TheTrucker.com

Canadian trucker freed; says he’s victim of marijuana scam

DETROIT — Federal prosecutors have dropped charges, at least for now, against a Canadian trucker who was arrested at the U.S. border early last month with more than a ton of marijuana in his rig, after his lawyer made the case that he was an unwitting victim of the drug smuggling scheme. Tasbir Singh, 32, was detained on July 7 after border agents in Detroit found more than 2,200 pounds of marijuana worth an estimated $3.2 million in his truck. Singh told authorities that he believed he had picked up compression springs in North York, Ontario. The delivery was supposed to go to Ohio. Because of COVID-19 rules, he never got out of his truck while it was being loaded, his attorney Ellen Michaels said. “I had not done anything wrong,” Singh told the Detroit Free Press. Michaels said Singh was the victim of marijuana dealers who hacked into the trucking company’s computers, created a fake order for springs and packed the trailer with marijuana. “He had no knowledge of what was in his truck,” Michaels said. The U.S. attorney’s office filed a request with the court on July 22 to have the criminal complaint against Singh dismissed without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could refile the charges at a later date. “The complaint was dismissed and the defendant released in order to allow the government to investigate further and decide whether criminal prosecution of Singh is appropriate,” Gina Balaya, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, said in a statement. Prosecutors also stated in court documents the “government needs additional time” to “identify all other individuals who should be held criminally responsible” for the pot smuggling, the Free Press reported. Singh, a native of India, was released from custody on July 23. During his 16 days locked up, he missed his naturalization ceremony in Canada. He has since returned to his home in Windsor, Ontario. “They gave me justice,” Singh said.

Mudslides close stretch of I-70 in Colorado; truckers advised to detour north on I-80 through Wyoming

DENVER — Mudslides from heavy rains caused “extreme damage” to a major interstate and left it blocked with piles of boulders and logs, Colorado transportation officials said Sunday, Aug. 1, as forecasters warned of more flash floods in the coming days across the Rocky Mountain and Great Basin regions. The flood risk was elevated for many areas of the West where recent wildfires burned away vegetation and left hillsides more susceptible to erosion, the National Weather Service said. Interstate 70 in Glenwood Canyon, Colorado, was closed with no word on when it might re-open after being pounded by flash floods over a three-day period. Lanes in both directions remained blocked by debris that flowed out of the burn scar from a wildfire last year in the Grizzly Creek area. The torrent of rocks that came tumbling down the canyon’s steep walls smashed apart sections of the concrete roadway and sheared off a long section of steel guardrail, photos provided by state officials showed. More rain was in the forecast for the drought-parched region, triggering flash flood watches for portions of Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington state. I-70 is a major transportation corridor between the Rocky Mountains and the West Coast. An approximately 46-mile stretch of the interstate was closed. Transportation officials advised long-distance truckers to detour north onto Interstate 80 through Wyoming. Crews were still assessing damage late Sunday. They had been working to clear the highway since Thursday when another flash flood hit Saturday, forcing them to evacuate the area and causing even more damage. “When we know exactly what the damage is, then we’ll have a better idea” on when it could reopen, said Colorado Department of Transportation spokesperson Tamara Rollison. “It’s not just clearing the debris. There’s also the damage,” she said. “Our engineering staff have never seen anything like this before.” More than 100 people had to spend the night on the highway Thursday night, including nearly 30 who took refuge in a tunnel following the mudslides in western Colorado. Mudslides also closed down Colorado Highway 125 near Granby and U.S. Highway 6 over Colorado’s Loveland Pass. Highway 6 was reopened Sunday, Rollison said. In Rock Springs, Wyoming nine adults and eight children received assistance after flooding on Saturday, the Red Cross said.

White House, Canada state support for new Detroit River international span

DETROIT — The White House and Canada issued a joint statement of support for a commuter bridge that when completed will span the Detroit River, connecting Detroit and Windsor, Ontario. The statement, issued Thursday, July 29, calls the Gordie Howe International Bridge “a top infrastructure priority” for both governments. “We’re committed to continuing our support to ensure the project’s state-of-the-art ports of entry are fully funded so vehicles can begin crossing the architecturally stunning cable-stayed structure once completed for the benefit of our shared prosperity,” the statement read. The statement of support comes as U.S. President Joe Biden and Republican senators try to work out a compromise over a nearly $1 trillion infrastructure package. Seventeen GOP senators joined all Democrats in voting this week to start a debate to consider the bill. The plan includes $550 billion in new spending beyond the typical highway and public works accounts. “This full-throated support of this vital bridge comes as President Biden and Congress continue to make progress on bipartisan and significant investment in transportation and other infrastructure,” Michigan Gov. Whitmer said in her own statement. “The ongoing construction of this bridge has created jobs on both sides of the border, and will continue to spur economic development for many years to come. This bridge also affirms Michigan’s ongoing partnership with Canada, the top purchaser of U.S. goods among countries.” In 2012, then-Gov. Rick Snyder and former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper struck a deal calling for Canada to pay for the bridge after the Republican governor ran into opposition in the GOP-led legislature. The $4.4 billion six-lane span is expected to open in late 2024. It’s named for Gordie Howe, a native of Canada and a hockey legend who starred for the Detroit Red Wings. Before the coronavirus pandemic, the Detroit-Windsor, Ontario, corridor was the busiest commercial land crossing on the U.S.-Canada border, handling more than 30% of truck-hauled trade. The privately owned Ambassador Bridge and the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel are the only current commuter crossings between the cities.

Minneapolis council votes to enact street parking ban for commercial trucks

MINNEAPOLIS — Effective Jan. 1, 2022, Minneapolis will enact a ban on street parking within city limits for most commercial trucks. The Minneapolis City Council passed the proposed ordinance Friday, July 23, with a vote of 12-1. Street parking is already banned in the city’s residential areas. Under the new ordinance, vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds will be barred from stopping, standing or parking on any city street. The restriction will be waived for trucks that are “actually and expeditiously” loading or unloading people or materials or that are stopped or parked at the request of law enforcement or traffic control. Trucks will still be allowed to park in areas that have posted signs authorizing parking for heavy vehicles. Penalties for violating the ordinance will result in a $100 fine throughout 2022. In 2023, the fine will be raised to $150, and it will jump to $250 in 2024. The Minnesota Trucking Association (MTA) earlier this year voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance, noting that forcing truck drivers to park outside of the city would impede on-time deliveries and disrupt daily commerce. John Housladen, president of MTA, explained that many of the trucks parked overnight within city limits belong to owner-operators who live in Minneapolis. “These small businesses, many of whom are minority-owned, would have no viable alternative for overnight parking. This ban could effectively force many of these hard-working residents to choose between their livelihood and the place they call home,” he said. The recently passed ordinance is the second time the Minneapolis City Council has considered a ban on truck parking. In 2019, the Minneapolis City Council heard a proposal of a similar nature; however, the proposal did not make it to a vote. After being submitted to the city council’s transportation public works committee for a second time, the language of the ordinance was changed. It now proposes partnerships for developing truck parking sites. “The language adopted puts the city in a purely reactive role, providing interested parties with only site search assistance,” Hausladen said. “Language asking for greater regional solutions is all good, but it doesn’t change the fact that starting Jan. 1, 2022, trucks will be ticketed for parking on Minneapolis city streets — with no new safe parking options.”

Key details of the Senate’s bipartisan infrastructure plan

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Wednesday, July 28, to take up a nearly $1 trillion national infrastructure plan after President Joe Biden and a bipartisan group of senators reached agreement on major provisions of the package. The White House is projecting that the investments will add, on average, about 2 million jobs per year over the coming decade. A 57-page Republican summary of the agreement obtained by The Associated Press also outlines how the lawmakers hope to pay for the additional spending. Here’s a breakdown of where the dollars would go, according to a summary released by the White House on Wednesday. $110 billion for roads and bridges. The $40 billion for bridges is the single largest dedicated bridge investment since the construction of the Interstate highway system. $39 billion for public transit. The money would be used to modernize bus and subway fleets and bring new service to communities. That’s about $10 billion less than senators negotiating the agreement had originally designated. $66 billion for passenger and freight rail. The money would be used to reduce Amtrak’s maintenance backlog, improve Amtrak’s 457-mile-long Northeast Corridor as well as other routes and make safety improvements to rail grade crossings. $7.5 billion for electric vehicle charging stations, which the administration says is critical to accelerating the use of electric vehicles to curb climate change. $5 billion for the purchase of electric school buses and hybrids, reducing reliance on school buses that run on diesel fuel. $17 billion for ports and $25 billion for airports to reduce congestion and address maintenance backlogs. $55 billion for water and wastewater infrastructure, including funding to replace all of the nation’s service lines using lead pipe. $65 billion to expand broadband access, a particular problem for rural areas and tribal communities. Most of the money would be made available through grants to states. $21 billion to clean up superfund and brownfield sites, reclaim abandoned mine land and cap obsolete gas wells. $73 billion for modernizing the nation’s electric grid and expanding the use of renewable energy. Here’s a breakdown of pay-fors in a Republican summary of the plan: Tapping about $205 billion in unspent COVID-19 relief aid. Congress has provided about $4.7 trillion in emergency assistance in response to the pandemic. Drawing on about $53 billion in unemployment insurance aid that the federal government was providing to supplement state unemployment insurance. Dozens of states are declining to take the federal supplement. Drawing on about $49 billion by further delaying a Medicare rule giving beneficiaries rebates that now go to insurers and middlemen called pharmacy benefit managers. The trade association for drug manufacturers argued that the rule would help reduce patients’ out-of-pocket costs, but the Congressional Budget Office had projected that it would increase taxpayer costs by $177 billion over 10 years. Raising an estimated $87 billion in spectrum auctions for 5G services. Restarting a tax on chemical manufacturers that had expired in 1995, raising about $13 billion. The money had been used to help fund the cleanup of Superfund sites. Also, selling oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve would add about $6 billion. Strengthening tax enforcement when it comes to crypto currencies, raising about $28 billion. Relying on projected economic growth from the investments to bring in about $56 billion. By Kevin Freking, The Associated Press

Biden promotes ‘buy American’ program, other goals during visit to Mack’s Lehigh Valley assembly plant

ALLENTOWN, Pa. — President Joe Biden visited Mack Truck’s Lehigh Valley Operations assembly plant in Macungie, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday, July 28, to promote his administration’s infrastructure, jobs and clean energy goals. While there, Biden met with Mack employees, including those represented by United Auto Workers Local 677, and toured the facility to learn about the manufacturing process, the supply chain and Mack’s production of battery-electric trucks, including the Mack LR Electric battery-electric refuse vehicle, the manufacturer’s first fully electric Class 8 truck. “We are honored that President Biden chose to visit Mack Trucks,” said Martin Weissburg, president of Mack Trucks, adding that the manufacturer is celebrating its 121st anniversary this week. “Mack is part of the only heavy-duty truck manufacturing group to assemble all of its trucks exclusively in the U.S. for this market.” While at the plant, Biden addressed Mack employees and state and federal government representatives, including Pennsylvania’s Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf, state Rep. Susan Wild (D-District 15) and U.S. Sen. Bob Casey Jr. (D-Pa). “Well, I’m not going to say anything; I just came to drive a truck, and I’m not sure which one I want to drive,” Biden said, gesturing to the Class 8 tractors positioned behind the podium and drawing a few laughs from the crowd “There’s one back in the corner you can’t see. It’s the biggest damn pick-up truck you ever saw in your life.” While this quip drew friendly chuckles from the crowd, another statement, captured by a local media outlet, has spurred less-kind laughter. “I used to drive an 18-wheeler, man … I got to,” Biden can be heard saying as he toured the Mack plant in a video posted to Twitter Wednesday. According to FOX News, there is “scant evidence that Biden has ever driven an 18-wheeler truck.” When FOX News reached out to the White House for confirmation of Biden’s claim, a spokesperson referred to a 1973 article from the Wilmington Evening Journal that stated Biden had ridden in an 18-wheeler on a 536-mile haul to Ohio. Following his opening statement at the Mack plant, Biden reiterated his goal to strengthen American companies and manufacturing through changes to the Buy American Act. “It’s a straightforward solution: support and grow more American-based companies. Put more Americans to work in union jobs. Strengthen American manufacturing and secure critical supply chains. And confront the climate crisis, which is all about jobs,” he said. I can sum it up in two words: Buy American.” Currently, any vehicles purchased by the U.S. federal government must be “substantially all” made in America, Biden said. However, because many products are assembled in the U.S. using foreign-made components, that goal can be difficult to meet.. “But because of loopholes, over time, you know what ‘substantially all’ means today?” he continued. “If 55% of it was made in America, you can go ahead and get all of the rest of it purchased other places. To me, 55% is not “substantially all” — it’s barely half.” The proposed solution is to boost the required percentage of American-made components. “Today, I’m directing the budget office to issue a rule to raise the amount of domestic content required to be considered Made in America from 55% to 75%,” Biden stated. “‘Substantially all’ is going to mean substantially all.” Biden’s remarks also touted the administration’s goals for a bipartisan infrastructure plan, which he hopes to expand to include clean energy, as well as new jobs, child care and elder care, and more. “You may have heard that, in Washington — and I was just on the phone — it looks like we reached a bipartisan agreement on infrastructure — a fancy word for bridges, roads, transit systems, high-speed Internet, clean drinking water, cleaning up and capping the orphan wells — over thousands of them abandoned, and abandoned mines — and a modern, resilient electric grid to build,” he said. Part of the Biden administration’s focus is on protecting the environment by converting much of the nation to electric vehicles, including both private and commercial transport. “I just saw the work you’re doing on the heavy-duty electric vehicles here, like electric garbage trucks,” he said, referring to Mack’s LR Electric battery-electric refuse vehicle, which is assembled at the Lehigh Valley plant. “Right here, on this factory floor, you’re making a product that are fighting climate change,” he continued. “That’s why when I hear ‘climate change,’ I think jobs.” In closing, Biden exhorted the nation’s political and business leaders to set a strong example of equality and inclusion for the rest of the world. We’re the most unique nation in the history of the world. … By that I mean: Every other nation was put together based on ethnicity or religion, geography — but not America,” he explained. “An idea is what formed America. And the idea was — and it sounds corny, but it is absolutely true — no other nation has this as their organizing principle: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men and women are created equal…endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights … life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’ “We believe it. We’ve never accomplished it, but every generation that moved us closer and closer and closer to inclusion,” he concluded. “That’s why America’s real power is not in the exercise of a military power, but people follow us because of our example. That’s why the rest of the world follows us.”

Infrastructure deal: Senate suddenly acts to take up bill

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Wednesday, July 28, to begin work on a nearly $1 trillion national infrastructure plan, acting with sudden speed after weeks of fits and starts once the White House and a bipartisan group of senators agreed on major provisions of the package that’s key to President Joe Biden’s agenda. Biden welcomed the accord as one that would show America can “do big things.” It includes the most significant long-term investments in nearly a century, he said, on par with building the transcontinental railroad or the Interstate highway system. “This deal signals to the world that our democracy can function,” Biden said ahead of the vote. “We will once again transform America and propel us into the future.” After weeks of stop-and-go negotiations, the rare bipartisan showing on a 67-32 vote to start formal Senate consideration showed the high interest among senators in the infrastructure package. But it’s unclear if enough Republicans will eventually join Democrats to support final passage. Senate rules require 60 votes in the evenly split 50-50 chamber to proceed for consideration and ultimately pass this bill, meaning support from both parties. The outcome will set the stage for the next debate over Biden’s much more ambitious $3.5 trillion spending package, a strictly partisan pursuit of far-reaching programs and services including child care, tax breaks and health care that touch almost every corner of American life. Republicans strongly oppose that bill, which would require a simple majority, and may try to stop both. Lead GOP negotiator Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio announced the bipartisan group’s agreement on the $1 trillion package earlier Wednesday at the Capitol, flanked by four other Republican senators who had been in talks with Democrats and the White House. After voting, Portman said the outcome showed that bipartisanship in Washington can work and he believed GOP support would only grow. “That’s pretty darn good for a start,” he said. That group had labored with the White House to salvage the deal, a first part of Biden’s big infrastructure agenda. Swelling to more than 700 pages, the bill includes $550 billion in new spending for public works projects. In all, 17 Republican senators joined the Democrats in voting to launch the debate, but most remained skeptical. The GOP senators were given a thick binder of briefing materials during a private lunch, but they asked many questions and wanted more details. According to a 57-page GOP summary obtained by The Associated Press, the five-year spending package would be paid for by tapping $205 billion in unspent COVID-19 relief aid and $53 billion in unemployment insurance aid some states have halted. It also relies on economic growth to bring in $56 billion, and other measures. Giving Wednesday night’s vote a boost, Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell announced late in the day he would vote to proceed, though whether he will support the final bill remains uncertain. The Republican negotiators met with McConnell earlier Wednesday and Portman said the leader “all along has been encouraging our efforts.” Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, a lead Democratic negotiator who talks often with Republicans also spoke with Biden on Wednesday and said she hoped the results showed “our government can work.” Democrats, who have slim control of the House and Senate, face a timeline to act on what would be some of the most substantial pieces of legislation in years. Filling in the details has become a month-long exercise ever since a bipartisan group of senators struck an agreement with Biden in June over the broad framework. The new spending in the package dropped from about $600 billion to $550 billion, senators said, as money was eliminated for a public-private infrastructure bank and was reduced in other categories, including transit. The package still includes $110 billion for highways, $65 billion for broadband and $73 billion to modernize the nation’s electric grid, according to a White House fact sheet. Additionally, there’s $25 billion for airports, $55 billion for waterworks and more than $50 billion to bolster infrastructure against cyberattacks and climate change. There’s also $7.5 billion for electric vehicle charging stations. Paying for the package has been a slog throughout the talks after Democrats rejected a plan to bring in funds by hiking the gas tax drivers pay at the pump and Republicans dashed an effort to boost the IRS to go after tax scofflaws. Along with repurposing the COVID-19 relief and unemployment aid, other revenue would come from the sale of broadcast spectrum, reinstating fees that chemical companies used to pay for cleaning up the nation’s worst hazardous waste sites and drawing $49 billion from reversing a Trump-era pharmaceutical rebate, among other sources. The final deal could run into political trouble if it doesn’t pass muster as fully paid for when the Congressional Budget Office assesses the details. But Portman said the package will be “more than paid for.” House Democrats have their own transportation bill, which includes much more spending to address rail transit, electric vehicles and other strategies to counter climate change. The chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., called the Senate’s bipartisan measure complete “crap,” during a private meeting Tuesday according to two Democrats who attended the session and spoke on condition of anonymity to describe it. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not commit to supporting the package until she sees the details, but said Wednesday she’s “rooting for it.” Pelosi said, “I very much want it to pass.” Senators in the bipartisan group have been huddling privately for months. The group includes 10 core negotiators, split evenly between Democrats and Republicans, but has swelled at times to 22. Transit funding has remained a stubborn dispute, as most Republican senators come from rural states where highways dominate and public transit is scarce, while Democrats view transit as a priority for cities and a key to easing congesting and fighting climate change. Expanding access to broadband. which has become ever more vital for households during the coronavirus pandemic, sparked a new debate. Republicans pushed back against imposing regulations on internet service providers in a program that helps low-income people pay for service. Meanwhile, Democrats are readying the broader $3.5 trillion package that is being considered under budget rules that allow passage with 51 senators in the split Senate, with Vice President Kamala Harris able to break a tie. It would be paid for by increasing the corporate tax rate and the tax rate on Americans earning more than $400,000 a year. By Lisa Mascaro, Kevin Freking and Alan Fram, The Associated Press. Associated Press writers Alan Fram and Josh Boak in Washington and Tali Arbel in New York contributed to this report.

Pennsylvania transportation funding report could launch years of debate

HARRISBURG, Pa. — A transportation funding commission is preparing to recommend how to raise billions more dollars in Pennsylvania for a 21st-century highway system, a report that will land at a politically touchy time and is expected to kick off a debate that could last years. The report, expected this week from the Transportation Revenue Options Commission, was ordered by Gov. Tom Wolf in March to find ways to replace Pennsylvania’s gas tax. It is expected to contain a blend of recommendations, including corridor tolling, goods delivery fees and higher vehicle fees and taxes, but the primary revenue-raiser will be a vehicle-miles-traveled fee. The report comes amid a stalemate over increasing funding for highway construction in Pennsylvania, and as states increasingly experiment with a vehicle-miles-traveled fee to replace long-stagnant gas tax collections. Even though federal statistics show vehicles are traveling more miles, those vehicles are increasingly fuel-efficient, and more motorists are increasingly driving all-electric vehicles. States are up against a deadline of sorts, with Ford and General Motors making major investments in electric vehicles and planning to substantially shift their fleets to all-electric vehicles by 2030 or 2035. House Appropriations Committee Chairman Stan Saylor, R-York, said it is a difficult time to raise taxes and fees, as the economy rebounds from the pandemic, and he predicted no action by the Republican-controlled Legislature on the plan before 2023, at the earliest. “I don’t think it will be received well at all right now,” Saylor said. He also questioned whether it will be necessary for a vehicle-miles-traveled fee to be imposed nationally, rather than state-by-state, and whether a federal infrastructure measure being discussed in Congress may lift some of Pennsylvania’s funding burden. However, Rep. Mike Carroll, D-Luzerne, the ranking Democrat on the House Transportation Committee, said it is better to be at the front of the line of states in making the change, rather than at the end. It will take many months of education to get lawmakers to the point where they can embrace parts of the commission’s report, Carroll said. “A lot of it is aspirational, but it’s the conversation that needs to be had,” Carroll said. The report faces thorny politics in the Legislature. Gene Barr, president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, said business-to-business taxes or fees being contemplated in the commission’s report could hurt the state’s economy and start-up businesses. One of those is a proposal being contemplated for a $1 or $2 surcharge on each parcel delivery. “My telephone lines blew up” from unhappy constituents when that idea made the news, Saylor said. Senate Republicans are attempting to halt a plan by Wolf’s Department of Transportation to toll up to nine major bridges. PennDOT said the money is needed to fund badly needed upgrades at a time when the state’s current highway and bridge budget for construction and maintenance is about $6.9 billion per year, less than half of the $15 billion that is needed to keep Pennsylvania’s highways and bridges in good condition and ease major traffic bottlenecks. Senate Transportation Committee Chairman Wayne Langerholc, R-Cambria, suggested that backing off the tolling plan — and adopting his suggestion to borrow the money — might engender some good will from his caucus. And while he called transportation “woefully underfunded,” he also said there is an appetite in the Legislature for reform — not necessarily for higher taxes — and that PennDOT will need to take a hard look at its own administrative costs while lawmakers consider overhauling the state’s highway maintenance funding formula. “Their big hope is to use this mileage-based user fee to offset the gas tax, but that’s just not the simple answer,” Langerholc said. “There needs to be a holistic solution to this, everything across all levels needs to be looked at.”  

I-40 Memphis bridge to partially reopen; limited traffic can resume August 2

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Commissioner Clay Bright announced Wednesday, July 28, that the Interstate 40 Hernando DeSoto Bridge over the Mississippi River at the Arkansas/Tennessee state line will reopen under limited traffic while contractors finish the work. Contractors will have completed all the Phase 3 plating by Friday, July 30, according to TDOT. They will begin to demobilize, break down platforms, and remove equipment and barriers starting with the eastbound direction. This will be done one side at a time. Barring any complications, the reopening plan is as follows: Monday, Aug. 2 by 6 a.m. CST: All I-40 eastbound lanes open Friday, Aug. 6 (time TBA): All I-40 westbound lanes open The bridge remains an active work zone, and motorists should pay attention to the interstate direct-messaging system, portable message boards and SmartWay for specific traffic information. “We know having the bridge closed has been incredibly inconvenient,” Bright said. “We appreciate the public’s patience while our team made the repairs and performed extensive inspections to ensure it’s structurally sound for many years to come.” The emergency bridge repair project was awarded to Kiewit Infrastructure Group. The selection was based on qualifications, experience and availability of personnel and equipment. “Back in May, we speculated that it would be the end of July, first of August to work through all the phases needed to reopen the bridge,” Bright said. “We did not know then what all would be involved, but what I do know is we have all been fortunate to have had a great team that personally took on this project and worked tirelessly to safely reopen the bridge as soon as possible.” TDOT shares responsibility for the bridge with the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT). ARDOT handles the inspections and TDOT is responsible for the repairs. On May 11, an ARDOT contractor discovered a crack in the bottom side of the bridge truss during a routine inspection and immediately shut down the bridge.

Schneider rallies behind Team USA as driver’s daughter competes in Olympics 

GREEN BAY, Wis. — Though associates at Schneider embrace the company’s trademark orange color, they will be cheering for red, white and blue as Krysta Palmer competes in the Tokyo Olympics. Krysta, a member of Team USA Diving, is the daughter of Schneider professional driver Mitch Palmer and his wife, Vicki. Since a young age, Krysta has always been a talented athlete. She narrowly missed making the 2016 U.S. Diving Team, she continued training in hopes of making the 2020 Olympics – and now the 2021 team, after the pandemic pushed the games back a year. “We are so proud of Krysta,” said Vicki. “She has put in an extraordinary amount of time and effort to make her dream of being an Olympian come true. It’s truly a remarkable story, and I guess the moral is never, ever give up.” Last month, Schneider routed the Palmers to Indianapolis so they could be in the stands as their daughter qualified for the U.S. Olympic Diving Team in the 3m Synchronized Springboard and 3m Individual Springboard events. “The Olympics are always exciting to watch but to have one of our own to cheer for makes these games even more special,” said Mark Rourke, president and CEO of Schneider. “We have been so blessed in what Schneider has done for us and what they have allowed us to do,” said Vicki. “Krysta competes all over the country, and we have been able to attend most of her competitions over the last few years.” Because of COVID-19 restrictions, Mitch and Vicki cannot travel to Tokyo and will instead watch Krysta compete from back home. Their Schneider family is also rallying around the driving and diving Palmers: Large banners and posters with Krysta’s photos are on display at company facilities across the country. Real-time results of Krysta’s events will be shared with associates via social and company communication channels. Associates can use a special Facebook frame created to support Krysta. Schneider associates are encouraged to take selfies with the banners and share their excitement on social media with #KrystaForGold. Associates will also show their support by wearing red, white and blue on Thursday, July 29, and Friday, July 30. “We hope Schneider’s enthusiasm, energy and support for Krysta during this incredible time makes the experience even more memorable for the Palmers,” said Rourke. “It just means the world to us that Schneider is supporting her and cheering for her too,” said Vicki. “We are so appreciative of the posters and words of encouragement from everyone. The excitement is contagious.” Krysta and her partner, Alison Gibson, placed eighth in the Final 3m Synchronized Springboard Sunday. Competition for Krysta’s next event, 3m Individual Springboard, begins Friday. Event schedule:   Friday, July 30, 1 a.m. CST   Prelim. 3m Individual Springboard Saturday, July 31, 1 a.m. CST   Semi-Final 3m Individual Springboard Sunday, August 1, 1 a.m. CST   Final 3m Individual Springboard

Senators, White House in talks to finish infrastructure bill

WASHINGTON — Senators and the White House are locked in intense negotiations to salvage a bipartisan infrastructure deal, with pressure mounting on all sides to wrap up talks and show progress on President Joe Biden’s top priority. Despite weeks of closed-door discussions, senators from the bipartisan group blew past a Monday, July 26, deadline set for agreement on the nearly $1 trillion package. Instead they hit serious roadblocks over how much would be spent on public transit and water infrastructure and whether the new spending on roads, bridges, broadband and other projects would be required to meet federal wage requirements for workers. They’re also at odds over drawing on COVID-19 funds to help pay for it. Republican negotiator Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, who took the lead in key talks with a top White House aide, insisted the bipartisan group was “making progress.” “This is heading in the right direction,” Portman told reporters at the Capitol. “It’s a big, complicated bill.” Biden struck a similarly upbeat tone, telling reporters at the White House he remained optimistic about reaching a compromise. This is a crucial week after more than a monthlong slog of negotiations since Biden and the bipartisan group first celebrated the contours of the nearly $1 trillion bipartisan agreement in June, and senators were warned they could be kept in session this weekend to finish the work. The White House wants a bipartisan agreement for this first phase, before Democrats go it alone to tackle broader priorities in a bigger $3.5 trillion budget plan that’s on deck. A recent poll from The Associated Press-NORC found 8 in 10 Americans favor some increased infrastructure spending, and the current package could be a political win for all sides as lawmakers try to show voters that Washington can work. Securing the bipartisan bill is also important for some centrist Democrats before engaging in the broader undertaking. But as talks drag on, anxious Democrats, who have slim control of the House and Senate, face a timeline to act on what would be some of the most substantial legislation in years. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer wants progress on both packages before the August recess, and he told senators to brace for a Saturday or Sunday session. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Biden himself “worked the phones all weekend,” and the administration was encouraged by the progress. But Psaki acknowledged “time is not endless.” Adding to the mix, Donald Trump issued a statement Monday disparaging Senate Republicans for even dealing with the Democrats on infrastructure, though it’s unclear what influence he has. The former president had failed at an infrastructure deal when he was in office. “It’s time for everyone to get to ‘yes,’” Schumer said as he opened the Senate. Schumer said Trump is “rooting for our entire political system to fail” while Democrats are “rooting for a deal.” The bipartisan package includes about $600 billion in new spending on public works projects, with broad support from Republicans and Democrats for many of the proposed ideas. Yet there was little to show Monday after a grinding weekend of talks, putting the deal at risk of stalling out. The Democrats and the White House had sent what they called a “global” offer to Republicans on remaining issues late Sunday, according to a Democratic aide close to the talks and granted anonymity to discuss them. But Republicans rebuffed the ideas, saying the new proposal attempted to reopen issues that had already been resolved, according to a GOP aide also granted anonymity to discuss the private talks. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said it’s time for Biden to become more involved. “I think it’s imperative that the president indicates strongly that he wants a bipartisan package,” she said. A top Biden aide, Steve Ricchetti, was tapped for the direct talks as Portman fielded information to the other senators in the group, several senators said. Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana said, “There were too many cooks in the kitchen.” While much of the disagreement has been over the size of spending on each category, labor issues have also emerged as a flashpoint. Democrats are insisting on a prevailing-wage requirement, not just for existing public works programs but also for building new roads, bridges, broadband and other infrastructure, according to another Republican granted anonymity to discuss the private talks. At the same time, transit funding has been a stubborn source of disagreement for the past several days. Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey, the top Republican on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, which oversees public transit, raised questions about the size of the transit funding increase. He cited, in part, previous COVID-19 federal relief money that had already been allocated to public transit. Democrats and public transit advocates don’t want spending to go any lower than what’s typically been a federal formula of about 80% for highways and 20% for transit. They see expanded public transit systems as key to easing traffic congestion and combating climate change. Psaki has previously said transit funding “is obviously extremely important to the president — the ‘Amtrak President,’ as we may call him.” The senators also appeared to still be debating money for public water works and removal of lead pipes after Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) raised questions about the amount. Also unresolved is how to pay for the bipartisan package after Democrats rejected a plan to bring in funds by hiking the gas tax drivers pay at the pump and Republicans dashed a plan to boost the IRS to go after tax scofflaws. Funding could come from repurposing COVID relief aid, reversing a Trump-era pharmaceutical rebate and other streams. It’s possible the final deal could run into political trouble if it doesn’t pass muster as fully paid for when the Congressional Budget Office assesses the details. The final package would need the support of 60 senators in the evenly split 50-50 Senate to advance past a filibuster — meaning at least 10 Republicans along with every Democratic member. A test vote last week failed along party lines as Republicans sought more time to negotiate. Meanwhile, Democrats are readying the broader $3.5 trillion package, which would go beyond public works to include child care centers, family tax breaks and other priorities. It is being considered under budget rules that allow passage with 51 senators in the split Senate, with Vice President Kamala Harris able to break a tie. That package would be paid for by increasing the corporate tax rate and the tax rate on Americans earning more than $400,000 a year. By Lisa Mascaro, Alexandra Jaffe and Kevin Freking, The Associated Press. Associated Press writers Hope Yen and Josh Boak contributed to this report.

Love’s donates $100,000 to St. Christopher Truckers Fund

OKLAHOMA CITY — Love’s Travel Stops announced July 26 that the company has donated $100,000 to the St. Christopher Truckers Development and Relief Fund (SCF). SCF is a nonprofit that helps professional truck drivers and their families during difficult times. “Professional truck drivers keep America moving, and this is one way we’re thanking them for all they do for the country,’’ said Jenny Love Meyer, executive vice president and chief culture officer of Love’s. “St. Christopher is a great organization that helps drivers every day, and we’re glad to continue to support the organization.” Love’s first donated to St. Christopher in April 2020, when the company gave $100,000 to help drivers during the coronavirus pandemic. The relief fund helps with expenses like rent, mortgage, utilities, insurance and vehicle payments. It also provides health and wellness programs for drivers. “The trucking industry is the backbone of our economy, and professional drivers are the heart of the industry. We depend on those drivers every single day and they can depend on St. Christopher Truckers Fund every single day,” said Shannon Currier, director of philanthropy and development for SCF. “We are humbled by the continued generosity of Love’s Travel Stops and their commitment to ensure the men and women of this industry have support when they need it most. Thank you for being a hero to our highway heroes.” Truckers in need of assistance can apply online at truckersfund.org/application. Supporters can donate through SCF’s website, truckersfund.org, or email Shannon Currier at [email protected].

At least 8 killed in 22-car pileup in Utah during sandstorm

KANOSH, Utah — A sandstorm on July 25 caused a huge 22-vehicle pileup on a Utah highway that left eight people dead, including children, authorities said. The Sunday afternoon crashes on Interstate 15 near the town of Kanosh came at the end of a holiday weekend for the state that often leads to increased highway traffic. At least 10 people were taken to hospitals, including three in critical condition, according to the Utah Highway Patrol. Ground and air ambulances were used to transport crash victims. The pileup occurred during a period of high winds that caused a dust or sandstorm which reduced visibility, the highway patrol said. Five of the eight people killed were in one vehicle, while two others were in another vehicle, according to a news release. Another fatality was in a third vehicle. Several children were among the dead, Highway Patrol Sgt. Cameron Rhoden told KUTV in Salt Lake City. “We have vehicles all over. Several vehicles tried to swerve off the roadway. We have vehicles that are flipped up on their sides,” Rhoden said. “One of the vehicles that was pulling a trailer, the trailer has pretty much completely been destroyed and is on the freeway.” I-15 remained partially shut down late Sunday. Traffic was redirected around the crash site. Kanosh is located about 160 miles south of Salt Lake City. Roadways on Sunday were full of drivers headed home after a long weekend to celebrate a state holiday recognizing Utah history and settlers from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who trekked west in search of religious freedom.

Senators race to seal infrastructure deal as pressure mounts; new problems arise

Updated July 26, 2021, at 11:45 a.m. WASHINGTON — Senators were running into new problems Monday, July 26, as they raced to seal a bipartisan infrastructure deal with pressure mounting on all sides to show progress on President Joe Biden’s top priority. Heading into a make-or-break week, serious roadblocks remain. One dispute is over how much money should go to public transit. But spending on highways, water projects, broadband and other areas remains unresolved, too, as is whether to take unspent COVID-19 relief funds to help pay for the infrastructure. Democrats and the White House sent a fresh “global” offer to resolve remaining issues, but it was rebuffed early Monday by Republicans as “discouraging” — a setback for a hoped-for afternoon deal. Biden, asked about the outlook, told reporters at the White House he remained optimistic about reaching a compromise. The week ahead is crucial after more than a month-long slog of negotiations since Biden and the bipartisan group first celebrated the contours of the bipartisan agreement in June at the White House. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has said he wants to pass the nearly $1 trillion bipartisan package as well as the blueprint for a larger $3.5 trillion budget plan before the Senate leaves for its August recess. The White House wants a bipartisan agreement for this first phase, but as talks drag on anxious Democrats, who have slim control of the House and Senate, could leave Republicans behind and try to go it alone. If it fails, it could be wrapped into the broader package of Biden’s priorities that Democrats are hoping to pass later. Adding to the mix, Donald Trump issued a statement Monday disparaging Senate Republicans for even dealing with the Democrats on infrastructure, though it’s unclear what influence he has. The former president had failed at an infrastructure deal when he was in office. The bipartisan package includes about $600 billion in new spending on public works projects. Democrats want to see more of the money go toward boosting public transportation, which includes subways, light-rail lines and buses, in line with Biden’s original infrastructure proposal and the push to address climate change. The Democrats and the White House had sent what they called a “global” offer to Republicans on remaining issues late Sunday, according to a Democratic aide close to the talks and granted anonymity to discuss them. But Republicans rebuffed the ideas, according to a GOP aide also granted anonymity to discuss the private talks. The aide said the new proposal attempted to reopen issues that had already been resolved. The Republicans believe the White House will need to show more flexibility if the talks are to be successful, the aide said. The bipartisan group originally appeared to be moving toward agreement on more money for transit. But Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey, the top Republican on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, which oversees public transit, raised questions. He cited, in part, previous COVID-19 federal relief money that had already been allocated to public transit. “Nobody’s talking about cutting transit,” Toomey said Sunday. “The question is, how many tens of billions of dollars on top of the huge increase that they have already gotten is sufficient? And that’s where there is a little disagreement.” Typically, spending from the federal Highway Trust Fund has followed the traditional formula of 80% for highways and 20% for transit. Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Tom Carper of Delaware say they will oppose the deal if transit funding falls below that. In the latest offer, Democrats had accepted the Republican proposal on highway spending, contingent on Republicans agreeing to the Democratic position on public transit, the Democratic aide said. “Transit funding is obviously extremely important to the president — the ‘Amtrak President,’ as we may call him,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Friday. “But we believe that members can get this work done and can work through these issues quite quickly.” The senators also appeared to have resolved issues around public water infrastructure funding. The group had an agreement to add $15 billion deal with lead pipe contamination beyond funds already approved in a Senate water bill. Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) made another proposal that Democrats found unworkable, the Democratic aide said. Romney’s office dismissed that claim as “laughably false.” Pointing to the White House’s own website, Romney’s office said the deal on water was always expected to be $55 billion in new spending. The final package would need the support of 60 senators in the evenly split 50-50 Senate to advance past a filibuster — meaning at least 10 Republicans along with every Democratic member. Last week’s test vote failed along party lines. There are other remaining issues still unresolved around how to pay for it. For instance, details on broadband funding, as well as whether to tap into the leftover COVID relief funds previously passed by Congress, continue to be discussed. Democrats are seeking a compromise to pay for the package after they rejected a hike in the gas tax drivers pay at the pump and Republicans dashed a plan to boost the IRS to go after tax scofflaws. Three rounds totaling nearly $70 billion in federal COVID-19 emergency assistance, including $30.5 billion that Biden signed into law in March, pulled transit agencies from the brink of financial collapse as riders steered clear of crowded spaces on subway cars and buses. That federal aid is expected to cover operating deficits from declining passenger revenue and costly COVID-19 cleaning and safety protocols through at least 2022. But Democrats and public transit advocates see expanded public transit systems as key to easing traffic congestion, combating climate change and curbing car pollution. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, recently sent a letter with 30 Democrats on the panel warning that the Senate proposal was inadequate and that any deal should incorporate the House-passed $715 billion infrastructure bill, which includes more money for rail and transit. “The historical share for public transit from the Highway Trust Fund is 20%,” Paul Skoutelas, president of the American Public Transportation Association, said Sunday. “It is the absolute minimum acceptable level to help sustain our nation’s public transportation systems. It is imperative that we make robust, forward looking investments to modernize and expand public transit that will assist in our economic recovery from the COVID pandemic and get Americans back to work.” Portman appeared on ABC’s “This Week,” Toomey was on CNN’s “State of the Union” and Warner spoke on “Fox News Sunday.” By Hope Yen and Lisa Mascaro, The Associated Press

Endangered falcons band together on Michigan’s International Bridge

SAULT STE. MARIE, Mich. — The International Bridge linking Sault Ste. Marie to Canada is more than just a vital link for cross-border freight and travel — it’s also “home sweet home” for one of Michigan’s endangered species. Several years ago, a pair of peregrine falcons nested on the bridge, and they have returned each year. These resident raptors have had a productive summer this year, successfully raising two chicks. A third egg did not hatch. Michigan lost its peregrine falcons in the 1960s and 1970s because of the usage of DDT and other environmental contaminants. Since conservation efforts started in the mid-1980s, the number of peregrines has fluctuated, but has generally increased since the 1990s, according to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The peregrine falcon has been removed from the federal endangered species list but is still listed as an endangered species in Michigan, protected by state and federal law. Peregrines have adapted to city habitats, nesting on tall buildings, smokestacks and bridges around the world. Karl Hansen, bridge engineer for the International Bridge Administration (IBA), reported on the pair of peregrine falcons that nested on the bridge between the U.S. and Canada. Nest boxes for the peregrines have been installed on the bridge since 2010 on the International Bridge. Last year, the same pair of peregrine falcons hatched one chick. Over the years, the site has been a great success, hatching 32 falcon chicks since IBA staff started counting the birds, Hansen said. Several chicks have been banded for tracking. An interesting illustration of how far the birds can range: one of the birds hatched and banded at the International Bridge was spotted and photographed in the Dominican Republic back in November 2020. This year’s chicks, a male and a female, were banded by a team from MDNR team in June. Color-coded bands were attached to the legs of the young birds to allow scientists to track the movements, reproductive behavior and population growth of the falcons. “The mother bird refused to leave the nest this year,” Hansen said. “That was a first. The MDNR staff had to gently remove her to access the young birds.” In addition to colorful leg bands, the peregrine chicks received names from the IBA staff — the male is Tony, and the female is Franny. High-speed hunters capable of flying at 200 miles per hour, the peregrines may help keep populations of nuisance pigeons under control. While researchers have found pigeons make up a relatively small portion of the falcon diet, the feathered predators may play a role in frightening them away from bridges. Keeping pigeons away is seen as potentially saving the IBA’s maintenance money down the line, as pigeon droppings can damage paint on metal bridge surfaces. Several years ago, the IBA added a video camera trained on the nest box, the “FalCam.” The live video stream is available at www.saultbridge.com/falcam. The best time to view the birds is in the spring, when they’re nesting.

New bipartisan bill would repeal FET on heavy trucks, trailers

WASHINGTON — Efforts to repeal the federal excise tax (FET) on heavy trucks and trailers were renewed July 22 with the introduction of the Modern, Clean, and Safe Trucks Act of 2021 by U.S. Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.). The FET was created more than a century ago to help pay for World War I. In 1917, the FET was established at 3%; today it stands at 12%. According to a joint statement released by Cardin and Young, the 12% FET is the highest percentage excise tax levied on any product, effectively discouraging the investment in new, cleaner and safer trucks and trailers. In addition, the statement noted that the FET “is an unpredictable and minimal source of revenue for the Highway Trust Fund.” “Our tax policy is one of the most effective ways Congress can encourage cleaner and greener technology. The current federal excise tax has become a barrier to the progress,” Cardin said. “It’s time to repeal this outdated and onerous tax on … truckers,” Young said. “Our bipartisan bill will open the floodgates to investment in safer and cleaner trucks and trailers that will benefit our economy and the environment.” The legislation would repeal the FET on heavy-duty trucks, which currently adds approximately $22,000 to the cost of a new tractor-trailer, according to the American Trucking Associations (ATA), which spoke out in support of the measure. “The federal excise tax on heavy trucks is a relic from the First World War that’s now serving to keep cleaner, safer trucks off of our nation’s roads today,” said Chris Spear, president and CEO of ATA. “By repealing this antiquated tax, Congress can deliver a win for the environment, highway safety, manufacturing jobs and supply-chain efficiency. We thank Sens. Young and Cardin for their bipartisan leadership in advancing a common-sense solution to the benefit of American truckers and the motoring public.” Even though technological advances have made the latest tractor-trailers cleaner and safer than ever before, the surcharges often discourage motor carriers from modernizing their fleets. As a result, the average tractor-trailer on the road today is nearly 10 years old. A 2020 survey by ATA showed that 60% of fleets would be either “somewhat likely” or “very likely” to buy additional trucks and trailers beyond currently scheduled purchase if the FET were repealed. According to the ATA, over the past two decades cleaner fuel and engines used in new trucks have combined to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by 97% and particulate matter emissions by 98%. Since 2010, more fuel-efficient diesel trucks have saved 101 million barrels of crude oil and reduced CO2 emissions by 43 million tons. Life-saving, driver-assist safety technologies that weren’t widely available or effective a decade ago, such as automatic emergency braking, forward collision mitigation and electronic stability technology, are now offered in new models. “Funding our national infrastructure need not come at the expense of highway safety or environmental health. Our industry will continue to advocate for equitable and sustainable user fees that align the goals of safer roads, cleaner air and a growing economy,” Spear said. Steve Bassett, chairman of the American Truck Dealers Association, noted that the act would “result in cleaner, safer trucks on the road,” adding that repealing the FET is “crucial to help America modernize its aging truck fleet.” Cummins Inc., a manufacturer of engines for trucks and other equipment, also signaled support for the bill. “Cummins supports Sens. Young and Cardin’s effort to repeal the outdated and burdensome federal excise Tax on heavy duty trucks,” said Jennifer Rumsey, President and Chief Operating Officer, Cummins. “This tax penalizes those who want to adopt the cleanest, most advanced technologies to reduce emissions and improve safety, and repealing it will help ensure the most efficient technologies are being deployed.” To read or download a PDF of the bill, click here.

Tennessee lawmaker hopes Nashville highway project can right an old wrong

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Harold Love Jr. raised his voice over the blare of traffic from the interstate above as he stood near the spot where his family’s home was razed to rubble a half-century ago. Love recounted the fight his father put up in the 1960s, before he was born, to reroute the highway he was sure would stifle and isolate Nashville’s Black community. His father was right. Decades later, Love Jr. wants to correct an old wrong. The state lawmaker is part of a group pushing to build new community space he says would reunify the city directly over Interstate 40, turning the highway stretch below into a tunnel. Mayor John Cooper backs the $120 million, 3.4-acre cap project. The city will spend months listening to ideas about what it should look like, cognizant of a past that saw community concerns about the highway ignored, and the booming growth of the city that challenges longtime residents’ ability to stay. Possible options include a park, a community center, an amphitheater and some way to preserve the historical context about businesses that used to line Jefferson Street, the once-thriving heart of Black Nashville. As the hum and heat of the highway enveloped the dead-end street where his family’s home once stood, Love, now a Democratic state representative and pastor at a church nearby, lamented the psychological damage done by the destruction. “If you’re born here and all you see are these structures like this that are wrought-iron fences and chain-link fences and the noise from the interstate, what you assume is, ‘I’m not valued,’ because they placed this here,” he said. “But if you could change that model and talk about how you were once valued in this neighborhood, and were trying to re-create that value by putting this (cap) here, you may change the mindset of children growing up here.” Amid the fight for civil rights in the South, the Interstate 40 route carved up Black neighborhoods where homes and businesses stood, dividing many from the business and music district on Jefferson Street and the city center beyond, separating one of three nearby historically Black colleges. An estimated 1,400 North Nashvillians were displaced, with 100 city blocks demolished. To this day, North Nashville residents remain disconnected, leaving amenities such as Vanderbilt University and two major hospitals accessible only by highway underpasses and bridges. The ZIP code that covers North Nashville — nearly 70% Black according to U.S. census figures — has a poverty rate more than double the city as a whole, which is 27% Black. President Joe Biden’s proposal on infrastructure has directed attention to Black communities nationwide that were carved up to make way for highways, including the “Main Street of Black New Orleans,” Claiborne Avenue, which had a freeway built above it in the 1960s, and Miami’s Overtown neighborhood, once nicknamed the “Harlem of the South.” Andre Perry, a Brookings Institution senior fellow, said the issue largely started with housing discrimination, as New Deal benefits went more to whites than Blacks, leading to white suburbs that excluded Blacks but needed highways to reach city job centers. “It happened so frequently, and it happened in so many areas because where Black people lived was in the city core,” Perry said. The Nashville cap project suffered a recent setback when the federal government rejected a $72 million infrastructure grant application. But Cooper has vowed to pursue other funding options as debate over infrastructure continues. For decades, cities have covered up highways to create usable public space, including the $110 million Klyde Warren Park in Dallas, Texas, that opened in 2012. Atlanta; Austin, Texas; St. Paul, Minnesota; and other cities are pushing ahead with proposals aimed at addressing racial inequities. Nashville’s Jefferson Street was a vibrant corridor of stores, barbershops, churches, restaurants and nightclubs before the interstate came through. Muddy Waters, James Brown, Etta James, Ray Charles, Little Richard, B.B. King, and Jimi Hendrix played there. The historically Black colleges of Fisk University, Tennessee State University and Meharry Medical College energized the area, and students from those campuses gave the civil rights sit-ins in the city their heartbeat. In 1955, as plans for a federal interstate system took shape, a preliminary route was proposed that would have wiped out some white-owned and -operated businesses, according to the Tennessee State Library and Archives. In 1967, after the route was changed to its current course, Love Sr. and other residents sued, alleging racial discrimination meant to harm North Nashville, its Black businesses and higher education institutions. The case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear it. Some 128 businesses were demolished or relocated, making up almost 80% of Nashville’s African American proprietorships, the state library says. Love Sr. and his wife had moved nearby after living for years on Scovel Street, one block away from Jefferson, and the demolition plans caught them by surprise. “Our homeplace was 2109 Scovel St., so I know that personally we never received any advance notice of a public hearing,” Love Sr. testified in 1967, saying they were “near the last to be notified” of the interstate route. The idea of capping the interstate came up but never caught on, stalled by community distrust of the federal government, said Faye DiMassimo, Cooper’s senior transportation adviser. This time around, prominent community leaders, companies and government officials have sent letters of support to the federal government. Among them: Amazon, which plans to grow to 5,000 jobs at its new downtown Nashville office and has committed $75 million in low-interest loans for new affordable housing; the state Department of Transportation, which will aid in design and construction; and some of the historically Black colleges. “Nashville has sustained dynamic economic growth for the last decade-plus: Social, environmental, and infrastructural challenges accompany such success,” wrote Dr. James Hildreth, Meharry Medical College’s president. “The proposed cap over I-40 is an important project in this respect, offering a major step forward for bringing shared prosperity to an historically marginalized public.” Love Jr. still has the records of what the government paid for his family’s Scovel Street house to make way for the freeway: $5,500 in 1966, the equivalent of about $47,000 today. For families like his who were handed similar checks to give up their homes, he sees the cap project as vindication for everything his father saw coming. “I think my father understood very intimately that those who would be left would be damaged, those who had their houses taken certainly would be damaged,” Love Jr. said. “I think that’s the point we’re trying to make, that this interstate cap can help repair a lot of that.” By Jonathan Mattise, The Associated Press

FMCSA bars Tennessee trucker from interstate commerce following repeated violations

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has declared Tennessee-licensed truck driver Kristopher Anthony Adams to be an imminent hazard to public safety and has ordered him not to operate any commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce. Adams was served the federal order June 23. On June 8, 2021, On June 8, Adams bypassed an open weigh station while driving a tractor-trailer in Branch County, Michigan. When he was stopped by a Michigan State Police officer, Adams admitted that he had, earlier in the day, used a Schedule II drug in violation of federal safety regulations. He was immediately ordered out of service; however, he willfully continued to operate a tractor-trailer in interstate commerce. Less than 24 hours later, on June 9, Adams was driving a tractor-trailer in Adair County, Kentucky — in violation of the out-of-service order — when his vehicle drifted into the opposing lane and collided with another vehicle. These were not the first times Adams had violated out-of-service orders. Previously, in March 2020, Adams tested positive for methamphetamine and amphetamine during a federally mandated pre-employment drug and alcohol screening test and was disqualified from operating a commercial motor vehicle until he successfully completed a statutorily required return-to-duty process overseen by a substance abuse professional. However, Adams continued to operate a commercial motor vehicle in violation of the March 2020 order. In August 2020, he was involved in a single-vehicle crash in Kentucky; three months later, he was subjected to two separate unannounced roadside inspections in Georgia and received citations for safety violations on both occasions. FMCSA’s imminent hazard out-of-service order states that Adams’ “blatant and egregious violations of [federal safety regulations] and disregard for the safety of the motoring public … substantially increases the likelihood of serious injury or death to you and motoring public if not discontinued immediately.” Failing to comply with the provisions of the federal imminent hazard order may result in civil penalties of up to $1,951 for each violation. Knowing and/or willful violations may result in criminal penalties.

Local, large-city governments consider bans, restrictions on truck parking

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) reports that a shortage of truck parking sites is a critical safety concern for the nation. But what if a lack of commercial truck parking isn’t a big concern at the state and city levels? In several areas, this is a reality. The Minnesota Trucking Association (MTA) recently sent a letter to the Minneapolis City Council — a council that, for the second time is reviewing a citywide truck parking ban. Under the proposal, trucks weighing 26,000 pounds or more would not be allowed to street park. “(The proposed ban) is in response to complaints by residents and business owners who say that trucks are creating problems for their businesses and some safety hazards, and they brought those concerns to their city council members,” said John Hausladen, president of MTA. “The troublesome part for us is that it is a broad-brush approach to a problem that is very complex. We have two major concerns,” he continued. “It will directly impact commerce and the ability to keep logistics chains flowing. Fully laden trucks that are parked in the city are there for a reason — and it is to serve the citizens and businesses of Minneapolis. … The other issue, which is equally as important, is there are many independent contractors who are residents of the city of Minneapolis.” If approved, the ban would force truck drivers to park outside the city, which would impede on-time deliveries and disrupt daily commerce, according to MTA. Truck parking is already banned in residential areas in Minneapolis. Hausladen said many of the trucks regularly parked overnight within the city limits belong to owner-operators who live in the city. According to the MTA, 96.5% of manufactured tonnage is transported by truck in Minnesota. There are 21,560 trucking companies in Minnesota; those companies employ 13,150 heavy and tractor-trailer drivers. “Our case to the city is that this broad-brush approach is not the best, and that they should look for more targeted approaches and look at finding ways to help develop safe parking for truck drivers, because as we know, there is a significant nationwide shortage of commercial truck parking,” Hausladen said. “These people carried us through the pandemic. They were there when we needed them. Now we’re telling them, ‘But we don’t want you. Go park your truck somewhere else.’” After being submitted to the city council’s transportation public works committee for a second time, the language of the ordinance was changed. It now proposes partnerships for developing truck parking sites. “The language adopted puts the city in a purely reactive role, providing interested parties with only site search assistance,” Hausladen said. “Language asking for greater regional solutions is all good, but it doesn’t change the fact that starting Jan. 1, 2022, trucks will be ticketed for parking on Minneapolis city streets — with no new safe parking options.” That is, if the ordinance passed. The Minneapolis City Council is scheduled to vote on the ordinance on Friday, July 23. In 2019, the Minneapolis City Council heard a proposal of a similar nature; however, the proposal did not make it to a vote. “The full city council was set to vote on it and ultimately sent it back to the committee,” Hausladen said. “There were, fortunately, enough voices raised that the full city council agreed that they needed to take a step back.” In Michigan, another MTA — the Michigan Trucking Association — is facing a similar challenge: The Detroit City Council is looking at an ordinance to reroute areas in which big rigs are allowed to operate. Mickey Blashfield, president of the Michigan Trucking Association, says this shouldn’t be a problem — as long as the city does not stray from adding more to the ordinance than just designating truck routes. “They’re looking at trying to keep trucks out of residential neighborhoods,” Blashfield said. “More than anything, I think it updates things after the last decade in Detroit, which has seen a ton of construction.” Blashfield, along with the rest of the association, is working with the city council to find a balance that can reroute trucking without causing harm to the industry. While Minneapolis and Detroit may soon offer additional challenges for drivers seeking safe parking, such challenges at the local level are nothing new. In Las Vegas, standard protocol made it illegal for big rigs to park in residential neighborhoods, but there was no enforcement. That changed in 2019. Fines are now enforced for any truck owner who parks in a residential neighborhood. Owners are fined $100 for a first offense, $250 for the second offense and $500 for every subsequent offense. “We know we have a truck parking issue all across the country, but Las Vegas is probably a little more acute, because land costs so much there, and there’s really not a lot of land,” said Paul Enos, president of the Nevada Trucking Association (NTA). “In a state like Nevada, less than 5% of the land is in the hands of the private sector and mostly government (owned). That makes land more expensive because we are not an attainment zone, so it’s not like you can just put a lot out and have trucks parked; you have to pay for that.” If there are little to no truck parking facilities available, drivers are apt to find parking in a nearby residential neighborhood. To mitigate the issue, NTA has worked to dedicate funding for safe truck parking. Through a 10% increase of the diesel tax and a truck parking and interstate freight plan, truck parking has been made more accessible for drivers. In 2020, the city of Las Vegas allocated $7.1 million for truck parking. “I do think that truck parking is a national problem,” Enos said. “But when you look at where these issues tend to arise and who has the purview to deal with land usage issues, it’s local governments.” According to Enos, local governments are “great” about focusing on job creation and building businesses, convention centers and warehouses to make that all possible. However, “They’re not so great at thinking about freight,” he said. “To me, I think the balance to address the truck parking issue is going to be best addressed at the local level, and it’s going to have to be something that all of these folks are building,” Enos said. “Whether you’re building warehouses in strip malls, they’re going to have to contribute to (truck parking).” Enos isn’t the only one in the trucking industry who is seeing a shortage rise with truck parking at the local level. “I think that we’re in an environment where the trucking industry, when it sees challenges, it has to step up and it has to speak,” said Minnesota’s Hausladen. “Of course, organizations like the MTA do that, but individual voices, truck drivers, trucking fleets have to make their voices heard in all of these forums. I think there’s just going to be more challenges at the local level and so it’s going to be more important to engage local governments on these really critical issues,” he continued. “I do think that individual truck drivers who spoke up in this process have been helpful in slowing this down and putting a face on these decisions that affect livelihoods and people.”

Infrastructure bill fails first vote; Senate to try again

UPDATED July 22, 2021 at 10:15a.m. CST WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans rejected an effort Wednesday, July 21, to begin debate on the big infrastructure deal that a bipartisan group of senators brokered with President Joe Biden, but pressure was mounting as supporters insisted they just needed more time before another vote possibly next week. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had scheduled the procedural vote to nudge along negotiations that have dragged for weeks. But Republicans mounted a filibuster, saying the bipartisan group still had a few unresolved issues and needed to review the final details. They sought a delay until Monday. “We have made significant progress and are close to a final agreement,” the bipartisan group of senators, 11 Republicans and 11 Democrats, said in a joint statement after the vote. The senators said they were optimistic they could finish up “in the coming days.” The nearly $1 trillion measure over five years includes about $579 billion in new spending on roads, broadband and other public works projects — a first phase of Biden’s infrastructure agenda, to be followed by a much broader $3.5 trillion measure from Democrats next month. Biden’s top priority is at a critical juncture, posing a test of his ability to forge bipartisan cooperation in Washington and make investments the White House views as crucial to the nation’s ability to pull out of the COVID-19 crisis and spur economic growth. The president traveled to Ohio later Wednesday to promote his economic policies, and was calling his infrastructure agenda a “blue-collar blueprint for building an American economy back.” He has said that Americans overwhelmingly support his plan. In a CNN town hall, Biden also talked up the benefits of the bipartisan framework, saying, “It’s a good thing and I think we’re going to get it done.” He also made passing reference to the dangerously outdated Brent Spence Bridge across the Ohio River, saying they’ll “fix that damn bridge of yours.” At another point, Biden was asked by a union electrician if it was possible to bring Congress together to pass an infrastructure bill that would help the region replace the bridge. “The answer is, absolutely, positively, yes,” the president said. The party-line vote blocked the bill from advancing, 51-49, and fell far short of the 60 votes required under Senate rules. Schumer switched his vote to “no” at the end, a procedural step that would allow him to move to quickly reconsider. The bipartisan group has labored for days with Biden aides to strike a deal, which would be a first phase of the president’s eventual $4 trillion-plus package of domestic outlays — not just for roads and bridges, but foundations of everyday life including child care, family tax breaks, education and an expansion of Medicare for seniors. The next steps are uncertain, but the bipartisan group insists it is close to a deal and expects to finish soon. “We’re voting ‘no’ today because we’re not ready, but we’re saying we do want to take up this bill as soon as we are,” said Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), a leader of the effort. “I think that’ll be Monday.” At least 11 Republicans signed on to a letter to Schumer saying they would vote yes to proceed on Monday, if certain details about the package are ready. Republican Sen. Todd Young of Indiana was among the Republicans who signed the letter and said he was “cautiously optimistic” they can reach a bipartisan deal. Restless Democrats, who are facing a crowded calendar while trying to deliver on Biden’s priorities, nevertheless said they are willing to wait if a deal is within reach. “I’m willing to give it another chance next week,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “But we need to fish or cut bait.” The senators in the bipartisan group were joined for a private lunch ahead of the vote by the two leaders of the House’s Problem Solvers Caucus, Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), a bipartisan group generally supportive of the effort. Schumer said senators are in the fourth week of negotiations after reaching agreement on a broad framework for infrastructure spending with the White House. He said Wednesday’s vote was no different from other times when the Senate sought to get the ball rolling on debate and “not a deadline to have every final detail worked out.” But Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky encouraged Republicans to vote against it, called the vote a “stunt” that would fail, but he emphasized senators were “still negotiating in good faith across the aisle.” “Around here, we typically write the bills before we vote on them,” he said. Biden has been in touch with both Democrats and Republicans for several days, and White House press secretary Jen Psaki traveling with the president Wednesday on Air Force One, said the administration was “encouraged.” While Biden proposes paying for his proposals with a tax hike on corporations and wealthy Americans who earn more than $400,000 a year, the bipartisan group has been working almost around the clock to figure out a compromise to pay for its package, having dashed ideas for boosting the federal gas tax or strengthening the IRS to go after tax scofflaws. Instead, senators in the bipartisan group are considering rolling back a Trump-era rule on pharmaceutical rebates that could bring in $170 billion, some of which could be used for infrastructure. They are also targeting unspent COVID-19 relief aid to health care providers and extending multiyear, modest reductions in a wide array of federal benefit programs, according to two people familiar with the talks who described the details on condition of anonymity. Senators are also still haggling over public transit funds. Typically, spending from the federal Highway Trust Fund has followed the formula of 80% for highways and 20% for transit. Some Republicans are concerned that the ratio would change to 82%-18% under the bipartisan bill, said Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah). “Big numbers are involved,” Romney said. But Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said, “There’s not a lot of sentiment for public transit on their side. They don’t really believe in the word ‘public.’” Ten Republicans would have been needed in the evenly split Senate to join all 50 Democrats in reaching the 60-vote threshold required to advance the bill past a filibuster to formal consideration. Many Republicans are wary of moving ahead with the first, relatively slim package, fearing it will pave the way for the broader $3.5 trillion effort Democrats are preparing to pass on their own under special budget rules that only require 51 votes. Vice President Kamala Harris can break a tie. Democrats hope to show progress on that bill before lawmakers leave Washington for their recess in August. Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been working to keep restless House Democrats in line as they grow impatient with the sluggish Senate pace. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, sent a letter with 30 Democrats on the panel warning that the Senate proposal was inadequate and that House lawmakers want a seat at the negotiating table for any final product. By Lisa Mascaro and Kevin Freking, The Associated Press. Associated Press writers Alan Fram, Darlene Superville and Josh Boak contributed to this report.