TheTrucker.com

Driving double-nickels never meant a trucker could stop on a dime

Back in a day many of you probably don’t remember, the U.S. had a national speed limit. No vehicle of any type on any road could lawfully drive over 55 mph — or as CB lingo put it “double-nickels.” Brought on by the Arab oil embargo of 1973, the national 55 mph speed limit was designed to save fuel as much as anything, although some safety experts also claimed it saved lives. On the other hand, just as many safety officials thought that the limit — imposed on interstate highways originally designed for vehicles traveling 70 to 75 mph — took as many lives as it saved. Fifty-five mph is a slow pace when traveling some remote stretch of interstate in Kansas or Nebraska. And when drivers headed through the urban Northeast, the 55 mph limit hardly kept up with the reality of traffic flow. As a result, tailgating, cutting off other drivers and a general disrespect for the rules of the road increased among most everyone. As far as truck drivers were concerned, whether they were following the national speed limit or not, it made for hazardous driving conditions. As Randy Travis famously sang in “Three Wooden Crosses,” one of his later hit songs, “18-wheelers can’t stop on a dime.” Travis was just one of many artists who recorded songs about truck drivers who couldn’t stop in time to avoid collisions. Truck-driving music could have its own subgenre when it comes to dealing with tragedy on the highway. Some songs tell of near misses that ended in the deaths of drivers and incidents that ended in collisions. Many of these songs are haunting, but others are matter-of-fact — a simple telling of the perils of the highway. Among the songs classified as “haunting,” it’s hard to recall one that has a greater emotional impact on listeners than Red Sovine’s “Phantom 309.” Even the title clues the listener in to the story Sovine told — in his trademarked recitation method — of “Big Joe” swerving his truck to miss a bus load of kids. “Big Joe” didn’t survive what ended as a single-vehicle accident, but he haunted the highway, handing out dimes for cups of coffee to those who needed a pick-me-up. While “Big Joe” was a fictional character, the incident that inspired the lyrics actually happened. Several accidents are credited as the basis for Sovine’s tale, but the fatality of a truck driver in Vermont seems to be the one most associated with the song. Coincidentally, another of trucking music’s most haunting songs also happened in the Northeast. “Tombstone Every Mile,” sung by the Baron of Country Music, Dick Curless, tells the history of a “stretch of road, way up north in Maine,” where many truckers lost their lives. The number of drivers who died in the Haynesville Woods is certainly exaggerated for effect — the highway is not a long one, but it does become treacherous during the winter months. However, some researchers believe the inspiration for Curless’ song was two young girls who were killed on the road by out-of-control trucks in separate incidents — on the same day. Fortunately, the stretch of road is no longer a “must-pass” route for truckers hauling potatoes to Boston. Merle Haggard’s “White Line Fever” doesn’t tell of a trucking accident per se; instead, Haggard sings of an eternal life on the road. The song is about a man who wants to change his lifestyle, but trucking is such an addiction it’s become part of his soul. The lyrics tell of a driver who sees his approaching death but is incapable of taking the steps needed to protect himself. In the category of near misses and miracles, country music’s Alabama recorded the No. 1 song “Roll On (Eighteen Wheeler).” More inspirational than tragic, the lyrics tell of a driver who has prepared his family for the moment he knows will eventually arrive — a time his wife and kids are unsure of his fate. Lost in a blizzard, the driver knows his family will find courage in the words he told them to sing when that time came, and the story has a happy ending. On the comedy side of trucking music, Red Simpson’s “I’m a Truck” offers a semi’s view of riding the highways with what the truck considers a relatively incompetent driver at the wheel. The truck recalls the many moments the driver brags of how his skillful driving techniques helped avoid accidents. All the while, the truck knows the truth: The truck, not the driver, always saved the day. The “double-nickels” speed limit is a theme of the novelty trucking song “White Knight,” recorded by Cledus Maggard and the Citizen’s Band. The hero of the song has a hard time paying attention to the national speed limit. In fact, he spends more time on his CB radio than he does watching the road, always on the lookout for “Smokeys” and speed traps. Of course, his reliance on the CB turns sour when one of his informants turns out to be a “White Knight,” CB slang for a traffic cop. The driver, “The Mean Machine,” decides he can’t stop on a dime — or even decelerate in short order — while traveling 92 mph. Aside from the aforementioned songs dealing with the national speed limit, there are songs about drivers who have no intention of slowing down. The movie “Smokey and the Bandit” provided more than one such tune on its soundtrack, most notably “East Bound and Down,” as well as the less popular “West Bound and Down.” Of course, the title track told the story of “The Bandit,” who used the heels of his boots to drag his out-of-control truck to a stop at the bottom of a steep grade in Tennessee. Congress raised the national speed limit to 65 mph in the latter half of the 1980s. And with increasing pressure from the states, whose officials realized better than Congress that traveling a virtually untraveled interstate highway in North Dakota is a lot different than driving up the Jersey Shore, the federal government soon abandoned the national speed limit. Speed limits are now set by each state. Some stretches of highway have no posted speed limit, while the highest enforced limit of 85 mph is on a relatively new bypass east of San Marcos, Austin and San Antonio, Texas. As far as I know, no one has recorded a song about it — at least not yet. Until next time, remember: Speed limits DO exist, and it’s best to avoid fracturing them to any significant extent. Doing otherwise might land you in the same shape as “The Mean Machine” — with your tail in jail and your rig impounded.

Why it’s important for drivers to manage their health, Part 1

Being a professional truck driver can be a dangerous and unhealthy occupation in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the trucking industry accounts for nearly 15% of the nation’s work-related deaths due to accidents alone. In addition, because of the physical demands placed upon them, truck drivers also report more on-the-job injuries, such as sprains and back and neck trouble, than workers in any other category, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA. Added to the obvious physical danger that operating such a large piece of machinery poses are the many corresponding health problems inherent to the job. Driving is often a sedentary occupation, requiring truckers to spend several hours a day in the cab and leaving limited hours to devote to their families or personal lives. In addition, the job is a highly stressful one. Most drivers are on the road, pushing to meet very tight delivery schedules, for up to three or four weeks at a time — sometimes more. Science says sitting is the “new smoking” Why is sitting so bad? Here’s what happens when you spend too much time sitting: Blood flow slows down. This can more easily allow fatty acids to build up in the blood vessels, leading to heart disease. Regularly sitting for extended periods of time may lead to insulin resistance, which can cause Type 2 diabetes and obesity — two major risk factors for heart disease. The risk of blood clots increases. A 2018 study found 82% of people who suffer from blood clots sat for a significantly greater amount of time than the remaining 18%. Blood clots can lead to heart attacks and strokes. The body’s ability to process fats is slowed. When you sit, your body’s production of lipoprotein lipase (an enzyme essential for breaking down fat) drops by about 90%. When your body can’t break down fat, the fat is stored instead, leading to weight gain — which can contribute to hypertension, heart disease and premature death. More work needs to be done to make truck driving careers healthier as well as safer. I believe we need more support from motor carriers to provide drivers with education. Driving awareness + accessibility to health screenings = results for drivers. Look for Part 2 of this series next month. Known as The Trucker Trainer, Bob Perry has played a critical role in the paradigm shift of regulatory agencies, private and public sector entities, and consumers to understand the driver health challenge. Perry can be reached at [email protected].

Some might view Christ as ‘original truck driver’

August is a month of transition. Yes, it’s still summer but we are thinking of fall. Schools will soon be in session. We already see all the fall decorations in the stores. Of course, as a truck driver, you already know the rush is on for the fall and winter seasonal events ahead. In addition to fall goods, you’re probably delivering products for Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas and other holidays. As a truck driver, you’re the one who delivers all the goodies that put the smiles on the faces of the nation. Just what is your concept of a trucker? Let me tell you how I see truckers. Truckers comes in all sizes and colors. They are the embodiment of progress with diesel fumes in their hair. They make a living maneuvering 10 tons of steel along the highways. They haul the needs of the nation. They are big business with a road map. And when the tires sing, the road is straight and the moon shines bright on a ribbon of cross-country highway, drivers are the happiest and the most useful people in America. If you were born 200 years ago, you might have been a buccaneer or a soldier of fortune, or maybe a Pony Express driver or a wagon master. And when truckers find themselves in need of a little “time out” with Christ, they need a minister who knows their needs and can relate to them. Because I was a trucker, I believe I can share Christ with drivers in special ways. I know the hurts and pitfalls of the road. The heartache can sometimes get a driver down, and having someone you can open up with and find a connection with is important. Writing this column is my way of giving truckers a way to find Christ in their lives. Did you know that Christ could be considered the original delivery “driver”? Just look at Christ and you can see his role as a truck driver. First, God can be viewed as the original dispatcher. He dispatched Jesus to the world. Then Jesus delivered healing (medical supplies), teaching (school books and lessons) and even food to feed the people. Jesus traveled many roads, delivering all these supplies to all the people along the way. And if you read in your Bible about all the traveling that Jesus did, you will notice also that he took time out to rest — just as you, the trucker, rest after your hours of service. But, now let’s look at the rest of the journey in the life of Jesus. At the end of his route, Jesus carried our load of sins to Calvary. He died on the cross for us and unloaded our sins at Hell’s gate. Christ then was dispatched back home to heaven, just as each driver returns home after a long haul. But it doesn’t end there. Jesus will be coming back as he promised, and his return load will be transporting all of those who are faithful to him to spend an eternity in heaven. Are you seeing how you can view Jesus as the original truck driver? Jesus brought us salvation from sin. You, as a trucker, bring “salvation” to mankind here on earth by delivering the material needs to people here on earth. Don’t ever think that you are not important, because you are. Without truckers, no one would have the clothing, food, shelter and other essentials needed for survival. Jesus, as our truck driver, is our salvation from sin. The road to heaven was paved by his shed blood. He brought us healing from sin. He taught us how to live through his teachings. He fed us the bread of life and the cup of salvation (communion). Every time you take communion, you are fed with the life of Christ. Always remember that you are important to the world. Jesus is important because he hauled your sins to Calvary and left them at Hell’s gate. Because of this, you can claim the promise of eternal life. Best of the roads and all gears forward in Jesus, Rev. Marilou Coins

Sometimes truck drivers just need to know when to get healthy

If you haven’t read some entries from the “Staying Fit on the Road” section of The Trucker’s site by Bob “The Trucker Trainer” Perry, after reading this edition of “Rhythm of the Road,” please make it your next stop. Only Bob can offer the advice you might need to save yourself from filling the shoes of The Willis Brothers in their 1968 song, “Quittin’ While I’m Still Alive.” It’s been a good while since I’ve written about the Willis Brothers, so let’s review a little of the trio’s background. The Willis Brothers — actually one of the original three was a Caldwell, but who’s counting? — got their start in the music business during the early years of the Great Depression in Shawnee, Oklahoma, a small city east of Oklahoma City. Interstate 40 didn’t exist, and even Route 66 bypassed Shawnee, but the city had long been an oasis along cattle drives northward from Texas, and it goes down in history as a thoroughfare along the West Shawnee Trail. In fact, with three major railroads building lines through the city along with well as depots, Shawnee was a fast-growing place that put up a good fight with Oklahoma City when it came time to choose a state capital. But when a major meatpacking plant chose Oklahoma City as its home over Shawnee, the neighbor to the west won out. Today, Shawnee isn’t a whole lot larger than it was in 1930, while Oklahoma City is home to some 650,000 residents. But Shawnee lives on as a major suburb of the capital. The original Willis Brothers trio were known locally as “The Oklahoma Wranglers,” and for the better part of the 1930s they appeared live as a regular feature on Shawnee radio station KGFF. But at decade’s end, one member left the group. A roller coaster of Willises started coming and going, interrupted only by World War II, when the entire trio served overseas. When the war ended, The Oklahoma Wranglers reunited and caught their first big break — an appearance on the Grand Ole Opry performing as themselves and as backup to Hank Williams. Their popularity quickly grew, and the group became permanent members of the Grand Ole Opry before the 1940s came to an end. The next big step for the group was an eight-year stint touring with Eddy Arnold, who was among the biggest names in country music at the time. When they decided to move on, the Wranglers also changed their name — and The Willis Brothers was officially born. After all, the name fit, since Caldwell had left the group and all three slots were now filled by men from the same family. All this is to let you know that The Willis Brothers probably inhaled a whole lot more than their share of dust in the 1930s, not to mention far too many liters of bovine-produced methane gas. And because they were on the road so many years (much like truck drivers), the fellows no doubt the developed a few other health problems they ignored a little too long. These experiences might have given birth to “Quittin’ While I’m still Alive.” During their career, The Willis Brothers had one big hit — a trucking song — “Give Me Forty Acres (and I’ll Turn this Rig Around),” a subject of one of my first columns for The Trucker. But this was far from the group’s only song about truck drivers. In fact, the genre became the band’s specialty. Using a Telechord electric guitar, The Willis Brothers developed a distinctive “highway beat” to their music, all the while keeping to a bluegrass style, particularly in their vocals. The combination made for some masterful trucking songs. Sticking with two-minute-long songs, the band recorded more than were found on other country albums. While few of those songs charted, The Willis Brothers discography was impressive In 1968, recording for Stardust Records, “from Nashville, Tennessee — the Musical Heart of America,” the group released “Hey, Mr. Trucker Driver,” an album bulging with 12 of the group’s short looks at life through a windshield. A long overlooked “Quitting While I’m Still Alive” is one tune every prospective truck driver needs to give a listen before deciding on a career in the industry. In “Quittin’ While I’m Still Alive,” The Willis Brothers play the role of a still-young 42-year-old man who has been driving a big rig more than half his lifetime. But the diesel has taken its toll. This isn’t a case of being lonesome; rather, it’s a matter of being “plum beat down,” as some might say. The singer realizes, after 22 years behind the wheel without a scratch or a dent, he’s pushing his luck. Chances are that time will catch up with him. After all, he sings, he’s seen too many rigs on the road go up in flames with the driver still inside. He’s also run across too many crazy driving “punks” and more than his share of drunks that leave him wondering how much longer he’ll remain unscathed. Aside from the fear of continuing to drive, The Willis Brothers tell us of the various maladies the trucker has come down with over the years. Thanks to the diesel, he claims he can see, he can’t smell and he can’t hear. (I guess if enough diesel residue builds up in one’s system, at least three of the five senses can be permanently damaged.) The only sense the driver claims to have left is being used up trying to keep his rig on the road. And how about those kidneys? I suppose 22 years of chain coffee-drinking does a number on those as well. With that, two minutes and 19 seconds later, we are left assume the trucker arrives in Memphis, where he turns in his papers and puts his truck up for sale. Until next time, scoot on over to Bob Perry’s column. Bob offers up some good advice to help you stay healthy out there on the road.

Did the COVID-19 pandemic have an effect on your weight?

I’m taking an unofficial poll: Have the shutdowns and restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic affected your weight? In my coaching calls each week, I discuss weight gains (and reasons for those gains) with drivers. Stress is a consistent contributing factor that comes up — and the added precautions that truck drivers have had to endure over the past year have definitely added to their stress levels. Combine this with added difficulty finding healthy food options. Actually, finding any food options at all was difficult, with many restaurants closing their doors or being inaccessible to drivers. Were you one of the many who experienced weight gain during the pandemic? I’ve read a number of reports indicating that weight gain has been a health concern across all professions during the pandemic, not just truck drivers. Many companies resorted to having employees work from home in order to stay compliant with safety protocols recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This shift to working from home offered easy access to workers’ home pantries — which equaled greater temptation to snack all day. In recent columns, I’ve been writing a lot about general health for drivers, primarily because the DOT Medical Exam re-certification wavier has been lifted. Of course, a healthy weight is always important. My number of calls is increasing weekly because drivers are faced with upcoming deadline to get their re-certification, and solid results happen over time, not overnight. Wanting to lose weight brings with it the temptation to look for fast results, and that almost always means cutting calories. Of course, cutting junk calories is a good idea, but drastically cutting all calories is not a good long-term solution: Crash dieting generally leads to “yo-yo” dieting syndrome. One of the dangers of crash (ultra-low-calorie) dieting is the unavoidable metabolic slowdown. This slowdown can start within just a few days of cutting calories. You’ll think, “This diet isn’t working!” so you’ll look for a new, more effective diet — and yo-yo syndrome begins. As I mentioned earlier, cutting junk calories is a good idea, and that’s where I suggest drivers start when changing their diet. Make a list for just one week of everything you eat and drink; then look at the caloric intake and decide what “junk” calories you can eliminate. Create your diet plan and stick with it, but give yourself and your body time to adjust to the new caloric intake. Remember, healthy weight loss is done over time, not overnight.

High-sugar diets could lead to health problems for drivers

In a recent coaching session with a new driver who was referred to me, I was reminded why I’m such a strong advocate for driver pre-screenings. This driver went in for his normal certification exam and was shocked when the doctor told him his blood sugar count was over 300. This gentleman weighted 155 lbs. and had no previous indicators. I’ve seen this happen numerous times with elevated blood pressure readings as well. You don’t have to weigh 300-plus pounds to be a potential candidate for pre-hypertension or pre-diabetes. Either of these health conditions can attack anyone at any time. A diet consisting primarily of foods high on the glycemic index —those with high amounts of quickly digestible carbohydrates, or sugars — can increase a person’s risk of cardiovascular disease. As we know, these conditions don’t happen overnight. They happen over time, especially when you live the lifestyle of a professional CDL driver. Each of the challenges that new driver and I talked about — finding better food options on the road, adjusting crazy sleep patterns and, of course, the ability to get into a workout routine — all contribute to the driver’s condition. A common thread I’ve seen between drivers is a lack of consistent medical evaluation. For many drivers, their last visit to a doctor for anything, including a preventative checkup, was their last DOT re-certification exam. Growing up in a trucking family, I get it. After being on the road, who wants to go sit in a doctor’s office a Saturday morning? (Back in the day, when you could see a doctor on a Saturday.) Slowly — and I do mean slowly — carriers are starting to offer screenings and are installing self-check health stations so drivers can stay on top of their health. However, this movement is slow-moving, so I urge you as drivers to take control. Visit www.higi.com to find a self-check station so you can work toward managing your health. Also please check out this article, International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values, which can be found online at care.diabetesjournals.org/content/31/12/2281. Here you will find information on food values, as well as suggestions for products to stay away from. Please, peek under your personal hood to see what’s going on in your own engine room.

Country duo rides Boy George’s stardom to hit song

I’ve never been a big fan of music videos, at least not the type that dramatizes the lyrics. And I don’t take a liking to many songs written with the sole purpose of being made into a video — to me, that’s screenwriting, not songwriting. After all, instrumentals alone can create a vision in a listener’s mind. I’ve mentioned the “clickity-clack” beat of Merle Haggard’s “Movin’ On” as an example of how the tempo gives rise to thoughts of the highway before the lyrics even begin. But every once in a while, especially in the 1980s, when country music was trying to capitalize on the MTV craze, country musicians offered a couple of videos that were funny enough to make me laugh at least twice before I started losing interest. When it came to country comedy videos, few were as successful as those of Moe Bandy and Joe Stampley. A lot of people remember “Moe and Joe,” as they were commonly known, for their videos. But both had successful solo careers before joining to record seven albums, and they continued with their solo efforts during and after the collaborations. As a duo, the two singers built an image based on their first single release, the No. 1 hit, “Just Good Ol’ Boys.” It seemed the image struck a chord with country music fans who have always so closely identified with the artists and songs they sing. Moe Bandy was born in Meridian, Mississippi, but was transplanted to San Antonio at age 6. The move fueled Moe’s interest in honky-tonk music, as well as a calling to rodeo for both Moe and his brother, Mike. As teens, both competed in rodeos across Texas, but their careers eventually diverged. Mike went on to be the professional rodeo star, while Moe pursued his musical career. Contrary to popular belief inspired by Moe Bandy’s signature song, “Bandy the Rodeo Clown,” he never performed as a clown (or bullfighter, as they are now known). After taking his first shot at a music career in 1962, it would be 12 years before Bandy’s efforts paid off. His first charting single, “I Just Started Hating Cheating Songs Today,” became the prototype for Bandy’s early career. He became the stereotypical country musician whose discography consisted almost exclusively of “cheatin’ and drinkin’” songs. He topped off the first phase of his career in 1979 when he and Janie Fricke teamed up for the No. 2 hit, “It’s a Cheatin’ Situation,” a duet that took home Song of the Year honors from the Academy of Country Music. Throughout his career, Bandy has recorded 40 solo albums and released 14 Top 10 singles. Joe Stampley, also a native of the Deep South, was raised in Northwest Louisiana. Born just a year before his future singing partner, Stampley began his musical career much differently than Bandy. He started with a rock band, The Uniques. The band recorded just four albums and released two moderately successful singles between 1965 and 1970. When his rock career fizzled, Stampley followed the path of many other southern rock musicians: He went country. Beginning in 1971, Stampley began a country career during which he quietly turned out 22 albums and 14 Top 10 solo hits, perhaps the most popular being the trucking song, “Roll On, Big Mama.” But when the ’80s arrived, Stampley’s solo career took a back seat to the success of the Moe Bandy and Joe Stampley duo. The “good ol’ boys’” reputation came to a head in 1984 when the duo recorded — and, more notably, made a video — of a parody song, “Where’s the Dress.” In early 1984, the most popular song in the world was “Karma Chameleon,” performed by the British band Culture Club and its prominent leader Boy George. The song appeared, most often in the No. 1 spot, on charts worldwide. Whether it was the flamboyant Boy George, the catchy tune or the music video accompanying the song, “Karma Chameleon” appealed to music fans of all sorts. The music video accompanying “Karma Chameleon,” ironically set in Moe Bandy’s native Mississippi, colorfully depicted everything that Moe, Joe and most “good ol’ boys” were not. So, inspired by a song written by Stampley’s son, Moe and Joe decided to parody the worldwide hit (and hoped to make a heap of money in the process). “Where’s the Dress” became Moe and Joe’s answer to Boy George. Before examining “Where’s the Dress,” it should be noted that 1984 was much different than 2021. Frankly, it’s doubtful the song would be written today, much less released in video form. In today’s world, one of Joe Stampley’s early lines wouldn’t even pass the smell test: “It was a man dressed like a woman, and he had a boy’s name.” If one applies 2021 standards to 1984, the entire “Where’s the Dress” episode ranks high on the list of offensive moments in country music history. In any event, before passing judgment, I suggest you first watch the “Karma Chameleon” video; then follow up with “Where’s the Dress.” This is a case where the visuals provided by the videos are needed to grasp the point Moe and Joe tried to make. Moe and Joe pose as truck drivers in the video, roles they take in several of the duo’s songs. The two lament the fame and riches of Boy George and their belief that he’s making it big by, essentially, “cross-dressing.” But the gist of “Where’s the Dress” is likely best described by music journalist Nick Murray in the Feb. 1, 2018, issue of Rolling Stone Magazine: “Stranger … even, was the duo’s song “Where’s the Dress,” a Boy George-inspired novelty hit in which Moe and Joe decide to dress in drag — become “country queens” — in a bid to revitalize their careers. The plan goes awry when they enjoy gender-bending so much that it instead puts their careers in jeopardy, and the music video ends with the conservative Roy Acuff using the bow of his fiddle to beat the mascara-wearing singers off the Opry stage. (In ‘Lucky Me,’ [Moe Bandy’s autobiography], Moe credits this episode mostly to Joe.)” It’s hard to say if “Where’s the Dress” hurt Moe and Joe as a duo. They did release three more songs from the same album, but none became hits. “Where’s the Dress” would be their last hit together before the duo stopped recording, noting their solo careers suffered. But in a 1984 interview, Joe Stampley was defensive in saying, “(‘Where’s the Dress’) wasn’t done as a put-down to Boy George. It’s a novelty song that wonders whether two country bumpkins could (dress that way) in a honky-tonk.” He added that Boy George “is a talent … genius … and sharp.” So, the entire “Where’s the Dress” episode was short-lived and didn’t cause a rift in music like it might today. At least not a major rift. Boy George and his manager did file suit against Bandy and Stampley for copyright infringement. The suit didn’t seek damages for using the likeness of Boy George or Culture Club, but for using the same guitar rift and harmonica lick written into “Karma Chameleon.” Bandy later said, “That little mess-up cost us $50,000.” Until next time, let me remind you: When you listen to classic country music, you need to go back in time and apply the standards of the day to your criticism, not today’s standards. After all, what could anyone expect from Moe and Joe? Neither of the two was a copyright lawyer. Moe and Joe were “just good ol’ boys.”

Is ‘hate’ speech protected by the First Amendment?

Those of you that read my columns may remember that I recently wrote on free speech and social media. As I mentioned then, I am a BIG free speech guy and feel strongly that no idea should be free from scrutiny, criticism or mockery. As I also said then, an unexamined thought or belief is not worth having. Since I wrote that column, I have received a few comments and questions about “hate” speech. I think we can all agree that you don’t have to look too far to find examples that would qualify as hate speech. Recent demonstrations by white supremacists are a good place to start. So, the question becomes, “Is hate speech protected by the First Amendment?” Well, I am glad you asked. Back in 2017, Ted Wheeler, the mayor of Portland, Oregon, said, “Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment.” This comment was made after two men were killed after they confronted another individual who was using anti-Muslim slurs. Also in 2017, former Democratic National Chair Howard Dean, when referring to comments made by Ann Coulter said, “Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment.” Well, they were both wrong. The U.S. Supreme Court has clearly stated that governments may not restrict speech expressing ideas that offend. A recent case addressing this matter is Matal v. Tam. In this case, Simon Tam, the founder and bass player for the Asian-American rock band The Slants sought to trademark the band name in an attempt to reclaim and take ownership of the derogatory term. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the mark and found it disparaging to people of Asian descent. In support of this position, the USPTO found that the mark violated the Lanham Act’s provision against registration of disparaging trademarks. Of course, Tam decided to appeal to the Federal Circuit. On appeal, the Federal Circuit found the disparaging provision of the Lanham Act to be unconstitutional. This did not sit well with the USPTO, which appealed the decision to the Supreme Court. The issue is whether the disparaging provision of the Lanham Act violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that the disparagement clause violates the First Amendments Free Speech Clause. In the opinion, Justice Alito wrote: “Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability or any other similar grounds is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express the ‘thought we hate.’” This, my friends, is the basis of free speech. In a world where we can watch television shows, read newspapers and magazines, and listen to radio programs that only serve to support our already existing beliefs, it is easy to be in favor of free speech — when that speech echoes our own beliefs. But what becomes a challenge is remaining in favor of free speech when that speech goes against everything we stand for. Now, I am not a movie critic, but maybe 20 years ago I watched the movie “The American President” starring Michael Douglas. The move had a bit of a Hollywood liberal take (and I like my movies politically neutral). However, in the movie, Michael Douglas is giving a speech, and he says: “America isn’t easy. America is advanced citizenship. You’ve gotta want it bad, ’cause it’s gonna put up a fight. It’s gonna say, ‘You want free speech? Let’s see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who’s standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.’ You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the symbol of your country cannot just be a flag. The symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. Then you can stand up and sing about the land of the free.” Say what you will about the movie but that quote pretty much sums up the good and the bad about free speech. While I may not agree with anything you say — or your decision to burn the flag or do other things I may find reprehensible — I will defend to the death your right to do so.  

Red, white and blue gives meaning to Old Glory, faith

Well, here we are getting ready to celebrate the Fourth of July! What are your plans? Have a barbecue with family? Go to the pool and swim? Or just relax and watch the fireworks? Do you fly Old Glory, our flag, to show you are free and can enjoy this time? No matter what you choose to do, remember that the Fourth of July is a day to remember those who fought for our freedom. It’s the birthday of our country and the anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. Sometimes we forget all that has transpired over the years that make our nation “the land of the free and the home of the brave.” If you served in the armed forces, no matter what branch, you understand just how much this day means to Americans. We can travel freely from coast to coast and not need to show identification to go from one state to another. We have freedom of speech and can show how we feel by protesting without being arrested. (Rioting is not a way to express how we feel; that’s chaos.) We as Americans have a legacy that is deeply rooted in all we say and do. We fly our flag with pride. We sing songs that reflect our freedom. We take pride in all we do to show our spirit of freedom. Now, let’s pause for a moment to reflect on these same principles, but in terms of our relationship with Jesus. Imagine we are trees, deeply rooted in the ground. Then, along comes trouble, and slowly the ground starts to slip away from under us. We watch the sands of time slowly eroding the very earth from beneath us. Eventually there is no more dirt beneath the tree — but our roots are still deep in that earth, holding us steady. Well, that’s how I see our relationship with Christ. When storms wash up against us, we still stand tall and mighty because we are firmly planted in the word of God. Our nation has been through many wars, but we, as Americans, are still planted firmly in its roots of freedom. So it is with our relationship with Christ. It doesn’t matter what Satan throws at us. If we are firmly planted in the word of Christ, then nothing will erode us from him. We fly Old Glory, so why not fly the Christian flag as well? The stars and stripes of the U.S. flag are red, white and blue. The flag of Christ is also red, white and blue — a white background with a blue square in the upper left corner, and in that blue square, a red cross. The red symbolizes Christ’s blood, shed for us to give us freedom from sin. Soldiers have, and continue to, shed their blood to preserve our nation’s freedom. The white background of the Christian flag represents our freedom from sin and our salvation. What greater freedom can we have than that? The white stripes on the American flag could be seen as the bandages of our soldiers, showing that they have suffered and even died so we can enjoy our barbecue with the family. Do you see how the white reflects both Christ’s love for us as well as a soldier’s love for our country? Then we have the blue. This shows we are heirs to the kingdom of heaven. We are officially “blue bloods” in the family of Christ, and this can’t be taken away from us. Once we accepted Christ into our lives, we inherited this privilege. Likewise, the blue on the American flag represents our heritage here in the land of the free. No one can take our American heritage from us. It doesn’t matter if you were born here or became a citizen through naturalization. We are all citizens of the USA. We, as Christians, are “naturalized” through baptism and are now heirs to the kingdom of God. We are blue bloods in God’s kingdom! Lord, help us to keep growing our roots deep in your word, your truth and your love. Let us say our Pledge of Allegiance with pride this Fourth of July, and know we are free — free here in America and free in God’s kingdom. Fly both flags, and be proud to be an American and proud to be a Christian. God bless the USA, and let the USA bless God for all we have. Enjoy your time this Fourth of July and celebrate all your freedoms both from tyranny and sin. Happy Independence Day! Best of the roads and all gears forward in Jesus, Rev. Marilou Coins

“Too country” of a singer leaves a legacy for all — including truck drivers

Randy Travis’ dream of becoming a country music star didn’t come easy. The young man who, in 1980, sent demo tapes to every record label in Nashville met rejection at every turn. On Music Row, where the dreams of so many performers — those falling into the “classic country” genre today — came true, producers deemed Randy Travis as “too country” for audiences’ tastes. The orchestrated “Nashville Sound” experiment promoted songs featuring strings, background singers, glitter and outright abandonment of country music’s famed Nudie Suits. A country boy from North Carolina didn’t stand a chance in a genre built by other country boys and girls armed with only their voices and a guitar. Travis was a troubled youngster who had several run-ins with the law. His infractions — while minor — painted the portrait of a habitual offender. Between his appearances in court, Travis worked as a cook in a Charlotte, North Carolina, nightclub. Its owner, Elizabeth Hatcher, placed the young singer on stage as a teenager. Eventually, a judge released Travis from yet another criminal charge but placed him under the guardianship of Hatcher. It was a match made in heaven. With a woman with funding to back up the effort, Travis moved to Nashville. With Hatcher’s promotional work, he recorded a few songs beginning in 1978, but none met with even moderate success. Five years later, Hatcher secured a record deal for Travis with Warner Brothers. While his first single, “On the Other Hand,” barely charted, his follow-up release, “1982,” reached the Top 10 on country charts. With some name recognition and a bona fide hit under his belt, Warner Brothers took a chance and re-released “On the Other Hand” a year later. The song shot to No. 1 and became one of several signature songs Randy Travis released during his career. Over the next 15 years, Travis released 20 albums and 50 singles, 16 of which rose to No. 1 on the country charts. His list of awards is impressive. At the height of his career, Travis won Grammys and country music awards in most categories. Eventually, he was enshrined in the Country Music Hall of Fame. For a performer like Randy Travis — one who seemed to appear out of nowhere and then remained atop the charts for 15 years — country music historians have difficulty agreeing on a signature song. “On the Other Hand” ranks high on the list, as do chart-toppers like “Diggin’ Up Bones,” “Deeper than the Holler” and perhaps his most recognized hit, 1987’s “Forever and Ever, Amen.” Travis even dropped a couple of trucking songs into his discography, with little fanfare. None became singles, nor are they recognized by many who aren’t hard-core Randy Travis fans, or at least fans who scour the backs of CDs looking for trucking music. One such song, “Highway Junkie” found a spot on Travis’ 1996 album — his last album for Warner Brothers — fittingly titled “Full Circle.” A listen to “Highway Junkie” reveals it to be THE trucker’s trucking song. Topics covered include everything from vices, the pressures of landing on schedule, the lonesome road, lost love and even “Smokies,” referred to as “State Boys” by Travis. He wastes no time getting to the heart of the matter as he describes his run as bolstered by “100 cups of coffee, 500 hundred cigarettes, 1,000 miles of highway, and I ain’t forgot her yet.” It’s “forgetting her” that, like so many trucking songs, becomes the focus of “Highway Junkie,” a theme Travis emphasizes as universal to the truck-driving profession with the short line, “A trucker’s heart gets broke.” Even his run-in with the “State Boy” near Nashville is met without a concern for driving over 100 mph. Travis’ response to the trooper’s question, “Where’s the fire son?” does nothing but bring up more thoughts of lost love: I said, “Man there ain’t no fire I’m just runnin’ from a flame So go on and write your ticket, man But I ain’t the one to blame.” A couple hundred miles west of Nashville, Travis inserts two of stanzas paying homage to his musical influences, both kings of country and rockabilly music who will always hold a special place in most truck drivers’ hearts. So, I rolled on down to Memphis, I had nothin’ left to lose, Wanted to hear some rock ’n’ roll, But all they played was blues, I didn’t wanna hear no blues.   So, I went to call up Elvis, But Roger Miller grabbed the phone, He said drive that 18-wheeler boy, You’re the king of the road, Said I was the king of the road. Nothing in “Highway Junkie” is original; in fact, most of the lyrics are little more than a rehash of other songs with similar themes, with minor twists on phrases describing Travis’ journey across Tennessee. What sets “Highway Junkie” apart from other heartbroken trucker songs is the chorus. Travis introduces a unique metaphor — to my knowledge an original — when he sings two lines, followed by a closing line that’s a takeoff from many trucking and road songs, and even a rodeo song or two: But, them big wheels of rubber, Gonna rub her off my mind, Well, I’m a highway junkie And I need that old white line. After recording “Full Circle,” in the twilight of his country music career, Randy Travis released two more albums, but for a new label. The pair offered just three combined Top 10 singles. The results were a far cry from Travis’ heyday when 25 of 31 singles reached the top 10, with 22 peaking at No. 3 or higher on the country charts. The remainder of Randy Travis’ career is well documented, filled with legal troubles, a divorce, a crossover to Christian music and a debilitating stroke. It was almost as if Travis’ youthful transgressions had returned to mar his successful career. Travis was never a force in the country subgenre of trucking music, but he did leave a couple of songs as a legacy. After all, with a career filled with songs that appealed to most listeners, it only fits that Travis offered truck drivers a little something to remember him. But history will remember Randy Travis as one of a handful of traditional singers who saved country music from the “Nashville Sound.” Until next time, remember when you’re driving a back road somewhere in America, “Deeper than the Holler” is a winding strip of highway — a steep grade down and another steep grade out.

Telematics, predictive monitoring can apply to health, too

Telematics, analytics, predictive monitoring — I’m sure these are all familiar terms to drivers today in the new technology-driven world of transportation. The tech industry is constantly introducing new technology and all the solutions they are covering from production to delivery. So, you ask, what prompted me to write about telematics versus driver health? Well, I read an article in Work Truck magazine June 9 about the “Top 14 benefits of telematics beyond tracking.” As I read the article, I was somewhat amused at how they made references to the use of telematics and how it helps manage the “health” of the truck and proper preventive maintenance. One line in the article stuck with me: “Engine data collected by a telematics device helps identify issues we can’t see with our eyes.” This states that this new technology can streamline maintenance, allowing drivers and companies to cut costs when dealing with repair on the road. I could easily address each one of the 14 telematics benefits from the article and make a direct correlation to drivers’ health and well-being. Of course, I can’t address all 14 points in this column, but I will hit some of the highlights. One important point is “vehicle health.” I realize we need to be conscious of the health of the truck, but it seems to me that the driver’s health is just as important. After all, you are manning the controls. Making sure healthy solutions are available to drivers and coaching would be a good start. Another is the collection of “engine data.” What about providing an easy way for drivers to take a peek under their personal “hood” to see how their “engine” is performing? One solution is to set up on-site screenings for drivers while they are at the terminals, along with health education. “Smart camera integrations” is noted in the article as offering the ability to prove a driver was practicing good defensive driving skills, and then rewarding that driver. What if the carriers rewarded drivers for receiving a long-term DOT medical card, saving the carrier on the cost of hiring and training a new driver? There is no doubt that technology has its advantages, but I believe we could use technology in driver health to keep our skilled drivers healthy and working. As I mentioned, I could go on to point out correlations with the remaining 11 points, except for time and space limits. Until next time, make sure both your truck and your personal health are in good working order.

There are multiple methods for interpreting the US Constitution

Throughout the course of these columns, I have discussed the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights (amendments 1-10) and the additional amendments. Ever since I memorized the Preamble to the Constitution (big shout-out here to Saturday mornings and the “Schoolhouse Rock” preamble song!), the document has always fascinated me. I mean, the U.S. Constitution, including the signatures, only contains 4,543 words and is only four pages long. It is the shortest written constitution of any major government in the world. Yet the Constitution, and all the amendments, have shaped our democracy and influence every aspect of our society. How can you not be fascinated by this? However, as amazing as the Constitution is, it is still over 200 years old, and we are often faced with the question of how to interpret the words that were written so long ago. Well, that my friends, is why we are here today. There are several different “methods” of interpretation. I get that most people don’t really care about the different methods of interpretations of the Constitution, or maybe they have just not given it much thought. However, judges care — tremendously. And the “school of thought” to which judges subscribe can greatly impact their decisions, which can impact your rights. With that in mind, I’d like to mention a few methods of Constitutional interpretation. Of course, I am only going to hit the highlights, so hold off on the hateful emails. The first method is called textualism. Textualism focuses on the plain meaning of a text, in this case, the Constitution. Textualists believe there is an objective meaning to the text and generally do not inquire about the intent of the writer. Those that subscribe to this theory believe the courts should simply stick to the Constitution. Considering anything other than the plain meaning of the text is judicial activism. Of course, as with any method of interpretation, this could lead to “different” results. As an illustration, in a dissent, former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia noted that the language of a statute increased the penalty involved in a drug trafficking crime. However, in the facts of the case, the defendant was trading an unloaded gun for cocaine. The majority took a textualist view and held that since a gun was involved, the enhanced penalty was in play. Justice Scalia disagreed and said that “uses a gun” as contained in the statute means that the gun needs to be used for what a gun is normally used for — as a weapon. The second method of interpretation is called originalism, or original meaning. While textualism focuses solely on the text, originalism considers the meaning of the Constitution as understood by some segment of the population the time of ratification. However, originalists generally agree that the Constitution’s text has an identifiable meaning at the time of ratification, and it is the task of judges to construct this original meaning. The Scalia illustration I mentioned before is an example of originalism, even though it is applied to a statute and not the constitution. The third method of interpretation is judicial precedent. This is the most commonly cited source of determining constitutional meaning. Judicial precedent provides guidance on future cases based on prior decisions made with similar facts. While the courts rely on judicial precedent, they also have a lot of latitude on whether they interpret prior decisions broadly or narrowly. Another method of interpretation is pragmatism. In contrast with textualists and originalists, pragmatists focus on the likely consequences of a particular interpretation. In other words, pragmatism considers the future costs and benefits of a particular interpretation to society or other branches of government. An example of a pragmatist approach is The United States v. Leon. In this case, the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require a court to exclude evidence obtained as a result of law enforcement’s good faith reliance on an improperly issued search warrant. In support of its decision, the Court noted that the adoption of a broader exclusionary rule would undermine the ability of the criminal justice system to obtain convictions of guilty defendants. Of course, there are additional methods of interpretation. These include moral reasoning, structuralism, national identity and historical practices. Because I am lazy — and also don’t have enough space — I will save the discussion of these methods for another time. Until then, think about how you believe the Constitution should be interpreted, and which method you think is best. Worst-case scenario: You will have something to think about late at night. Best-case scenario: You can now use the phrase, “You know, when it comes to constitutional interpretation, I am a (insert preferred method here).” If you are like me, it will make you sound smarter than you really are — which is never a bad thing.

The District of Columbia could become 51st state — but will it?

Everyone who reads my articles — all two of you — have probably figured out that I enjoy writing about, thinking about and arguing about what the federal government can and can’t do. Some of the things Congress proposes are so blatantly unconstitutional that you know it will never happen. But it is cute when they try. A recent subject many people find fascinating (well, me and maybe three others, but this is my column, so I’m going to write about it) is the prospect of the District of Columbia (DC) becoming a state. Of course, this is a highly political issue because if it occurs the State of DC would get a couple of senators and additional representatives. On the surface this does not seem like a big deal; however, DC has always seemed to lean in the direction of the Democratic party. As you can imagine, the Democrats do not think this is a big deal. The Republicans disagree. For what it is worth, there has been a push for DC statehood in some form since around 1991. However, with the Democrats currently in control of Congress and the White House, now may be the best chance for DC statehood. For me, the interesting part is the mechanics of how this could happen. At a hearing in the House of Representatives March 22, the American Civil Liberties Union, more commonly known as the ACLU, filed testimony that Congress, with presidential approval, could establish DC as the 51st state. At the same time, The Heritage Foundation took a different approach and said that a constitutional amendment would be required for DC to become a state. As background, Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution (the “Admissions Clause”) grants Congress the power to create a new state — with some limitations of course. For example, this section states that a new state cannot be formed within the jurisdiction of another without the consent of the legislature of both the state AND Congress. Historically, Congress has created new states based on majority vote and presidential approval. However, DC is unique in that it is specifically addresses the Constitution. As you may remember from your civics class, DC was created as a federal enclave to serve as the seat of the government and was carved out of the states of Maryland and Virginia. The Constitution also gave Congress authority over the new territory. In 1961, the 23rd Amendment was ratified, giving DC three electoral votes for president. In 1970 Congress approved a nonvoting DC delegate in the House, meaning the residents who live in DC and pay federal taxes still have no voting representation in Congress. On April 22 of this year, the House approved DC statehood legislation that would carve out a small enclave of federal buildings, including the White House, to serve as the seat of the federal government. President Joe Biden supports the bill. A similar bill died in the Senate last year, but with Democrats controlling Congress and the White House, the chances of passage are somewhat better. Interestingly, this would basically give whichever party holds the White House a three electoral vote head start. Opponents of the bill claim several constitutional problems exist. First and foremost, there’s the 23rd Amendment. Opponents claim that for DC to become a state, this amendment would have to be repealed prior or simultaneously with DC becoming a state. In its current form, the bill simply provides for expedited consideration of joint resolution appealing the amendment. Repealing an amendment would require ratification by 38 states. Since 30 states are currently led by Republicans this seems unlikely. Quite simply, whether Congress can create a state from DC raises several novel constitutional questions. And, as you can imagine, there is little case law on this subject. Of course, these questions would ultimately fall to the U.S. Supreme Court, leaving the justices to sift through all the constitutional issues and determine whether Congress and the president could carve a new state out of DC or if statehood would require the repeal of the 23rd Amendment. See … I told you there are only about three of us who find this interesting.

Don’t use latest extension of CDL licensing waiver as excuse to postpone medical certification

In the March 15, 2021, issue of The Trucker, I reminded drivers across the U.S. that a waiver on medical certifications and recertifications, issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) would expire May 31. In that column, I also urged drivers to go ahead and schedule an appointment with a registered DOT physician to make sure everything was in order well in advance of the waiver’s expiration. Just in case anyone needs a refresher on the situation: In March of 2020, because of the national shutdown caused by COVID-19, the FMCSA approved a waiver on medical certifications and re-certifications for holders of CDLs. According to the FMCSA, the COVID-19 public health emergency had caused many states offices to close and/or reduce hours of operation of their state driver licensing agencies in response to safety protocols set by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The shutdown also resulted in medical clinics and DOT examiners either temporarily closing or offering limited hours of operation, making it difficult for drivers to obtain medical certifications. FMCSA’s waiver allowed drivers to continue to operate without stoppage of freight and essential goods and products. As of June 1, the waiver has once again been extended, this time through Aug. 31, 2021, giving drivers who didn’t heed my advice back in March just a little more time — but don’t use this latest extension as an excuse to postpone that dreaded DOT certification yet again. “Why not?” you ask. Think of it in terms of a bottleneck. Just as drivers face traffic bottlenecks every day on the highway, you can expect bottlenecks (in other words, long lines) when making appointments to see a registered DOT physician between now and Aug. 31. I’m urging drivers to get ahead of the line and not wait to make that appointment. The first step, however, is to take a peek under your personal “hood” and see where your health levels are before you visit your DOT doctor. There are thousands of self-administrated health-check stations at pharmacies and grocery stores across the U.S., where you can check your blood pressure, weight, BMI (body mass index) and heart rate. While you are at one of those places, also pick-up a do-it-yourself glucose-monitoring kit with a meter and check your blood-sugar levels My experience has taught me that, depending on the individual’s conditions and levels that need to be corrected, most positive changes can happen over a 90-day period, getting you in a good position to pass and possibly upgrade your card term. They are even companies that can help you making simple changes that can equal positive results. Getting your body in shape for medical certification — and keeping it that way — can be as easy as cutting back on high-sugar drinks and high-sodium foods, drinking more water, or starting a walking and/or fitness program. I don’t know the right thing to do for everyone, but I do know the wrong thing, is to do nothing at all. You don’t drive your rig down the road at night with your lights out; manage your health the same way. In this case, look ahead regarding your health to put yourself at the “front of the line” when it’s time to re-cert. Here are some resources that can help you with your journey: Higi (www.higi.com); Pursuant Health (www.pursuanthealth.com); and — of course — Fit to Pass (www.fittopass.com).

What color truck is your time machine?

If you’ve ever sat behind a steering wheel, you have one — that one particular vehicle from your past that you wish you could drive once again. If you’re a trucker, it might be your first truck, some cabover from the ’70s, or one that had a little quirk or rap in the engine that drove everyone except you crazy. If you’re like me (not a trucker), there’s some vehicle you’ve owned, driven and finally retired after it left you stranded one too many times. On the other hand, it might have been one you sold too soon, leaving you with only dreams of the memories that might have been made. Years, or even decades, have passed. You now know how much you miss that old drive that cost far too much money, time and frustration to keep on the road. If you’re lucky, something reminds you of it on occasion. If you’re really lucky, your old ride became a hit country song. That’s where I sit. I once had a car, and I swear a country songwriter wrote about that car in lyrics directed at me. To admit it is kind of embarrassing. The year? 1984. The car? A 1976 bright yellow Ford Pinto wagon. It was the first car I ever bought entirely with my own money — $500 earned the previous summer by performing maintenance for a Little League ballfield. I didn’t own the car long, but to say the least, the old girl was memorable. Anyone with a little bit of insight into the automobiles of the ’70s knows the story of the Ford Pinto. The car sold dirt cheap when brand new, made possible by the fact Ford only invested about 2% of the selling price in the parts that held it together. As far as engineering went, there was none. The Pinto had a knack for exploding when hit from behind. Fortunately, the ’76 Pinto wagon was not a model with a disposition to explode — or maybe I just never got hit from behind. But I take solace in the fact I didn’t drive an orange AMC Gremlin like a friend did. No one had a hit song about an orange Gremlin. “My Old Yellow Car” was a No. 9 country song for the former soft rock turned country artist Dan Seals. The song debuted in February 1985, just about the time I parted ways with my “yellow submarine,” as it became known around town. As far as the song goes, change the color to fit your own vehicle, and the lyrics are universally appreciated. Of course, I was special. Dan Seals, after all, sang specifically about my yellow car. She weren’t much to look at. She weren’t much to ride. She was missing a window on her passenger side. Her floorboard was patched up with paper and tar, But I really was something in my old yellow car. Well, my old yellow car wasn’t missing a window; in fact, the passenger window wouldn’t move up or down. Its floor was patched up with paper and tar — to the point it failed inspection, and my dad had to get a sticker from a friend who owned a garage. That sticker, obtained illegally (the statute of limitations has long passed, I assume), somehow allowed me to drive a deadly hunk of steel unfit for the road. Dad must have recalled his own rides from the ’50s and figured the Pinto couldn’t be any more dangerous than his jalopies. Of course, most of those didn’t have a reputation for exploding. In his song, Seals goes on to chronicle his experiences in his old yellow car — the type of experiences any young guy who’s somehow become old remembers well. Perhaps the lyric giving the song universal appeal is when Seals fondly recalls, “There was no road too winding and nowhere too far, with two bucks of gas and my old yellow car.” My personal old yellow car had its set of issues, and they were probably a bit more serious than the one Seals drove. The Pinto held no fluids other than gasoline. Ford’s engineers designed the vehicle so all of the liquids needed to make it run smoothly traveled through a bundle of cardboard tubes in front of the fire wall. As miles passed, the tubes rubbed holes in each other. A lack of brake fluid left me skillfully using the parking brake to stop. When it was time to get moving, the car did so without the aid of transmission fluid. I just put the pedal to the metal and waited. Gears eventually caught, and off I went. When I managed to get up to speed, I always wondered why everyone passed me so quickly. I finally realized the speedometer registered 12 miles higher than my actual speed. I didn’t move on to another car in just a year later, in 1985, because the Pinto had trouble stopping and going. Rather, I took note that the yellow submarine left an oil slick that rivaled the one the Exxon Valdez would create a few years later. To be precise, both the front and rear engine seals of the car had disintegrated. The poor car wasn’t holding a drop of oil. On last check, it leaked a quart a day. Those ballfield maintenance dollars allowing me to buy the car weren’t enough for the “fill up the oil and check the gas” approach the Pinto demanded. Some poor soul took the Pinto off my hands for the same thing I paid for it — $500. Last I knew, it sat in his front yard sporting a flowerpot for a hood ornament. But, hey, I broke even. Or maybe I lost more than I expected. After “My Old Yellow Car” fell from the charts, I didn’t hear the song on the radio for years. Then, in 2003, I bought a shiny new Nissan Frontier pickup truck I’d been eyeing — yellow in color. And I swear on Dad’s grave that on the drive home, “My Old Yellow Car” came across the airwaves! You can bet that Nissan went down many winding roads far from home. Until next time, when you think about a car — or that pretty Mack, Kenworth or Peterbilt — you drove into the ground in your distant past, consider the chorus of “My Old Yellow Car.” I bet you’ll shed a tear: Somewhere in a pile of rubber and steel, There’s a rusty old shell of an automobile, And if engines could run on desire alone… That old yellow car would be driving me home.

Plenty of precedents have led to current deadly force by a police officer standards

When I write these articles, I normally try to stay away from the “hot topic” of the day.  That’s mainly because by the time the article is published it is no longer the hot topic and everyone is sick of hearing about it. Well, with that being said, I am going to break my own rule and discuss a hot topic.  Why the change of heart you may ask? The answer is easy: This topic has been an issue for years and does not appear to be going away. What is the subject?  The standard for the use of deadly force by the police. There, I said it. Now, nobody can deny that this is an issue that is at the forefront of our culture. Regardless of your political views, I think folks need to understand the legal standard that needs to be met to justify the use of deadly force. You can’t really have a civil discussion if no one understands the standard. Now, before you start sending me hate mail or making up your mind about me, please understand that this is not a political piece, and I do not have the time or space in this article to do a deep dive into the subject. This is simply a review so that we can all possibly find some common ground on which to talk. It is not necessary for me to list all the highly publicized cases where police have fatally shot an unarmed person. What everyone needs to understand is that the facts and circumstances of each of these cases are unique, and officials, judges and juries must take all that into consideration. However, for more than 50 years, the U.S. Supreme Court has been consistent in the standard that should be applied to determine under what circumstances police shootings are legal. The first case to begin the issue was Terry v. Ohio. In this case, the Supreme Court provided grounds for police officers to “stop and frisk” without probable cause if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person committed, is in the process of committing or is about to commit a crime and have a reasonable belief that the person “may be armed and dangerous.” In the 1980s, two Supreme Court cases elaborated on what is “reasonable” and began to expand the framework for when the use of deadly force is allowed. The first case was Tennessee v. Garner.  In 1985 the Supreme Court struck down a Tennessee statute that allowed the police to “use all the necessary means to effect the arrest” of a person the police thought was fleeing or resisting.  Specifically, the facts of this case involved a Memphis police officer who shot and killed a teenager in the backyard of a house the officer suspected had been burglarized, even though the officer was “reasonably sure” that the suspect was unarmed. In a 6-3 decision, Justice Byron White wrote, “The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable.” In 1989 the court again looked at the issue of deadly force by the police.  In Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court found that the use of excessive force “requires careful attention to the facts and circumstances of each particular case, including the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officer or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.” In a 9-0 decision the court held that the “reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, and its calculus must embody an allowance for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second decisions about the amount of force necessary in a particular situation.” In other words, what would a reasonable police officer on the scene have done? In 2018, the Supreme Court gave a little more direction to the lower courts in an unsigned opinion. In Kisela v. Hughes a Tucson police officer shot a suspect (Hughes) within a minute of arriving at the scene.  Hughes had been reported to 911 as hacking a tree with a knife and acting erratically. When Kisela fired, Hughes was holding a large knife and had taken steps toward another woman (her roommate) and had ignored multiple instructions to drop the knife. Hughes’s injuries were not life-threatening and other officers on the scene said they believed Hughes was a threat to her roommate. Hughes sued Kisela, alleging that Kisela exercised excessive force, 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the officer and stated that Kisela was entitled to qualified immunity even though the officers were in no apparent danger.  While the 9th Circuit had found that Kisela violated Hughes Fourth Amendment rights (unreasonable searches and seizures) the Supreme Court disagreed and said a “reasonable officer” is not required to know that shooting the suspect would violate their Fourth Amendment rights. So, to drastically oversimplify the above cases, the police can use deadly force if a reasonable officer at the scene believes that the person is a threat to the officer or others. Now, if someone would just introduce me to that reasonable person.

Events along I-40 serve as long-delayed vindication, create a new trucking song

Pardon me for this column, in which I connect recent events and personal experience that have combined to turn a six-decade-old rockabilly/blues hit into — temporarily at least — a trucking song. A couple of weeks back, the Rutherford side of my family gathered in Roxton, Texas (yes, it is on the map). It was the first time my mom, my wife Karen and I, and all of the offspring with their spouses — and, course, our two young grandchildren — had gathered since the onset of COVID-19. The celebration was joyous, but as is usually the case, I couldn’t escape thoughts of writing — specifically, finding a topic and writing the words you are now reading. To borrow a phrase from the Willie who needs no last name, writing is “Always on My Mind.” As crunch time grew near, I began to ruminate, or brood, on the writing issue. I have always been a ruminator and a brooder, and one who obsesses over insignificant (if not virtually impossible) thoughts that are unwelcome in my mind. As I sat brooding, the topic of the “crack” in the steel of the Hernando de Soto Bridge over the Mississippi River at Memphis, Tennessee, came up in conversation. It just so happens that the Hernando de Soto bridge and I have a long-standing love-hate relationship. The bridge opened along Interstate 40 in 1973, when I was at the impressionable age of seven. My family made an annual trek for the summer from Maine to Texas and back — sometimes twice annually — so I expected to be crossing the nearly 2-mile long engineering masterpiece two to four times a year. Prior to that, of course, we crossed the river using the Memphis & Arkansas Bridge. A couple of miles south of the I-40 bridge, even when the Memphis & Arkansas was less than a quarter-century old, it was already showing too many signs of rust to suit me. Between 1966 and 1973, likely as a result of my older brother’s intentional effort to force a young lad to brood long before his time, I had become quite fearful of bridge crossings — specifically the one over the Mississippi River. The opening of the new bridge in 1973, one would think, should have alleviated my fear. But the trade-off between a 1-mile-long bridge that showed a bit of rust and a 2-mile-long, state-of-the-art bridge, I thought, was pretty much a wash. I continued brooding. Every trip, I made plans to be asleep when it came time to cross from Tennessee into Arkansas or vice versa. Those plans never came to fruition. Instead, I shook with fear and stayed alert in case muddy water suddenly surrounded our station wagon. I am not celebrating the newly discovered defect that shut the Hernando de Soto Bridge down for what, at the time of this writing, could be months. No universal good comes of something that will tie up traffic along what arguably (with the possible exception of the I-70 bridge at St. Louis) is the most important crossing for commercial and noncommercial traffic over the Mississippi River. The traffic jams alone will be disastrous. But I will admit, I used the event as proof to my mother that my childhood fears were not unreasonable. As one whose family’s reaction to a childhood fear was flippant, the danger now created by the crack in the bridge does serve one positive purpose — vindication. My brooding over a “virtually impossible” event wasn’t without merit after all. Unexpectedly, my mother recited a lyric from the old Chuck Barry and Elvis Presley song, “Memphis,” sometimes referred to as “Memphis, Tennessee.” She said, “just a half a mile from the Mississippi bridge.” Suddenly another crack formed — one in the dike that held my case of writer’s block together. While my mom recalls the Elvis Presley version of “Memphis,” I am more familiar with the Top 10 country cover of the song in 1981 by Fred Knobloch. Even among hard-core country music fans, Fred Knobloch is hardly a household name. Better known as a member of a rock band and a songwriter than a country artist, Knobloch released only one country album in his career, “Why Not Me?” (1980). The album itself wasn’t particularly memorable, but it did produce “Memphis” and another Top 10 song, “Killing Time,” a song Knobloch performed with Susan Anton. Regardless, considering that Fred Knobloch has written songs for the likes of George Strait, Sawyer Brown and John Anderson, he has dabbled in classic country — at least enough for this column. “Memphis” is the story of a man begging a telephone operator to put him in contact with a young lady named Marie who he knows lives in Memphis. The operator can’t provide much help even with the singer explaining that Marie lives “on the south side, high upon a ridge, just a half a mile from the Mississippi bridge.” As the song closes, we learn that Marie is not just any young lady; instead, she is the singer’s six-year-old daughter. “Memphis” never had any reason to be considered a trucking song. The only reference to anything related to trucking was the Mississippi bridge. But the song is an example of how circumstances can change the meaning of lyrics, even when those lyrics are over 60 years old. After all, with the traffic east- and westbound truckers will experience at Memphis until the Hernando de Soto Bridge is reopened, many will idle on I-55, just below that very ridge referred to in song by Chuck Barry, Elvis, Fred Knobloch and several others. So, as you sit in traffic, do me a favor and give a nod to the kid who was right some 45 years ago: No bridge is “unsinkable.” Until next time, be pleased when you find yourself “just a half a mile from the Mississippi Bridge.” Chances are, drivers sitting a few miles behind you wish for the moment when they can be where your truck is idling. Oh, and thanks, Mom.

Fitness competitions can be used as motivation

Hopefully, many of you have seen the Fit to Pass fitness competition ads and stories in previous editions of The Trucker. I’m hoping those ads motivated you to sign up and compete, which was my goal. Most of us can always use an incentive and or a reason to kick-start a workout program. What I like — and what I have experienced — is how effective a competition can be in kick-starting a personal fitness program. With our competitions, you don’t have to come up with a special exercise routine; plus, we supply you with the training manual to get prepared. All you have to do is show up and participate, and — depending on your fitness level and how hard you train — you can win big prizes. Prizes are always a nice reward for your hard work and dedication, but in the end everyone who participates is a winner, not to mention healthier. You may notice that the exercises in our competitions combine strength and cardio. Getting cardio training in as a driver can be a challenge on the road (unless you are a dedicated runner). When strength and cardio are incorporated simultaneously into routines, the combination is sometimes referred to as “concurrent training.” In a perfect world, you would have two separate workouts each day. You would do a weight-training workout and then a separate cardio workout. However, most people don’t have time to do two separate workouts each day — especially professional truck drivers. As a driver, concurrent training is a great way to maximize your time by combining strength and cardio. So, the next time you are struggling to start a routine or need an incentive, consider getting involved in a competition (maybe one you see advertised in The Trucker). Remember, it’s not about the exercise you SHOULD do — it’s about the exercise you WILL do. I hope you find it.

If employers help improve drivers’ health, it will pay off in the long term

How many drivers has the transportation industry lost recently? More than 150,000, according to some sources. Many left the industry due to medical conditions. If just 50% of those vacancies were caused by drivers leaving due to elevated blood pressure and sugar levels — and if companies could have helped 50% of THOSE drivers regain their health — that’s potentially 37,500 drivers who would have stayed in the transportation field. Is there a driver shortage? Or is there a shortage of vision, of a desire to do things differently? Based on the number of otherwise-qualified drivers who fell out of the industry for health problems, the industry’s methods must change when it comes to retaining drivers. It starts during the recruiting process. When I speak to driver recruits at wellness and driver-orientation events, all too often I see a lot of junk food being consumed. It seems like a small thing, but it sends a signal. Driver wellness education should be an enhancement to the recruiting package. During driver orientation, take the following steps: Take health readings, and consult on findings. Feed recruits better. Explain that the company will be demonstrating agility-testing procedures. Take new students to an area for agility demonstration. Go through the testing process, from the minute they walk in the room until it is complete. Demonstrate proper form. Give tips on what to expect and how to maximize results. Continued coaching and education after orientation can help drivers make health and wellness a long-term lifestyle change. Most drivers really appreciate it when someone takes the time to work with them. You can’t just load up on the front end; there must be follow-through to show your company cares about their health. Here are tools motor carriers can put in place: Create a wellness road map. After all, drivers are familiar with getting from Point A to Point B. Their health is the same. Provide them with a road map showing how you’re going to help them improve their fitness, diet, and overall health. Train the trainers. Get them together. They must be your first line of defense and ambassadors. When doing pre-trip safety checks, remind drivers to pack healthy, high-energy foods. Display wellness posters throughout your facility. Publish driver-wellness content in your company newsletter.

Take a fresh look at your Bible with modern-day comparisons

How many of you read your Bible daily? How many say it’s outdated and old-fashioned? How many say you can’t make it fit into today’s lifestyle? Many people say they don’t read the Bible because they can’t make it fit in with their daily lifestyle, so they just ignore it. Is that how you feel? Is that why you don’t read it? Well, let’s now take that “old-fashioned” Bible and make it come alive in our world today. How many of you watch the TV show “CSI”? Well, that premise came from the Bible. Cain killed Abel — there’s your first crime scene. God investigated the crime and questioned Cain about it. What about the show “Law and Order”? In the book of Exodus, Moses received the Ten Commandments — and gave the world guidelines for law and order. Then there’s “Wheel of Fortune” — now that’s a good one to look at. Read the Book of Job and you will see that Job had it all and lost it all. But one thing Job never lost was his trust and faith in God. How about “Survivor”? On that show, people do a lot of stuff to survive the course and win the prize. Well, let’s look at how the Israelites survived 40 years in the desert. They were cared for and fed manna (bread from heaven). They survived the trials and tribulations and conquered all they went through. We too are now survivors, and we are working to conquer COVID-19 in addition to all our daily trials and troubles. Oh, and let’s not forget about love stories that some folks enjoy reading. Read the book of Ruth and you will find a true love story. It’s about a daughter-in-law and mother-in-law. Then read the first four books of the New Testament for the greatest love story ever: Jesus loved us enough to die for our salvation. And let’s not forget about all you sports fans. Do you enjoy NASCAR? Well, read the book of Joshua and how the Israelites marched around the city of Jericho and blew trumpets — and the walls of the city came tumbling down. Doesn’t that remind you of NASCAR, with cars going around a course and all the accidents where they hit the wall? And there’s always a winner. Oh, and don’t forget baseball, basketball, football and tennis — just to name a few. These can all be related to the story of David throwing the rock that killed the giant, Goliath. Just look at your Bible in a new way. The more you look and read the stories within it, the better you will be able to relate those ancient events to our modern world. The Bible is also a book about history and ancestry. Many of us are looking up our ancestry these days, so why not look at the ancestry of Christ and follow it? Do you dream of going on a cruise? Noah took a 40 day cruise with his family and a boatload of animals. Can you imagine how awesome that was? No land in sight, but those voyagers watched the sun rise and sun set for more than a month as they cruised the floodwaters in the ark. We often take our pets with us on our vacations. Okay, truckers: Here’s something for you to ponder. You carry freight from shipper to receiver. You are also included in the Bible. Think about how Mary “carried” Jesus to Bethlehem, where she gave birth to him. The Magi carried gold, frankincense and myrrh on their journey to find the Christ child and deliver their gifts to him. How much more do you need to know about the Bible as it relates to us in our modern times? I think we all need to evaluate our thoughts about the value and worth of the Bible. Bringing it alive today is as easy as reading it and translating it to our modern world. And if you have doubts, just start praying about what you read. Prayer is like our modern-day cellphones, serving as an open line to God. We don’t get a phone bill or need a contract for that prayer line, so use it as much as you want. It’s free service. Have I given you enough reasons to explore your Bible with a new vision of thought? Have a blessed day by opening your Bible and exploring new ways to make it relatable to today’s world. Enjoy the time you spend with your Bible. You will be amazed at what you will find. Best of the roads and all gears forward in Jesus, Rev. Marilou Coins