax were repealed, new equipment prices would immediately decrease by 12%. Emissions for new-generation engines have made incredible gains, and we could make real changes in clean air if we could make newer equipment more affordable for truckers to retire their old trucks and purchase newer technology. It’s a great opportunity, but there is no agreeable solution in Congress to replace the lost dollars coming out of the Highway Trust Fund.   Linda: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for your time. I look forward to our next conversation. This article originally appeared in the May/June 2024 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

Lessons Learned with TCA Chairman Dave Williams

When Dave Williams stepped into the role of chairman of the Truckload Carriers Association last year, he immediately set to work addressing issues faced by the industry and amplifying the voice of truckload on Capitol Hill. Over the past 12 months, he has worked to increase TCA members’ involvement in the creation of policies impacting the industry at both the federal and state levels. He is now preparing to pass the reins to TCA’s next chairman during Truckload 2024: Nashville in March. Recently, we had a chance visit with Williams about his tenure as chairman. During the conversation, he was quick say he believes it’s more important to look back at lessons learned than to point out achievements. Read on as Williams shares words of wisdom, along with his hopes and goals for the future of trucking.   Mr. Chairman, thank you for joining us for the last of your Chat with the Chairman interviews. As usual, it has been an eventful year for the trucking industry. What stands out most in your mind? There have been a considerable number of good and positive things that stand out in my mind over the past year. It has truly been an honor to represent the TCA and its members. I am really excited about the direction we are headed as an association. Maybe it’s a flaw of mine, but when I reflect on the past, I tend to gravitate toward lessons learned rather than celebrating accomplishments. One of the things that stands out in my mind this past year is how difficult an industry that this can be. Over the past year, we have endured — and are still enduring — one of the most challenging truckload cycles that we have ever experienced. We went from the highest of highs to some very tough trucking. We saw general rates drop to pre-pandemic levels while costs in just about every area went through the roof. Some fleets prepared for this difficult cycle by building a strong balance sheet while others found ways to insulate and differentiate their service offerings to survive the storm. I am hopeful we will see some daylight at the end of this tunnel sometime soon. I think this just highlights how important it is for companies to be actively engaged members of the TCA. This is the place to learn and implement best practices by interacting with other fleets and experts. This is also the place to understand and take action on what needs to be done to ensure the long-term financial viability of our industry. It’s also been a busy 12 months for TCA. What growth have you noticed in the association during your chairmanship? There is a statement I’ve heard from one of my mentors on many occasions: “I am not here to make you happy; I am here to help you succeed.” Associations can sometimes get caught up in chasing a lot of the activities they think members might enjoy. While there’s nothing wrong with having a good time, I don’t think that’s why our members join TCA. At the end of the day, we have an obligation to help our members survive — and then thrive. That is where we create value. This doesn’t mean we won’t continue to provide many of the fun things that associations can provide, including important networking opportunities. It means that our focus has shifted toward elevating activities that bring genuine business value, such as timely information sharing, real-world education that results in better business decisions, industry-leading benchmarking opportunities, effective government advocacy, and access to a variety of industry experts, to name a few. We have always provided these things at some level, but we are really stepping up our game in strengthening each of these important areas. We are focusing our energy on activities that pay valuable dividends and show up in the actual results for our members. I really believe we are making significant progress here. We have a tremendous opportunity to really do some good, and it’s starting to show. Very exciting! TCA has a mission to give the truckload segment a clear voice on Capitol Hill. What topics have been the main focus of that voice during the past year, and what progress have you seen? Giving the truckload industry a voice on Capitol Hill is a process that started several years ago and has been building every year. For many of our larger fleets, the function of government advocacy is the most valuable benefit of being part of an association, whether it’s at the state level or the national level. During the first few years of Capitol Hill visits with the TCA, we had to spend a good amount of time familiarizing members of Congress and the Federal Regulatory Agencies with the TCA. There was not a general knowledge about TCA because we had not actively lobbied for several decades. Now they know who we are. They are asking for our input on issues. They are listening to our concerns. I am really grateful for the TCA members and staff who have invested time and resources to put us in this position. We will continue to build on this and create more value for the industry. We have also been consciously moving away from having to play defense all the time. For much of my career, every year felt like a superhero movie. Most of our efforts went into getting the industry all worked up about bad ideas coming out of Washington that might lead to the “end of the world” for our industry. If we defeated a bad idea, it was considered a great success. However, that was only half of the equation. We needed to develop a different approach, and we did. This past year, we furthered that effort by articulating a focused understanding of what we’re actually trying to accomplish. Specifically, we are working toward improving the driving job, improving highway safety, helping fleets become more financially sustainable, charting an appropriate environmental course, and improving the image of this industry. This has given us a foundation to start playing more offense and push for ideas and legislation that will help us to become a stronger industry. It is a different mindset that I believe will continue to change the way we operate from an advocacy perspective. During our first conversation last March, when you assumed chairmanship of TCA, you were asked to share your thoughts on the most important issue facing trucking. At that time, you expressed a desire for the industry to move from “survival mode” into a pattern of growth and success, with leaders looking ahead to address and overcome challenges. How has the industry progressed since then? In short, we still have a lot of work to do. If anything, we have fallen into a deeper downcycle over the past 12 months. The inevitable result of that will be many fleet bankruptcies. It’s a cruel market. But this also highlights the need to really understand how various policies impact our industry. One of the most basic principles our industry has a really hard time grasping is the economic law of supply and demand. Even if demand remains constant, when supply increases then prices fall. When supply decreases then prices rise. It’s very simple. We saw that play out through the pandemic and after the pandemic. We’ve seen this play out every couple of years for the last three-plus decades. Supply in this case is a form of tractor capacity. That capacity can be impacted by a number of factors, including the availability of tractors, the availability of drivers, the availability of hours of service, and equipment size and weight, to name a few. Ideally, cycles would be caused by demand — meaning how much freight needs to be moved in a time period based on consumer buying, manufacturing output, business investment, etc. But through time, it seems the majority of truckload cycles (especially this one) are primarily driven on the supply side — the side we have the most impact on. When things get really good, the industry’s “eyes” tend to get bigger than those of a football player at an all-you-can-eat buffet line, and it organically grows, leading to an overbuy of tractors. On top of that, there are groups within the industry that often push for policies that compound the issue. Examples of this might include: More hours-of-service or hours-of-service flexibility. This is a doubled edged sword. We want to help our drivers out, but are we exchanging more work for less pay? Lowering the barriers to entry. Programs like the younger driver program can actually hurt the pay of a veteran driver by not allowing the full impact of supply and demand to run its course. Higher weight or length limits. More often than not, the efficiencies gained through size and weight are not fully compensated through the truckload market, especially when that efficiency becomes the norm. So, while many of these things feel good in the short term — especially when things are tough — they can actually be quite harmful in the long term. As long as the greater portion of the industry remains in survival mode, we will continue to think short-term and struggle to make long-term progress. When you look at the LTL industry, it’s an industry that has generally figured this out. Among the public LTL companies and their truckload counterparts, the LTL companies have substantially higher price-to-earnings ratios (meaning that they are worth more even if they are the same size). The LTL rate environment is also much more stable and less susceptible to volatile cycles. It’s as clear as day, but we keep making the same mistakes. Hopefully, at some point, our industry will begin to understand the correlations. As political parties and candidates move into high gear during this presidential election year, how do you see political agendas impacting the trucking industry? Despite all the bipartisan battles and all the bickering that occurs, the structure of the government in this country is really a beautiful thing. Checks and balances are a beautiful thing. Sometimes those checks and balances work for you and sometimes they work against you, but in the end everything should even out. What has really changed in my opinion over the past decade or so is the increasing role of presidential executive orders and activist regulatory agencies. These shifts have placed a greater emphasis on the influence of the White House. In the grand scheme of things, I strongly believe Congress should make the rules and the agencies should enforce the rules. A balanced government usually results in a better government. We are seeing the impact from these executive orders and agency moves more and more in the areas of environmental and labor law. This is where near-term elections will likely play the biggest role. Outside of environment and labor, the other significant area to watch is tax policy. I don’t think it is our place as an association to align ourselves with a certain party — but we can align with candidates who will help preserve our ability to operate our businesses successfully. The most direct impact an individual can make is through their vote. But there are also opportunities to educate and advocate. Trucking is not a Republican or a Democrat priority; it is an American priority. Trucking is critical to the continued economic success of this country. We need to keep reminding our elected officials of that. The race to achieve zero emissions in every sector, including trucking, is always a topic of hot debate. In a sea of changing legislation, regulations, and deadlines, what would you point to as the most important piece of information for motor carriers? This has been a very confusing journey for fleets. Regional rules, state rules, and national rules with different requirements and timelines have created a jumbled mess. To make things even more challenging, some of the regional and state rules in California have not followed the requirements of the Clean Air Act, which gives the industry adequate time to prepare for compliance. In the case of California, changes and tweaks to the rules are being made right up until the deadline for compliance. This has been a source of great frustration for the industry. The most important thing a motor carrier can do is stay informed. This is a difficult task, especially for smaller carriers that don’t have the extra resources. But you cannot claim you didn’t know — that is not a good strategy. The federal rules are generally easier to follow and typically only apply to new equipment going forward. Many of the California rules are much more complex and have some element that applies to existing fleets. In California, there are several rules that were implemented on January 1, 2024 (i.e., the Advanced Clean Fleet Rule, the Drayage registry changes, the Transport Refrigeration Unit Rule, and the new warehouse rule to name a few) that require some sort of reporting requirement fleets must file with the state. If you are unsure whether you need to report, I would err on the side of caution. In some cases, the California rules then progress towards prohibiting certain types or age bands of equipment from operating in the state. As other states consider implementing various portions of the California rules, it creates nothing but confusion. As an association we have called upon the EPA to stand up and lead. We do not need a new rule every time you cross a state line. We need a national standard that allows for the efficient flow of interstate commerce. Whether the federal government has the means or the will to accomplish that will remain to be seen. As work continues on the accuracy and safety of autonomous systems, from basic driver-assistance software to self-driving trucks, how do you see this technology impacting motor carriers? There have been some really interesting advancements in the world of equipment technology taking place over the past eight or 10 years. While progress has not materialized for autonomous truck developers as many had thought, we have learned some valuable lessons and insights. To truly implement autonomous technology, I believe a few things need to happen: Developers need to create greater technical stability — creating more durable sensors that can survive harsh environments, making the software systems more robust, etc. Developers need to expand the functional capabilities of the technology. Ramp-to-ramp or hub-to-hub technology in the truckload sector leaves a lot to be desired. The drayage moves required at both ends of the move make it very difficult operationally. Door-to-door functionality is really what needs to happen in order to create value for our industry. Developers need to achieve some sort of regulatory and societal acceptance of autonomous tech in large trucks. Legislation proposed in California, New York, and Indiana to ban this technology is an early indication this is not going to be easy. Developers need to create an economic model that is sustainable for themselves and for fleets. That is an entire conversation in and of itself. In the meantime, what I see the biggest benefit from this whole experience is the potential of implementing various portions of the technology in today’s trucks to help our drivers. We can use lane-centering technology today to improve safety and reduce fatigue. We can use the learnings from the additional sensors and computer logic to improve the accident mitigation or active braking systems. Part of this will require developers to invest some time in scaling down their vision of driverless trucks and focusing on what we can do today for our drivers. Overcoming the four issues I listed above is not insurmountable, but it will take time — and a lot more financial investment. With many of the developers running out of funding, we hope to salvage the lessons learned so far and put a portion of that technology to work. Of course, a shortage of safe, available truck parking remains a concern for both drivers and carriers. During last fall’s annual Call on Washington, TCA members and staff gained additional sponsors in the House and Senate for the Truck Parking Improvement Act bills. Currently, TCA is helping legislators identify closed rest areas across the U.S. What are other steps motor carriers can take to help effect change? Recently the U.S. Department of Transportation announced $292 million in grants to go toward truck parking. This is a win for the industry, and confirmation that our efforts are making a difference. We have much more to accomplish though, as these grants are concentrated in only a half dozen states, with some of the money going towards information systems rather than additional capacity. We also need to recognize that this issue is more complex than just getting federal funds. We need to convince state, regional, and local planners to take truck parking into consideration when planning the future. We will never catch up if we’re constantly building new projects without consideration of truck parking. As an example, one of the big challenges comes in the building of new warehouse space. Most of these projects are built on a plot of land that maximizes the footprint of the warehouse. Then, many of these builders will post “No Truck Parking” signs on the streets surrounding the warehouse. This shifts the burden of the impact of that building onto the truck driver and the surrounding community as the driver tries to find a place to park until the delivery appointment. It’s not right. Every warehouse should have an obligation to accommodate the impact of its existence by providing some amount of on-site truck parking. That can be done locally or regionally through zoning laws. That is going to require us to engage local lawmakers — which will require our members to build support in their communities. TCA has also been working to gather information on shuttered rest stops across the country. As an industry, we can put pressure on the states and counties that operate these rest stops to open them and provide immediate relief. This is an issue with many layers. There is a lot to be done, and this will require all of our best efforts. Traditionally, we ask the outgoing chairman to give advice to the incoming chairman each year. What would be your advice to John Culp of Maverick Transportation, who will soon be stepping into your shoes? I am really excited for our incoming chairman. John Culp is an extremely capable leader and has my full support. I consider John a friend and am looking forward to seeing him continue to influence the direction of the TCA. If anything, I would seek advice from him rather than the other way around. If he ever needs my help, I will always be there for him. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It has truly been a pleasure working with you over the past 12 months. This article originally appeared in the March/April 2024 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

Setting Goals with TCA Chairman Dave Williams

As we wrap up 2023 and roll into 2024, the trucking industry faces numerous challenges — some old, some new. How is the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) working to address the issues faced by motor carriers, service providers, and equipment manufacturers, and how can the association help its members thrive in uncertain times? The Truckload Authority team recently enjoyed a visit with TCA Chairman Dave Williams. In addition to sharing insights about regulations and policy impacting the movement of freight, he provided a sneak peek at some of the association’s plans for the future.   Good morning, Mr. Chairman, and happy New Year! As you know, it’s customary to set personal or professional goals at the beginning of a new year. What are a few of your goals for the Truckload Carriers Association in the coming year? For the trucking industry as a whole? Earlier this year, we laid out some very ambitious goals. We have made progress in laying some of the foundational groundwork that we believe will create real value for our members. In fact, we have gone so far as shifting staff assignments and changing some of our program offerings to align with these goals. As a refresher, we stated that our aim is to: Improve highway safety; To do a better job of advocating on behalf of our drivers to improve the driving job; To work as an industry to improve the financial viability of motor carriers; To guide the truckload industry through the ever-changing environmental regulations; and To improve the perception and image of the truckload industry. There are no lightweights in that group; too much is at stake to think small. Our intent would be to continue along these lines and start narrowing our focus on specific objectives that can be accomplished through the next year. I truly believe that as we start to experience wins in these areas, we will generate momentum that will spark more member involvement, and more wins. We are really not looking for surface-level wins that we can advertise. We want real wins that move the needle in our members’ businesses. It is important to note that prioritizing our efforts within the framework of these objectives should be driven by the members of the association. So please, consider this an open invitation to engage in the process! There is a good chance that there are some different ideas, and maybe some conflicting ideas, but that’s welcome. A good, healthy debate before making a decision will almost always produce a better result. TCA’s 2024 convention is set for March 23-26 in Nashville, Tennessee. What benefits can TCA members gain by attending the convention? Our annual convention is really the pinnacle event of the year for the TCA. If there is one event to be involved with, it’s this one. The convention is a place where our members can really be immersed in what TCA is all about. Based on feedback received from carrier members and allied members over the past several years, our annual conference has experienced a significant makeover. We can’t wait to see everyone at Truckload 2024 in Nashville and share what we’ve been up to. While most Truckload Authority readers are TCA members, there are a few non-members in our audience. Why should those readers consider joining TCA? I have never really been much of a salesman. My belief has always been that the goal is to build something that brings value — something that people need. It will then sell itself. That is what we are continuing to build at TCA. We are building an organization that provides timely information, valuable educational material, best-in-class advocacy, and can’t-miss networking opportunities. We are trying to make a difference by improving the truckload industry’s impact on drivers’ families, on motor carriers, on motorists that we share the road with, on the environment, and on the nation’s supply chain. That is as meaningful as it gets in our industry. For those that want to be a part of that, it’s time to get on board and get involved. It’s pretty simple: Our strength comes from the collective strength of our members and grows with the involvement of the people within those companies. As political debates heat up during this presidential election year, what issues should motor carriers and other trucking industry stakeholders pay particular attention to? We have all seen the far-reaching impact government can have on our businesses. Sometimes our elected officials find ways to help us, and sometimes they make life really challenging for us. While each individual will have their own take on social issues, the issues that tend to impact our industry the most are associated with areas such as tax policy, labor policy, and the ever-growing influence of environmental policy. It is important to understand how each candidate approaches these important areas, which have real implications on our ability to successfully run our businesses. We try not to get too tied up on party politics. The fact is that no matter which party controls the White House — or the House or the Senate — we have to work with both sides of the aisle. Our TCA lobbyists are representative of this, in that Missy Edwards is a former staff member of a Republican senator and Richard Sullivan is a top Democratic fundraiser. Both are extremely well connected within the respective parties, and both work together to help us navigate the needs of the truckload industry in Washington, D.C. The best thing our members can do is to educate themselves on the issues of the day and let their voice be heard by voting for the candidates they feel give their family and their business the best chance to succeed. Each month the TCA publishes our Capitol Recap email to help our members stay up to date on the issues that mean the most to us. If you are not receiving this, please reach out to TCA staff. This is an important resource. We also need our members to engage at the state and local levels, as not every government challenge has a federal solution. We have found that issues such as predatory towing, lawsuit abuse, and the spending of truck parking funds often have strong local ties. As we become aware of local issues, there are often strategies that have worked in other areas that we can share and deploy. Our strength doesn’t always come from our staff doing the work. Our real strength comes from a mobilized and motivated membership. You wrote an insightful story last fall, which we printed, with permission, in the January/February 2024 edition of Truckload Authority. The story discusses the relationship between clean air regulations and the trucking industry. In it, you note that environmentalists seem unwilling to acknowledge the strides made to improve the efficiency of and reduce the emissions of diesel fuel. Why do you believe so many groups are focused on fuel sources other than diesel? That is a good question. It seems society’s “cancel culture” has put petroleum on the dart board and is determined to eliminate it. But changing the world’s energy source is going to take more than just cancel culture. There is a balance of many factors that need to be considered, and some of these factors are more complex than you think. These would include energy density, energy cost, energy emissions, energy transportation costs, and energy production capabilities, among others. Replacing petroleum “at any cost” is an extremely dangerous proposition. I am not trying to be dramatic, but such an effort could destroy our economy and put our country at a competitive disadvantage if we are not balanced in our approach. It has taken us centuries to develop petroleum-based energy into the resource the world is so dependent upon today. Wind or solar energy will take perhaps many lifetimes to fully displace petroleum, if that ends up happening. Some groups are trying to do this in the next 10 or 20 years. Rather than “canceling” diesel fuel and petroleum, we should continue to improve the use and impacts of diesel fuel — and then let these other alternative energy sources mature over a natural development cycle. We have made tremendous progress with diesel emissions and can make more progress. If it ends up that we replace diesel with another form of energy, then so be it. But we must do it in the right way, on the right timeline. In late November, the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) released a report examining the issue of predatory towing in the trucking industry. How prevalent is this practice, and what regulatory steps can be taken to prevent it? This is a big problem, as indicated by the description “predatory.” ATRI’s study states that 30% of crash related towing events are overcharged. Like any issue, many of the actors in the towing industry are doing the right thing, but there seems to be a growing number of bad actors. ATRI outlined some of the problematic practices, which include excessive hourly or per pound rates, unwarranted additional equipment or labor charges, excessive daily storage rates, vehicle release delays, and cargo release delays, among others. Some of the situations that I am aware of could very well be described as “hostage situations.” In these cases, tow companies navigate the nuances of the local laws or local contracts and create leverage on the motor carrier. The tow company then demands an inflated fee before they release the equipment or the cargo. A growing number of cases don’t even involve an accident! More and more situations involve a tow company seizing vehicles without cause and then racking up gigantic storage charges. Minimal efforts to contact the motor carrier are made, and then the motor carrier is left to pay an outrageous fee or forfeit the equipment. It’s theft. The key for motor carriers is to actively manage every accident, overcommunicate, and document everything you do. Waiting for a tow company to send you a bill is a recipe for disaster. Motor carriers also need to leverage GPS technology to monitor their fleets and keep storage charges on vehicle seizures from racking up. The problem is that even if a motor carrier does all the right things, they still have exposure. Something needs to change here. This is a complicated issue that does not appear to have a simple solution. Also in November, identical bills were introduced in the U.S. House and Senate calling for guaranteed overtime pay for commercial drivers. The author of the Senate bill told Truckload Authority that one goal of the legislation is to compensate drivers for excessive wait/detention time. Most drivers are paid on a cents-per-mile basis, and detention time has long been an issue for drivers and carriers. Can motor carriers legally be held responsible for delays caused by shippers and receivers? This is a potentially touchy issue, and a classic case of “gotcha!” in politics. Who would possibly argue against drivers being paid more, right? I believe I can safely speak on behalf of the grand majority of TCA members and state that no one wants to see professional truck drivers be paid more appropriately than the motor carriers that the drivers work for. Our drivers work hard; they are the lifeblood of the supply chain. But just because we want something doesn’t automatically make it happen. There are checks and balances throughout the free-market system that require carriers to make tough decisions on how much they can pay in some areas of the business and still have enough left over to pay the bills. The truckload industry is extremely competitive, and sometimes not very rational. Our deep economic cycles reward and punish carriers on a regular basis. One significant miscalculation can put a multi-generational business at risk. On top of that, this is an industry that has largely been commoditized. The supply chain rarely accepts higher freight rates that are not tied to supply and demand imbalances. Raising rates in order to offset higher driver compensation or any other cost, simply as a result of an increase in that cost, has proven to be a difficult thing to do consistently in this industry. The proposed overtime bill would force additional costs on the carrier, and hope the carrier finds a way to pass on those costs to the shipper. The problem is that in a market cycle like the one we are in right now, the motor carrier would likely be expected to absorb that cost, which would likely force the carrier to manage its drivers’ time and not allow them to work past 40 hours (a week). This then becomes a case of “good intentions with unintended consequences.” Currently, our drivers have the freedom within the hours-of-service rules to work harder when they can and rest when they need to. Managing drivers in a 40-hour week would, in my opinion, not yield the result the authors of this bill are looking for. It could potentially cause the opposite result. As for detention, this is a problem that has existed for decades. The question becomes this: Do we solve the issue through the market, or do we try to have the government solve the problem? As for the market, we seem to only make progress when the cycle swings toward the motor carriers. But as soon as the market turns towards the shipper, we seem to lose much of that progress. This is a common theme on many fronts that has plagued the truckload industry for many decades. As for a government solution, there is always a risk of “over-engineering.” The “keep it simple” approach would be my preference. Perhaps setting a universal standard around acceptable detention periods, with the shipper/receiver compensating for any time above that (i.e. any time greater than one or two hours of waiting) would be appropriate. Government intervention beyond something simple like that leaves the possibility of more unintended consequences. I firmly believe the market should solve the majority of its own problems. We just have not been able to make lasting progress on this one. Speaking of issues regarding driver pay, in your experience, what factors other than the amount of a paycheck can impact the relationship between a driver and motor carrier? Pay is rightfully one of the most important factors that drivers consider when they choose who to work for. You cannot underestimate the impact of pay. At the same time, we have seen that drivers will often change jobs for an issue unrelated to pay. What makes this difficult is that each driver values the elements of a relationship in different ways. Some place a higher value on time at home, some really want to be respected, others place a high value on the “family feel” they get within a company — and the list goes on. I believe most drivers want to be part of something; they want to make a difference. They want a reason to get up in the morning, and they want to contribute in a meaningful way. They want to develop relationships that enrich their lives and grow into friendships. Pay is important, but there is more to it. The human side of the relationship goes well beyond dollars and cents. Finding the right balance of tangible pay and intangible benefits is both an art and a science. We will need to keep working on it until we get it right! While electric Class 8 tractors have not yet been proven feasible for over-the-road, long-haul routes, they are becoming more common for first- and last-mile runs as well as for drayage at the nation’s ports. In fact, California’s Port of Long Beach is planning to build charging infrastructure that promises “high-speed” (90-minute) charging for 200 trucks a day. In real-world applications for a motor carrier, is an hour and a half a reasonable time for refueling/recharging? Before I answer this question, I will have to repeat that I would love to see zero-emissions vehicles succeed. As an industry, we all want clean air and clean water. The challenge is that we keep seeing what I will call “misleading headlines” that make it seem that regulations such as California’s Advanced Clean Fleet Regulation are reasonable. I have learned repeatedly throughout my career, sometimes through hard experience: 1) Things need to be kept in perspective, and 2) the details are important. Let’s talk about perspective first. The California Air Resources Board website states that “approximately 33,500 drayage trucks service California’s seaports and railyards annually.” A charging station that could accommodate 200 trucks would be, by far the largest charging site that I am aware of. But using some simple math, this would represent an infrastructure solution for less than 1% of the trucks that operate as drayage trucks in California. The power needs and infrastructure accommodations needed to meet the demands of the Advanced Clean Fleet regulation are enormous. We would need hundreds of these facilities, and a significant number of new power plants would have to be built. Also note that the Port of Long Beach is “planning” to build this. Some of the other charging facilities that have been announced do not have completion dates for several years. This regulation begins on January 1, 2024. A company can only add a zero-emission (electric) truck to the drayage registry after January 1, 2024. If the cart hadn’t been put in front of the horse on this regulation, these charging facilities should have been in the planning stages years ago to meet the regulation requirement that is now on top of us. As for the details, let’s talk about a 90-minute charging time. In all fairness, most manufacturers can only give an average charging time. There are so many factors to consider, such as the size of the battery, how much charge is left on the battery when you begin charging, the ambient temperature, and the age of the battery, to name a few. For “high-speed” charging scenarios, the standard disclaimer is that you can’t get to a 100% battery charge on a “high-speed” charger; normally you will only get to 80% of the available battery capacity. The remaining 20% normally takes significantly longer to charge than the first 80%. Elon Musk described this using a parking lot analogy: It’s easy to find a parking spot in an empty lot, but when the lot is full, it takes substantially longer to find a spot. In any case, this makes an already limited tractor range even more limited. The bottom line is that if you have a Class 8 truck and assume that you can get to a 100% charge in 90 minutes, you are likely to be disappointed. As an industry, we really need to get past the flashy headlines and have some transparent dialogue about what this technology can really do and what it can’t do. For those of us that want to see zero-emissions vehicles succeed, that is the only way we are going to make progress. Because as soon as we solve the infrastructure and power generation problem, we are going to need to address the cost, the weight, and the range issues. Sounds like a good time, right? As I stated earlier, there is a lot at stake here. We need everyone to engage as this is not going to go away. Thank you for your time, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to our next conversation. This article originally appeared in the January/February 2024 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

Looking Forward with Dave Williams

For the rest of the world, 2023 is winding down as the winter holidays and the dawn of a new year approach. That’s not the case for the freight industry. Manufacturers and retailers are gearing up for a busy shopping season — and that means even more cargo will be moving along the highways of North America. At the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), Chairman Dave Williams, along with TCA President Jim Ward and the rest of the team, are forging ahead with plans for 2024, from webinars, on-site meetings and seminars, and certification training to the association’s 2024 convention, scheduled for March 23-26 in Nashville, Tennessee. The Truckload Authority team recently had a chance to visit with Williams about the events of this year, including the group’s annual Call on Washington. Read the interview, conducted by Managing Editor Linda Garner-Bunch, below. Linda: Can you believe it’s already November? You’re now past the halfway point in your year as chairman of TCA. What has been your most memorable experience since picking up the reins? Dave: I have had a lot of great experiences, many of which I treasure. I don’t take any of them for granted. But for me, it’s more about seeing results; it’s about momentum. At each of our events, in everything that we do, we want to build value and make a difference. There are so many places our members can spend their time. For those that choose to spend time investing in the betterment of their company and giving back to the industry, we want to make sure we give them the best experience and the best opportunity possible. To me, this is not about reaching a destination. This is a process of building, reinventing, and improving. I get excited about that. Linda: Of course, the highlight of September is always TCA’s Call on Washington. Please share a few thoughts on this year’s event. Dave: We had a great event, with a record turnout. It was a thrill seeing almost 100 members line up on the steps of the U.S. Capitol and then descend on the halls of Congress to share the message of the truckload industry. This is what the process is all about! After splitting up into groups we were able to hold 90+ meetings in the offices of members of the House, the Senate, and other government agencies, including the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. We emphasized the continued need for funding and solutions for truck parking to aid our drivers as they continue to struggle to find safe parking. We even got commitments from two members of the Senate to add their names as co-sponsors to a bill that would allocate more funds to truck parking. We argued on the merits of eliminating the Federal Excise Tax and walked them through the obstacle that this tax has become as the industry struggles to invest in safety equipment and cleaner burning trucks. We also spent quite a bit of time educating members of Congress and their staffs on the challenges associated with zero-emissions tractors. Members of Congress take a lot of heat for their decision-making, and rightly so in many cases. But the number of topics and the complexity of those issues that they are making decisions on is amazing. Not one of them can be an expert in all these fields. So, to be able to give them real information, directly from the field, can really turn the tide in our favor. While it may not seem like it sometimes, our feedback is helping them see how challenging this effort to electrify the nation’s freight transportation industry truly is. Linda: TCA’s Fall Business Meeting was also held in D.C. during the Call on Washington. What was this experience like? Dave: Our Fall Business Meeting is one of those meetings that, if I’m being honest, needs some work. Don’t get me wrong — it was a good meeting, but we need to find a way to take it to the next level. It provides a great chance for our committees to get together and perform some of the association work, but we have some work to do in giving it that “make a difference” factor for our members in attendance. If you have thoughts or ideas, please share them with us. Stay tuned for next year! Linda: One of the many pieces of legislation that would impact the trucking industry is a proposal to increase the weight limits on certain heavy-duty trucks. What is TCA’s stance on this, and why? Dave: Any time you review a proposed piece of legislation, it is helpful to understand who benefits and who is potentially harmed. Win-win legislation is rare. In the case of increased weight limits, the truckload industry is typically at risk for economic harm. Why is this the case? The answer comes in a couple of parts. One, the truckload industry charges by the mile, not by weight. More weight means more fuel cost and wear and tear on our equipment, but it usually does not lead to more revenue. Some will argue that shippers currently pay for more weight in some cases. That may be true, but that premium disappears as soon as the higher weight limit becomes standard. The second part of this is that higher weight limits would likely end up causing a massive recapitalization of trailing equipment within the industry. An industry that already struggles with an appropriate ROIC (return on invested capital), would then be required to replace their current fleet with trailers that have a heavier weight rating (stronger floors, etc.), or trailers that have a third axle, depending on what is required. This capital outlay would have to be massive, because you would need to create new trailer pools large enough to cover your operating area. That is hard enough to do now, with trailers that are generally the same. Carriers would likely need to replace their entire fleet over time, switching to more flexible trailers capable of carrying all weight ranges in order to keep trailer ratios manageable. There are lessons from the past, such as the shift from 48-foot trailers to 53-foot trailers, that we can learn from. In the end, carriers are at great risk for absorbing the cost of this recapitalization, putting margins at significant risk. This is already a capital-intensive business with relatively low risk-reward. Increased weight limits have the potential to make this industry even more financially challenging. Linda: In early October, Congress narrowly averted a government shutdown through a bill providing temporary funding through November 17. As that deadline approaches, what impact would a government shutdown have on the truckload industry? Dave: The impact of a government shutdown would vary based on each carrier’s freight mix. During a government shutdown, essential government workers are still theoretically required to work — but they don’t get paid until the shutdown is over. Short-term government shutdowns become more of a nuisance, while longer term government shutdowns present a greater economic risk. Someone hauling government-contracted freight may see a greater impact than someone hauling retail freight or freight generated from manufacturing activity. There are certainly indirect impacts, but most freight would move despite a government shutdown. The bigger question to me is, how do we get to the point where we don’t have the threat of a government shutdown every 12 to 18 months? How do we overcome the dysfunction that has become the norm within our government? That’s a topic for another day. Linda: While the predicted economic recession hasn’t occurred — at least yet — industry news is filled with headlines about the current freight recession. What exactly is a freight recession, and how can motor carriers best overcome the challenges it presents? Dave: I am going to ignore a more formal definition of a freight recession, which has more to do with contracting volumes of freight year over year. To me, the more important concept is the all-important Law of Supply and Demand. When supply (tractor capacity) and demand (freight volumes) are imbalanced, we end up with either a strong or a weak market. In a weak market, like the one we are in now, the number of trucks available exceeds the number of loads that need to be moved. The result of this discrepancy is a drop in freight rates. Simple as that. Certainly, we have seen the hangover effect from the pandemic, including bloated inventories that have had an impact on freight volumes. It will take time for those inventories to come back into balance. But many economists are stating that the key to coming out of this particular down-cycle will likely come on the supply side, through the reduction of available tractors. Looking at tractor build data for 2023, tractor manufacturers are on pace to build somewhere around 340,000 new Class 8 tractors. That is substantially higher than the number of tractors being retired, which means capacity has grown this year, while freight volumes have been muted. That is oversimplified, but you get the point. In order to balance the market again, we either need to see higher freight volumes (less likely) or we need to see less available trucks on the road. This is a tough business. Linda: A short time ago, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration stated that its suggested cap for speed limiters in trucks would be 68 mph. That statement was almost immediately retracted, and no limit has yet been established at the time of this conversation. Please share your thoughts on the use of speed limiters and the process of selecting a cap. Dave: I have shared my thoughts on this previously and feel the need to state again that not everyone in the industry agrees on this issue. I respect that. That being said, I do believe slower speeds are safer (physics cannot be ignored) and more economically efficient (fuel economy). With improving technologies that assist in accident mitigation, this is not the same argument that we had 10 or 15 years ago. Perhaps reconsidering the “one speed limit” standard approach is something we may need to explore. It may be that tractors outfitted with mitigation technologies are capable of going slightly faster than those not equipped. New technologies even have the ability to make speed limiting a dynamic process based on the speed limit rather than a top end limit only. Whatever rule ends up coming out, there will be people unhappy with it. At the end of the day, the rule needs to be simple, and it needs to be soundly based on data and science. As an industry, we have done a great job over the years improving safety. I do believe, as unpopular in some circles as this may be, that speed limiters will help us get to the next level of safe operations. Rather than speculating further, let’s see what comes out and go from there. Linda: In September, we celebrated National Truck Driver Appreciation Week. How did TCA and its member carriers show appreciation to drivers this year? Dave: National Truck Driver Appreciation Week is a great opportunity to rededicate ourselves to the needs of our drivers and to celebrate their contributions to this nation. Members had a chance to hold various recognition events across the country. From an association standpoint, we continue to discuss areas where we can really make a difference in getting things done for our drivers. Truck parking is our current focus on providing relief for our drivers. This process is much slower and more frustrating than it should be, but if that’s what it takes, then that’s what we’ll do. Sometimes we push for federal dollars, but rarely see the results of those dollars. Recently I had the opportunity to meet with the director of the Arizona Department of Transportation in my home state of Arizona. She walked through what Arizona has done with the last round of truck parking funding including opening three rest stops that were previously closed, increasing the number of available highway parking spots in Arizona by a meaningful amount. She also talked about plans to use state land, where possible, to add even more spots. In other words, these dollars that we are fighting for really do make a difference for our drivers! We also need to find other ways that we can improve our drivers’ quality of life. While we celebrate them one week of the year, we will continue to advocate for them every day. Linda: The California Air Resources Board continues to push the envelope on environmental regulations leading to a confusing compliance path that many carriers are struggling to keep up with. Is this something TCA members should be concerned about? Dave: Absolutely! There have been so many changes in just the last few months that it is becoming very difficult to follow. Starting January 1, 2024, new diesel trucks will no longer be able to be added to the California drayage registry, meaning they can’t enter ports or rail yards. Any new trucks have to be zero-emissions if they want to do work in California ports or rail yards. In 2024, California will begin its Heavy Vehicle Inspection program. This will require emissions data to be sent to the state through a download or via telematics along with a fee (of course). Various portions of the Advanced Clean Fleet Rule and the Advanced Clean Trucks Rule start to kick in. These rules are very complicated and have declarations and reporting that is required in the coming months. There are new reefer unit rules starting in 2024 that require a fee and new decals that come from the state. It’s an absolute mess! California also has a track record of coming to fleets several years after a new rule kicks in and auditing for compliance. So, if you think that they are not enforcing the rules, think again … they can issue big fines. There are going to be legal challenges, but not all these rules are being challenged. I would strongly encourage TCA members to find someone to help navigate through these various regulations. If you don’t do business in the state of California, that doesn’t mean that you are off the hook. Many states have adopted or are considering adopting portions of these rules. Like I said, it’s a hot mess. But don’t put your blinders on and hope it goes away. Stay informed, and protect your company. Linda: As senior vice president of equipment and government relations for Knight Transportation, fleet safety must be a subject that’s near and dear to your heart. How does TCA work to provide its member carriers with the tools they need to ensure fleet safety? Dave: For anyone that has lost a loved one due to an accident, or had their life permanently altered due to an injury, ask them what safety means to them. It means everything. They had plans and dreams, and all of that changed in an instant. We must take that seriously. When you look at companies that are the best in class for safe operations, it doesn’t just happen. They work at it. They have critical measurements that they watch, they have processes that they follow, they set standards, they train and re-train, everything they do is intentional. Everything action has a purpose. Many of those carriers are willing to share what they do. They share in our benchmarking groups, they share in our educational webinars and on conference panels, they share in private conversations. If you are a carrier that struggles with safety performance, then you need to engage. You know what you know, and don’t know what you don’t know. Knowledge is powerful. Comparing data and knowing where your weaknesses are is even more powerful. That is one of the great values that TCA provides, bringing carriers together to achieve a common cause — in this case, improving highway safety. For those who are interested, the TCA is in the process of forming a benchmarking-type group that solely focuses on safety. If you are interested in participating, please reach out to David Heller for more details. Linda: As noted earlier in the conversation, 2023 is coming to an end, and the winter holiday season is upon us. Do you have any thoughts to share with our readers? Dave: Thank you to all of those who dedicated their time and their resources to making this a better industry. Your efforts are not always acknowledged, but they are truly appreciated. We have so much to accomplish. Let’s stay after it! Linda: Thank you for your time, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to our next conversation. This article originally appeared in the November/December 2023 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

Moving Forward with Dave Williams

It’s been a busy summer for the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), with the annual Safety & Security meeting, Refrigerated meeting, officers’ meeting and retreat, and more — and TCA Chairman Dave Williams says he’s enjoyed every minute. As the sunny days of summer begin to give way to crisp autumn breezes, the association is ramping up for more events and educational resources for members, from informative webinars and on-site seminars to TCA’s Call on Washington and Fall Business Meetings. Williams reiterates the importance of the annual visit to Capitol Hill and making sure the voice of the truckload industry is heard loud and clear by the nation’s lawmakers. Turn the page to read Williams’ thoughts on a variety of issues faced by the trucking industry, along with a wrap-up of TCA’s summer events.   It’s been a busy summer for TCA, with the annual Safety & Security Meeting in June and the Refrigerated Meeting in July. Please share a few highlights from the two events. The Safety & Security Meeting in San Antonio was great. The highlight of the meeting for me was the panel of our TCA Professional Drivers of the Year sharing their thoughts and insights on managing safety. They were very candid and had some great feedback for the fleets in the room. The Refrigerated Meeting in Park City was equally good. One of the things we have really been stressing is that every function we present needs to provide high-value educational content. When you combine that with our trademark networking opportunities, these become “can’t miss” meetings. We are working hard to make sure we provide fresh, relevant takes fleets can benefit from. While I think we can always work to get better, I do believe that we are solidly heading in the right direction.   TCA’s Fall Business Meetings, along with the association’s annual Call on Washington, are just around the corner. Addressing each event separately, please explain why membership participation is important. How can companies find out more about these initiatives? I am disappointed that I will miss the Call on Washington this year due to a conflict. This will be the first time I will have missed it. The Call on Washington is so important, as it connects real people in the industry — who are impacted by legislation and regulation — with those who are deciding what the rules should be. So many of our members comment that they are afraid they may not know the right thing to say. First of all, you don’t have to say anything. You can just go and listen. You can also share your thoughts on how the rules and regulations are impacting your business. You don’t have to debate with anyone; you just share your thoughts. I have found that members of Congress listen intently when someone from the industry is sharing their perspective. It is a way for members of Congress to stay connected. Our Fall Business Meeting also brings a lot of value, as members get a chance to take advantage of hearing from Washington, D.C.-based resources including our contracted lobbyists, members of Congress, and leaders of regulatory agencies, among others. With so many important decisions being made in Washington these days, companies need to know what is coming and anticipate what needs to be done in their own businesses to remain successful.   Many — I dare say most — truck drivers are concerned about the adoption of automated heavy-duty trucks, fearing that their jobs will ultimately be eliminated in favor of self-driving trucks. Please share your thoughts on this issue. I am not a fan of the phrase “driverless or self-driving trucks.” In fact, I have fought against the use of the phrase since I first heard it. This is not because I am in denial, but because I have stayed close to this technology. I believe we are further away from widespread use of this technology in the truckload industry than people may think. As you may have noticed, the buzz around autonomous trucks has died down over the past year or so. This has come as tech companies realize that applying this technology to heavy-duty truck applications is more challenging than they may have anticipated. Operationalizing an autonomous articulating tractor-trailer combination weighing 80,000 pounds is a different proposition than trying to operationalize an autonomous taxi. And, by the way, that same tractor-trailer combination weighs 60% less as soon as it is unloaded, dramatically changing the center of gravity for the unit. There are technical, economic, and operational challenges that will need to be overcome, which will require substantial funding and a good amount of time. Many of the tech providers in this space are running out of cash as investors grow impatient and the cost to develop the technology continues to grow. Someone will eventually figure it out, but it will likely be limited to a small number of applications until some of these issues are overcome. On top of this, we haven’t even started considering social acceptance, liability questions, and cybersecurity concerns, among others. I am by no means counting this technology out, but the reality is that we will need good men and women to operate trucks in the truckload market for a long time to come.   Finding and keeping qualified workers is always top of mind for motor carriers. What basic strategies would you recommend a trucking company undertake to ensure their drivers and employees are satisfied with the opportunities they have in front of them? It takes work to understand what an employee is looking to get out of their relationship with a company. In the truckload market, there is so much diversity in our driving jobs alone — there are long haul jobs, local jobs, and regional jobs. There are loads that require significant physical demands for unloading, while other loads are virtually no-touch. Some freight is so time-sensitive that it may shut down a factory if it is late, while other freight may sit for weeks after delivery. There are companies that supply the newest high-tech equipment, and there are those that buy equipment that has already been around the block a few times. Some routes run though the open roads of the Midwest, while others may run through gridlocked mega-metropolitan cities. There are cold-weather climates and climates that are blazing hot. Depending on the combination of those factors, our drivers are going to have different expectations for compensation, benefits, and opportunities for personal growth. After accounting for all the workplace variables, I believe it really comes down to relationships. Communicating well, being available, listening to concerns, setting clear expectations, following through on what you say you will do, and showing genuine concern will always yield positive results. There are no one-size-fits-all problems, and there are no one-size-fits-all solutions. However, there are some best practices in how we treat people that will resonate no matter what.   Earlier this year TCA, along with a handful of other industry groups, came together to form the Clean Freight Coalition. As the nation progresses along the road to zero emissions, concerns about the time line and the feasibility of developing technology remain. What progress has the coalition made in addressing these concerns? I have said and written much about this topic over the last few months. Should the current proposed rules and time lines stand, this could be one of the single biggest transformational events in the history of our industry. I am not trying to be dramatic — that is just how I see it. One of our challenges is that the rules keep changing, sometimes for the good but oftentimes, not so much. The Clean Freight Coalition has gotten off to a slower start than many of us wanted, but you should expect to hear and see more from this group in the coming months. With multiple federal and state government agencies involved that are not in sync, it creates some very challenging dynamics. In addition, the entire subject has become strongly partisan, so the difficulty level rises again. This issue is too important for our industry. We certainly want to do our part in preserving clean air and clean water, but these rules have to work for our industry. Rest assured that we will be fighting hard to make sure that whatever happens won’t put the nation’s supply chain in jeopardy.   The annual TCA Officers’ Planning Meeting is something participants look forward to each year, not just for fun and fellowship, but also for the chance to brainstorm about issues facing the trucking industry. Please share a little bit about this year’s meeting. Our strategic planning meeting this year was held in beautiful Monterey, California, which is one of my favorite places. This meeting is a really important opportunity to unplug from everyday activities and focus for a couple of days on the TCA organization, programs, policies, and value proposition. We had the chance to perform an honest evaluation of everything that we do. We really wanted to step back and reflect on how our programs and organization can provide greater value to members. I am really pleased with the direction we are headed; now we just have to keep building momentum. As a side benefit, it also gives a chance for our officers to bond together and create some important team dynamics. I really look forward to it every year.   In addition to normal price increases due to inflation, what factors are driving up the cost of equipment, maintenance, staffing and other business expenses? Are the after-effects of the COVID-19 pandemic still impacting pricing in the industry? The truckload industry is currently suffering through one of the worst markets we have seen in some time. After all-time highs through the pandemic, it didn’t take long for the bottom to fall out. While rates dropped farther and faster than anything we have possibly ever seen, costs within the industry continued to climb. This has put a lot of carriers at risk. While I am not an economist, I have learned a few things about cost over the past three decades. When you talk about equipment prices for example, there are a couple of buckets you need to understand, including raw materials, margins, labor, and regulation. We are starting to see relief on raw materials after the COVID years and world conflicts took raw material inflation to extreme highs. That alone should start to bring cost relief, although it may not show up right away. Some manufacturers that are still seeing strong demand may keep those raw material savings to bolster margins; they may only give those savings up when they see a softening of demand. Manufacturers may also keep those raw materials savings to offset higher labor costs. Those higher labor costs are affected by many different factors, including the supply-and-demand balance within the workforce, cost-of-living pressures, and pressure on local minimum wages in many states, just to name a few. Another wild card in equipment costs is environmental regulation. Each new regulation puts upward pressure on equipment costs. With several new standards coming over the next few years, it could be a bumpy ride.   TCA and many of its members are active participants in nonprofit initiatives, such as The Wall That Heals and Wreaths Across America. Please share a little bit about the association’s involvement with these organizations. One of the things I really appreciate about the trucking industry is that we have good people. Many of the owners of companies are self-made and down to earth. They also recognize the importance of giving back. The TCA officers and staff are continually evaluating how we can effectively give back to the communities we serve. With many of our drivers and office staff having served in the military, programs such as the Wall That Heals and Wreaths Across America provide an opportunity to give back and honor those who served. Even for those who didn’t serve in the military, there are strong feelings associated with this great country. We appreciate what we have and want to instill that in future generations. In addition to these programs, the TCA Scholarship Fund provides meaningful education dollars to the up-and-coming generation. We have been in discussions about potentially expanding the reach of those dollars to include vocational education needs, including mechanics. There is a growing need for trained mechanics in our industry, and I think we are in a position to adapt — and at least participate in solving that need.   In addition to the topics noted in previous questions, what issues are top of mind for the trucking industry at this point? I think the most pressing issue in my mind right now is the financial health of our members. With the truckload market embroiled in a tough cycle, this is a time when membership in the TCA should be most valuable. Carriers have a chance to really examine their companies to make sure best practices are actually being followed. Our benchmarking programs and seminars allow carriers to really see where they are doing well … and where they still need some work. We continue to push for favorable tax policies at the federal level. We are cautiously optimistic that we may finally see some relief on the Federal Excise Tax. This will be important in the short term, giving cost relief to member companies. It will also provide the ability for companies to better afford safety technologies and emissions reducing technologies down the road. Every little bit helps.   Thank you for your time, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to our next conversation. This article originally appeared in the September/October 2023 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

A voice for the industry with Dave Williams

As Dave Williams enters his second quarter as chairman of the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), he’s continuing the organization’s focus on providing valuable resources for its members, from enhanced educational offerings to amplifying the “voice of truckload” on Capitol Hill. This year’s Safety & Security meeting is one for the record books and the Refrigerated meeting is just around the corner; Williams says both events have been redesigned to better help carriers catch up on regulations and trends. Looking forward, TCA members are encouraged to participate in September’s Call on Washington and place issues vital to trucking directly on the desks of their legislators. There are many topics of note, from the feasibility (or non-feasibility) of the Environmental Protection Agency’s zero-emissions deadlines for big rigs to AB5-type attacks on trucking’s independent contractor model, a shortage of truck parking, the prevalence of lawsuit abuse and nuclear verdicts, and more. Read on to discover Williams’ thoughts on the state of trucking in general, plans for the future of TCA, and ideas for meeting the industry’s day-to-day challenges. Congratulations on completing your first quarter as chairman of the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA). What goals do you have for TCA in the next two to three months? We have some really good things going on right now. We are working toward getting the entire organization hyper-focused around creating value for TCA members. We are focused on developing ways to improve the driving job, to improve roadway safety, to improve motor carrier financial sustainability, to shape the industry’s environmental stewardship efforts, and to improve the industry’s image. We are also developing several new value opportunities. Over the next couple of weeks, we will be meeting with two new subject-based benchmarking groups to see how we can help member fleets improve in equipment maintenance and safety management. Many fleets have expressed a high degree of interest in getting their safety and maintenance personnel more connected so that they can learn from the experiences of others. More to come! In June, TCA hosted the 2023 Safety & Security Division Meeting in San Antonio, Texas, and the 2023 Refrigerated Meeting is scheduled for July. How do events like these benefit TCA members? The Safety & Security and Refrigerated Meetings have both recently experienced significant makeovers, so if you haven’t gone in a while, I would encourage you to attend. As part of our focus on value, the leadership teams from both of these groups have been challenged to continue raising the bar in presenting the highest quality educational content. These meetings provide an excellent opportunity to get educated on the latest regulations, to catch up on the latest trends, to share best practices, and to really get a chance to interact with some of the best subject matter experts and suppliers in the industry. You won’t want to miss out. September is just around the corner. In addition to the association’s Fall Business meetings, members are encouraged to take part in the annual Call on Washington, D.C. What issues do you see at the top of the agenda? The beauty of TCA’s Call on Washington is that TCA members can discuss the issues that are top of THEIR agenda. There is no script. These meetings provide a chance for TCA members to get in front of policymakers and help members of Congress understand what keeps them up at night. If you’re not comfortable sharing a concern specific to your own business, there are plenty of general industry topics to talk about — truck parking, abolishing the Federal Excise Tax, the realities of zero-emissions tractors, lawsuit abuse, nuclear verdicts, predatory towing, the attack on the independent contractor model … the list goes on and on. There are some really important issues that impact our businesses every day. Most members of Congress don’t fully understand how important these issues are. The Call on Washington is one of the best opportunities to step up and inform them. In the May/June 2023 edition of Truckload Authority, you mentioned that it’s vital that the trucking industry look beyond “next week” and “next year,” and focus on more long-term goals for the next few years and even decades. Please share some of your long-term industry goals. The truckload industry is often its own worst enemy. Short-term thinking has historically led us into deep and vicious economic cycles. The “make hay while we can, before we run off a cliff” mentality is dangerous for a business that is trying to build a reasonable balance sheet. One of my long-term goals is to get stakeholders in this industry to think differently about their businesses. A great step in that direction is to get business leaders to understand truckload cycles. What causes truckload cycles? Can the industry mitigate the magnitude or duration of a cycle? Can a business predict the beginning or the end of a cycle? Should a business act differently if it knows a cycle is beginning or ending? Should a fleet have a portion of their tractors paid off to more effectively adapt to a down cycle? The answer to each of these questions within reason is yes. It takes a lot of work. But knowing more about what makes the tide rise and fall is very powerful and enabling for a business. I liken this to the role of a quarterback: If the quarterback is only looking downfield, then the quarterback is likely to get pummeled. If the quarterback is only trying to avoid getting sacked and never looks downfield, then we never make progress. We need to be good at both. One ongoing debate involves requiring speed limiters on big rigs; however, the top allowable speed has yet to be determined. Both TCA and the American Trucking Associations have spoken out in favor of such legislation. How do you believe speed limiters will help the industry? Please share any thoughts on how a speed cap should be determined, and by whom. First of all, let’s be transparent and recognize that this issue does not enjoy unanimous support across our industry. We can disagree and still be friends. To me, this is about the long game. In the long game, our industry has to be safer. We can proactively take steps to get safer, or we can wait until the government tells us what we have to do. In this case, much of the industry has already voluntarily moved to reasonable governed speeds, which is a form of speed limiter. Some will argue that highway speed differentials are a problem, and I would agree that there are some legitimate concerns, but we have that issue today with the fleets that have governed speeds. There are trade-offs in everything we do. In my opinion, the laws of physics rule the day here. When you operate an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer combination, additional speed equates to additional risk — substantial risk. With nuclear verdicts looming as a threat to shut down a business after just one accident, we have to control what we can control. We can’t control the behavior of four-wheelers, but we CAN control what we do and how fast we drive. If a fleet feels like it needs to run fast in order to hire drivers, or to meet customer demands, or to meet productivity goals, then I would say that the odds are not in favor of that fleet surviving in the long run. I would estimate that the majority of TCA member fleets operate at or under the 65 to 70 mph speed range that has been discussed as part of the proposed rule. These fleets are not only likely to be safer, but they will also experience the benefits of better fuel economy, as well as improved ESG metrics. Another hot topic is the Environmental Protection Agency’s push for zero-emissions vehicles in all sectors. Aside from charging facilities and range being issues for heavy-duty trucks, what other challenges do these requirements mean for motor carriers? As I have stated before, we want to do our part as responsible environmental stewards. We have a responsibility to be part of the solution. The problem is that many of the policymakers are not addressing industry concerns. Electric tractors likely have a future in our industry but are currently facing real-world issues, including significant range limitations, excessive vehicle weights, very high acquisition costs, higher-than-expected operating costs, excessively long lead times for charging equipment, and an underpowered electrical grid. Each of these issues will see improvement over the course of time, but policymakers have decided to force an accelerated timeline that doesn’t allow for the maturing of the technology. It’s become a matter of partisan politics, which is now producing unbalanced — even unreasonable — demands on our fleets. Hydrogen-powered solutions also hold promise but are likewise seeing significant early development challenges. I don’t want to be dramatic, but the current path is leading us towards a financial and operational wreck. We need policymakers to retool the rules to fit technologies that actually work today and allow future technologies to naturally mature. As for the myriad of recent California rules, that is a can of worms that we don’t have space to cover right now. Compliance with a rule should be achievable, it should apply to all equally, and it should be easy to understand. I believe they missed badly on this one. One of the stories in this edition of Truckload Authority (click here to read) touches on ways carriers can attract — and retain — safe, reliable drivers. While many offer sign-on bonuses or guaranteed weekly pay or home time to pull in new hires, how can carriers work to reduce driver turnover? After 31 years in this industry, I can safely say that I still have a lot to learn. Driver hiring and retention is one area that few have mastered, and a place where we all still have a lot to learn. I have seen a significant number of strategies to attract and retain drivers deployed in one way or another. Some strategies come across as very gimmicky, while others are more innovative. In the end, this is a “people business,” and each fleet needs to find a way to provide meaningful personal connections with their drivers … easier said than done. This involves creating a culture that goes beyond words. Surprisingly to some, I believe that it involves setting high expectations and holding people accountable to those expectations. It involves providing well-maintained equipment, favorable working conditions, consistent work opportunities, good benefits, and competitive pay. It involves building relationships and having healthy lines of communication to work through issues. It’s a balance of all of these efforts. No fleet does all of these things perfectly, but if, as an industry, we can focus on making progress related to each of these efforts, then we have a shot at making the driving job more attractive than other options that high-quality workers may have. I wish there was a silver bullet, but it is a lot of hard work. The American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) has selected five topics on which to focus in 2023, including expanding truck parking at public rest areas, identifying barriers to entry for female truck drivers, complete streets impact on freight mobility, the diesel technician shortage, and the cost of driver detention. Of these five, which two do you see as the most critical to the trucking industry, and why? I wish it was as simple as picking two priorities and saying that these priorities will bring the greatest amount of benefit to the industry. Just like a truck’s engine, every component performs a critical function. If any component fails, then the entire engine can be compromised. As an industry and as an association, we have to be prepared to make meaningful progress across several fronts. If I were to pick critical areas, my list would certainly complement the areas you have mentioned — but might look a little different. In fact, these may sound familiar! I would pick: Improve the driving job and make it a more attractive job for all high-quality workers. Improve roadway safety through technology and by adopting effective best practices focused on reducing accidents. Improve motor carrier financial sustainability by educating carriers on proper returns on investment and by advocating for favorable tax policies and regulations. Shape the industry’s environmental stewardship by educating policymakers on the huge progress we have already made and then implementing reasonable real-world solutions going forward. Improve the industry’s image by highlighting the many things that the truckload industry does to support communities and keep America’s supply chain strong. I know this is a bit of a repeat from what I said earlier, but these are the things I would see as most critical. Within each of these five broader areas, there are a number of more specific challenges captured in the ATRI report that need to be addressed — including truck parking, barriers for female drivers, diesel technician shortages, and driver detention, just to name a few. Finally, what thoughts would you like to share with TCA members about the issues facing the trucking industry? The truckload industry is full of great people — smart people, who want to make a difference. We need more of this industry’s leaders to engage on these issues to help shape what this industry looks like for the next generation. There is no questioning the essentiality and critical nature of what we do for the economy. We just need to find more effective ways to move the needle. Thank you for your time, Mr. Chairman — and have a wonderful summer. This article originally appeared in the July/August 2023 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

Focused on the issues with Dave Williams

During the closing banquet for Truckload 2023: Orlando, Dave Williams officially picked up the reins as chairman of the board for the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA). Williams first entered the trucking industry in college, landing a job in the shop at what was then Knight Transportation. Now, 31 years later, he serves as senior vice president of equipment and government relations for the same carrier, now known as Knight-Swift Transportation. An active member of the TCA for nearly a decade, Williams says he’s excited about the momentum the association is gaining on Capitol Hill and the value it provides to its members. As he accepted the role of chairman on March 7, Williams clearly outlined his goals for TCA as well as the trucking industry as a whole. During this first visit with Williams, the Truckload Authority team quickly discovered that Williams is intently focused on the issues faced by the trucking industry; in addition, he is dedicated to providing value to TCA’s members. Here, he shares his passion for the industry, along with a few of his goals for the coming year.   Congratulations on picking up the reins as the chairman of the Truckload Carriers Association. What does this step mean to you, both personally and professionally? Serving as TCA Chairman is a tremendous responsibility. I feel strongly that each of us has an obligation to give back to the industry, and this is one of my opportunities. Fortunately for me, the TCA staff and the officers group are very strong and won’t let me get too far off track.   What do you see as the most important issue facing the industry today? Truckload is such a wonderful and essential industry. But let’s be honest, it’s not for everyone … it’s a tough industry. It requires a tremendous amount of capital risk, with financial rewards that often don’t coincide with the amount of risk that is taken. That is a problem. I believe that one of our big issues is being able to spend less time locked into survival mode and spend more time understanding the driving factors that make it difficult to succeed in our industry. We should be spending more time asking ourselves what we want this industry to look like in five, 10, or 20 years. We have potentially transformational technologies and regulations that we are going to face over the next couple of years. We really need to make sure we are thinking clearly about our place in the economy and make sure that it works for us.   TCA’s annual convention, Truckload 2023: Orlando, wrapped up just a few weeks ago. How would you describe this year’s event? It was a tremendous success! We have received a lot of positive feedback, and we are so grateful for all that attended. Special thanks to those who helped in any way. It takes an army of volunteers to pull off a good conference. Thank you all. We have really gone to great lengths in recent years to build fresh energy back into the convention by adding new elements, staying relevant with topics, bringing in high-quality learning opportunities, and listening to the feedback from our fleet and allied members. This is an evolutionary process where we hope to adapt to current needs and create a valuable experience for all. Our plan is to build on this year’s success and make it even better next year … no pressure right?!   During your acceptance speech at the closing banquet at Truckload 2023: Orlando, you touched on the main points of your goals for the trucking industry and for TCA. Please explain those for the membership. Throughout much of my career, I would describe our industry as fairly reactive, and a bit resistant to change. When proposals for change came our way, our immediate response was more than likely to fight against them. This is not necessarily a bad thing, considering that many of the proposals weren’t that good! As we fast forward to today, the proposals are coming at us at light speed. We find ourselves under attack from every angle, and we need a new strategy. As part of that new strategy, we have an opportunity to reclaim the narrative and set our own agenda. An industry that ‘proactively polices’ itself can more effectively take the high ground and defend against well-intentioned, but misguided, proposals from outside groups. The key is being forward thinking and rallying around initiatives that will ultimately put the industry in a better position. In my remarks, I recommended creating initiatives around four areas: Improving the driving job. Improving safety. Improving the financial sustainability of trucking companies. Improving our tangible impact on air and water quality. I don’t think anyone in the industry wants bad jobs, more accidents, bankruptcies, or dirty air. These are all things we can agree on…no brainers. I proposed that it’s time to do something about it. We would then ask government agencies to support our goals rather than the other way around. We change the narrative. It starts with defining what we can do in each of those areas to really make an impact. Over the next few months, we are going to begin outlining how we go about getting some of these things done. I am excited and anxious to do this and would invite all who want to play a role in this process to let your voice be heard.   What events and projects are on your calendar for the next three months? My other job with Knight-Swift Transportation is keeping me plenty busy, as we just announced our plan to acquire U.S. Xpress. Outside of that, I plan to spend a significant amount of time working with TCA members and staff on our issues in Washington, D.C. We have started putting together monthly visits for TCA members on Capitol Hill for those who are interested. I would recommend them to everyone, beginners and experts alike. These visits are not only critical in educating policy makers, but they also help TCA members realize how effective their voice can be in shaping policy. I also plan to attend the Safety and Security meetings in San Antonio in June, and the Refrigerated Meeting in July in Park City. No rest for the weary.   As the incoming chairman, what message would you like to share with TCA members who are not actively involved in the association’s educational programs, legislation reform efforts, and other opportunities? For me, getting involved early in my career has been a great blessing. I feel like I have been able to make better decisions on behalf of my company as my understanding of the issues has improved. Behind every regulatory or legislative policy is a business issue or practice. I have worked hard to really dig in and understand how some of these proposed policies will impact our businesses. While I still have a lot to learn, I feel like I have been able to make more balanced decisions that stand the test of scrutiny and time. So, I would encourage members to commit to making the critical investments of time and involvement. The more you invest, the greater the returns within your own business. There is a tremendous amount of value that can be unlocked as a TCA member. If you are unsure how to start, please reach out and let us make a few suggestions.   As many in the industry would agree, there is a shortage of company drivers. In your opinion, how can carriers work to attract and retain qualified drivers? One of the things you will find about me is that I was trained by my mentor, Kevin Knight, to think a little differently. I don’t like the word “shortage.” I have been hearing about the driver “shortage” since I started in the industry in 1992, and it was talked about for at least 10 years prior to that (a total of over 40 years). The law of supply and demand would say that if there is a shortage of something that is in strong demand, the price (driver wages) for that resource goes up until supply and demand are balanced. Until recently, driver wages have generally increased in line with, or even below, inflation. And even more recently, driver wages have stopped rising. If there is a shortage, why would driver wages not continue to increase? Because supply and demand have reached balance. There is something else going on here that we need to look at from a different angle. Part of that discussion involves addressing the pain points that make the driving job less competitive than other options that workers may have. Another part of that discussion involves acknowledging the peaks and valleys of truckload cycles and understanding that demand for drivers is not constant. That will take longer than we have room for in this chat.   Earlier this year, TCA joined a group of industry stakeholders to form the Clean Freight Coalition. What is the group’s ultimate goal, and how can TCA members get involved in the efforts? The Clean Freight Coalition is important because it combines the voices of several large trucking stakeholders in the national debate on energy and climate change. Like it or not, this issue is not going away. Our goal is to help policymakers understand the industry’s strong track record of collaboration in achieving meaningful emissions reductions over the years. We also want to make sure that the transition to a zero or near zero-emissions future is done the right way and doesn’t jeopardize the nation’s supply chain. Recent proposals from policy makers have been far from collaborative. This is a critical time for the industry to ramp up the dialogue on some of the technical challenges associated with zero emissions tractors that we have not been able to solve. This is not about a reluctance to adopt technology, it’s about timing. Much of the proposed technology has not matured enough to be effectively commercialized. Even if we resolve some of the operational issues associated with the weight, range, and cost of the tractors, we still have significant infrastructure issues that loom over us. Rather than trying to take the massive leap to zero-emissions, I think we would be much more successful by implementing intermediate targets and working in stages towards zero-emissions. The current proposals put us on a path where the threat of the industry spending massive amounts of money, and then realizing that we need to backtrack and readjust our national strategy, is very real. That would be a disaster.   In recent years numerous types of safety technology, from automated driver-assistance systems (ADAS) to forward- and driver-facing cameras, rear underride guards, and more have been integrated into most fleets. In your experience, what impact have these measures had on the overall safety of the trucking industry? For most of my career, the safety technology options available on our tractors and trailers were slow to develop, and the choices were few and far between. In the past decade, the number of legitimate options has exploded. This is a huge win for safety, as many of these options improve our drivers’ ability to avoid or minimize the severity of accidents. While driver training will continue to play an important role, many fleets have turned to these emerging technologies to “engineer” accidents out of the system. It is critical that as an industry we do a good job of training our drivers how to interact with these technologies rather than assuming that the technologies will work on their own. Going back to our discussion about our industry being more proactive, this technology will play a critical role in helping us reach the next level of safe operations.   We’ve heard talk of eliminating the federal excise tax (FET) in recent months. If the proposed legislation is passed, what kind of effect will it have on the freight industry as a whole, and on trucking specifically? Federal excise tax was first implemented 100 years ago to help the country pay for World War I. It’s funny how some things start for one reason and then never go away. I think this issue has really come to the forefront as new emissions technologies have seen their already-astronomical costs compounded even further by FET, adding $40,000+ to the cost of some of these zero-emissions tractors. The tax has become a financial obstacle in deploying some safety technologies as well. In addition, the tax is too concentrated on buyers of new equipment, while the benefits of the tax go to all road users via the Highway Trust Fund. By removing the tax, we really hope to create momentum for investing in safety technologies and other emissions reducing technologies as those technologies mature. It’s the right thing to do.   Finally, as you assume the chairmanship, what excites you most about the year ahead? I really feel like the truckload industry is approaching a fork in the road. We have some big decisions to make. I am really excited about facilitating healthy discussions within the TCA membership on how we should approach our future. Finding the right balance between learning from the past and adapting to the future is tricky. We can’t underestimate the need to leverage the hard-earned lessons from the past that have brought great success to our industry. At the same time, if we aren’t willing to adapt, we run the risk of becoming the next Blockbuster Video, MySpace, or travel agency industry. While fashion trends eventually come back in style, business models usually don’t. I have a tremendous amount of confidence in our industry. We are survivors, and together, we will succeed.   Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for your time. We look forward to an exciting year! This article originally appeared in the May/June 2023 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

In the end zone with John Elliott

Load One CEO John Elliott didn’t just step into the role of chairman of the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) in March 2022. He burst onto the field, snatched the ball, and started running for the goal — and he never slowed his pace during the following 12 months. Together with newly appointed TCA President Jim Ward, he set out to not only grow the association’s membership, but also to expand and improve member benefits, revamp existing programs, and amplify the voice of truckload on Capitol Hill. Now, as he prepares to pass the ball to the next chairman, he says he would be hard-pressed to name TCA’s greatest accomplishment of the past year; however, he is quick to applaud the association’s members for their enthusiasm and engagement in both local and national initiatives. While Elliott is planning a couple of well-deserved breaks, it’s doubtful he’ll slacken his pace during the coming year. In addition to plans to grow and improve his own company, he says he intends to remain an active voice in TCA and the trucking industry as a whole. Following is the Truckload Authority team’s final chat with Elliott.   Mr. Chairman, thank you for joining us for the last of your Chat with the Chairman interviews. As usual, it has been an eventful year for the trucking industry. What have been TCA’s major accomplishments during your term? It is simply amazing to me how fast this year as chairman has gone. It has been an extremely busy year for the association. I think the first big thing was a highly successful transition to our new president, Jim Ward. Our officers and I tasked him with a long list of desired improvements and initiatives. I can say without a doubt that Jim and our TCA staff are making it happen. Our membership and retention numbers are the highest they have been in decades, and they continue to grow. We have revamped the TCA Professional Driver of the Year program, and we will see more winners and greater prizes. We will also see these individuals be a valuable resource as industry ambassadors to help tell the story of truckload as the year goes on. We have spent a good deal of time working to bring our Truckload Profitably Program in house, and that project is progressing very well. We have over 150 carriers submitting data and added another full-time facilitator as the value of the program to our members continues to grow.   How has TCA worked with other trucking organizations to strengthen the voice of the industry in Washington? A great example of our government affairs push was our ability to help financially support the American Trucking Associations (ATA) in the fight against the predatory tolling by the State of Rhode Island. It was a great victory for our industry and all carriers, as this practice of truck only tolling would have quickly spread across many states and been another unfair economic burden placed upon our industry. It was a great example of how the strong relationship TCA and ATA share only makes the trucking industry more powerful in D.C. TCA and ATA have recently joined the Truckers Service Association as partners in its fight to preserve and protect the owner-operator/independent contractor model, which has been under attack more and more. This model is the basis of the American dream and is the exact way so many trucking companies were founded — with a dream, one man, and one truck.   What are some other highlights of the year? Another major initiative involves the North American Transportation Management Institute (NATMI). Most people are very surprised to learn that NATMI is owned by TCA. We did not leverage this relationship in the past anywhere near its full potential, but that is changing. We are moving NATMI onto our Association Management System, and we will be making more announcements this year. Last, but not least, we recently announced the launch of the Clean Freight Coalition with TCA as a founding member. This coalition will spearhead industry initiatives to help push for a logical, balanced, and realistic application of technology and regulations. Trucking has made huge improvements in our impact on the environment, and we are steadfast in our commitment to continue to improve. However, it needs to be done with well-thought-out policies that include trucking as a stakeholder at the table, not just policies put forward that can have disastrous implications for our industry and ultimately affect the people we serve.   Which of those accomplishments has given you the most pride in TCA and its members, and why? I cannot honesty answer that question. What I am most proud of is the organization as a whole, its upward trajectory, and the exciting energy that comes from it. I have heard from so many members and vendors that the organization just continues to evolve in such a great direction. The ROI value of TCA has never been higher, in my opinion.   What can TCA members expect in the coming year? We will see exciting new enhancements coming over the next year. We are launching a revamped fleet safety program that will improve upon this highly successful program and provide even more actionable data to our members to help them improve in this critical area of their companies. Our government affairs efforts continue to increase on behalf of our membership. We now have two internal and two external lobbyists who are focused on telling the story of truckload and helping to shape opinion on proposed regulations and legislation that can affect our members.   While Democrats still control the U.S. Senate after last fall’s elections, Republicans now lead the House. In addition, there has been a “changing of the guard” in the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee. How do you foresee those changes affecting the trucking industry? Great question, because going into the election there were many things still on the table as it relates to our industry, and that hasn’t changed regardless of the outcome. Trucking is the very backbone of this nation’s economy, and the truckload segment is the heartbeat. We know that many of our issues will continue to permeate in the next Congress. We must continue to challenge the threats to the independent contractor business model, creating new opportunities for truck parking, and of course, making this industry more attractive for people looking for rewarding careers. These are essential to moving the needle toward the advancing of our industry — and in many cases they should be viewed as bipartisan. Of course, as the years shake out, we will continue to weigh in on issues regarding equipment, highway funding, and certainly size and weight questions that could arise as the congressional demographics have changed.   Earlier this year the Biden administration released the U.S. National Blueprint for Transportation Decarbonization to eradicate all greenhouse emissions from the transportation industry by the year 2050. What do you believe will be the earliest impacts felt by motor carriers? The earliest impacts are already being felt by motor carriers as we progressively continue to look at the equipment landscape and the environmental impacts that coincide with them. Our environment has no friendlier ally than our industry, and recent data has proven exactly that. In just over 35 years, it would take 60 of today’s trucks to produce the emissions of just one truck in 1988. Over the past 30 years, our engines have cut NOX and particulate matter emissions by more than 98%, eliminating harmful pollutants from the air we breathe. In knowing that, and wanting our industry to continue to be great stewards of the environment, it is essential that we continue to test equipment to the point that each has proven itself roadworthy. Our carrier members want to be an active part of the solution to this problem, to preserve the environment and ensure that the store shelves are stocked with the goods that this nation lives on. In short, the impact for these regulations are already being felt to the point that our industry must make sure the deadlines are realistic and that the changes to equipment are ones that truly work to fulfill the nation’s freight delivery needs.   It’s now been 15 years since the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMSCA) launched the CSA (compliance, safety, accountability) program with an initial “test run.” How have you seen the program change over the years, and has it helped or harmed the freight industry? I think the intentions of the FMCSA were very noble. I don’t think we are anywhere close to a finished product. I know the industry looks to continue to work with regulators to improve CSA. We all want a fair, consistent measurement tool, but the devil is in the details, and I personally do not see safety as an area that should be graded on a curve. Of course, the issue of safety fitness determinations continues to appear on the DOT regulations report, and this may be the year that something gets done. The reality is that motor carriers should not be afraid to have their safety performance judged; however, that judgement must be done correctly. CSA continues to evolve from its original premise. They have incorporated the Crash Preventability Determination Program, removed the public viewing of scores because of the inconsistencies, and continue to try to improve the system. Discussions surrounding the Item Response Theory have proven themselves to be just discussions, as few could actually understand the algorithm changes that would have been required for the program. We must continue to insist that this program be as accurate as possible, eliminating geographical biases that exist and of course continue to account for clean inspections as much as we do for the bad ones.   Of course, the ratio of trucks on the road to safe, available parking is an ongoing concern. Last fall, new truck parking legislation was introduced in both the House and the Senate. If passed, how will these bills help motor carriers and drivers? Ample, safe parking is a critical need for our drivers. As we fight to retain and attract new drivers to the industry, parking is a huge issue. Drivers spend over an hour a day of wasted time looking for parking. On top of that, without hours-of-service flexibility, drivers are not able to utilize their available hours effectively as the fear of not finding a parking spot and running over hours in violation weighs on them. All this is stressful, and as an industry we want safe, well-rested drivers who are not stressed behind the wheel.   In addition to giving the trucking industry a voice in Washington, TCA is active in a number of community service efforts, including partnering with the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund (VVMF) to transport The Wall that Heals across the nation during its annual tour. Tell us a little about TCA’s affiliation with this project, and how members can get involved. Since 2015 TCA has partnered with VVMF to bring the Wall That Heals to communities across the country. The wall itself is a replica of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C., and our industry has risen to the challenge of supporting the transportation efforts of this monument. It is imperative that we continue to volunteer our equipment and drivers that help preserve the legacy of the wall and allow for cities and towns across the country and education everyone about the war and its impacts. Without the generous donations of trucks and drivers, this monument likely would not have the impact that is does.   What other service opportunities does TCA offer its membership? Besides the Vietnam Wall project, TCA has been a long-time supporter of Wreaths Across America and promoting its mission to remember, honor, and teach those military members that made the ultimate sacrifice. Also, at this year’s annual convention, our spouse/partner activity TCA is teaming up with Volunteer Orlando to drive change and support a local at-risk school to help them break the cycle of poverty and hardship. Trucking is an industry that has always stepped up when needed and looks to give back.   As your term comes to a close, what are your plans for the immediate future? I look forward to continuing with TCA in my role as past chairman and working with our incoming chairman and officers to continue the success. I also have a very exciting year ahead personally for my company as we continue to grow and build out our time-critical offerings. I am also looking forward to spending some time at a new condominium I recently had built in Cancun.   As is tradition, we always ask the outgoing chairman to give advice to the incoming chairman. What would be your advice to Dave Williams of Knight-Swift Transportation, who will soon be stepping into your shoes? Dave has been one step behind me for seven years on the officer line. We have had a great working relationship, and on a personal level he is a great person and a good friend. Dave is very much like me in valuing and listening to our carrier and vendor members. We are and will continue to be a member-driven organization. I know Dave, with his wife Suzy by his side, will be an outstanding leader for TCA and the industry as a whole.   Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for a wonderful year. Any closing comments to the membership would be welcome. Thank you to the members of TCA who entrusted me to be your chairman. As a third generation in trucking, it’s been an amazing journey — from a kid whose first job in trucking was sweeping out trailers to now being the chairman of the TCA. I do wish my late grandfather had been alive to see how far his decision to become a truck driver had affected my family’s life. I also want to thank Jim Ward, who has been an amazing friend, and I have to give a big thank-you to all of the TCA staff for all their hard work! This article originally appeared in the March/April 2023 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.

A chat with the chairman | January-February 2023

As this issue of Truckload Authority hits the wire, John Elliott is racing hard toward the finish line of a highly motivating and extremely successful tenure as chairman of the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA). It seems only yesterday he stepped up to the starting line to accept the gavel from outgoing chairman Jim Ward, who is now TCA president. Whether it’s the 100-meter dash or the 5,000-meter run, it takes skill and a well-thought-out strategy to win a race. For the 100-meter run, it’s a mad dash from start to finish. For the 5,000-meter race, it’s all about pacing — being aware of other runners, having an understanding of how many meters there are to the finish, and knowing how much stamina you have left. John Elliott has exhibited the skill to handle any length of race. He’s used his leadership skills to react to suddenly arising issues, such as the surge in diesel prices, as well as long-term problems, such as the driver shortage and lack of truck parking. In this edition, he addresses those three issues along with others. He outlines all-new plans for TCA’s annual convention coming up in March, and reviews the success of the Bridging Border Barriers meeting in November. Question: Mr. Chairman, thank you for joining us for another Chat with the Chairman. We hope you had a merry Christmas and a happy new year. As one year ends and another begins, it is time to reflect on the year just ended. First, share with us the top achievements of the trucking industry in 2022. Answer: Thank you. I hope everyone had a happy holiday season! The year 2022 was really a year of success for our industry on many levels. Some of the biggest include the entry-level driver training requirements, the younger-driver apprenticeship program, some streamlining of the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, removal of redundancy on the TWIC and HAZMAT background checks, getting a Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) leader who was officially appointed by Congress, and the victory against Rhode Island on its discriminatory tolling. Question: Second, what were TCA’s major achievements? Answer: Well, many of the things I have already spoken of were supported and were helped across the finish line with the support of TCA. Internally the organization is really firing on all cylinders. We continue to have record membership numbers. All our events this past year have seen resounding feedback and record attendance. Our officers, leadership, and staff have really rolled up their sleeves when it comes to delivering value to the membership. Question: What challenges does 2023 hold, both for the trucking industry as a whole and for TCA? Answer: As for the industry, I think we have a lot of hard work and battles ahead. California’s AB5 and the continued attack on the owner-operator model is an issue of great concern for me. So many of the companies in our industry started with one person and one truck! Trucking is one of the best examples of the American dream and the spirit of entrepreneurship. Yet some in political office look to burden this great path to business success. I think one of the other looming issues is environmental mandates that sound great on paper but do not have a practical path to success at this time and in the time frames proposed. Our industry continues to push to get greener, but we have to do it at a logical, sustainable pace that makes some sense economically — and we have to have an infrastructure capable of supporting that effort. Question: As you enter the home stretch of your term as chairman, what does your schedule look like for January and February? Answer: Luckily, this is a slower time of the year coming off the holidays. I have some industry events to attend and to represent TCA. I will also be making some trips to the TCA headquarters for leadership transition planning and to participate with our refrigerated officers in the planning of the annual refrigerated meeting. Somehow when I say not as busy, my calendar finds a way to fill up fast! Question: Obviously, the highlight of the last month of your chairmanship — March — will be TCA’s annual convention, set for March 4-7 at the Gaylord Palms in Kissimmee, Florida. We have heard that TCA will roll out a new convention format this year. Share with us what members can expect at the 2023 convention and why it is important to attend the event. Answer: CA’s annual convention is the flagship program for the association. As a member-driven organization, it only makes sense that we rely upon our members to develop the content and offerings industry executives want to know about. We appointed Karen Smerchek, president of Veriha Trucking, to work with a task force of carriers and associate members to develop the schedule, sessions, and speakers that should make every potential attendee take notice. In other words, this meeting has been designed for our members, by our members — and I can guarantee you will be bringing something back to the office that will justify your attendance. Question: Each year, the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) releases the results of its “Critical Issues in the Trucking Industry” survey of motor carrier executives and drivers. For 2022, a year of record inflation, it’s not surprising that fuel prices topped the list as the No. 1 overall concern. This is the first time the topic of has appeared since 2014. What do you hear from members — both carriers and independent contractors — about how the cost of diesel is impacting their business? Are they seeing any easing of those high prices? Answer: At the time of this interview, we are not seeing any easing. While gas prices have fallen, diesel prices have not. It is a common “feedstock” with heating oil and the cold winter that has driven up demand. Refining capacity also continues to be a serious constraint. While the general public feels economic relief with lower gas prices, the cost of diesel really helps drive consumer cost and inflation, as that cost ultimately gets passed along to the end user —the consumer. Question: The driver shortage ranked second among the overall concerns. Is there any indication the shortage may be easing? Or, at least, are there new programs or new policies in place that promise pathways to ease the shortage? Answer: The driver shortage and stress it has had on the supply chain is no secret. Looking at the recent actions that have come from FMCSA and the Department of Transportation (DOT) in the past year, this problem has certainly reached a crisis level in the office of the Secretary of Transportation. In addition to the entry level driver training rule that went live last February, our industry is embroiled in other programs that focus on recruiting people to become interested in the truck-driving profession. The younger driver pilot program that is determining once and for all that drivers ages 18 to 20 can operate in a manner as safe (or safer) than their more seasoned counterparts could open our industry up to a demographic to operate in interstate commerce that we had not been exposed to before. The creation of federally recognized apprenticeship programs that will encourage people to get into our industry is yet another prime example. The Women of Trucking Advisory Board, through FMCSA, is exploring ways to make trucking a more attractive option for females to enter our industry. Considering that women make up approximately 7% percent of the driving workforce, there is certainly room for improvement. Question: No. 8 on the overall list of concerns was CSA. For years, it was a hotly debated issue in trucking, but recently it seems like CSA disappeared from the radar. Has CSA been effective in improving safety in the trucking industry? Does the program need an overhaul? Answer: That is a great question. Keep in mind the promise that was made when this program made its first appearance under the name CSA2010 — that replacing Safestat would be a great thing and that eventually drivers would be incorporated into that premise. We have certainly come a long way from that originally proposed date. I think CSA has certainly influenced how carriers operate and the safety programs that coincide with it; however, there is so much more that needs to be done. First and foremost, any overhaul that coincides with CSA must come with the ability to actually explain it, which the proposed Item Response Theory (IRT) certainly lacks. Carriers are not against having their safety fitness determined; we must, however, insist that it is determined correctly. The shortcoming with CSA must be taken into account when contemplating these changes so that a level playing field exists for the industry in its entirety. Question: The ATRI survey breaks down its results by commercial drivers and motor carrier executives. Among drivers, the top concern continues to be truck parking. Can you update members on the progress of programs in place to address this issue? Answer: I think everyone would agree, including members of the House and Senate, that there is a definite need to fix this problem. Not only would it help our driving force to operate in a manner that makes their profession a more attractive place to work, but it would also help our nation’s supply chain shortage by alleviating the constant search for a safe, secure place to park a truck. As an industry, we must advocate for dedicating funding to help resolve this issue. TCA was successful in getting language that highlighted this problem into the recent House Appropriations bill, a win for TCA and its efforts to fix this problem. However, this is not just an issue that exists for federal intervention. Efforts within each state, county, and municipality must continue, and we have found educating local governments will go a long way towards improving upon this problem and combatting the misinformation that seems to exist at the local level when it comes to creating new avenues for truck parking. Question: Each year, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance conducts safety checks on the nation’s highways. In 2022, out of some 34,000 trucks inspected in the U.S. during Brake Safety Week, 4,664 (13.6%) were put out of service for various brake violations. Does it concern you, as an industry leader, that more than one out of every 10 CMVs on the highway today might be operating with serious brake problems? Answer: Hauling freight in this industry is certainly dependent upon the ability to deliver a load safely. Yes, the number of vehicles placed out of service for brake violations is concerning, since the impact of those poorly maintained brakes can have life-or-death consequences. Obviously, the reason these vehicles have been placed out of service is because of the unsafe nature in which they can be operating. Unfortunately, nine out of every 10 CMVs suffer from the negative aspects of proper maintenance that can often be discovered with a thorough pre-trip inspection rather than a roll of the dice. Question: TCA participated in three important events during November and December — the Sixth Annual Bridging Border Barriers conference, held in Canada; the transport of the U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree and its lighting ceremony in Washington, D.C.; and Wreaths Across America. Please share the highlights of these events and why it’s important for TCA to participate in these events. Answer: Bridging Border Barriers was a great success in 2022. We saw the largest attendance since the inception of the conference. The content covered a diverse set of subject matter that educated our Canadian and cross-border carrier members. Many do not realize that over 10% of TCA membership is Canadian. On top of that, a good percentage of our American members offer cross-border service in and out of Canada. The Capital Christmas Tree and Wreaths Across America are both great programs that allow the trucking industry to join with these causes and showcase to the public the importance and the generosity and level of caring that the trucking industry showcases. Question: Two November events highlighted the role of women in trucking. First, the FMCSA held the inaugural meeting of the Women of Trucking Advisory Board. Later in the month, the Women In Trucking Association held its annual Accelerate! Conference and Exhibition. Both are designed to bring more women into the industry, which prompts the question: Is the industry doing enough in addressing this important matter? Answer: I think it’s hard to say whether we are doing enough. I do think that as an industry we are doing more than at any time in trucking’s history. I think the industry is engaged, and a lot of great people are helping to lead this charge. I think the best plan is to keep addressing and tackling the issue and to continue to find ways to step up and improve constantly. This article originally appeared in the January/February 2023 edition of Truckload Authority, the official publication of the Truckload Carriers Association.